V Agrawal A Sarmad Stoc Expo Presentation Updated2 - Presentation Transcript
Simulation Modeling of a Crude Oil or Refined Products Export Facility
Abbas Sarmad, P.E.
Principal Marine Engineer – Vice President
AECOM Transportation
Vijay Agrawal
1
Senior Port Analyst & Planner
AECOM Transportation
Author’s Perspective
• Consulting Civil Engineers / Planners /
Programmers
• Trained in Design, Fabrication and Construction
of waterfront and Offshore Structures
• Reliance on Self Engineering Expertise and Client
Taught Terminal Operation
• Use of Simulation Modeling as a “Tool” to
Achieve Optimized Solutions for two decades
2
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
AECOM Clients
Port Authorities
•
Shipping Lines
•
Terminal Operators
•
Industry Consortia
•
Private Developers
•
Government Agencies
•
Multilateral Agencies
•
3
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
AECOM Experience
PROJECT TYPE How Many?
Port Studies 400+
Container Terminals 100+
Major Multipurpose Ports and Harbors 100+
Marine Tanker Terminals 350+
Bulk Cargo Terminals 50+
Piers and Wharves 400+
Coastal Engineering Projects 250+
Offshore Platforms 300+
Storage and Tank Farm Facilities 50+
Cryogenic Cargo Terminals 25+
Shipyard Facilities 400+
Floating and Graving Docks 75+
Major River Ports 25+
River and Flood Control Programs 300+
Naval Bases and Stations 50+
4
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Presentation Overview
Simulation Modeling
•
Crude Oil/Refined Product Export Terminal
•
Storage Fluctuation and Berth Occupancy
•
Cost of Change
•
5
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Simulation Modeling
Simulation Modeling
What is Simulation
• Simulation is the art of creating
mathematical representation of
physical and logical “occurrences” in
realistic time domains
• Computer simulation is the art of
making a computer generated
representation look like the real
world
• For us, simulation is the art of
creating a real time moving
operating marine terminal
7
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Spreadsheets vs. Simulation
• Spreadsheets
Quick, simple, flexible
–
Limited randomness and sophistication
–
Unwieldy at large scale
–
Limited to known relationships & formulas
–
• Simulation
Continuous or Discrete Event
–
Thorough treatment of randomness
–
Excellent for comparing alternatives
–
Animation of operations
–
Challenging to program
–
8
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Why Simulate ?
• Measure Implications of Change
– Increased/decreased throughput
– Changes in port or terminal facilities
– Changes in capacity of hinterland connections
• Consider Alternative Scenarios
– Identify bottlenecks
– Evaluate storage capacity
– Cost analysis
9
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Key Physical and Logistics Inputs
• Vessel Fleet Composition, Parcel Size
Distribution, Arrival Patterns, etc.
• Terminal Products, Storage Capacity,
Infrastructure, etc.
• Transportation Vessels, Barges, Trucks and Trains,
Pipelines, etc.
• Cost Parameters Infrastructure, Operations and
Maintenance
10
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Model Output
Behavior of key parameters in time as they
vary discretely or continuously
– Vessel waiting time and resulting demurrage
– Storage fluctuation for different products
– Berth occupancy factors
– Equipment utilization factors
11
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Crude Oil/Refined Product Export Terminal
Production coming in from Upstream
Tankfarm Storage
Supply to Export Facilities
12
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Change is Expensive
0.5 to 1 Million Barrels Capacity Tank $14 - 25 Million each
New Conventional Wharf – Medium Size $70 Million each
New SPM More than
$25 Million each
New pump, 10,000 to 15,000 MT/hour $12-20 Millions each
More pipelines, Large Diameter Crude More than
Submarine $7,000/meter
13
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Find Out “What Goes - to What Tank - to Go Where”
14
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Tankers Don’t Arrive on Time
Tanker 1
NEW2
Tanker 2
NEW1
Tanker 3
Oceania
Tanker 4
Ampac
Tanker 5
XLT
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
Blue regions: Most likely time vessel is at berth
Non Blue region: Small probability, but still possible
times when a vessel is at berth
15
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Tanker Size Determines the Parcel Size
16
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Tanker Loading Takes Time
Berth Suspension Takes Away Time
• Tanker arrival and tie up
• Hose connection
• Custom Clearance &
Quarantine
• Start-up time
• Pump Loading
• Top-off time
• Disconnects
• Tanker leaves the area
17
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Simulation Model Scenario 1
Product 1
Facility
Tank Farm 2 Tank Farm 3
Tank Farm 1
Refineries
Refinery 1
Refinery 2
Refinery 3
Refinery 4
Berth 1 Berth 2
Product 1
Product 1 Alternate Flow
SPM SPM
1 2
18
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Simulation Model Scenario 2
Product 2 Product 1
Facility
Tank Farm 2 Tank Farm 3
Tank Farm 1
Refineries
Refinery 1
Refinery 2
Refinery 3
Refinery 4
Berth 1
Berth 2
,3
Product 1
Product 2
Being
Product 1 Alternate Flow
Overhauled
SPM SPM SPM SPM
2 3
1 4
19
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Crude Oil/Refined Product Export Terminal
Simulation Model Animation
Tank Farms
SPM or Berth Selection
Crude type, LRII vs. VLCCs
% of VLCCs going to Piers
% of VLCCs going to Piers that are partially loaded
Select tank farm with highest inventory
Select SPM with highest pump speed
Non-Availability of Berth due to
Bad weather or maintenance
Occupancy by other tankers
22
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Simulation Results
Storage Fluctuation and Berth Occupancy
Dynamic Tracking of Tank Farm Inventory
Storage/Production :13
Storage/Export :15
Storage/Production : 7
Storage/Export :-
Storage/Production :15
Storage/Export :15
Storage/Production : 7
Storage/Export :11
24
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Total vs. Simulated Storage Requirement
25
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Buffer Ullage Available vs. Required
100%
1,200
90%
89%
1,000 80%
79%
70%
800 67%
F req u en cy
60%
54%
600 50%
40%
400 30%
20%
200
10%
0 0%
> 3-day buffer 3-day buffer 2-day buffer 1-day buffer
Simulated Cap
ullage ullage ullage ullage
Bin
Frequency Cumulative %
26
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Berth Occupancy vs. Vessel Waiting Times
Berth Occupancy (%) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4
SPM 1 58 27 31
SPM 2 59 35 34 35
SPM 3 24 27 31
SPM 4 24 24 31
SPM 5 61
Berth 1 41 36 16 39
Berth 2 33 27 31 <1%
Berth 3 5 17 7
Average wait time (days) 0.57 0.12 0.26 0.57
Average berth time (days) 1.49 1.17 1.02 1.05
Avg wait time / Avg berth time 0.37 0.11 0.25 0.51
Number of Tankers per year 467 475 633 814
27
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Annual Demurrage Cost vs. SPM Cost
Number of Tankers Cumulative Frequency %
2,000 100%
1,800 90%
1,600 80%
Number of Tankers Waiting
Cumulative Frequency (%)
1,400 70%
Carriage
1,200 60%
Insurance Freight
1,000 50%
(CIF) Tankers
800 40%
Free On Board
600 30%
(FOB) Tankers
400 20%
200 10%
0 0%
more
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
7.00
Tanker W aiting Time (Days)
28
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Capital Cost per
Barrel of Additional Daily Production
$2,000
Substations
Demurrage
Barrel of Additional Daily Production
SPMs
$1,600
Pumps+Metering
US $ Capital Cost Per
Pipelines
Tankage
$1,200
$800
$400
$0
100% 106% 106% 117% 133% 133% 133% 167%
% Increase in Daily Production
29
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
Application of Simulation Software for
Crude Export/Refined Product Terminal
• Evaluate the capacity of the existing system and
bottlenecks
• Determine the optimal storage, pipelines, and terminal
facilities required to accommodate additional production
capacity
• Initiate required capital projects ahead of demand
• Evaluate impact of crude segregation alternatives on
future facility requirements
• Establish the need for waterside export facilities
expansion regarding tanker service level and demurrage
cost
30
STOC EXPO MIDDLE EAST 2009
0 comments
Post a comment