Presentation notes: Gartner; Towards Ubiquitous Cartography

  • 1,018 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,018
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
20
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Motivation - Role of cartography is shifting o “Anyone” can create a map for any purpose o Cartographic knowledge/training non-existent o User need; context specific spatial and aspatial information Ubiquitous mapping - Ubiquitous mapping: “Use and creation of maps by users anywhere and at anytime” - Ubiquitous cartography: “Study of how maps can be created anywhere and at anytime” - Ubiquitous cartography emerging technology/field o No general accepted ontology / taxonomy § I.e. not generally defined § No definition on what it is and what it is not. § (fits well with GISc in general?) - Context awareness a driving force o Location Based Services, TeleCartography, mobile cartography +++ - Technology supports this (ie. it is already feasible) o Stimulation and facilitation of dynamic and personalized mapping o Wireless broadband, data storage, +++ Supporting context - Reduce cognitive burden o “translation” between map and perceived reality o Embed users in the map § Moving avatars etc o Embed map in reality § Augmented reality - Carto-centric to user-centered - Issue; What to present and how to best present it - More than automatic map making o Adaptive maps o Context-sensitive maps
  • 2. Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Location Location Location - Foundation for context - Position in space is the foundation of (ubiquitous) map making - Two orthogonal perspectives o Determined position (eg. by GPS) o Process to help determine the position (eg. as input) - Technologies o Positioning with coordinates § Indoor problem § WiFi, RFID, GPS, Galileo, Dead reckoning, Digital compass etc. o Positioning through the user [figure: ellipsis including user] § User interaction helps system find position § sketch maps, image analysis, augmented reality, (Machine vision) • Images along a path, Virtual signposts Communicating meaning - Cartography is shifting o Not limited to static views à dynamic maps § Zoom, Level of detail, panning, show/hide concepts o Data availability increasing § Everything is available - Guidelines for TeleCartography o Need for guidelines? Old guidelines still valid? o Screen size emphasized o Cartographic communication process need to be met § Attention towards adaptability • Adapts to context (automatic, semi-automatic) • Argue; Only a selection of qualities – relative to guidelines o However! No guidelines exist for mobile cartography § A wicked problem?’ § Technology centric/driven - Technologies for visualization o AR, ePaper, high-resolution LCD/TFT screens, digital Etch-a-Sketch +++ o Should not drive research
  • 3. Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Finding the way - Translation of computed data-structures to cognitive available presentation - Context defined by; o User situation o Users knowledge/interpretation o Quality of instructions § Semantic, geometric, temporal correctness or usability o Ability for communication (ie. human understanding?) o Technical restrictions - Research topics; o Alternative presentation forms § Maps, text-visual, acoustic, photographs, animations etc. § Context important (night/day) o Translation of route information to guiding instructions § Translation algorithms must be defined § What about formal languages? o Active landmarks § Landmarks important for navigation / orientation process § Large church, monument etc. o Augmented reality § All necessary information displayed to the user § Reduce cognitive load § Not in the near future. Keeping it safe - Privacy; “ability to self-determine; when, how and to what extent location information is shared” - Collective sense of privacy may be shifting o Accepting intrusion into privacy for better technologies - Manual/automatic information mining (transitive approach) needs to be considered o Could be unintended privacy issue Conclusion - Context-driven, machine “reasoning”, adaptability, individualism - Definition and scope of ubiquitous cartography is hard to find o SOA all over again - Indicating wide applicability and impact domain o To wide?
  • 4. Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Discussion - Context o Field of cartography is shifting § Users and makers are “everyone” § Applicability is wider o Context-sensitive maps => Selection of qualities (MAPQUAL!!) § Verbal output, generalization, symbolization (night vs. day maps) +++ • Language vs. maps - Location o Important, many technologies exist o Needs better way of exploiting this - Communication - Argue for new guidelines! o Issues not only limited to symbolization (graphics) o Map is an holistic representation § Road is not useful without a position § Blue polygon no meaning without context - Adaptability (automatic/semi-automatic); o Argue; Only a selection of qualities - No existing guidelines o Shift focus from technology driven to technology independent - Navigation o Translation the main task § What about the language/model perspective? o Augmented reality § Google Android + Street View + camera? - Privacy - Concern, but more ethically/social than cartography