• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Rudebock Hlth2002
 

Rudebock Hlth2002

on

  • 317 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
317
Views on SlideShare
308
Embed Views
9

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 9

http://ucolibinstruction.wordpress.com 9

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Rudebock Hlth2002 Rudebock Hlth2002 Presentation Transcript

    • HLTH 2002 RUDEBOCK
    • YOUR ASSIGNMENT: FIND 4 ARTICLES OVER A WOMAN’S HEALTH ISSUE OF WHICH 3 MUST BE FROM ACADEMIC SOURCES
    • TYPE GOOGLE.COM INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER
    • AUTHORITY: Who wrote it and WHY? CONTENT: Is it more than a brochure? DOCUMENTATION: Does it support its facts? CURRENCY: When was it updated?
    • What is a Domain? Part of a web address indicating the origin of a website Domain Example Author/Sponsor .com www.espn.com For-profit entity .edu library.ucok.edu Educational institution .org www.sierraclub.org Non-profit entity .gov www.fda.gov US government .ok.us www.health.state.ok.us State government .co.uk www.bbc.co.uk Outside US .net pages.prodigy.net Private server
    • The Information Cycle in the Sciences Radio & TV & Internet Newspapers Magazines Scholarly Research journal articles Conferences & Books Professional Society Meetings
    • PEER-REVIEWED/REFERRED
    • Peer-reviewed vs. Popular Peer-reviewed   Written by a scholar or a researcher  Written for academia  Full documentation  Original or primary research  Popular  Written for general public  Written by reporters or free-lance writers  No or minimal documentation  No original research- secondary literature
    • THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND… Just because your article is from peer-reviewed journal… •It’s not always a research article •Research is never “over” •If mentioned in pop lit article– Biased?
    • DOUBLE-CHECKING PEER-REVIEWED Ulrich’s Periodical Directory   “Find Articles (Databases)”  Gives information about serials  Does NOT provide articles  Use journal not article name when searching