• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Digital home messenger (ma2c)
 

Digital home messenger (ma2c)

on

  • 201 views

CMT 2326 Designing Interaction - Principle & Practice

CMT 2326 Designing Interaction - Principle & Practice
Digital Home Messenger (MA2C)

Statistics

Views

Total Views
201
Views on SlideShare
201
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Good after noon sir, My name is Ramlochun Goonveer, on my left is Moedeen Waseemah and Cedric Jean Michel De Poilley and on the right is Abayomi AntonioOur presentation today is about explanation of the various steps to construct the Digital Home Messenger System which we named the MA2C. MA2C stands for Moedeen, Akii, Antonio and cedric. Now we shall see the different contents of the slides.
  • These are the 4 major content to be presented through out the slide. We have the user research, prototyping, evaluation and further plans. I shall now leave the floor for Waseemah to continue with the user research.
  • Good design is the most important way to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. This means that if our product is good, easy to use, the marketability of our product will be high. I shall now leave the floor for Waseemah to continue with the user research
  • The definition of triangulation is simple: more than one data collection technique is used to tackle a goal.Techniques that we have used are as follows:Interview: Interview was used to target specific user group such as family and students sharing a homeObservation: Observation was used to understand the context of the task performance. Observation was done for Indian workers who share the hostel Questionnaire: Questionnaire was used for wider population
  • The observation was done with Indian workers. One of the member of the group was sent at the hostel after being granted permission by the owner of a factory. His task was to observe and take down notes about the way that the Indian workers communicate and delegate works among themselves. The observation outcome are as follows: Indian workers of Star Knitwear Group Ltd reside in hostels. They are divided in groups of five and each group are supervised by one supervisor. The supervisor delegates tasks to each members of his groups. Example of tasks delegated are cleaning the room, cooking, ironing clothes and shopping. Tasks are written on a whiteboard found near the main door of the room. It is only the supervisor that has the right to cancel or modify the tasks.
  • Here is a snapshot of the whiteboard used by the Supervisors at the hostel.
  • Now we shall move to the second part. The Prototyping
  • Good design is the most important way to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. This means that if our product is good, easy to use, the marketability of our product will be high.
  • Prototyping is the key node in the iterative development.A prototype typically simulates only a few aspects of, and may be completely different from, the final product.Now we shall look at the different steps to build up our prototype.
  • The objectives of prototyping are as follows:The identification of the user requirements base on the user research so as we as designer we know what kind of functions, features the users want to have in the device.The development of a design solution that is designing a low fidelity prototypingThe creation of a working model of the system, this is performed in order that the conceptual model can be tested at an early stage and to gather feedback from experts and users about the usability of the system.
  • The user requirements were derived from the personas & scenarios created in the user research stage.The user requirements are as follows: persona 1 wants a device to overcome these problems: the direct message, a to-do list and reminder list and these features could have saved Marie Helena from preparing dinner that day.From persona 2 the user requirements are simple as a log and message system
  • We shall now see the design stage. Our approach for the design stage were the horizontal prototyping approach and the vertical prototyping approach.The horizontal prototype displays a wide range of features but without fully implementing all of those features; vertical prototypes do not attempt to show all that will be in the system but instead focus on implementing a small set of features in a nearly-complete fashion.In our prototype, an example of the horizontal prototype is the setting option in the home screen where it is just displaying the setting feature without implementing it.An example of the vertical prototype approach is the Message feature which was implemented in a nearly complete fashion.Design pattern in architecture or HCI is a formal way of documenting a solution to a design problem in a particular field of expertise.Design patterns such as the one-windows drilldown, breadcrumb were selected and used in the prototype of the MA2C
  • Now we will move to the prototype stage.Microsoft power point was used to construct the prototype from our paper base draft.This is an example of the one-window drilldown.On the right of the screen is a screen shot of the prototype for the fast track screen constructed in Microsoft Power point and on the left is the paper base draft on the same screen.Initially all the screen were drafted on paper first then it was transferred to Microsoft power point.
  • We shall now see the demonstration of the prototype.
  • These are some of the innovative features that we have added together with the user requirement to construct the device.
  • As the prototype part is now over, I now leave the floor for my colleague cedric to cover the evaluation part.
  • This infers that if nobody compromises of the user and experts in the evaluation stage, this does not mean that our prototype is perfect.

Digital home messenger (ma2c) Digital home messenger (ma2c) Presentation Transcript

  • Digital Home Messenger (MA2C) RAMLOCHUN GOONVEER, MOEDEEN WASEEMAH, CEDRIC DE POILLEY & ABAYOMI ANTONIO Middlesex University
  • Table of content Middlesex University 1 1. User-research 2. Prototyping 3. Evaluation 4. Further Plans
  • Middlesex University 2 “The details are not the details. They make the design” Charles Eames What is the MA2C? A home messaging system or device to improve the ways people communicate and organise their activities at home
  • Table of content Middlesex University 3 1. User-research 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Our Approach 1.3 Collection of data 1.4 Data analysis 1.5 Personas
  • User Research Middlesex University 4 1.1 Why? To obtain sufficient information to design a feasible device based on user requirement Objectives: • Approach the user-centered design process • Capturing the user requirements • Involving users for the design of the prototype • Assemblage of individual requirements into persona & scenarios
  • User Research Middlesex University 5 1.2 Our Approach: Triangulation QuestionnaireObservation Interview
  • User Research Middlesex University 6 1.3 Collection of data: Observation End users: Indian workers Task performed by observer: To observe and take down notes about their way they communicate and delegate works Observation instance: 1. Indian workers divided in five, 2. Each groups supervised by one supervisor, 3. supervisor delegates tasks
  • User Research Middlesex University 7 1.3 Collection of data: Observation Photo
  • User Research Middlesex University 8 1.3 Collection of data: Questionnaire • Why?  To obtain quantitative data for comparison  To compare user opinions • End users: General Public • Structure:  Factual Questions  Opinion Questions
  • User Research Middlesex University 9 • Sample Questions from User Questionnaire:
  • User Research Middlesex University 10 • Sample Questions from User Questionnaire:
  • User Research Middlesex University 1.3 Collection of data: Interview • Why?  To obtain qualitative data about the system  To obtain greater depth of detail from the interviewee  Social Cues • End Users: Students and Family Members • Structure:  General factual questions  Current methods of communication and its effectiveness  Opinion-type questions about design of a new digital messaging system 11
  • User Research Middlesex University 12 1.4 Data analysis Family Home 64% Shared Home 36% Single 0% Accommodation 0 to 2 8% 3 to 6 75% greater than 6 17% Number of Residents
  • User Research Middlesex University 13 1.4 Data analysis 0 2 4 6 8 10 Verbally Sticky Notes Phone Calls Others Methods Used Communication Yes 67% No 0% Neutral 33% Need for alternative digital solution
  • User Research Middlesex University 14 1.4 Data analysis Text 28% Audio 39% Audio/Video 33% Other 0% Preferred Method of Message Communication Touchscreen 67% Physical Keyboard 0% Voice Recognition 33% Message Input Method
  • User Research Middlesex University 15 1.5 Personas & Scenario
  • User Research Middlesex University 16 1.5 Personas & Scenario Scenario A One morning Marie Helena wakes up one hour late and realizes that despite the alarm was functioning well, she was too tired to wake up. This delay causes her husband to go to work without having his breakfast and her children were not ready for schools. She decided to give her children some more money to buy some foods. She left the money on the table and went to shower to go for work. As soon as she finished with her shower, she finds that the money was still on the table. She pick up her smart phone and dialed her son number. Surprised in turn her son told her that he has not heard anything about the money and thought that the money was for his mother. Scenario B One afternoon, Marie had an important meeting with other members of the Rotary Club from other town. Before leaving her home, she left a reminder and to do list for both of her children. The reminder was left for her daughter for preparing the dinner whilst the to-do list was left for her son to perform some tasks e.g. gardening at home. In the middle of the meeting, she phones at home to check whether the children were at home after school but no one took the phone as on that day, after school the children were supposed to go to the GYM and her husband would be late due to the pickup of the children after works. Once home, Marie realizes that the children were at the GYM and her husband would pick them. It was too late and she discovered that her paper base reminder and to-do list was still lying on the table. Poor Marie had to prepare dinner for the whole family after a tiring day.
  • User Research Middlesex University 17 1.5 Personas & Scenario
  • User Research Middlesex University 18 1.5 Personas & Scenario Scenario A: John Talagan left home earlier and went directly to the campus to meet people for a group coursework. He has been told that there's a party for a friends birthday tonight at the club. John came back home and as the other house sharers were absent he left a message on the home messaging system inviting every house mate to come to the club for the party. John left the house to buy a gift and went directly to the club. Talagan and he's room mates managed to join at the party that night.
  • Table of content Middlesex University 19 1. User-research (done) 2. Prototyping 3. Evaluation 4. Further Plans
  • Middlesex University 20 “Good design is the most important way to differentiate ourselves from our competitors” Samsung CEO Yun Jong Yong, 2004
  • Table of content Middlesex University 21 2. Prototype I 2.1 Objectives 2.2 The user requirement 2.3 The design stage 2.4 The prototyping stage 2.5 Demo 2.6 Innovative features
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 22 2.1 Objectives: • To identify the user requirements • Development of a design solution • Creation of a working model of the system
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 23 2.2 The User-requirement: • Persona 1: Direct message, To-Do list, reminder list • Persona 2: Log, message system / Text, video, audio, calendar
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 24 2.3 The Design stage: • Horizontal prototyping: Provide a wide range of features but with little details • Vertical prototyping: Provide many details for a few function • Design Pattern
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 25 2.4 The prototype stage:
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 26 2.5 Demo:
  • Prototype I Middlesex University 27 2.6 Innovative features: • Smart pause • Use of sim cards to send text message • Touch free device • Finger print recognition
  • Table of content Middlesex University 28 1. User-research (done) 2. Prototyping (done) 3. Evaluation 4. Further Plans
  • Middlesex University 29 “ Just because nobody complains doesn’t mean all parachutes are perfect “ Benny hills
  • Table of content Middlesex University 30 3. Evaluation 3.1 Objectives 3.2 Approach 3.3 Heuristic Evaluation 3.4 Cognitive Walkthrough 3.5 User Evaluation (future)
  • Evaluation Middlesex University 31 3.1 Objectives: 1. Perform an expert evaluation in order to remove the maximum of errors that can be avoided 2. Perform user evaluation of the reviewed prototype to identify the rest of the usability issues
  • Evaluation Middlesex University 32 3.2 Approach: Triangulation - Expert <=> Heuristic Evaluation - Theory <=> Cognitive Walkthrough - Field <=> User Testing
  • Heuristic Result Visibility of system status -lack of icons -lack of visual notifications Match between system and the real world The system should speak the users' language, with words, phrases and concepts familiar to the user, rather than system-oriented terms. Follow real-world conventions, making information appear in a natural and logical order. User control and freedom -no undo and redo supported -lack of home button Consistency and standards -lack of consistency between the "Events" feature and the other features such as messages and calendar Error prevention -no error prevention planned Evaluation Middlesex University 33 3.3 Heuristic Evaluation
  • Evaluation Middlesex University 34 3.4 Cognitive Walkthrough Error in the structure and the flow of some features, i.e. "Message" => All type of messages ordered by date instead of type => Show the "Inbox" when accessing "Message" instead the menu => Selecting the receiver: -Group feature should be removed -Instead of "Single account" different users' names could be checked
  • Evaluation Middlesex University 35 3.5 User Evaluation (future) - Aim: Detect usability issues not detected by experts - Approach: - Co-operative evaluation - Post evaluation questionnaire + SUS questionnaire
  • Table of content Middlesex University 36 1. User-research (done) 2. Prototyping (done) 3. Evaluation (done) 4. Further Plans
  • Further Plans Middlesex University 37 Prototype II: • Second version of prototype I based on expert evaluation • Changes: o Replace text menus by icons o Include speech-to-text feature o Additional user options o Simplification of steps needed in performing tasks o Removal of virtual keyboard o Include phonebook and emergency numbers o Improved navigation menus
  • Further Plans Middlesex University 38 User Evaluation • Chosen methods: 1. Co-operative evaluation 2. Usability questionnaire + SUS questionnaire • User Selection for Evaluation: One from each user group Prototype III: • Refined version of prototype II based on user evaluation
  • Table of content Middlesex University 39 1. User-research (done) 2. Prototyping (done) 3. Evaluation (done) 4. Further Plans (done)
  • Middlesex University 40 Conclusion System Research User Research & Requirement Low fidelity prototype The Design Stage Investigate Plan Design Evaluate MA2C Data Analysis Personas and Scenarios Low fidelity prototype brief Expert Evaluation User Evaluation Refined prototype Prototype stage
  • Thank you. Middlesex University 41 We are now open to any queries and questions.