Post Storm Survey Background

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Post Storm Survey Background - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Post Storm Survey Matt Taraldsen Saint Cloud State University Meteorology-Communications Student Amanda Graning Forecaster/Meteorologist National Weather Service, WFO Duluth, MN MNgage
    2. Post Storm Survey (PSS) This survey was created by Matt Taraldsen, a meteorology student at Saint Cloud State University, under the guidance of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences professor Dr. Anthony Hansen, Communication Studies professor Suzanne Stangl- Erkens and meteorologists from the National Weather Service office in Duluth, Minnesota. http://studentweb.stcloudstate.edu/tama0502/poststormsurvey.html poststormsurvey@gmail.com
    3. Post Storm Survey (PSS) Motivation “Need a process by which WFO [Weather Forecast Offices] can systematically gather local customer input and local research results … and turn that information into improved products and services” Ray Wolf – Science and Operations Officer (Science Operations Officer) NWS WFO Davenport, IA Goal Improve communication & effectiveness of winter weather information and threat by gaining insight into perceptions and decision making processes related to hazardous winter weather.
    4. The Post Storm Survey  Not a Critique of Forecast Accuracy  Rather, asks a few Specific Questions How did you received the winter storm information  How did you perceived the threat of the storm  What steps did you take to prepare for the storm  How did your plans changed due to the storm 
    5. Post Storm Survey Details  Post Storm Survey Homepage is Hosted on SCSU Web Server http://studentweb.stcloudstate.edu/tama0502/poststormsurvey.html  Test Season was Conducted Winter 2008  Survey will Continue to be operational through at least 2010.
    6. How it works  After a Winter Event Ends A link to the brief event specific survey is posted on the  PSS homepage Survey is open to take for 3 days immediately following a  winter storm that requires a warning to be issued by the local NWS office. Additional links to the survey will be posted on the PSS  homepage in the case of multiple or overlapping winter storms  Survey results available online for anyone
    7. Post Storm Survey Details Multiple Online Locations to Access Survey Partners in the Weather Community post a link to the PSS Homepage on their web pages to obtain wide broad of respondents after a winter event. Partners for Winter 2009 include: • News Section of Several Participating NWS Offices • MN State Climatologist & MN Hidden Program • MN State Emergency Manager Web Site • SCSU Meteorology Department Web Page • Multiple Media Partner Web Sites • Many more…this means you!!!
    8. Post Storm Survey Details  Utilized Range of Departments at SCSU Statistics, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Communication  Studies, Technology  Created to follow Online Surveying Methods  Questions were formulated similar to previous surveys on parallel topics  Post Storm Survey project was approved by SCSU Review Board and NWS Central Region Headquarters in March 2008
    9. Test Season March-April 2008  Only included winter storms that Affected Duluth, MN Forecast Area  Proposed for Winter Events Requiring a “Warning.”  Didn’t quite work that way…No Storms.  Winter finally arrive March & April 2008  Posted Survey for Three Winter Events • One case (Snow Advisory of March 18th) did not have a Warning but was still used in Test season data  Received over 500 responses Total
    10. Post Storm Survey Please Refer to the PSS Results Slideshow for the Post Storm Survey Questions and Responses from the Test Season of 2008 http://www.crh.noaa.gov/Image/dlh/slideshows/PSS_results.pdf
    11. Test Season Conclusions  Significant number of respondents stated they altered their routine because concerned about road conditions/travel.  People did not perceive the meteorlogic terminology such as sleet and freezing rain as the threat; because not a direct impact?   There was an increase in preparedness (gas, food water, communication) with highly anticipated blizzard versus low impact snow advisory  Climatology plays major factor…What is viewed as “normal” for winter?
    12. How to get involved? If you are interested in hosting a link to the Post Storm Survey on your website, please send an email to PostStormSurvey@gmail.com
    13. Acknowledgements  Amy Liles  Phil Shumacher  Mike Bettwy  Dr. Robert Weisman  Lisa Schmit  Dr. Anthony Hansen  Peter Boulay  Suzanne Stangl-Erkens  David Kellenbenz  Brian Curtice  Mindy Albrecht  Dan Miller  Carol Christensen  Todd Shea  Julie Demuth  Phil Shumacher  Eve Gruntfest  Ray Wolf  Sheldon Drobot  Tanja Fransen  Brent MacAloney
    14. Thank You! Matt Taraldsen Saint Cloud State University Meteorology-Communications Student poststormsurvey@gmail.com Amanda Graning Forecaster/Meteorologist National Weather Service, WFO Duluth, MN amanda.graning@noaa.gov Post Storm Survey Team Mike Bettwy, Matt Taraldsen Amanda Graning, Amy Liles

    + agraningagraning, 2 years ago

    custom

    171 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The objective of this Post Storm Survey (PSS) is to more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 171
      • 171 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories