Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Patent troll
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Patent troll

986

Published on

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
986
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
28
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. PATENT TROLL DHANYA N. MENON ATTORNEY
  • 2. PRINCIPLE OF PATENT LAW “ A Patent Not Only Prevents The Imitation Of The Patentee’s Technology But Also Limits The Ability Of Inventors To Develop And Market Their Own Technologies.”
  • 3. DEFINITION “ A patent troll is somebody who tries to make a lot of money off a patent that they are not practicing and have no intention of practicing and in most cases never practiced.”
  • 4. WHO/WHAT? <ul><li>A person or entity </li></ul><ul><li>Acquires ownership of a patent </li></ul><ul><li>Without the intention of actually using it to produce a product </li></ul><ul><li>“ nonproducing entity”, “nonpracticing entity”, “Patent Shark” </li></ul><ul><li>Buyers as well as sellers </li></ul>
  • 5. THEY DO? <ul><li>Procure patents </li></ul><ul><li>Licenses the technology </li></ul><ul><li>Identifies the ingringers-Sues an entity </li></ul><ul><li>Only enforce patents against the alleged infringers </li></ul><ul><li>Interested in exclusion right; not in the underlying knowledge. </li></ul><ul><li>Only concern is of the damages or settlement payment </li></ul>
  • 6. THEY DON’T DO? <ul><li>Manufacture products </li></ul><ul><li>Commercialize the process </li></ul><ul><li>Transfer the technology </li></ul><ul><li>* * * </li></ul><ul><li>Though the inventions are not copied, but developed independently, patent suits can be brought </li></ul>
  • 7. WHO ARE NOT? <ul><li>University holding patents: Though non practicing entities </li></ul><ul><li>Individual Inventors who licenses his invention to others for commercialize </li></ul>
  • 8. THREE STRATEGIES <ul><li>Injunction based strategy: Under legal threat of an injunction - seeks a favorable settlement </li></ul><ul><li>Damages based strategy: damages awarded by the court for infringement </li></ul><ul><li>Switching-cost based strategy: exploits the high cost for switching to a non-infringing technology </li></ul>
  • 9. WHO HELPS? <ul><li>Inefficiency in the patent system </li></ul><ul><li>- Excessive damages </li></ul><ul><li>- Patentee friendly injunction </li></ul><ul><li>- Generous granting of patents </li></ul><ul><li>- Disclosure – not practice that grant </li></ul><ul><li>monopoly </li></ul>
  • 10. TROLL PATENT ? <ul><li>Is owned by someone that does not practice the invention </li></ul><ul><li>Is infringed by, and asserted against, non-copiers exclusively </li></ul><ul><li>Has no licensees practicing the particular patented invention except for defendants) </li></ul><ul><li>Is asserted against a large industry </li></ul>
  • 11. TROLLS AND INJUNCTION <ul><li>General rule: “courts will issue permanent injunctions against patent infringement absent exceptional circumstances” </li></ul><ul><li>eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C ., US Supreme Court rejected this general rule. </li></ul><ul><li>Reason: “An industry has developed in which firms use patents not as a basis for producing and selling goods but, instead, primarily for obtaining licensing fees.” </li></ul>
  • 12. TROLLS & DAMAGES <ul><li>Patent Troll v. Apple </li></ul><ul><li>NTP- Patent – wireless </li></ul><ul><li>e mail technology – files suit – </li></ul><ul><li>unfairly using their technology – in 2006 – similar suit – Research in Motion – paid $612 million to NTP – does not produce or offer any wireless e mail software services. </li></ul>
  • 13. Thank You

×