A set of technologies and applications that enable efficient interaction among people, content, and data in support of collectively fostering new businesses, technology offerings, and social structures.
According to Tim Berners-Lee
Web 2.0 is of course a piece of jargon, nobody even knows what it means.
According to Ross Mayfield
Web 2.0 is made out of people
That's all I have to say.
According to Dave Simon
Web 2.0 is like porn. I can’t define it, but I know it when I see it.
According to Weebl & Bob
According to Wikipedia
Define by Example?
Blogs
… have been around since 1994.
Wikis
… have been around since 1995
Tagging
… has been around for centuries.
Still, something happened in 2005…
… so what exactly is Web 2.0?
Web 2.0 is what enables complex web technology to actually be used.
Blogs
Wikis
[ ][ ]
Tagging
ADD TAGS:
Web 2.0
Examples Applying lessons learned from Web 2.0 to web content management
Web 2.0 vs. CMS
Blogs
Wikis
Tagging
ADD TAGS:
Success?
Pilot Faculty of Law, live December 2005
1994 - 2005: 2200 pages produced
2006: 7000 items produced
2005: on average 4.000 visits a day
2007: on average 10.000 visits a day
Lessons Learned
Using Web 2.0 is not synonymous to implementing blogs or wikis It could create a chaos of content repositories and most organizations don’t have the scale to succeed at “social networking”
Most CMS don’t really get Web 2.0 “ I can't even count how many CMS products have added drag and drop sorting to their old "operating system" of a user interface just to claim they understand and deliver a Web 2.0 experience” - Seth Gottlieb, Content Here
… but…
Web 2.0 learns valuable lessons on what really works Working intuitively is of enormous value and enables managing complexity
Web 2.0 principles make content management easier and fun Sorry Gutenberg, but using paper as a metaphor is like, soooo 1450.
Presented by Adriaan Bloem at the CM Pros Fall 2007 more
Presented by Adriaan Bloem at the CM Pros Fall 2007 Summit on Web Content Management, November 26, 2007.
While blogs and wikis get all the attention, most organizations are still trying to get a grip on their “standard” web content management implementation. What is it that makes many web 2.0 applications a success, while most CMS implementations are so hard on their users? How can we use this to make these implementations work?
Adriaan will start off the discussion with a presentation on why a blogging cat is funny, but not very useful, while there’s a lot to be learned from the fact that it’s apparently so easy to blog even a cat can do it. After a couple of examples, you’re invited to join in on the discussion of what we can learn from web 2.0, and more importantly, how we can use this to our advantage in classic CMS implementations. less
0 comments
Post a comment