Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Rudebock Hlth2002
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Rudebock Hlth2002

176

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
176
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  1. HLTH 2002 RUDEBOCK
  2. YOUR ASSIGNMENT: FIND 4 ARTICLES OVER A WOMAN’S HEALTH ISSUE OF WHICH 3 MUST BE FROM ACADEMIC SOURCES
  3. TYPE GOOGLE.COM INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER
  4. AUTHORITY: Who wrote it and WHY? CONTENT: Is it more than a brochure? DOCUMENTATION: Does it support its facts? CURRENCY: When was it updated?
  5. What is a Domain? Part of a web address indicating the origin of a website Domain Example Author/Sponsor .com www.espn.com For-profit entity .edu library.ucok.edu Educational institution .org www.sierraclub.org Non-profit entity .gov www.fda.gov US government .ok.us www.health.state.ok.us State government .co.uk www.bbc.co.uk Outside US .net pages.prodigy.net Private server
  6. The Information Cycle in the Sciences Radio & TV & Internet Newspapers Magazines Scholarly Research journal articles Conferences & Books Professional Society Meetings
  7. PEER-REVIEWED/REFERRED
  8. Peer-reviewed vs. Popular Peer-reviewed   Written by a scholar or a researcher  Written for academia  Full documentation  Original or primary research  Popular  Written for general public  Written by reporters or free-lance writers  No or minimal documentation  No original research- secondary literature
  9. THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND… Just because your article is from peer-reviewed journal… •It’s not always a research article •Research is never “over” •If mentioned in pop lit article– Biased?
  10. DOUBLE-CHECKING PEER-REVIEWED Ulrich’s Periodical Directory   “Find Articles (Databases)”  Gives information about serials  Does NOT provide articles  Use journal not article name when searching

×