   Defining Terms    ›   Software as Intellectual Property    ›   Proprietary Software    ›   Open Source Software    ›  ...
 Software as Intellectual Property Proprietary Software Open Source Software Freeware
 Software is valuable intellectual property A software license is the contract  between the software owner and the  lice...
 Fairly standard terms Source code availability    › Source code not provided - trying to figure      out inner workings...
 Restrictions on dissemination. Licensee  and users strictly defined. Licensee has  no right to share with those not defi...
   Warranties provided:    › Defects in media and existence of viruses,      Trojan Horses, backdoors, etc;    › Can nego...
 Non-proprietary software which may or  may not be used commercially; Typically licensed under an Open Source  license (...
 Original software owner or developer  chooses to limit the rights that he asserts  over licensees Licensees, subject to...
 Source code to original product always  provided; Licensee can modify or enhance source code  (create “derivative works...
 Generally, software provided “AS-IS” with  no warranties, warranties excluded; No indemnification; No maintenance or s...
 No standard open source license, but  GPL most widely used (roughly 85% of  open source software); Terms include:    › ...
 Developed by Netscape for the Mozilla  browser Terms include:     Very similar to the GPL but,     Can charge royalti...
   Terms include:    › User freedom to distribute and/or modify;    › No requirement for source code availability      in...
   Terms include:    › User freedom to distribute and/or modify;    › Viral license, source code is always made      avai...
 Governs the Apache web-server  software. Terms include:    › User freedom to distribute and/or modify;    › No requirem...
   Terms will always include preservation of    copyright notices and warranty disclaimers;   Some licenses will be extr...
 Indemnification; Maintenance and support; Licensee doesn’t have to have open  source savvy staff; Licensees’ rights i...
   COST!    › License fee    › Product bundling—example: Microsoft office.   Licensee cannot modify or enhance the    co...
 PRICE: Generally no or low license fees; Availability of source code coupled with  permission to make modifications; A...
   No indemnification; if a third party claims    that licensee is using code that the third    party developed, the lice...
Made By :-             ABHISHEKGOEL             9 ‘C’              th
Made by:- ABHISHEK             GOELSubmitted to:-   Ms. Himani
THEEND
Open Source File
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Open Source File

910

Published on

This is the presentation related to the chapter control structures in the class IX

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
910
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
55
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Open Source File

  1. 1.  Defining Terms › Software as Intellectual Property › Proprietary Software › Open Source Software › Freeware Advantages and Disadvantages Sharing Software within the Commonwealth Best Value Procurement
  2. 2.  Software as Intellectual Property Proprietary Software Open Source Software Freeware
  3. 3.  Software is valuable intellectual property A software license is the contract between the software owner and the licensee defining terms of use of software Software owners also have enumerated rights under the law to control the use and distribution of their property (with few exceptions) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and contract law typically protect software owners’ rights
  4. 4.  Fairly standard terms Source code availability › Source code not provided - trying to figure out inner workings of software through reverse engineering or decompiling of operating mode is forbidden; OR › Source code provided - may or may not include permission to create modifications and enhancements
  5. 5.  Restrictions on dissemination. Licensee and users strictly defined. Licensee has no right to share with those not defined as licensee users in license; Licensor indemnifies licensees against third party infringement claims; Often, have to sign a new license each time new licensee obtains the code.
  6. 6.  Warranties provided: › Defects in media and existence of viruses, Trojan Horses, backdoors, etc; › Can negotiate for warranties re: meet specifications in product documentation Maintenance and support terms included (although may be in separate document).
  7. 7.  Non-proprietary software which may or may not be used commercially; Typically licensed under an Open Source license (not given away) › License terms differ from proprietary software license terms Source code is generally made available › Legal restriction on reverse engineering (under the DMCA) do not apply.
  8. 8.  Original software owner or developer chooses to limit the rights that he asserts over licensees Licensees, subject to license terms, can: › make and distribute copies of software; › build upon software to create modifications or other works.
  9. 9.  Source code to original product always provided; Licensee can modify or enhance source code (create “derivative works”) or include source code with other license types (create “larger works”); Licensee may be required to share modifications with the world (in source and/or binary form), but not necessarily; Licensee may be prohibited from charging royalties for derivative and larger works, but not necessarily.
  10. 10.  Generally, software provided “AS-IS” with no warranties, warranties excluded; No indemnification; No maintenance or support.
  11. 11.  No standard open source license, but GPL most widely used (roughly 85% of open source software); Terms include: › User freedom to distribute and/or modify; › Requirement that original and modified source code be always made available to the world under the terms of the original license; › Must retain copyright notices and warranty disclaimers; › Does not include grant of patent licenses; › Extremely viral license.
  12. 12.  Developed by Netscape for the Mozilla browser Terms include:  Very similar to the GPL but,  Can charge royalties for modified versions;  Can include source code within larger works licensed under different license types, thus license does not ‘infect’ all downstream projects;  Must retain copyright notices and warranty disclaimers;  May provide additional warranties to downstream users but may have to indemnify original developer for any claims arising as a result;  Includes grant patent licenses;  Less viral than the GPL.
  13. 13.  Terms include: › User freedom to distribute and/or modify; › No requirement for source code availability in downstream distribution; › The program can be distributed in executable form thus allowing downstream users to develop, sell, and install customized software packages without having to make all customizations available to the world; › Must retain all copyright notices and warranty disclaimers; › Includes grant of patent licenses.
  14. 14.  Terms include: › User freedom to distribute and/or modify; › Viral license, source code is always made available to the world; › Must retain copyright notices and warranty disclaimers; › Requires indemnification for attorney’s fees incurred as a result of potential claims or litigation.
  15. 15.  Governs the Apache web-server software. Terms include: › User freedom to distribute and/or modify; › No requirement for source code to be made available to the world in downstream distribution; › Must retain all copyright notices and warranty disclaimers; › Not a viral license.
  16. 16.  Terms will always include preservation of copyright notices and warranty disclaimers; Some licenses will be extremely viral: thus prohibiting any other type of downstream licensing apart from under the terms of the original license; Some with permit inclusion of code within proprietized programs; In some instances, provision of additional warranties and support will trigger indemnification provisions to the original developer.
  17. 17.  Indemnification; Maintenance and support; Licensee doesn’t have to have open source savvy staff; Licensees’ rights if: › media is defective; › software contains viruses, backdoors, etc.; › product fails to meet written technical/business specifications.
  18. 18.  COST! › License fee › Product bundling—example: Microsoft office. Licensee cannot modify or enhance the code; Often not built to open standards, leading to interoperability problems; Shut off from continuing development and information sharing in open source community; Some proprietary code is not as good as its open source counterparts.
  19. 19.  PRICE: Generally no or low license fees; Availability of source code coupled with permission to make modifications; Access open source development community, which may be very active with respect to code used. Continuing improvement; outstanding development; More likely to be built to open standards, so interoperable with other open standards systems.
  20. 20.  No indemnification; if a third party claims that licensee is using code that the third party developed, the licensee has no one to pay his legal fees and damage award (SCO v. IBM); No maintenance and support (unless purchased separately); No warranties regarding media, viruses, and performance; Staff must be open source savvy; License terms are NOT standard: thus important to pay close attention to terms.
  21. 21. Made By :- ABHISHEKGOEL 9 ‘C’ th
  22. 22. Made by:- ABHISHEK GOELSubmitted to:- Ms. Himani
  23. 23. THEEND
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×