Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Models of evaluation in educational technology Done by: Bader Al-Wardi  68709 Sluiman Al-Subihi 68703 Submitted to: Dr. Al...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Study Title:   USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODELTO EX...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Introduction of the Study: </li></ul><ul><li>the Study examines two...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>The Findings of the Study: </li></ul><ul><li>1- the real time stude...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level one:...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level Two:...
Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level Thre...
References 1-www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/ papers/baskinc.pdf   >
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Models of evalaution in educational technology

677

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
677
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Models of evalaution in educational technology"

  1. 1. Models of evaluation in educational technology Done by: Bader Al-Wardi 68709 Sluiman Al-Subihi 68703 Submitted to: Dr. Alaa Sadik
  2. 2. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Study Title: USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODELTO EXPLORE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLABORATIVE ONLINE GROUP WORK. </li></ul><ul><li>Author: Colin Baskin </li></ul><ul><li>Teaching and Learning Development Unit </li></ul><ul><li>James Cook University, Australia </li></ul>
  3. 3. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Introduction of the Study: </li></ul><ul><li>the Study examines two cohorts of students. One cohort of 90 students completed a real time learning program integrating group dynamics and participative decision-making and the second cohort of 171 students completed the same course of study in an online environment. </li></ul><ul><li>The Goal of Study: </li></ul><ul><li>to explore student-learning outcomes related to online group work by using Kirkpatrick model. </li></ul><ul><li>The models used: </li></ul><ul><li>using a four level evaluation of learning model (Kirkpatrick, 1996) to explore student-learning outcomes related to online group work. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>The Findings of the Study: </li></ul><ul><li>1- the real time student sample recorded a significantly higher satisfaction rating in some aspects of their group learning experiences than their online counterparts. </li></ul><ul><li>2- the online group work model successfully supports group learning behaviors, transfer of these behaviors to practice, and improvement in learner behaviors at the enterprise level. </li></ul><ul><li>  </li></ul>
  5. 5. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level one: Reaction </li></ul><ul><li>1- Students in both cohorts were asked to respond to six statements related to their understanding of the group work process and their perception of their peers. </li></ul><ul><li>2- Responses were rated on a five point scale ranging from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree. </li></ul><ul><li>Its Findings: </li></ul><ul><li>The overall satisfaction level of both cohorts of students (Mean = 1.88). indicates that students in both the real time and online group settings remained highly satisfied with the group work experience. </li></ul><ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>> </li></ul>
  6. 6. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level Two: Evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>Its Findings: </li></ul><ul><li>tend to suggest that online learning groups and peer-assessment processes provide a translational learning model that is able to situate students within contemporary organizational learning processes. </li></ul><ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>> </li></ul>
  7. 7. Models of evaluation in educational technology <ul><li>Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975). </li></ul><ul><li>Level Three: Behavior </li></ul><ul><li>Used as a check to see if the skills base underlying the pedagogy of online group work is actually being accessed and used by students </li></ul><ul><li>Its Findings: </li></ul><ul><li>Students benefit from exposure to learning opportunities that enable </li></ul><ul><li>them to observe how others authentically behave, act and perform in a group learning context. </li></ul><ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>> </li></ul>
  8. 8. References 1-www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/ papers/baskinc.pdf   >
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×