E/INCB/2001/1 D. Europe                                                   success of all eradication efforts made by Gover...
E/INCB/2001/1506. Member States of the European Union have                sentences might still be applied, however, if ca...
E/INCB/2001/1financial, material and human resources. Some                 2008 entitled “Building on Experience”. The ove...
E/INCB/2001/1522. In its report for 1999, 66 the Board again               Baltic States abused home-made substances prepa...
E/INCB/2001/1Asia and Europe goes in both directions. The illicit        such criminal activities. The increasing involvem...
E/INCB/2001/1and     local   institutions  and   non-governmental        the international drug control conventions. Theor...
E/INCB/2001/1money-laundering activities are not yet adequate and           The Board is also disturbed by the widely repo...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

D. Europe

1,021 views
939 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,021
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

D. Europe

  1. 1. E/INCB/2001/1 D. Europe success of all eradication efforts made by Governments outside of Europe is bound to be limited. Major developments Treaty adherence496. Europe remains a major source of illicitlymanufactured synthetic drugs, abused widely by young 501. Since the last report of the Board was published,people both within and outside the region. The Board Albania has ratified the 1961 Convention and the 1988is concerned about the easy availability of synthetic Convention and Belarus and Ukraine have acceded todrugs throughout the region. In central and eastern the 1972 Protocol amending the 1961 Convention. OfEurope, a noticeable increase in the illicit manufacture the 44 States in Europe, 43 are parties to the 1961and abuse of amphetamine-type stimulants has been Convention, 42 are parties to the 1971 Convention andreported. The Board calls for more cooperation among 41 States and the European Community are parties tocountries in the region in order to effectively address the 1988 Convention.those problems. Europe remains the second largest 502. The Holy See, Liechtenstein and Switzerlandillicit market for cocaine in the world, after North remain the only States in Europe that have not yetAmerica. ratified the 1988 Convention.497. In the past decade, the countries in central and 503. The Board notes with satisfaction that Albania,eastern Europe have experienced a significant increase the only State in Europe that was not a party to any ofin drug abuse and illicit trafficking. While cannabis the international drug control treaties, has acceded toremains the most widely abused drug, the availability the 1961 Convention and to the 1988 Convention. Theof opiates originating in south-west Asia has increased. Board encourages Albania to become a party to theAuthorities in some countries are concerned by the 1971 Convention as well.appearance of “open-drug scenes”, which is a newphenomenon in central and eastern Europe. Regional cooperation498. Drug trafficking in Europe often involves 504. On their way to becoming integrated into theorganized criminal groups. For example, Russian law European Union, a number of countries in central andenforcement authorities reported that the number of eastern Europe benefit from assistance provided bydrug-related crimes committed by such groups institutions of the European Union. For example, theincreased sixfold from 1996 to 2000. Drug trafficking Phare programme has been active in providingin the region continues to be in the hands of assistance to strengthen the capacity of lawtransnational organized criminal groups. International enforcement authorities to deal with drug-related anddrug trafficking organizations are increasingly cross-border crime and to develop chemical controls.smuggling more than one type of drug. Regional cooperation could be further fostered by499. Some countries in western Europe have including the surrounding States in those efforts, indecriminalized offences related to the possession and particular in efforts aimed at strengthening criminalabuse of controlled drugs and openly tolerate the abuse intelligence capabilities and the exchange ofof drugs, particularly cannabis and MDMA (Ecstasy). information at the regional level. CIS member StatesThe Governments of those countries should consider operate a common database on drug-related cases,whether that is the proper strategy for achieving the created under a multilateral intergovernmental agree-targets set by the General Assembly at its twentieth ment on cooperation in combating the trafficking inspecial session, in particular the target of significantly narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors.reducing drug abuse by the year 2008. So far, none of 505. Another example of subregional cooperation arethe Governments concerned have been able to provide the activities of the centre for combating transborderto the Board information showing that the application crime, established by the Southeast Europeanof such measures reduces the demand for illicit drugs. Cooperative Initiative in Bucharest, which serves as a500. As long as there is no significant reduction of the focal point for sharing information, includingdemand for cannabis in most parts of western Europe, information on drug trafficking, among countries in thewhere cannabis abuse is increasingly tolerated, the subregion. 73
  2. 2. E/INCB/2001/1506. Member States of the European Union have sentences might still be applied, however, if cannabisstarted to implement the European Union Action Plan is abused in the presence of minors, in schools or at theto Combat Drugs (2000-2004), a political framework workplace. Similarly, effective July 2001, penalguiding the activities of the European Union in the sanctions in Portugal no longer apply to the illicit use,field of drug control. The Board appreciates the fact possession and acquisition for personal abuse of allthat the European Commission, in cooperation with the drugs; instead, those offences are now subject toEuropean Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug administrative sanctions such as fines or otherAddiction, has begun examining existing drug co- limitations of rights. The Board would like to remindordination arrangements in the member States of the States that article 3, paragraph 2, of the 1988European Union, with a view to further strengthening Convention requires each party to that Convention tothem. The Board encourages each presidency of the establish as a criminal offence under its domestic law,European Council to focus its programme on the when committed intentionally, the possession, purchaseimplementation of the Action Plan, in order to ensure or cultivation of narcotic drugs or psychotropicits full implementation by the end of 2004. substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention, the 1961 National legislation, policy and action Convention as amended by the 1972 Protocol, or the 1971 Convention, keeping in mind that parties have to507. A new law on the medical use of analgesics meet their fundamental obligation under all threeentered into force in Italy in March 2001. The law conventions to limit the use of controlled substances tosignificantly simplifies the procedures for the medical and scientific purposes.prescription of opioids. Prescriptions no longer have tobe handwritten and they may cover medication for a 510. The Board wishes to reiterate 62 that theperiod of up to 30 days of treatment (the previous establishment of drug injection rooms, where addictsmaximum period was eight days). Opioids needed to can abuse drugs obtained from illicit sources, undermeet urgent requirements may now be held and direct or indirect supervision of the Government, istransported by doctors and can be administered in the contrary to the international drug control treaties.patient’s home. Sanctions for violation of adminis- 511. The Board notes that most countries in centraltrative procedures on the prescription of opioids were and eastern Europe have made substantial stepssignificantly reduced. The new law should enable an towards developing their national drug control legis-increase in the medical use of opioids in Italy, which lation, as well as in upgrading their administrative andhas one of the lowest average levels of consumption of coordination structures. That is partly related to thenarcotic analgesics in Europe. process of expanding the membership of the European508. In Germany, regulations amending the Narcotics Union, as many candidate countries have adjusted theirPrescription Regulation in order to increase security drug control measures and begun to adapt their legis-and control of drugs used in maintenance programmes lation to meet the standards of the European Union.went into effect in June 2001. Physicians who pre- Although the process varies in intensity throughoutscribe substitution drugs for heroin addicts must show central and eastern Europe, most Governments havethat the addicts qualify for drug substitution therapy. In elaborated and implemented in a more consistent man-addition, all prescriptions of substitution drugs will be ner multidisciplinary national drug control strategies.registered in a central register. The Board welcomes 512. The Board urges the Government of the Russianthe efforts by the Government of Germany to curb the Federation to complete the adoption and promulgationdiversion of drugs used in maintenance programmes of all remaining regulations for ensuring the fulland encourages the Governments of other countries implementation of the 1997 law on narcotic drugs andwith drug maintenance programmes to take similar psychotropic substances.steps. 513. Even when legal and institutional frameworks are509. According to a new law that entered into force in in place, Governments’ capacities to implement effec-Luxembourg in May 2001, prison sentences are no tively the adopted measures remain limited in centrallonger given for the abuse of cannabis or the and eastern Europe. The problem is largely at thepossession of cannabis for personal abuse. Prison working level and it stems from limitations in74
  3. 3. E/INCB/2001/1financial, material and human resources. Some 2008 entitled “Building on Experience”. The overallauthorities experience difficulties related to lack of, for objective of the strategy is to significantly reduce theexample, legislation on the use in courts of evidence harm that drug abuse causes to individuals and societycollected during controlled deliveries or legislation on through concerted efforts focusing on the reduction ofthe substitution of drugs during such operations. Since illicit drug supply and on drug abuse prevention,relevant legislative texts have already been drafted, the treatment and research. The strategy sets conciseBoard invites the Governments concerned to finalize targets and specifies key performance indicators.their adoption. 519. In Germany, a project on the administration of514. The Board welcomes the entry into force of heroin to addicts is expected to commence in late 2001.legislation on precursor control in Slovakia in In the project, about 1,200 heroin addicts in sevenJanuary 2001. The Board wishes to reiterate its call to cities will be monitored over a three-year period tothe Governments of Albania 63 and Croatia 64 for the investigate whether management with heroin is aadoption of such legislation, the drafts of which have suitable way of retaining them in the addicts’ supportalready been prepared. system in order to eventually move them towards abstinence. In addition to health outcomes, social and515. As a matter of principle, the Board wishes to criminological effects are to be studied. The Boardunderline the importance of effective legislation on the trusts that any such project rests on scientifically andcontrol of precursors and other chemicals used in illicit medically sound protocols. The Board wishes todrug manufacture. Such legislation should also provide emphasize the importance of formally involving WHOfor sanctions that will have the appropriate deterrent in the evaluation of the results. Furthermore, theeffect on trafficking in such chemicals. Board, recalling the experience of Switzerland, wishes516. The Board appreciates the adoption of legislation to reiterate its reservations towards such maintenanceagainst money-laundering in Poland in January 2001 programmes. 65and in the Russian Federation in August 2001. The 520. There are substitution treatment programmes forBoard invites the Governments of the Republic of heroin addicts in all 15 member States of the EuropeanMoldova and Ukraine to accelerate the adoption of Union, where it is estimated that over 300,000 addictssuch legislation. receive drug substitution care from general517. In May 2001, a comprehensive action plan aimed practitioners, treatment centres, methadone clinics orat, inter alia, intensifying the criminal investigation similar outlets. As there is no information on howand prosecution of cases involving synthetic drugs, those programmes have influenced the illicit market forparticularly MDMA (Ecstasy), in the period 2002- heroin, the Board invites Governments of member2006, was presented by the Government of the States of the European Union to assess the impact ofNetherlands. The action plan foresees research on the such programmes on the illicit market for and theneurotoxic effects of synthetic drugs and the abuse of heroin.implementation of campaigns for the prevention of 521. Albania, which faces growing problemsdrug abuse. The action plan also calls for considerable concerning illicit drug production and drug abuse, hasfunds to be devoted to improving the handling of undertaken some primary and secondary preventioncriminality related to synthetic drugs as well as activities but needs to finalize a comprehensivestrengthening international legal assistance and national strategy for reducing illicit drug demand. Incooperation. In this regard, the Board requests the Bulgaria, a five-year national programme for theGovernment of the Netherlands to cooperate closely prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of drug addictswith the Government of China in order to prevent the was adopted. In Latvia, the authorities have started asmuggling into western Europe of chemicals used in programme aimed at reducing illicit drug demandthe clandestine manufacture of stimulants. Those among young people. As such programmes are oftenchemicals are mainly manufactured in China for licit short of funds, the Board invites Governments ofpurposes. countries in central and eastern Europe to allocate518. In May 2001, the Government of Ireland adopted sufficient resources to such demand reductiona national drug control strategy for the period 2001- activities. 75
  4. 4. E/INCB/2001/1522. In its report for 1999, 66 the Board again Baltic States abused home-made substances preparedencouraged countries in eastern Europe to establish from poppy straw (“kompot” or “liquid heroin”). Theredrug abuse information systems and to collect data on have been numerous reports that addicts in Estonia,the prevalence of drug abuse in that subregion. The Latvia, Lithuania, the Russian Federation and UkraineBoard is therefore pleased to note that progress has have replaced such home-made substances with morebeen made in that area by, for example, expanding the potent drugs, particularly heroin, in part because it ismulti-city network of the Pompidou Group to include more readily available.the countries in central and eastern Europe. In Latvia 527. Most of the cocaine in Europe has been smuggledand the Russian Federation, research on drug into the region through transit countries in Southavailability was finalized, providing useful information America or the Caribbean. The most significant entryon the drug situation in those countries. point in Europe for cocaine consignments continues to523. Because of the evidence that organized criminal be Spain, followed by the Netherlands; however,networks are involved in drug trafficking, government Portugal is also increasingly being used as an entryactivities against organized crime and corruption are of point, as indicated by an increase in cocaine seizures inparticular importance. The Board therefore welcomes that country. Drug trafficking organizations haveanti-corruption measures and campaigns that have continued to use countries in central and easterntaken place in several countries in central and eastern Europe for transporting consignments of cocaine toEurope. western Europe. The extent of abuse of cocaine in that part of central and eastern Europe remains limited, Cultivation, production, trafficking and abuse mainly because of the relatively high price of the drug on local markets. Narcotic drugs524. Cannabis remains the most widely abused and Psychotropic substancestrafficked drug in Europe. Much of the cannabis avail- 528. Seizures of MDMA (Ecstasy) and similarable in Europe is grown in the region. Despite some synthetic drugs increased during 2000 throughouteradication efforts and large seizures effected by the western Europe. A particularly large number ofauthorities, Albania has continued to be a major source seizures were effected in France, Germany and thefor cannabis herb. Indoor cannabis cultivation con- United Kingdom. In France, the number of seizurestinues in Europe, facilitated by the unrestricted sale of doubled in 2000. The authorities in Bulgaria, the Czechcannabis seeds and growing accessories in so-called Republic, Estonia, Romania, the Russian Federation“hemp shops” and on the Internet. Unless Governments and Ukraine have reported a marked increase in thetake action, there will continue to be no significant abuse of MDMA (Ecstasy). MDMA (Ecstasy)reduction in cannabis cultivation and abuse in the continues to be smuggled out of some countries inregion. western Europe and into North America. Western525. In 2001, illicit opium poppy cultivation was dis- Europe remains the source of most of the MDMAcovered for the first time in Albania. In several other (Ecstasy) seized throughout the world.countries in central and eastern Europe, the illicit culti- 529. Seizure statistics for 2000 show a decline invation of opium poppy has continued on a small scale. amphetamine seizures in Europe for the second year in526. The Balkan route continues to be the main route a row. As in past years, the principal source countryused to smuggle heroin into Europe. There has been an was reported to be the Netherlands, although severalincrease in the flow of Afghan heroin into the Russian laboratories were located in countries in easternFederation. Most countries in central and eastern Europe, particularly in Poland.Europe, having been used for a long time as transit 530. In August 2001, the national law enforcementcountries, are now facing serious problems of heroin agency of Switzerland discovered and dismantled aabuse. HIV infection and hepatitis C infection are major methamphetamine trafficking ring, the first of itsspreading among injecting drug abusers in many kind in Europe, which had been smuggling meth-countries. At the beginning of the 1990s, most of the amphetamine from South-East Asia into Europe. Theregistered drug addicts in CIS member States and the discovery shows that the traffic in stimulants between76
  5. 5. E/INCB/2001/1Asia and Europe goes in both directions. The illicit such criminal activities. The increasing involvement ofmanufacture of methamphetamine has continued in the organized criminal groups in drug trafficking activitiesCzech Republic, where 14 laboratories for in Europe has made it necessary for law enforcementmanufacturing that substance were seized in 2000. The officers to receive training in investigative andmethamphetamine manufactured in the Czech Republic surveillance techniques, as well as in the installation ofis mainly sold on the illicit market in that country, sophisticated technical equipment.though some of it is smuggled into Germany. Despite 535. The Board notes with appreciation that, inresolute action by the regulatory and law enforcement Croatia, the Commission to Combat Drug Abuse hasauthorities in the Czech Republic, ephedrine, the main become fully operational and is planning to prepare aprecursor for methamphetamine, continues to be national strategy on narcotic drugs. The Board hopesavailable in that country. A clandestine laboratory that the national strategy will cover all aspects of illicitmanufacturing meth-amphetamine was also discovered drug supply and demand reduction, including lawin Bulgaria. enforcement cooperation and programmes for the531. In addition to the widespread abuse of ampheta- treatment and prevention of drug abuse, as well as amine and MDMA (Ecstasy), the abuse of meth- system for controlling the licit manufacture of andamphetamine, which was not previously a concern, is trade in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances andspreading in several parts of Europe. For example, the precursors.number of methamphetamine abusers in Poland has 536. The Board notes with appreciation theincreased. The abuse of methamphetamine is becoming achievements of the Croatian health authorities in themore common, particularly among women and young treatment of drug addicts and in strategies for drugpeople, reportedly because of its low price and the abuse prevention. Treatment programmes in Croatiavariety of methods by which it can be abused. are of a high standard and, because of the variety of532. In CIS member States, there continues to be inpatient and outpatient treatment options, treatmentconcern over the large-scale abuse of home-made can be adjusted to suit individual cases. Programmesephedrone. The drug is made from over-the-counter for drug abuse prevention are designed and regularlypreparations containing ephedrine and from plants of carried out for specific target groups, such as children,the genus Ephedra, which grow in abundance in parents, teachers, social workers and doctors.Central Asia. 537. The Board sent a mission to Finland in533. Very few European countries have data on the September 2001. The Board wishes to commend theabuse of prescription drugs, and the Board again 67 Government of Finland for its comprehensive policycalls on Governments to examine this issue further, in for drug control, based on a sound general welfareorder to detect and counteract possible approach and on a balance between law enforcementoverconsumption and abuse of such substances. The on the one side and prevention and treatment on theBoard is concerned that, for example, studies other. The policy is also adequately supported withconducted in Germany have shown that more than one resources. Legislative and administrative structures forthird of all parents are willing to cure their children’s drug control in Finland are efficient.problems in school with prescription drugs. 538. The Board notes with appreciation the resolution on drug policy adopted by the Finnish Government, Missions which is destined to intensify measures against drug534. The Board sent a mission to Croatia in May 2001. trafficking, to prevent experimenting with and abuse ofBranches of the Balkan route, leading through Bosnia drugs and to provide, and facilitate access to, adequateand Herzegovina to Croatia, are increasingly being care and treatment for drug abusers.used for trafficking in illicit drugs, mostly heroin and 539. The Board finds that Finland’s experience incannabis but also synthetic drugs and cocaine. The early drug prevention may be useful to other countries.Board encourages the Croatian authorities to establish Finland has set up in the last few years aclose cooperation with their counterparts in Bosnia and comprehensive system for community-based drugHerzegovina and Yugoslavia in order to develop a prevention. By relying on a large network of centralcomprehensive regional approach to counteracting 77
  6. 6. E/INCB/2001/1and local institutions and non-governmental the international drug control conventions. Theorganizations, the authorities have built up a strong Government has consistently followed asystem for primary and secondary prevention. comprehensive drug control policy in accordance withEducation and information, in particular through the the provisions of the conventions, which includesInternet, are considered essential means to influence efficient control measures and consistent efforts forattitudes and to encourage young people to lead a drug- prevention and treatment. Necessary legislative andfree way of life. administrative mechanisms for drug control have been put in place. Coordination among various authorities540. The Board visited the Holy See in March 2001. and Norway’s reporting to the Board in acccordanceThe Board appreciates the activities of the Roman with the conventions have been excellent.Catholic Church in the area of drug demand reduction,freeing people from the scourge of drug addiction. The 546. While drug abuse and trafficking have remainedBoard appreciates the stand taken by the Holy See relatively limited in Norway compared with otheragainst the opening of drug injection rooms, where countries in Europe, the country has experienced anaddicts take drugs obtained from illicit markets, which alarming increase in the number of deaths fromechoes the view expressed by the Board in its report overdose in recent years. The Board thereforefor 1999. 68 encourages the authorities of Norway, a country with a well-developed social and health-care system, to541. The Holy See is a party to the 1961 Convention continue their efforts aimed at preventing drug abuseand the 1971 Convention. The Board calls on the Holy and providing adequate medical facilities for theSee to reaffirm its support for international drug treatment of drug addicts.control by becoming a party to the 1988 Convention,which provides valuable tools for addressing the world 547. The Board sent a mission to Ukraine indrug problem in all its forms, including drug abuse and July 2001. Ukraine adopted comprehensive drugillicit trafficking and related activities such as money- control legislation in February 1995, developed alaundering. national drug control policy and enacted a number of supporting regulations. In 1999, the legislation was542. The Board visited the Netherlands to assess the amended to include several new provisions, includingimplementation of the European Commission regula- the lifting of the prohibition of the cultivation of opiumtions for the control of subsidized licit cultivation of poppy. The Board urges the Government of Ukraine tolow-THC cannabis for industrial purposes and their take all measures necessary to prevent the diversion ofconformity with the respective requirements of the poppy straw from licensed farms cultivating poppy for1961 Convention. culinary purposes.543. The controls implemented by the authorities of 548. The Board notes the commitment of thethe Netherlands in accordance with the relevant authorities to meeting their obligations under theEuropean Commission regulations are effective. The international drug control treaties and to building aBoard notes with satisfaction that the above-mentioned system of measures to deal with the serious problemsregulations of the European Commission are strict and of drug abuse and illicit trafficking in Ukraine. Thethat the misuse of those regulations or the diversion of smuggling of illicit drugs into and through Ukraine hascannabis licitly cultivated in member States of the significantly increased in recent years, accompanied byEuropean Union is unlikely. the rapid spread of drug abuse. The Board notes the544. At the same time, the Board is concerned that absence of resources to adequately implement the drugseeds of cannabis varieties from the Netherlands with a control legislation and to ensure the functioning of thehigh THC content continue to be advertised via the drug control mechanisms.World Wide Web and that the authorities of the 549. While Ukraine has put into place mechanisms forNetherlands appear to have no legal instruments to deal inter-agency coordination at the policy level,with that problem. coordination at the working level could be streng-545. The Board sent a mission to Norway in thened by supporting the national narcotics controlSeptember 2001. The Board wishes to congratulate the commission with adequate executive powers andNorwegian authorities for the strict implementation of resources. Mechanisms to identify and counter78
  7. 7. E/INCB/2001/1money-laundering activities are not yet adequate and The Board is also disturbed by the widely reportedthe Board therefore encourages the authorities to enact plans of the local authorities in the city of Venlo tolegislation against money-laundering as soon as open drive-through “coffee shops” that sell cannabis,possible. as it is a sign that the authorities have become more actively involved in organizing the distribution of that550. The Board sent a mission to Yugoslavia in drug. The Netherlands continues to maintain a policy,May 2001. Drug abuse and illicit trafficking increased introduced in the 1970s, of tolerating the consumptionduring the years of upheaval and international isolation and sale of cannabis products in so-called “coffeethat followed the secession from Yugoslavia of its shops”, which is not in compliance with theformer republics, as law enforcement structures and international drug control treaties.health facilities were partly destroyed. After thepolitical situation in Yugoslavia stabilized, the transit 554. The Board notes, on the other hand, that thetraffic in heroin and cannabis resumed, leading to an policy of tolerance has become more restrictive inincrease in activities involving organized crime. recent years with the tightening of legislation governing the growing of cannabis, the reduction of the551. The Board encourages the Yugoslav authorities to number of so-called “coffee shops” and the like.develop a comprehensive drug control master plan,covering all areas relating to trafficking in and abuse of 555. Work continues to be done on a project in theillicit drugs, as well as a system for controlling the licit Netherlands that involves, inter alia, prescribing heroinmanufacture of and trade in substances under to heroin addicts. The Board trusts that efforts areinternational control. The Board suggests that a high- being made to ensure that the basis for the project islevel national coordinating body for drug issues be scientifically and medically sound and that the resultsestablished to ensure cooperation between all national are carefully evaluated before any changes are made inoffices and between the competent authorities of the policy or regulations.Government and the republics.552. The Board notes with appreciation that the E. Oceaniainternational donor community, particularly theEuropean Union, is providing support to Yugoslavia Major developmentswithin the framework of the Organization for Securityand Cooperation in Europe, the Stability Pact for 556. Hydroponically grown cannabis has become theSouth-Eastern Europe and UNDCP. However, a most popular form of cannabis abused in Australia. Inconcerted international or regional approach to all Australian states and territories, the majority of theresponding to drug trafficking and organized crime is cannabis seizures involved cannabis grown indoors.still lacking. The Board, therefore, urges the Seizure data confirm that sizeable quantities of heroinGovernment of Yugoslavia to work closely with the from South-East and South-West Asia continue to beGovernments of neighbouring countries in formulating smuggled into Australia, with Sydney being a key focalcoordinated and effective responses to the problem of point for domestic distribution. In 2000, the totalorganized crime and drug trafficking in Europe. The amount of cocaine seized by Australian lawBoard also appeals to the international community to enforcement officers reached a record-high level—support the efforts of the Yugoslav authorities in drug more than twice the total amount seized in 1999; theycontrol matters through concerted technical coopera- also made their first seizure of solutions of cocaine.tion and financial support. The number of clandestine laboratories manufacturing amphetamine-type stimulants in Australia is also553. The Board has reviewed action taken by the increasing, as is the number of seizures of MDMAGovernment of the Netherlands pursuant to (Ecstasy) at its air and sea borders.recommendations made by the Board after its missionin March 1998. The Board is concerned that the 557. Seizure data indicate that for the past 2-3 years,country remains the source of a significant proportion New Zealand and many of the smaller Pacific islandof the world’s illicitly manufactured MDMA (Ecstasy) countries in Oceania have been used more and more asdespite efforts by law enforcement agencies to curtail trans-shipment points for smuggling illicit drugs intothe illicit manufacture of and trade in the substance. Australia. In late 2000, for example, a sizeable amount 79

×