• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Development of Management Thought
 

Development of Management Thought

on

  • 13,052 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
13,052
Views on SlideShare
13,050
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
5
Downloads
299
Comments
5

1 Embed 2

http://thanumore.blogspot.com 2

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel

15 of 5 previous next Post a comment

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Development of Management Thought Development of Management Thought Presentation Transcript

    • Development of Management Thought
      Ms. Amanpreet Kaur
    • Michelangelo…
      The lonely genius trapped between agony and ecstacy, isolated on his back on a scaffold, single handedly painting the ceiling of Sistine Chapel –
      A Myth….!!!!!
    • Reality…
      Some 480 yrsago, was running a mid-sizedfirm.
      13 people helpedhimpaint, 20 in carving and 200 helped in building the library.
      He used to personally select, train, and assignthem teams.
      Kept a detailedemployment records of names, daysworked and wages of everyemployee, everyweek.
      He wasjust a trouble-shooting manager with us evenbeforeIndustrialrevolution.
    • IndustrialRevolution..??
      The advent of machine power, mass production and efficient transportation begun in the late 18th century in Great Britain.
    • ClassicalApproach
      The termisused to describe the hypotheses of the scientific management theorists and the general administrative theorists.
      • Inter-relatedfunctions
      • Based on experience of managers
      • Based on basic truths and facts
      • Managers weredeveloped by formaleducation and training
      • People are motivated by incentives and penalities.
      • No conflictwithinindividuals, if any, interest of orgn prevails
    • A) BureaucracyMax Weber (1864-1920) A German Social Scientist
      Principles
      • Division of work
      • Rules and Regulations
      • Hierarchy of Authority
      • TechnicalCompetence
      • Record Keeping
      • Impersonal Relations
      LegitimateAuthority
      Traditional
      Rational
      Charismatic
    • +ves & -ves
    • B) Scientific ManagementFredrick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915)Father of Scientific Management
      • Grew out to increaseproductivity
      • In 20th century, skilled labour in US were short in supply, soneccessary to increaseefficiency.
      Objectives
      • Providescientific basis for designing and performing jobs.
      • Managers to followscientific and systematicapproach to managerialproblems in place of rule of thumb
    • Principles
      Science – No rule of thumb.
      Harmony, not discord.
      Co-operation not Individualism.
      Maximum output not restricted.
      Development of each man to his best capacity and ability.
      Maximum prosperity of employees, coupledwith maximum prosperity of Orgn.
      ‘Mental Revolution’
      Eyes off division of surplus, rather focus on increasing the size of surplus
    • Techniques..
      Time Study (workMeasurement)
      Motion Study
      Method Study
      Fatigue Study
      Differentialwage rate system
      Scientifictask planning
      Standardization + Simplification
      FunctionalForemanship
    • C) Administrative TheoryHenry Fayol (1841-1925)Father of Adminstrative Management
      His Contributions…
      • 6 Business Activities
      • 5 Management Functions
      • 14 Principles
      Business Activities
      Technical
      Commercial
      Financial Operating activities of business
      Accounting
      Security
      ManagerialActivity Most Neglected
    • 14 Principles
      Division of Work
      Authority and Responsibilty
      Discipline
      Unity of Command
      Unity of Direction
      Subordiantion of Individualinterest to generalinterest
      Remuneration of personnel
      Centralisation
      Scalar Chain
      Order (Materialorder + Social order)
      Equity
      Stability of tenure
      Initiative
      Espirit de corps (Unity of efforts throughharmony of interests)
    • Neo-ClassicalApproach
      A classicalapproachled to efficient orgn, but failed to recognize the overwhelmingrole of people in management.
      People began to resistformal and impersonaltreatment.
      The resistance and the need to securewillingco-operation of workersled to the development of neo-classicalapproach.
      • HawthroneExperiments
      • Human Relations Movement
      • Behavioural Sciences Thinking
    • A) HawthroneExperimentsGeorge Elton Mayo (1880-1949)Father of Neo-ClassicalApproach
      Experimentsconductedat a plant at Western Electric Company.
      • Illumination Experiment
      • Relay Assembly Test room studies
      • Mass Interview
      • Bank wiring observation room study
      Conclusion-
      A work group- not a techno economic unit but a social system
      Workers not only rational economicbeingsmotivated by money, but alsorespond to work conditions
      Social+Psychologicalfactorsexercisegreater control on employeebehaviour.
    • B) Human Relations Approach
      • Pertains to motivating people in orgn to develop team workwhicheffectivelyfulfillstheirneeds and leads to achievingorganisational goals.
      Contributions-
      Moral Justification
      Satisfysocial and psychologicalneeds to increaseproductivity.
      Highlights the people side of orgn.
      A trueconcern for workers
      Focuses attention on inter-personal relations + Dynamics
      Stressed on training of people management skills and managerial styles.
    • C) Behavioural Science Approach
      Belief thathumanis more complexthan the ‘economic man’ description of classicalapproach and the ‘Social man’description of the Human relations approach.
      • Concentrates on the nature of workitself and degree to whichitcanfulfill the humanneed to use skills and abilities.
      Contibutions-
      More use of teams to accomplish goals, focus on training and development and the use of innovativereward and incentivesystems.
    • Systems Approach
      Attempts to explainorganisationalbehaviour by analysing the structure of orgn.
      It was a result of thoseorgnsthatweretrying to adapt to the rapid change in business environment.
      Features-
      Unified and purposeful system
      Each inter-related parts and subsystems.
      Each system has a boundary- Internal or External
      Open system Vs. Closedsystems
      A business enterprise as a open system
      (Draws Inputs- convertinto output- sends to environment)
    • ContigencyApproach
      Wasdeveloped by managers, consultants and researcherwhotried to apply the concept of earlierapproaches to real life situations.
      ‘ There is no best way to tackle the problem of management. The application of management principles and practices is contingent upon the environment’
    • Best solution is one whichis responsive to the pecularities of a given situation.
      Features
      Mgt issituational.
      Should match or fit itsapproach to the requirements of a particular situation.
      Mgt’ssuccessdepends on itsability to copewithitsenv, itshouldsharpenitsdiagonisticskillsso as to anticipate and comprehend the environmental change.
      Mgrs shouldunderstandthatthereis no best way to manage.
    • 4 SequentialSteps
      Analyze and understand the situation
      Study and examine the validity of various concepts, principles and techniques to situation.
      Make the right choice by matching the technique to the situation.
      Implement the choice.
    • Practical Utility of Approach
      • Clearview of the realities of managerial job.
      • Suggests situation specific solutions.
      • Common sense value and widenspractical utility
      • Integrateclassicalapproach + apply contingent to situation
      • Organisations environment are dynamic to bealwayseffectivelymanaged in the samemanner.
      • No golden rule – Applicable in all situations.
    • Negatives..
      Confusion
      No theoriticalfoundation
      Does not incorporate all aspects of systemstheory
      Reactivestrategyratherthan proactive theory.
    • Queries… ???
      Ms. Amanpreet Kaur