Comparison Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, 2012

436 views
372 views

Published on

The comparison of Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, Thailand, 2012, DNI 550 w/m2

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
436
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Comparison Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, 2012

  1. 1. Comparison Between Solar Trough and CLFR  Solar Trough CLFRTHLand Area / Megawatt Solar Hour 5 hrs 12 Rais 8 Rais 19,200 Sq.m. 12,800 Sq.m.Direct Normal Insolation                W/m2   500‐1000 500‐1000Solar Receiver Multi Tube Linear TubeSolar Receiver Tube High Price Low PriceFluid Friction Losses Very High LowTracking Power High LowUniversal Joint Leakage Yes NoReceiver Thermal Shock Yes NoReceiver Crack due to Rain Yes NoReceiver Crack due to Bending Moment Yes NoInsulator Cost High LowTurbine Super Heated Saturated  High Pressure Low PressureSteam Engine Not Plausible Plausible Low PressureOperation Cost High LowMaintenance Cost High LowEngineering On Site Senior JuniorSteam Quality High LowDirect Steam Yes YesThermal Storage Yes YesSteam Pressure Storage Yes NoOperate 24 hrs on Pure Solar Yes YesSystem Schedule Operation No  YesSystem Schedule Maintenance No YesModular System No YesEngine and Generator Back Up No YesBack up Burner Yes YesSynchronize System High Price Not RequiredReflector Mirror 1 mm Mirror 2‐3 mmTransformer Solar Type Solar TypeOverall Efficiency 10‐20 10‐20

×