Procurement

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Procurement - Presentation Transcript

    1. David Banes
      AbilityNet
      October 2009
      Accessible Procurement
    2. Accessibility in Assessment
      Accessible Courseware
      Alternative formats
      Universal design
      Facilitated Learning
      Accessible Assessment
      Multiple Formats
      Universal Design
      Supported Assessment
    3. Why Accessibility ?
      Business Case for Accessibility
      Social
      Political
      Economic
      Legal
      Technological
    4. Legal Background
      What is meant by “reasonable adjustments”?
      Steps that should be taken to make reasonable adjustments include:
      acquiring or modifying equipment, eg the provision of specialist access technology to allow an individual to carry out his or her job using a computer
      modifying instructions or reference manuals, eg offering alternative formats
      conducting a proper assessment of what reasonable adjustments may be required.
      While "reasonable" is not defined in the Act, the Code of Practice does give some guidance on this, and indicates that it will depend upon:
      the type of service provided
      the type of organisation you are and resources available
      the impact on the disabled person.
    5. Interrogating suppliers
      We can ask “Is your IT solution accessible to people with disabilities?” but even in this case the question is too ambiguous. It would be reasonable for the supplier to answer yes based on “our software package has been extensively tested with people in wheelchairs and they had no problem using it. Therefore it is accessible to people with disabilities.”
      Instead we want to ask questions that provide a meaningful evidence base and which can be tested and measured. In this case a question such as “What accessibility standards does your IT solution meet?” is more specific and open and hence more likely to provide us with usable responses.
    6. Standards
      Useful Standards to refer to
      Websites
      World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
      RNIB “See it right”
      Irish NDA Accessibility Guidelines 
      Software
      IBM Software Accessibility Guidelines
      ISO 16071 Guidance On Software Accessibility
      Section 508 VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template)
    7. Problem with Statements
      VPAT Statement
    8. Probing Responses
      To overcome this lack of hard evidence we can ask further questions to
      give us information upon which to base a decision.
      Has their solution been tested by people with a range of physical, sensory and language disabilities and what were the results?
      How will they involve these disabled people in the development of the solution?
      Do they have reference sites?
      Will they let you test the solution yourself?
    9. Probing Responses
      We cannot expect all suppliers to provide us with positive responses to all of these questions, as a result we will need to consider how we will deal with issues of Non Compliance. As part of the discussion with a supplier it is reasonable to ask further questions such as
      What plans do they have to meet accessibility standards?
      Will they commit to improvements and timeframe in the contract?
      Is there an acceptable interim workaround or mitigation?
      And in making a decision the purchaser will themselves have to decide the priority that they ascribe to accessibility compliance in the Invitation to Tender.
    10. Suppliers may tell you
      “No one else is asking for it”
      To this we would simply state that this is a condition of this tender, and
      moreover you cannot ignore the legal framework.
       
      “We’re an international company and we can’t comply with every national law”
       
      In this case, the value of standards is apparent. We are not asking for
      compliance to a single set of laws, instead we are referring to the
      international standards upon which most law is based
       
    11. “We have made a corporate decision to apply to a single international standard”
      In this case, it is reasonable to ask which standards and to ask for a
      compliance report against those standards
      “We’ll do it, but it’s going to cost you”
      One can choose to accept the additional costs, but this will need to be
      factored into the total cost of procurement within the competitive
      dialogue with all those offering a tender.
    12. You should not be surprised if during this process, other interests within
      your organisation press forward issues. For instance
      “We don’t have any disabled learners or members of staff”
      This is not the issue, we need to plan for those who could become
      disabled and anticipate the reasonable adjustments we might need to
      make
      “Disabled people aren’t capable of doing this job anyway”
      Based on what evidence, again the issue of reasonable adjustment and
      the law would be relevant
    13. “Disabled learners have never complained before”
      Again unless you have been proactive in seeking opinions from disabled
      learners then this would not be a useful piece of evidence, it makes
      assumptions that the learner is willing to complain and in fact believes
      that a complaint would be listened to, or even that they know how to
      complain.
      “It does what we want at a price we’re happy with but it isn’t accessible. We’ll take the risk.”
      Ultimately this a decision that can be taken, in this case it is important
      that this decision is signed off by the appropriate level of authority and
      that they have been informed of the potential consequences and are
      willing to accept responsibility for those risks.
    14. User Testing – Understanding Interface
      Solutions for pupils with VI
      Supernova – Dolphin Software
      Jaws - Freedom Scientific
      Windows Accessibility – Magnifier and Narrator
      Claroview – ClaroSoft
      CCTV/Hand held magnifiers
      Solutions for pupils with Physical Needs
      Clicker 5 - Crick Software
      Grid 2 – Sensory software
      Windows on screen keyboard
      Dragon Naturally Speaking - Nuance
      Vista Voice recognition
      Alternative access devices including Switches, touch screen, joystick, eye tracker, head pointer, variety of keyboards and pointing devices
      Solutions for pupils with communication needs
      • Symwriter – Widgit Software
      • Communicate in Print – Widgit Software
      • Clicker 5
       
      Solutions for pupils with Dyslexia
      • Text Help Read and Write – TextHelp Systems
      • Screen Tinter – Thomson Software
      • ClaroRead – Clarosoft
      • Clicker 5
      • Dragon Naturally Speaking,
      • Digital voice recorder,
    15. Checklists
    16. Procurement Flowchart
    17. Many Thanks and Questions
      David Banes
      Director of Development
      AbilityNet
      david.banes@abilitynet.org.uk
      07989 409287
      Twitter @abilitynet
      Skype david_banes_abilitynet

    + David BanesDavid Banes, 4 weeks ago

    custom

    93 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Guide to procuremnet of accessible technology - pre more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 93
      • 93 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories