S ta r chart

172 views
134 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
172
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • This is in the advanced level.
  • This is in the advanced level.
  • Teaching and Learning
  • S ta r chart

    1. 1. STaR chart BCJH Technology assessment for you
    2. 2. <ul><li>1. What are the STaR charts? </li></ul><ul><li>2. Campus data from 2006-2007 and 2009-2010 </li></ul><ul><li>3. Campus ranking </li></ul><ul><li>4. Summary and discussion of STaR chart data </li></ul>
    3. 3. <ul><li>The STaR chart is the Texas Education Agency’s evaluation tool for school district and campus technology progress. It is required every year to be completed by all school staff. It measures the campus in four areas: </li></ul><ul><li>Teaching and Learning </li></ul><ul><li>Infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Educator Preparation and Development </li></ul><ul><li>Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support </li></ul>
    4. 4. <ul><li>2006-2007 STaR Chart </li></ul><ul><li>Grading scale </li></ul><ul><li>1 beginning level </li></ul><ul><li>2 developing level </li></ul><ul><li>3 advanced level </li></ul><ul><li>4 target level </li></ul>
    5. 5. TL1 TL2 Tl3 Tl4 Tl5 Tl6 Total Patterns of Classroom Use Frequency/ Design of Instructional Setting Content Area Connections Techology Applications (TA) TEKS Implemention Student Mastery of Technology Applications Online learning 4 3 4 4 3 3 21
    6. 6. Educator Preperation and Development EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL Professional Development Experiences Models of Professional Development Capabilities of Educators Access to Professional Development Levels of Understanding and Patterns of Use Professional Development for Online Learning 2 3 3 2 2 2 14
    7. 7. Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total Leadership and Vision Planning Nstructural support Communication and Collaboration Budget Leadership and Support for Online Learning 4 3 3 3 4 3 20
    8. 8. Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total Leadership and Vision Planning Nstructural support Communication and Collaboration Budget Leadership and Support for Online Learning 3 2 3 3 3 3 17
    9. 9. Infastructure INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF6 TOTAL Students per computer Internet Access Connectivity Speed Other Classroom Technology Technological support local Area Network Wide Area Network Distance learning capacity 2 4 3 2 3 3 17
    10. 10. STaR chart 2009-2010
    11. 11. 2006-2007 Final Evaluation <ul><li>KEY AREA SUMMARY </li></ul><ul><li>Key Area Key Area Total Key Area STaR Classification </li></ul><ul><li>I. Teaching and Learning 21 Target Tech </li></ul><ul><li>II. Educator Preparation and Development 19 advanced tech </li></ul><ul><li>III. LeaderShip, Admin., Instructional Support 20 advanced tech </li></ul><ul><li>Support </li></ul><ul><li>IV. Infrastructure for Technology 17 advanced tech </li></ul><ul><li>Principal: Brandon Hood </li></ul><ul><li>Email: [email_address] </li></ul><ul><li>Completed Date: 5/1/2007 </li></ul>
    12. 13. Star Chart 2009-2010
    13. 14. Teaching and Learning
    14. 15. Educator Preperation and Development EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL Professional Development Experiences Models of Professional Development Capabilities of Educators Access to Professional Development Levels of Understanding and Patterns of Use Professional Development for Online Learning 3 4 4 3 4 1 19
    15. 16. TL1 TL2 Tl3 Tl4 Tl5 Tl6 Total Patterns of Classroom Use Frequency/ Design of Instructional Setting Content Area Connections Techology Applications (TA) TEKS Implemention Student Mastery of Technology Applications Online learning 3 3 3 3 3 3 18
    16. 17. Educator Preperation and Development EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL Professional Development Experiences Models of Professional Development Capabilities of Educators Access to Professional Development Levels of Understanding and Patterns of Use Professional Development for Online Learning 2 3 3 2 2 2 14
    17. 21. Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total Leadership and Vision Planning Nstructural support Communication and Collaboration Budget Leadership and Support for Online Learning 3 2 3 3 3 3 17
    18. 23. Infrastructure INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF6 TOTAL Students per computer Internet Access Connectivity Speed Other Classroom Technology Technological support local Area Network Wide Area Network Distance learning capacity 2 3 2 2 3 3 15
    19. 24. 2009-2010 final evaluation <ul><li>KEY AREA SUMMARY </li></ul><ul><li>Key Area Key Area Total Key Area STaR Classification </li></ul><ul><li>I. Teaching and Learning 18 advanced tech </li></ul><ul><li>II.. Educator Preparation and Development 14 developing </li></ul><ul><li>III. LeaderShip, Admin., Instructional Support 17 advanced tech </li></ul><ul><li>IV. Infrastructure for Technology 15 advanced tech </li></ul>
    20. 25. <ul><li>http://starchart2.esc12.net/ </li></ul><ul><li>Type district name in the blank and click on Simple Search </li></ul><ul><li>Then find your campus and click on it. The report should appear. </li></ul>
    21. 26. Comparison of the BCJH campus surveys for 2006-07 and 2009-10 1 2006-2007 2009-2010 difference TL1 4 3 -1 TL2 3 3 0 TL3 4 3 -1 TL4 4 3 -1 TL5 3 3 0 TL6 3 3 0 TOTAL 21 18 -3
    22. 27. Educator Preparation and Development 2006-2007 2009-2010 Difference EP1 3 2 -1 EP2 4 3 -1 EP3 4 3 -1 EP4 3 2 -1 EP5 4 2 -2 EP6 1 2 +1 Total 19 14 -5
    23. 28. Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support 2006-2007 2009-2010 difference L1 4 3 -1 L2 3 2 -1 L3 3 3 0 L4 3 3 0 L5 4 3 -1 L6 3 3 0 Total 20 17 -3
    24. 29. Infastructure 2006-2007 2009-2010 difference INF1 2 2 0 INF2 4 3 -1 INF3 3 2 -1 INF4 2 2 0 INF5 3 3 0 INF6 3 3 0 Total 17 15 -2
    25. 30. Conclusions <ul><li>As the charts and data indicates the Bay City Junior High has a long way to go in the Campus technology fields. The campus has lost ground in all four area of technology. We as a campus must strive to improvestudent learning through technological advances </li></ul>

    ×