Advertising standards

1,160 views
1,008 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,160
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
58
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Advertising standards

  1. 1. ADVERTISING STANDARDS IN INDIA DHANYA N. MENON ADVOCATE Web Site: www.altacit.com ; E mail: ip@altacit.com
  2. 2. ADVERTISEMENTSPublic informationMarket trendsAvailable products/servicesVarious ChoiceDecision MakingAssist in Business Development
  3. 3. WHAT IS ADVERTISEMENT?• Commercial speech• Protection under Article 19(1)(a)• Right to Information• Dissemination of information about the sellers and their products• A paid-for communication• Addressed to the Public or a section of it• To influence the opinions or behaviour of those to whom it is addressed.
  4. 4. WHY ADVERTISING STANDARDS?For tracking and stopping the malpractices carriedout by advertisers in order to lure the consumers
  5. 5. LEGAL PROVISIONS1.  Obscene publication or advertisement of a lottery under the Indian Penal Code.   2. Harmful publication under the Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956.3. The indecent representation of women under the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986.4. Use of report of test or analysis for advertising any drug or cosmetic under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.5. Inviting transplantation of organs under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994.
  6. 6. Contd…6. Advertisement of magical remedies of diseases and disorders under Drugs and Magical Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954.7.  Advertisements relating to prenatal determination of sex under the Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994.8. Advertisements of cigarettes and other tobacco products under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003.9.  Any political advertisement forty hours prior to polling time under the Representation of People Act, 1951.
  7. 7. ADVERTISING STANDARDS COUNCIL OF INDIANon statutory TribunalNot-for-profit company: Section 25Advertising industry: advertisers, advertising agencies, media owners and allied professionals like consumer researchers, processors, film makers.Purpose: Regulating content of advertising Protecting consumer interest Ensuring fairness in competition
  8. 8. DUTIES• Entertains Complaints received from Consumers• Lacked the force of legal recognition.• 2006 Notification: TV Commercials should abide by the ASCI Code was made compulsory for TV ads.• “No advertisement which violates the Code for Self- Regulation in Advertising, as adopted by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), Mumbai for public exhibition in India, from time to time, shall be carried in the cable service".
  9. 9. Contd…Section 6 the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1955:Prohibits the transmission or retransmission of any adsThrough a cable service unless they are in conformity with theASCI Code.Rule 7:Prohibits any advertisement which derides any race, caste andtends to incite people to crime, cause disorder or are indecentOr vulgar.
  10. 10. ASCI CODE - OBJECTIVES• Control the content of advertisements, not to hamper the sale of products• Make truthful and honest representations and claims which is essential to prohibit misleading advertisements;• Not be offensive to public decency or morality;• Not promote products which are hazardous or harmful to society or to individuals, particularly minors; and• Observe fairness in competition keeping in mind consumer’s interests.
  11. 11. APPLICABILITY/RESPONSIBILITY• Applies to advertisers, advertising agencies and media• All who commission create, place or publish any advertisement or assist in the creation or publication of any advertisement.• Complaints against the advertisements can be made by - any person consumers and the general public, and ad. Agencies - Government officials, consumer groups - Suo Moto Complaints
  12. 12. COMPLAINTS• Registering a complaint is free of cost• Decides within a period of 4 to 6 weeks• Opportunity of presenting the case.• Withdraw/Modify
  13. 13. PRINCIPLESI. To ensure the truthfulness and honesty of Ads. and to safeguard against misleading advertisements.II. To ensure that advertisements are not offensive to generally accepted standards of public decency.III. To safeguard against the indiscriminate use of Ads.IV. To ensure that advertisements observe fairness in competition
  14. 14. TRUTHFULNESS• Truthful• All descriptions, claims and comparisons should be capable of substantiation• Produce substantiation as and when called upon to do so.• Advertisements shall not, contain any reference to person, firm or institution, without permission.• Should not distort facts and mislead the consumer• Should not abuse the trust of consumers or exploit their lack of experience – Claims should not be exaggerated.• Obvious untruths or exaggerations are permissible
  15. 15. Contd…Should not: -Contain nothing indecent, vulgar or repulsive-Incite people to crime or to promote disorder and violence-Deride any race, caste, colour, creed or-Convey the modus operandi of any crime -Adversely affects friendly relations with a foreign State-Cause physical, mental or moral harm to minors-Encourage to enter strange places or to converse with strangers-Feature dangerous or hazardous acts which they imitate to do-Show minors using or playing with hazardous instruments-Feature minors for tobacco or alcohol-based products-Propagate banned products
  16. 16. FAIRNESSAdvertisements containing comparisons are permitted if:-The aspects of comparisons are clear-Is not chosen in such a way as to confer an artificial advantage-Are factual, accurate and capable of substantiation-No likelihood of the consumer being misled-Does not unfairly denigrate, attack or discredit other products-Should not make unjustifiable use of the name or initials of any-Other firm and its goodwill attached to the trade mark/symbol-Shall not be similar to any other advertiser’s earlier run ads
  17. 17. Complaints which are upheld by ASCI
  18. 18. PARLE AGRO PVT LTD (LMN JUICE)TVC shows - “a dry parched African site where the people(showcased as having no water and depicted as stupid) arescrounging for water. The TVC then says, “if you don’t havewater, drink LMN juice”.The TVC is in extremely poor taste showingAfricannation in a bad light. The voice over,“if you don’t have water, drink LMN juice”, is ridiculous. TVC hasnourished stereotypes about Africans which are blatantlyracist. TVC Withdrawn
  19. 19. RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTDClaim: “unlimited talk time abkisi bhi network par CDMA plan”.Actually, the unlimited plan hadlimited time Unlimited talk time wasoffered from Reliance to RelianceNetwork only – Thus misleadingTVC discontinued. Advertiserassured that the said claim willnot be repeated again.
  20. 20. NESTLE INDIA LTD.(MAGGI KETCHUP)TVC shows - “an obese aged gentleman consumingUnhealthy fried burger”, and makes a misleadingclaim that “Make India healthy”.Creates an impression that by consuming unhealthyfood India can be made healthy - it is contradictory to healthyeating habits And thus misleading.TVC discontinued
  21. 21. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD.TVC shows - 3 dentists are holding `Colgate Sensitive’ pack andThe fourth dentist is holding `other’ toothpaste.Claim – “In India 3 out of every 4 dentists recommend ColgateSensitive” – misleadingClaim - “Colgate Sensitive – immediate relief from pain ofSensitive teeth” - false and misleadingAdvertiser provided data supporting their claim regarding“relief from pain for sensitive teeth”. 3 out of 4 dentistsrecommend Colgate sensitive for sensitivity is not misleading.Advertiser assured appropriate modification of the TVC.
  22. 22. COCA-COLA INDIA PVT LTD.TVC shows - “two explorers are captured by atribe who is, apparently, cannibals andappear, quite distinctly, African. One of Themmanages to get out of it by bribing them with asoft drink bottle”.TVC has nourished stereotypes about Africans which areblatantly racist.TVC withdrawn since July 2010.
  23. 23. Complaints which are not upheld by ASCI
  24. 24. DLF IPLTVC shows - “a passenger getting down from the trainand hurriedly walking away. When the checker asks him for his ticket.He smartly replies that he is going to buy that. After funny argumentswhen the Checker intends to fine him, the passenger answers “takethis (train) ticket. Yeh kohi ticket hai? Main toh IPL ka ticket kharidne jaa raha hoon”.Claim: The words “Yeh kohi ticket hai” which is deliberatelyCorrelated with a railway ticket (shows platform/TC etc) DenigratesThe Indian Railway. Advertisement was done in good humour anddid not denigrate The Indian Railways.
  25. 25. Havells India LtdThe TVC runs Zindagi main hum sabko paap karnapadta hai, kuchh to punya kama sakte hai, bijli bachake. The AdThen upholds the energy saving proposition of the brands CFLs”.The Ad is showing the hanging procedure of a human being,which is not suitable for viewing by children. Also, the TVC showsthe `hangman’ in poor light implying he is a murderer.TVC does not portray the Hangman in poor light. Also, as theactual act of hanging is shown through a shadow, the TVC isnot likely to offend the sensibilities of children
  26. 26. GlaxosmithKline Consumer Healthcare LtdClaim – “23 Vital Nutrients” that helps children to fill their keynutritional gaps. The use of “23 Vital Nutrients” by theAdvertiser on their Horlicks pack as well as in their Adsamounts to plagiarism.Claim was generic and not the intellectually proprietaryright of the Complainant and hence did not amount toplagiarism.
  27. 27. Horlicks ComplanCase was decided by the court instead of ASCI 2008.GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare and Heinz India–adsdirectly compared the brands – Both the brands denigrate eachother brand by calling each others product cheap‘-There werethree suits-legal and ethical issues involved in comparativeadvertisement.The first suit pertains to two advertisements by Complan (Heinz)The second suit pertains to a print advertisement in leadingnewspapers comparing ingredients of Complan & HorlicksThird suit was filed by Complan (Heinz) against Horlicks.
  28. 28. -Law regarding disparagement: a trader can puff up his goods inComparison -cannot denigrate or disparage the competitor’s goods-The two advertisements in the first suits as disparaging and beyond therealm of permissible Puffing - word ‘cheap’ & ‘compromise’ would harmthe reputation of Horlicks.-The advertisements in the second suit were held to be in the realm ofpuffing as they seem to be based on some scientific report-decisioncan be based on trial.-The advertisements in the third suit were held to be in the realm ofpuffing.-Advertisers should be more carefully when creating comparative adsfor TV

×