Janet May's Assessing Online Learning Process Maturity: the e-Learning Maturity Model

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Group

    Janet May's Assessing Online Learning Process Maturity: the e-Learning Maturity Model - Presentation Transcript

    1. Assessing Online Learning Process Maturity: the e-Learning Maturity Model Janet May Associate Director Penn State World Campus
    2. The e-Learning Maturity Model (eMM) focus… “…changing organisational conditions so that e-learning is delivered in a sustainable and high quality fashion to as many students as possible” (2006) Stephen Marshall Victoria University of Wellington 2
    3. The eMM focus… “The key concept is that the ability of an organisation to be effective in a particular area of work is dependent on their capability to engage in high quality, reproducible, processes that can be sustained and built upon” Stephen Marshall Victoria University of Wellington (2006) 3
    4. How can the eMM benefit Penn State World Campus? • Help us better understand our own organizational capacity for sustained success with online learning • Implement change based on that understanding • Benchmark with other Institutions 4
    5. The e-Learning Maturity Model (eMM) is… • A quality improvement tool that measures an institution’s ability to sustain online learning • Provides a set of key practices that can inform improvement activities 5
    6. Process categories Each process category includes multiple processes, for a total of 35 processes 6
    7. Process categories • Each Process assessed on 5 dimensions 7
    8. eMM dimensions 1 Delivery ~ creation and delivery of process outcomes • Assess the extent to which the process is seen to operate within the institution. • Without capability in other dimensions, at risk of failure or unsustainable delivery and wasting resources through needless duplication. 8
    9. eMM dimensions 2 Planning ~ assesses the use of predefined objectives and plans in conducting the work of the process. • The use of predefined plans potentially makes process outcomes more able to be managed effectively and reproduced if successful. 9
    10. eMM dimensions 3 Definition ~ use of institutionally defined and documented standards, templates and policies during implementation of process. • The institution has clearly defined how a given process should be performed. • This does not mean that the staff of the institution follows this guidance. 10
    11. eMM dimensions 4 Management ~ how the institution manages implementation of process and ensures the quality of the outcomes. • Capability reflects measurement of the outcomes and the way in which the practices of the process are performed by the staff of the institution. 11
    12. eMM dimensions 5 Optimization ~ the extent to which an institution is using formal approaches to improve capability measured within the other dimensions of this process. • Capability reflects a culture of continuous improvement. 12
    13. eMM dimensions • Not an hierarchical model; does not measure progressive levels • The dimension concept is holistic capability • Capability at the higher dimension without capability at the lower dimensions does not deliver desired outcomes • Capability at the lower dimensions that is unsupported in the higher dimensions will be unsustainable and unresponsive to change and learner needs 13
    14. Institutional “capability” Rating Meaning Not practiced/Not adequate Partially adequate Largely adequate Fully adequate Not assessed 14
    15. Example eMM Capability Assessment Rating Meaning Not practiced/Not adequate Partially adequate Largely adequate Fully adequate Not assessed 15
    16. As a Benchmarking Tool Processes that directly impact on pedagogical aspects of e-learning Optimization Delivery 16
    17. At Penn State World Campus… • Beginning an eMM project… – Wanted a mature program, fully developed – Wanted a program that the World Campus had developed, rather than another unit at the University 17
    18. At Penn State World Campus… Selected BS in Turfgrass Science • Worked with lead faculty, instructional designer, administrators, and others to assess the program. • Required evidence collection. • Iterative process. • Assessment just completed….. 18
    19. Penn State World Campus 19
    20. 20
    21. 21
    22. For more information on eMM… Please contact – Janet May at jam11@psu.edu – Stephen Marshall at stephen.marshall@vuw.ac.nz Please visit the eMM web site: – http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/ 22

    + Alexandra M. PickettAlexandra M. Pickett, 10 months ago

    custom

    635 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    SLN SOLsummit 2009 presentation - by Janet May
    http more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 635
      • 622 on SlideShare
      • 13 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 11
    Most viewed embeds
    • 12 views on https://confluence.delhi.edu
    • 1 views on https://vanckohall.delhi.edu

    more

    All embeds
    • 12 views on https://confluence.delhi.edu
    • 1 views on https://vanckohall.delhi.edu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events