Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
In vitro evaluation of
Orange-Fleshed
Sweetpotato (Ipomoea
batatas Lam) genotypes for
drought tolerance using
polyethylene...
Presentation outline
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Overall conclusions and recommendations
Importance of Sweetpotato
Rank 7th among food crops of the world
(CIP, 1997); Area under cultivation world
wide is 9M hect...
Importance of Sweetpotato
Major source of food/nutrition
Ability to produce under adverse weather
conditions
Short maturit...
Importance of Drought in Sweetpotato
production
Drought is often a major environmental
constraint for sweet potato product...
Importance of drought in
sweetpotato production, cont.
The unpredictable and variable forms in
which drought manifest comp...
In vitro culture technique for drought screening
• In vitro culture techniques minimizes
environmental variations due to d...
The technique has been used for various crops
Wheat genotypes (Hsissou and
Bouharmont,1994)
Tomatoes(Manoj and Uday,2007)
...
To Screen a large number of orange-fleshed
sweetpotato genotypes at earlier stages of
development for drought tolerance un...
Genetic material
Consisted of 59 OFSP genotypes with
contrasting beta carotene and mineral content
levels received from CI...
Planting material/preparation of growth
media
Propagation of planting material for the 59 genotypes
were from nodal done i...
Data gathered
Root length (cm)
Root dry weight (g)-dried
for 48h at 65ºC
Leaf Area (cm²)
Shoot length (cm)
Shoot fresh wei...
Results
ANOVA
Analysis of variance indicated genotypes,
salt levels and salt level x genotype
interaction, were highly significant...
Effect of water stress on root length (cm) and Root dry weight (g) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening u...
Effect of water stress on shoot fresh and dry weight (g) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening using diffe...
Effect of water stress on leaf area (cm²) and shoot length (cm) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening usin...
Treatment effects
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 10 15
Salt level PEG g/litre
weight(g)
Shoot fresh weight (g)
Root weight (g)
Shoot ...
Genotype 440429 (Drought tolerant) Genotype 440286 (susceptible)
Conclusions
10 genotypes were identified as drought
tolerant:194515.5, 194539.36, 441724, 441538,
189135.9, 401055, 441768...
Conclusions
In vitro screening method using PEG (6000) was
found to be a simple enough to be used for evaluation
of drough...
Acknowledgment
HARVEST PLUS
CIP/SASHA
JKUAT
KARI-KIBOKO/MARIGAT
KEPHIS MUGUGA
Sess08 3 agili   in vitro evaluation of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (ipomoea batatas lam) genotypes for drought tolerance u...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Sess08 3 agili in vitro evaluation of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (ipomoea batatas lam) genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol

94

Published on

Published in: Technology, Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
94
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Sess08 3 agili in vitro evaluation of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (ipomoea batatas lam) genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol"

  1. 1. In vitro evaluation of Orange-Fleshed Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas Lam) genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol Agili, Sammy, Nyende B, Ngamau K,Masinde P 30th June to 4th July 2013 9th Triennial Conference of APA, Naivasha, Kenya
  2. 2. Presentation outline Introduction Materials and Methods Results Overall conclusions and recommendations
  3. 3. Importance of Sweetpotato Rank 7th among food crops of the world (CIP, 1997); Area under cultivation world wide is 9M hectares 95% of the world’s sweetpotato output is from developing countries Predominantly grown in small plots by poor farmers, hence known as poor man’s crop
  4. 4. Importance of Sweetpotato Major source of food/nutrition Ability to produce under adverse weather conditions Short maturity period/possible to have two crops in a year OFSP types-contains sufficient levels of beta carotene
  5. 5. Importance of Drought in Sweetpotato production Drought is often a major environmental constraint for sweet potato production in areas where it is grown under rain fed conditions Under field conditions drought severity, timing and duration vary from year to year and a cultivar which is successful in one year might fail in another year
  6. 6. Importance of drought in sweetpotato production, cont. The unpredictable and variable forms in which drought manifest complicates the selection of superior plant materials as well as breeding programs
  7. 7. In vitro culture technique for drought screening • In vitro culture techniques minimizes environmental variations due to defined nutrient media, controlled conditions and homogeneity of stress application; can handle a large number of materials • Osmotica/ PEG6000- stimulate water deficit conditions in cultured cells in a manner similar to that observed in the cells of intact plants subjected to true drought conditions
  8. 8. The technique has been used for various crops Wheat genotypes (Hsissou and Bouharmont,1994) Tomatoes(Manoj and Uday,2007) Rice(Shankhodhar et al 2000) Green grams(Gulati and Jaiwal, 1993) In vitro screening, cont.
  9. 9. To Screen a large number of orange-fleshed sweetpotato genotypes at earlier stages of development for drought tolerance under in vitro conditions simulating stress drought conditions Place-Tissue culture laboratory, Kenya plant Health Inspectorate Service Quarantine station, Muguga, Kenya Objective of the study
  10. 10. Genetic material Consisted of 59 OFSP genotypes with contrasting beta carotene and mineral content levels received from CIP, Lima For initial propagation the materials were transferred into in vitro and routinely propagated from the nodal cutting(0.2-0.5cm), each circle lasting 2-4 weeks.
  11. 11. Planting material/preparation of growth media Propagation of planting material for the 59 genotypes were from nodal done in MS media MS basal media containing 30g/l sucrose and 2.8g/l phytogel maintained at PH 5.7 + PEG (6000) at 0,10 and 15g/l was used as the growth media 5cuttings with2-3nodes/kilner jar/genotype/ Factorial/CRBD/ two factor factorial design with 3 replications Growth condition-10 hours per day; photon light flux density of 70µmol m²/s, 28ºC for 65 days
  12. 12. Data gathered Root length (cm) Root dry weight (g)-dried for 48h at 65ºC Leaf Area (cm²) Shoot length (cm) Shoot fresh weight (g) Shoot dry weight (g)- dried for 48h at 65ºC Data analysis-SAS version 8
  13. 13. Results
  14. 14. ANOVA Analysis of variance indicated genotypes, salt levels and salt level x genotype interaction, were highly significant (p<0.001) with respect to all the traits This shows the presence of variability, different responses to genotypes to different salt levels
  15. 15. Effect of water stress on root length (cm) and Root dry weight (g) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening using different concentrations of polyethylene glycol Root length(cm) Salt concentration (g/l) Root dry (g) Salt concentration (g/l) Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Marooko* 26.0a 22.0a 21.3a 23.1 Marooko* 1.3a 1.6a 2.2a 1.7 189135.9 33.0a 33.5a 35.3a 34.0 189135.9 6.0b 7.9a 5.0bc 6.3 194515.5 31.3a 33.3a 30.7a 31.8 194515..5 4.8a 0.6b 3.8a 3.1 441097 32.5a 34.2a 25.3a 30.7 441097 1.3bc 1.3b 3.5a 2.0 441768 32.7a 25.8a 22.2a 26.9 441768 5.9b 0.3a 5.4bc 3.9 441724 29.3a 25.0a 29.7a 28.0 441724 0.8b 2.7a 0.9c 1.5 440031 5.3a 4.3a 3.8a 4.5 440031 0.0a 0.0a 0.01a 0.0 440286 11.9a 2.9a 1.4a 5.4 440286 0.3a 0.0a 0.0a 0.1 420027 17.8a 3.6a 2.6a 8.0 420027 0.1a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0 K566632** 13.7a 8.0a 4.5a 8.7 K566632** 0.1a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0
  16. 16. Effect of water stress on shoot fresh and dry weight (g) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening using different concentrations of polyethylene glycol shoot fresh weight (g) Salt concentration (g/l) shoot dry weight (g) Salt concentration (g/l) Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Marooko* 1.6a 1.6a 2.2b 1.8 Marooko* 0.7a 0.7a 1.0a 0.8 189135.9 6.45c 5.6b 2.8a 5.0 189135.9 2.8bc 2.4b 1.2a 2.1 194515.5 4.8a 4.3a 2.7b 4.0 194515.5 1.8bc 2.1b 2.6a 2.2 441097 4.1a 4.5a 5.7b 4.8 441097 2.0bc 1.9b 1.2a 1.7 441768 5.5c 4.8b 2.2a 4.2 441768 2.5bc 2.2b 4.4a 3.0 441724 6.1a 5.7a 3.1b 5.0 441724 1.4a 4.3c 0.1b 1.9 440031 0.3a 0.2a 0.0a 0.2 440031 0.1a 0.1a 0.0a 0.1 440286 0.3a 0.3a 0.1a 0.2 440286 0.2a 0.0a 0.2a 0.1 420027 0.3c 0.2b 0.3a 0.3 420027 0.4a 0.0a 0.0a 0.1 K566632** 0.2a 0.3a 0.0a 0.2 K566632** 0.1a 0.0a 0.0a 0.1
  17. 17. Effect of water stress on leaf area (cm²) and shoot length (cm) of 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening using different concentrations of polyethylene glycol Leaf area (cm²) Salt concentration (g/l) shoot length (cm) Salt concentration (g/l) Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Genotype 0 10 15 Mean Marooko* 5.5a 6.5a 5.7a 5.9 Marooko* 7.2a 5.2a 8.5a 7.0 189135.9 7.0a 7.3a 5.2b 6.5 189135.9 15.3a 12.8a 13.2a 13.8 194515.5 4.2a 6.3b 6.4b 5.6 194515.5 10.3a 14.7b 12.2ab 12.4 441097 5.1a 9.5b 5.8c 6.8 441097 10.3bc 11.5b 18.2a 13.3 441768 5.7a 10.0b 6.5a 7.4 194539.36 9.3bc 10.0b 16.7a 12.0 441724 7.0a 11.3b 3.8c 7.5 441724 16.2a 16.0a 12.7ab 15.0 440031 0.6a 0.6a 1.5a 0.9 187017.1 10.3b 13.8a 14.9a 13 440286 1.1a 1.5a 0.6a 1.1 440286 5.8b 1.0a 1.2a 2.7 420027 2.8a 0.9a 0.8a 1.5 420064 10.3bc 11.5b 18.2a 13.3 K566632** 11.2a 2.0b 1.7b 5.0 K566632** 4.5a 3.5a 1.9a 3.3
  18. 18. Treatment effects 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 10 15 Salt level PEG g/litre weight(g) Shoot fresh weight (g) Root weight (g) Shoot dry weight (g) 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 10 15 Salt level PEG g/litre Length(cm) Shoot length (cm) Root length (cm) Effect of different salt levels on shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight and shoot dry weight (a) and shoot and root length (b) for the screened 59 sweetpotato genotypes during in vitro screening using different concentrations of polyethylene glycol.
  19. 19. Genotype 440429 (Drought tolerant) Genotype 440286 (susceptible)
  20. 20. Conclusions 10 genotypes were identified as drought tolerant:194515.5, 194539.36, 441724, 441538, 189135.9, 401055, 441768,192033.5, 440027 and 440429. All showed higher leaf expansion, higher stem length elongation, high root and shoot growth and high dry matter production at high salt concentration level Correct/clear expression of genotypes can be evaluated by this method using different PEG concentrations
  21. 21. Conclusions In vitro screening method using PEG (6000) was found to be a simple enough to be used for evaluation of drought tolerance in a large number of genotypes in very short time. Out of the 10 genotypes identified as drought tolerant under in vitro screening 5 were confirmed to be tolerant under field conditions suggesting that in vitro screening can be a simple method of evaluating OFSP genotypes drought tolerance
  22. 22. Acknowledgment HARVEST PLUS CIP/SASHA JKUAT KARI-KIBOKO/MARIGAT KEPHIS MUGUGA
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×