Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Project Update / Initial Alternatives




            CHSRA Board Meeting – May 6, 2010
Today’s Presentation

I.
I      Project U d t
       P j t Update
       •   Project Inception
       •   SJRRC is Local P...
Project Inception

   The Authority is pursuing a “regional joint-use” project in Altamont
                              ...
Regional Partner




 Operates Altamont Commuter Express (ACE)

 Signed MOU to partner with Authority
 Wants regional s...
Altamont Corridor Partnership Working Group

 Partners with the Authority
 Provides guidance on local issues




   San ...
Key Goals and Objectives

   Develop HST-compatible regional intercity
          p HST-      p         g            y
   ...
Project Corridor
Altamont Corridor Connectivity
Scoping Meetings

Meetings
• Cit of Li
  City f Livermore – NNovember 10 2009
                           b 10,
• City of S...
Identification of Initial Alternatives

P j tT
 Project Team prepared D ft Scoping R
                     d Draft S  i Re...
Initial Alternatives – Bay Area
Initial Alternatives – Tri Valley
Initial Alternatives – San Joaquin Valley
Next Steps (Next 6 Months)


 Commence Alternatives Analysis

 Meet with Resource Agencies

 W k with Caltrans on state...
Questions & Answers
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Altamont Corridor Rail Project

2,437

Published on

1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • well documented, thanks for sharing!
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,437
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
16
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Altamont Corridor Rail Project"

  1. 1. Project Update / Initial Alternatives CHSRA Board Meeting – May 6, 2010
  2. 2. Today’s Presentation I. I Project U d t P j t Update • Project Inception • SJRRC is Local Partner • Altamont Corridor Partnership Working Group • Goals and Objectives j • Corridor Location • Scoping Process • Identification of I iti l Alternatives Id tifi ti f Initial Alt ti II. II Development of Alternatives • Initial Alternatives III. III Next Steps N t St
  3. 3. Project Inception  The Authority is pursuing a “regional joint-use” project in Altamont regional joint-use Corridor with support from local and regional partners  The project will serve a different Purpose and Need from the HST system serving the Northern California regional market  Per Metropolitan Transportation Commission Regional Rail Plan, Altamont Corridor is a complement to both the regional network as well as the statewide HST network  San J S Joaquin Regional Rail Commission is the local partner i R i l R il C i i i th l l t  The FRA has agreed to serve as Lead Agency for the EIS
  4. 4. Regional Partner  Operates Altamont Commuter Express (ACE)  Signed MOU to partner with Authority  Wants regional service  Will provide local funds p
  5. 5. Altamont Corridor Partnership Working Group  Partners with the Authority  Provides guidance on local issues San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission / Altamont Commuter Express – Bay Area Rapid Transit District / BART Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority – San Mateo County Transit District / Caltrain Alameda County Congestion Management Agency – California Partnership for San Joaquin Valley Metropolitan Transportation Commission – Sacramento Area Council of Governments Stanislaus Council of Governments – Tri Valley Policy Advisory Committee
  6. 6. Key Goals and Objectives  Develop HST-compatible regional intercity p HST- p g y passenger rail service linking Bay Area with northern San Joaquin Valley  Provide dedicated corridor and trackage separate g p from UPRR where feasible  Provide connectivity and accessibility to Oakland and Oakland International Airport p  Maximize intermodal connections with other rail services including BART
  7. 7. Project Corridor
  8. 8. Altamont Corridor Connectivity
  9. 9. Scoping Meetings Meetings • Cit of Li City f Livermore – NNovember 10 2009 b 10, • City of Stockton – November 12, 2009 • City of Fremont – November 17, 2009 • City of San Jose – November 18, 2009 Participation p  More than 200 participants  More than 100 written comments Summary of Comments Received  Many comments in favor of project  Some requested project be “fast tracked” fast-tracked  Interested in service to Sacramento and Merced via Altamont  Some suggestions for “out of corridor” alternatives AAgree with BART connection; possibly stopping at Li ith ti ibl t i t Livermore
  10. 10. Identification of Initial Alternatives P j tT Project Team prepared D ft Scoping R d Draft S i Report t  Project Team identified alignments and stations by area (Bay Area / Tri Valley / San Joaquin Valley)  Options reviewed with City/County & Transportation Agency representatives in March p g y p  Initial Alternatives presented to Working G Group in April
  11. 11. Initial Alternatives – Bay Area
  12. 12. Initial Alternatives – Tri Valley
  13. 13. Initial Alternatives – San Joaquin Valley
  14. 14. Next Steps (Next 6 Months)  Commence Alternatives Analysis  Meet with Resource Agencies  W k with Caltrans on state hi h Work ith C lt t t highway i t f interfaces  Work with Cities & Counties, Transportation Agencies on Counties refinement of alignment & stations  Prepare Preliminary Alternatives Analysis
  15. 15. Questions & Answers
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×