TMc: This is a story about how we’ve developed in our thinking and in our practice. LR: But it’s also an account of a dialogue about the tensions between centrally-determined policies and technology infrastructure and faculty priorities.
A VLE of one’s own? A Virtual Learning Environment that works for studio-based learning Tony McNeill and Lucy Renton April 2009
A bit about me …
Tony McNeill
PL in Educational Technology
Academic Development Centre
Kingston University
[email_address]
And a bit about me …
Lucy Renton
Blended Learning Co-ordinator
Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture
Kingston University
[email_address]
A bit about where we work
1 VLE (sort of …) and 7 faculties
each with own Blended Learning Strategy
BL co-ordinator (.4 secondment)
L&T co-ordinator (.5 secondment)
notional .4 e-developer allocation
School of Architecture and Landscape
School of Art & Design History
School of Design Communication
School of Fine Art
School of Surveying and Planning
School of 3D Design
Faculty of Art Design & Architecture
Signifier of difference
Familiar reservations?
“ How much is this a replacement for contact hours?”
“ What are the implications of its usage for staff?”
“ Who owns what on Bb?”
“ I could never find the time”
“ a programme designed to induce RSI”
“ I really, really, really, hate Blackboard. I work with another educational content site based in Korea – and although that site is in Korean which I do not speak, it is 50 times more user friendly than Blackboard”
Useability
“ Blackboard is aesthetically inappropriate for A/D staff and students”
“… they’re [Blackboard pages] the ugliest things you could ever look at. […] They’re horrible”
Aesthetics
What characterises the use of ILT in most (not all) subject areas is that students are users of software and the medium of software and ILT is incidental to the content of the learning. […] . Within Art and Design and Media things are somewhat different. Design students study interface design, create web and multimedia artefacts and are concerned with issues of visual language, usability and the medium of ILT itself.
(Owen, 2006)
“ Studio culture's all about students making things alongside one another”
“ Creativity can't be taught over the internet”
“ Students know the difference between an online and a studio-based course”
Studio culture
2005: e-developers arrive
Their role was to:
support the development of sustainable e-learning content resources and activities
develop strategic exemplars that will act as catalysts for further engagement with educational technology.
FADA projects
We thought we’d:
address the question of how a VLE might be used in the context of the studio
explore how we might make it more visually appealing to art and design staff and students
2005/6 projects BA Illustration and Animation Printmaking
What they said after …
“ I’ve been impressed by the way Jake has made it much more accessible, visually accessible”
“… great visual qualities which lots of people said you couldn’t do with Blackboard. […] I think it’s brilliant”
More of what they said
“ You have succeeded in making the Illustration and Animation site more visually interesting. But unfortunately it still runs on Blackboard”
What we learned
course-based approach worked well but whole course team need to be involved from the start
more student-centred approach needed (Web 2.0 beginning to go mainstream at this point)
2006/7 projects BA Fine Art Art and Design History
ADh for a/d student
A variety of approaches
replication of Blackboard functionality via creation of bespoke web sites
pushing Blackboard as far as it can go
independent websites for resource areas
some use of Web 2.0 tools
more student generated content
Pic of arch bb module
3d diff
Fine Art Student, comment from NSS
“ The introduction of blackboard into our course. They got rid of all the paper work and they did more about the teaching.”
The introduction of blackboard into our course. They got rid of all the paper work and they did more about the teaching.
Future challenges (for KU)
PLEs (Personal Learning Environments)
social networking/social media
mobile internet
user-generated content
networked “participatory cultures”)
integrating extra-institutional practice with institutionally-defined activities
Future challenges (for FADA)
Future developments
Risk taking, innovation, working with all staff academic, technical and administrative
0 comments
Post a comment