Comparison Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Comparison Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, 2012

on

  • 454 views

The comparison of Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, Thailand, 2012, DNI 550 w/m2

The comparison of Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, Thailand, 2012, DNI 550 w/m2

Statistics

Views

Total Views
454
Views on SlideShare
454
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Comparison Solar Trough with Thai CLFR, 2012 Document Transcript

  • 1. Comparison Between Solar Trough and CLFR  Solar Trough CLFRTHLand Area / Megawatt Solar Hour 5 hrs 12 Rais 8 Rais 19,200 Sq.m. 12,800 Sq.m.Direct Normal Insolation                W/m2   500‐1000 500‐1000Solar Receiver Multi Tube Linear TubeSolar Receiver Tube High Price Low PriceFluid Friction Losses Very High LowTracking Power High LowUniversal Joint Leakage Yes NoReceiver Thermal Shock Yes NoReceiver Crack due to Rain Yes NoReceiver Crack due to Bending Moment Yes NoInsulator Cost High LowTurbine Super Heated Saturated  High Pressure Low PressureSteam Engine Not Plausible Plausible Low PressureOperation Cost High LowMaintenance Cost High LowEngineering On Site Senior JuniorSteam Quality High LowDirect Steam Yes YesThermal Storage Yes YesSteam Pressure Storage Yes NoOperate 24 hrs on Pure Solar Yes YesSystem Schedule Operation No  YesSystem Schedule Maintenance No YesModular System No YesEngine and Generator Back Up No YesBack up Burner Yes YesSynchronize System High Price Not RequiredReflector Mirror 1 mm Mirror 2‐3 mmTransformer Solar Type Solar TypeOverall Efficiency 10‐20 10‐20