Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Copia de pmf problem solver by Jacovocho 190 views
- Situational leadership theory by ankur shrivastava 18795 views
- Situational Leadership Theory by www.technofunc.com 9658 views
- Bond Stock Valuation Fm by Zoha Qureshi 1398 views
- 続・ビジュアル系高専生 by Daichi OBINATA 1204 views
- Shanghai open university presentation by Paul Resta 874 views

No Downloads

Total views

741

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

4

Shares

0

Downloads

0

Comments

0

Likes

5

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Fundamentals of Investments 19 C h a p t e r Performance Evaluation and Risk Management second edition Valuation & Management Charles J. Corrado Bradford D. Jordan McGraw Hill / Irwin Slides by Yee-Tien (Ted) Fu
- 2. It is Not the Return On My Investment ... “ It is not the return on my investment that I am concerned about. It is the return of my investment!” – Will Rogers
- 3. Performance Evaluation & Risk Management <ul><li>Our goal in this chapter is to examine the methods of evaluating risk-adjusted investment performance, and assessing and managing the risks involved with specific investment strategies. </li></ul>Goal
- 4. Performance Evaluation <ul><li>Can anyone consistently earn an “excess” return, thereby “beating” the market? </li></ul>Performance evaluation Concerns the assessment of how well a money manager achieves a balance between high returns and acceptable risks.
- 5. Performance Evaluation Measures <ul><li>The raw return on a portfolio, R P , is the total % return on the portfolio with no adjustment for risk or comparison to any benchmark. </li></ul><ul><li>It is a naive measure of performance evaluation that does not reflect any consideration of risk. As such, its usefulness is limited. </li></ul>
- 6. Performance Evaluation Measures <ul><li>The Sharpe Ratio </li></ul><ul><li>The Sharpe ratio is a reward-to-risk ratio that focuses on total risk. </li></ul><ul><li>It is computed as a portfolio’s risk premium divided by the standard deviation for the portfolio’s return. </li></ul>
- 7. Work the Web <ul><li>Visit Professor Sharpe at: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www. stanford . edu /~ wfsharpe </li></ul></ul>
- 8. Performance Evaluation Measures <ul><li>The Treynor Ratio </li></ul><ul><li>The Treynor ratio is a reward-to-risk ratio that looks at systematic risk only. </li></ul><ul><li>It is computed as a portfolio’s risk premium divided by the portfolio’s beta coefficient. </li></ul>
- 9. Performance Evaluation Measures <ul><li>Jensen’s Alpha </li></ul><ul><li>Jensen’s alpha is the excess return above or below the security market line. It can be interpreted as a measure of how much the portfolio “beat the market.” </li></ul><ul><li>It is computed as the raw portfolio return less the expected portfolio return as predicted by the CAPM. </li></ul>
- 10. Performance Evaluation Measures
- 11. Comparing Performance Measures
- 12. Comparing Performance Measures <ul><li>Sharpe ratio </li></ul><ul><li>Appropriate for the evaluation of an entire portfolio. </li></ul><ul><li>Penalizes a portfolio for being undiversified, since in general, total risk systematic risk only for relatively well-diversified portfolios. </li></ul>Since the performance rankings may be substantially different, which performance measure should we use?
- 13. Comparing Performance Measures <ul><li>Treynor ratio / Jensen’s alpha </li></ul><ul><li>Appropriate for the evaluation of securities or portfolios for possible inclusion in a broader or “master” portfolio. </li></ul><ul><li>Both are similar, the only difference being that the Treynor ratio standardizes everything, including any excess return, relative to beta. </li></ul><ul><li>Both require a beta estimate (and betas from different sources may differ a lot). </li></ul>
- 14. Work the Web <ul><li>The performance measures we have discussed are commonly used in the evaluation of mutual funds. See, for example, the Ratings and Risk for various funds at: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www. morningstar .com </li></ul></ul>
- 15. Sharpe-Optimal Portfolios <ul><li>A funds allocation with the highest possible Sharpe ratio is said to be Sharpe-optimal . </li></ul><ul><li>To find the Sharpe-optimal portfolio, consider the plot of the investment opportunity set of risk-return possibilities for a portfolio. </li></ul>Expected Return Standard deviation × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
- 16. Sharpe-Optimal Portfolios <ul><li>The slope of a straight line drawn from the risk-free rate to a portfolio gives the Sharpe ratio for that portfolio. </li></ul><ul><li>Hence, the portfolio on the line with the steepest slope is the Sharpe-optimal portfolio. </li></ul>Expected Return Standard deviation × A R f
- 17. Sharpe-Optimal Portfolios
- 18. Sharpe-Optimal Portfolios <ul><li>Notice that the Sharpe-optimal portfolio is one of the efficient portfolios on the Markowitz efficient frontier. </li></ul>
- 19. Investment Risk Management <ul><li>We will focus on what is known as the Value-at-Risk approach. </li></ul>Investment risk management Concerns a money manager’s control over investment risks, usually with respect to potential short-run losses.
- 20. Value-at-Risk (VaR) <ul><li>If the returns on an investment follow a normal distribution, we can state the probability that a portfolio’s return will be within a certain range given the mean and standard deviation of the portfolio’s return. </li></ul>Value-at-Risk (VaR) Assesses risk by stating the probability of a loss a portfolio may experience within a fixed time horizon.
- 21. Value-at-Risk (VaR) <ul><li>Example: VaR </li></ul><ul><li>Suppose you own an S&P 500 index fund. Historically, E(R S&P500 ) 13% per year, while S&P500 20%. What is the probability of a return of -7% or worse in a particular year? </li></ul><ul><li>The odds of being within one are about 2/3 or .67. I.e. Prob (.13–.20 R S&P500 .13+.20) .67 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>or Prob (–.07 R S&P500 .33) .67 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>So, Prob ( R S&P500 –.07) 1/6 or .17 </li></ul><ul><li>The VaR statistic is thus a return of –.07 or worse with a probability of 17%. </li></ul>
- 22. Work the Web <ul><li>Learn all about VaR at: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www. gloriamundi .org </li></ul></ul>
- 23. More on Computing Value-at-Risk <ul><li>Example: More on VaR </li></ul><ul><li>For the S&P 500 index fund, what is the probability of a loss of 30% or more over the next two years? </li></ul><ul><li>2-year average return = 2 .13 = .26 </li></ul><ul><li>1-year 2 = .20 2 = .04. So, 2-year 2 = 2 .04 = .08. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>So, 1-year = .08 .28 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The odds of being within two ’s are .95. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>I.e. Prob (.26–2 .28 R S&P500 .26+2 .28) .95 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>or Prob (–.30 R S&P500 .82) .95 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>So, Prob ( R S&P500 –.30) 2.5% </li></ul>
- 24. More on Computing Value-at-Risk <ul><li>In general, if T is the number of years, </li></ul><ul><li>So, </li></ul>
- 25. Work the Web <ul><li>Learn about the risk management profession at: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www. garp .org </li></ul></ul>
- 26. Chapter Review <ul><li>Performance Evaluation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Performance Evaluation Measures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The Sharpe Ratio </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The Treynor Ratio </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Jensen’s Alpha </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Comparing Performance Measures </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sharpe-Optimal Portfolios </li></ul></ul>
- 27. Chapter Review <ul><li>Investment Risk Management </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Value-at-Risk (VaR) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More on Computing Value-at-Risk </li></ul>

No public clipboards found for this slide

×
### Save the most important slides with Clipping

Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.

Be the first to comment