Organizational Structure
A firm’s formal role configuration, procedures,
governance & control mechanisms, and authority
and decision making process
Determination of how a firm completes its given
work
Strategy’s potential achieved when Structure
congruent with Strategy
New structural arrangements required as Firms
evolve
Existing Structures influence the future selection
of strategies
Simple Functional Structure
An organizational form in which the owner
manager makes all the major decisions directly
and monitors all the activities
Staff serves as an extension of the manager’s
supervision authority
Little specialization of tasks, Few rules, &
limited formalization
Information systems are relatively
unsophisticated
Firms offerings single product line in a single
geographic market
Simple Structure
Advantages:
Control of all Business Operations
Frequent Communication
Openness to Innovation
Great Structural Flexibility
Simple & Informal Motivation/ Reward/ Control Systems
Rapid decision making
Competitive advantage due to introduction of new products
quickly and quicker responses as per environment needs
No coordination problems
Disadvantages:
Lack of specialization and hence, complex tasks deterrent
Very demanding on the Owner Manager
Does not facilitate development of Future Managers
Day to day matters & not future Strategic Orientation
Functional Structure
Consists of a CEO with limited corporate staff,
with functional line managers in dominant
organizational areas such as production,
accounting, marketing, R&D, engineering &
human resources
Central task of CEO is to in integrate the
decisions and actions of individual business
functions for the benefit of the entire corporation
Firms with low levels of Business Diversification
One or Few related Products/Markets
Groups similar tasks and activities in each
divisions
Functional Structure
CEO
Corporate
Staff
Sales & Finance &
Production Personnel
Marketing Accounting
Functional Structure
Advantages:
Efficiency Through Specialization
Differentiates & Delegates day-to-day operating decisions
Functional Specialization thereby facilitating knowledge
sharing & Idea Development
Facilitates career paths & professional development in
specialized functional areas
Retains centralized control of Strategic Decisions
Disadvantages:
Promotes narrow specialization & potential functional rivalry
or conflict
Difficulty in functional coordination & inter functional
decision making
Tendency to focus on local vs. overall company strategic issues
Only successful in Limited Diversification
Divisional Structure
Functional Structure becomes inadequate for
serving distinct different customer groups
Divisional Structure provides the control required
to deal effectively with additional levels of
diversification
Comprises of operating divisions each
representing a separate business or distinct
customer segment
Coordination demands on Top Management are
beyond the capacity of a functional Structure
Divisional Structure
Advantages:
Coordination & authority to appropriate level of rapid
response
Divisions unique environment hence, unique Strategic
Orientation
CEOs focus on Strategic Orientation
Performance Accountability
Disadvantages:
Divisions Manager’s line of Authority
Policy Inconsistencies between divisions
Corporate Resource Allocation in terms of Resources
and costs
Strategic Business Units
Multidivisional Structure consisting of three levels, the
top level being the corporate headquarters, The SBU
groups, and final level division grouped by relatedness
Business Portfolio is organized into divisions related to
one another within an SBU group
Divisions within groups are related but groups are largely
unrelated to each other
Divisions with similar products or technology are
organized to achieve synergy
Each SBU is a Profit center controlled by firms corporate
office
Strategic Business Units
Advantages:
Coordination between divisions with similar
strategic concerns & product/Market environments
Distinct & In depth business planning and Strategic
orientation for each SBU
Channels accountability to distinct business units
Disadvantages:
Degree of autonomy for each SBU
Dysfunctional competition for corporate resources
may increase
Matrix Organization
Dual Channels of Authority, Performance
Responsibility & Evaluation & Control
Subordinates are assigned to both a basic
functional area & a Project manager or
product manager
Advantages of Functional Specialization &
Product/Project Specialization
Balance between Strategic & Operating
channels
Matrix Organization
Resources are allocated on the same basis
Increases the number of Middle level
managers exercising General Management
responsibilities and exposure to strategic
concern
Flexibility according to Functional
Specialization
Matrix Organization
Permanent Structure
Temporary/Flexible Structure
Accomplish a Particular Strategic Task
Temporary Advantage of Matrix Type Team
Simplify & Amplify the focus of resources on
narrow but strategically important product,
Project or Market
Matrix Organization
Advantages:
Variety of Project Oriented Business Activity
Efficient use of Functional Managers
Creativity & Multiple Sources of Diversity
Middle Management Exposure to Strategic Issues
Disadvantages:
Dual Accountability can create confusion and
contradictory prices
Necessities tremendous horizontal & Vertical
Coordination
Strategy & Structure
Considerations:
All Forms of Organizational Structures are not equally
effective
Structures seem to have a limited life
Sheer Growth gives rise to new structures
Diversification
Choice of Structure:
Size
Product/Service Diversity
Competitive Environment & Volatility
Internal Political Considerations
Information/ Coordination Needs for each component
Corporate Stages of
Development
Simple, Small Business - Simple to Functional
One Product/ Service or one line of products/ Services
Singular or Closely related line of products/
Services - Functional to
Divisional
Expanded but related lines of Products/
Services: Divisional to matrix
Diverse but unrelated lines: Divisional to SBUs
0 comments
Post a comment