From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in
the German Wikipedia. (January 2012)
Click [show] on the right to read important instructions before translating. [show]
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article
by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and
removed. (February 2007)
This article needs attention from an expert in Psychology. Please add a reason or a talk
parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Psychology or
the Psychology Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (October 2009)
Applied behavior analysis
Industrial and organizational
Gestalt psychology or gestaltism (German: Gestalt – "essence or shape of an entity's complete
form") is a theory of mind and brain of the Berlin School; the operational principle of gestalt
psychology is that the brain is holistic, parallel, and analog, with self-organizing tendencies. The
principle maintains that the human eye sees objects in their entirety before perceiving their
individual parts, suggesting the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Gestalt psychology
tries to understand the laws of our ability to acquire and maintain stable percepts in a noisy
world. Gestalt psychologists stipulate that perception is the product of complex interactions
among various stimuli. Contrary to the behaviorist approach to understanding the elements of
cognitive processes, gestalt psychologists sought to understand their organization (Carlson and
Heth, 2010). The gestalt effect is the form-generating capability of our senses, particularly with
respect to the visual recognition of figures and whole forms instead of just a collection of simple
lines and curves. In psychology, gestaltism is often opposed to structuralism. The phrase "The
whole is greater than the sum of the parts" is often used when explaining gestalt theory, though
this is a mistranslation of Kurt Koffka's original phrase, "The whole is other than the sum of the
parts". Gestalt theory allows for the breakup of elements from the whole situation into what it
o 1.1 Gestalt therapy
2 Theoretical framework and methodology
3 Support from cybernetics and neurology
o 4.1 Emergence
6 Gestalt laws of grouping
7 Gestalt views in psychology
o 7.1 Fuzzy-trace theory
8 Uses in human–computer interaction
9 Quantum cognition modeling
11 See also
13 External links
The concept of gestalt was first introduced in contemporary philosophy and psychology by
Christian von Ehrenfels (a member of the School of Brentano). The idea of gestalt has its roots in
theories by David Hume, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Immanuel Kant, David Hartley, and
Ernst Mach. Max Wertheimer's unique contribution was to insist that the "gestalt" is perceptually
primary, defining the parts it was composed from, rather than being a secondary quality that
emerges from those parts, as von Ehrenfels's earlier Gestalt-Qualität had been.
Both von Ehrenfels and Edmund Husserl seem to have been inspired by Mach's work Beiträge
zur Analyse der Empfindungen (Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations, 1886), in
formulating their very similar concepts of gestalt and figural moment, respectively. On the
philosophical foundations of these ideas see Foundations of Gestalt Theory (Smith, ed., 1988).
Early 20th century theorists, such as Kurt Koffka, Max Wertheimer, and Wolfgang Köhler
(students of Carl Stumpf) saw objects as perceived within an environment according to all of
their elements taken together as a global construct. This 'gestalt' or 'whole form' approach sought
to define principles of perception—seemingly innate mental laws that determined the way
objects were perceived. It is based on the here and now, and in the way things are seen. Images
can be divided into figure or ground. The question is what is percieved at first glance: the figure
in front, or the background.
These laws took several forms, such as the grouping of similar, or proximate, objects together,
within this global process. Although gestalt has been criticized for being merely descriptive, it
has formed the basis of much further research into the perception of patterns and objects
(Carlson et al. 2000), and of research into behavior, thinking, problem solving and
The founders of Gestalt therapy, Fritz and Laura Perls, had worked with Kurt Goldstein, a
neurologist who had applied principles of Gestalt psychology to the functioning of the organism.
Laura Perls had been a Gestalt psychologist before she became a psychoanalyst and before she
began developing Gestalt therapy together with Fritz Perls. The extent to which Gestalt
psychology influenced Gestalt therapy is disputed, however. In any case it is not identical with
Gestalt psychology. On the one hand, Laura Perls preferred not to use the term "Gestalt" to name
the emerging new therapy, because she thought that the gestalt psychologists would object to
it; on the other hand Fritz and Laura Perls clearly adopted some of Goldstein's work. Thus,
though recognizing the historical connection and the influence, most gestalt psychologists
emphasize that gestalt therapy is not a form of gestalt psychology.
Theoretical framework and methodology
The investigations developed at the beginning of the 20th century, based on traditional scientific
methodology, divided the object of study into a set of elements that could be analyzed separately
with the objective of reducing the complexity of this object. Contrary to this methodology, the
school of gestalt practiced a series of theoretical and methodological principles that attempted to
redefine the approach to psychological research.
The theoretical principles are the following:
Principle of Totality—The conscious experience must be considered globally (by taking
into account all the physical and mental aspects of the individual simultaneously) because
the nature of the mind demands that each component be considered as part of a system of
Principle of psychophysical isomorphism – A correlation exists between conscious
experience and cerebral activity.
Based on the principles above the following methodological principles are defined:
Phenomenon experimental analysis—In relation to the Totality Principle any
psychological research should take as a starting point phenomena and not be solely
focused on sensory qualities.
Biotic experiment—The school of gestalt established a need to conduct real experiments
that sharply contrasted with and opposed classic laboratory experiments. This signified
experimenting in natural situations, developed in real conditions, in which it would be
possible to reproduce, with higher fidelity, what would be habitual for a subject.
Support from cybernetics and neurology
In the 1940s and 1950s, laboratory research in neurology and what became known as cybernetics
on the mechanism of frogs' eyes indicate that perception of 'gestalts' (in particular gestalts in
motion) is perhaps more primitive and fundamental than 'seeing' as such:
A frog hunts on land by vision... He has no fovea, or region of greatest acuity in vision,
upon which he must center a part of the image... The frog does not seem to see or, at any
rate, is not concerned with the detail of stationary parts of the world around him. He will
starve to death surrounded by food if it is not moving. His choice of food is determined
only by size and movement. He will leap to capture any object the size of an insect or
worm, providing it moves like one. He can be fooled easily not only by a piece of
dangled meat but by any moving small object... He does remember a moving thing
provided it stays within his field of vision and he is not distracted. Cyberneticist
Valentin Turchin points out that the gestalts observed in what we usually imagine are
'still images' are exactly the kind of 'moving objects' that make the frog's retina respond:
The lowest-level concepts related to visual perception for a human being probably differ
little from the concepts of a frog. In any case, the structure of the retina in mammals and
in human beings is the same as in amphibians. The phenomenon of distortion of
perception of an image stabilized on the retina gives some idea of the concepts of the
subsequent levels of the hierarchy. This is a very interesting phenomenon. When a person
looks at an immobile object, "fixes" it with his eyes, the eyeballs do not remain
absolutely immobile; they make small involuntary movements. As a result the image of
the object on the retina is constantly in motion, slowly drifting and jumping back to the
point of maximum sensitivity. The image "marks time" in the vicinity of this point.
The key principles of gestalt systems are emergence, reification, multistability and invariance.
Emergence is the process of complex pattern formation from simpler rules. It is demonstrated by
the perception of the dog picture, which depicts a Dalmatian dog sniffing the ground in the shade
of overhanging trees. The dog is not recognized by first identifying its parts (feet, ears, nose, tail,
etc.), and then inferring the dog from those component parts. Instead, the dog is perceived as a
whole, all at once. However, this is a description of what occurs in vision and not an explanation.
Gestalt theory does not explain how the percept of a dog emerges.
Reification is the constructive or generative aspect of perception, by which the experienced
percept contains more explicit spatial information than the sensory stimulus on which it is based.
For instance, a triangle is perceived in picture A, though no triangle is there. In pictures B and D
the eye recognizes disparate shapes as "belonging" to a single shape, in C a complete threedimensional shape is seen, where in actuality no such thing is drawn.
Reification can be explained by progress in the study of illusory contours, which are treated by
the visual system as "real" contours.
See also: Reification (fallacy)
the Necker Cube and the Rubin vase, two examples of multistability
Multistability (or multistable perception) is the tendency of ambiguous perceptual experiences to
pop back and forth unstably between two or more alternative interpretations. This is seen for
example in the Necker cube, and in Rubin's Figure/Vase illusion shown here. Other examples
include the Three-legged blivet and artist M. C. Escher's artwork and the appearance of flashing
marquee lights moving first one direction and then suddenly the other. Again, gestalt does not
explain how images appear multistable, only that they do.
Invariance is the property of perception whereby simple geometrical objects are recognized
independent of rotation, translation, and scale; as well as several other variations such as elastic
deformations, different lighting, and different component features. For example, the objects in A
in the figure are all immediately recognized as the same basic shape, which are immediately
distinguishable from the forms in B. They are even recognized despite perspective and elastic
deformations as in C, and when depicted using different graphic elements as in D.
Computational theories of vision, such as those by David Marr, have had more success in
explaining how objects are classified.
Emergence, reification, multistability, and invariance are not necessarily separable modules to
model individually, but they could be different aspects of a single unified dynamic
Main article: Principles of grouping
The fundamental principle of gestalt perception is the law of prägnanz (in the German language,
pithiness), which says that we tend to order our experience in a manner that is regular, orderly,
symmetric, and simple. Gestalt psychologists attempt to discover refinements of the law of
prägnanz, and this involves writing down laws that, hypothetically, allow us to predict the
interpretation of sensation, what are often called "gestalt laws". These include:
Law of closure
Law of similarity
Law of proximity
Gestalt laws of grouping
A major aspect of Gestalt psychology is that it implies that the mind understands external stimuli
as whole rather than the sum of their parts. The wholes are structured and organized using
grouping laws. The various laws are called laws or principles, depending on the paper where
they appear—but for simplicity sake, this article uses the term laws. These laws deal with the
sensory modality vision however there are analogous laws for other sensory modalities including
auditory, tactile, gustatory and olfactory (Bregman – GP). The visual Gestalt principles of
grouping were introduced in Wertheimer (1923). Through the 1930s and '40s Wertheimer,
Kohler and Koffka formulated many of the laws of grouping through the study of visual
Law of Proximity—The law of proximity states that when an individual perceives an assortment
of objects they perceive objects that are close to each other as forming a group. For example, in
the figure that illustrates the Law of proximity, there are 72 circles, but we perceive the
collection of circles in groups. Specifically, we perceive there is a group of 36 circles on the left
side of the image, and three groups of 12 circles on the right side of the image. This law is often
used in advertising logos to emphasize which aspects of events are associated.
Law of Similarity—The law of similarity states that elements within an assortment of objects
are perceptually grouped together if they are similar to each other. This similarity can occur in
the form of shape, colour, shading or other qualities. For example, the figure illustrating the law
of similarity portrays 36 circles all equal distance apart from one another forming a square. In
this depiction, 18 of the circles are shaded dark and 18 of the circles are shaded light. We
perceive the dark circles as grouped together, and the light circles as grouped together forming
six horizontal lines within the square of circles. This perception of lines is due to the law of
Law of Closure—The law of closure states that individuals perceive objects such as shapes,
letters, pictures, etc., as being whole when they are not complete. Specifically, when parts of a
whole picture are missing, our perception fills in the visual gap. Research shows that the reason
the mind completes a regular figure that is not perceived through sensation is to increase the
regularity of surrounding stimuli. For example, the figure that depicts the law of closure portrays
what we perceive as a circle on the left side of the image and a rectangle on the right side of the
image. However, gaps are missing from the shapes. If the law of closure did not exist, the image
would depict an assortment of different lines with different lengths, rotations, and curvatures—
but with the law of closure, we perceptually combine the lines into whole shapes.
Law of Symmetry—The law of symmetry states that the mind perceives objects as being
symmetrical and forming around a center point. It is perceptually pleasing to divide objects into
an even number of symmetrical parts. Therefore, when two symmetrical elements are
unconnected the mind perceptually connects them to form a coherent shape. Similarities between
symmetrical objects increase the likelihood that objects are grouped to form a combined
symmetrical object. For example, the figure depicting the law of symmetry shows a
configuration of square and curled brackets. When the image is perceived, we tend to observe
three pairs of symmetrical brackets rather than six individual brackets.
Law of Common Fate—The law of common fate states that objects are perceived as lines that
move along the smoothest path. Experiments using the visual sensory modality found that
movement of elements of an object produce paths that individuals perceive that the objects are
on. We perceive elements of objects to have trends of motion, which indicate the path that the
object is on. The law of continuity implies the grouping together of objects that have the same
trend of motion and are therefore on the same path. For example, if there are an array of dots and
half the dots are moving upward while the other half are moving downward, we would perceive
the upward moving dots and the downward moving dots as two distinct units.
Law of Continuity—The law of continuity states that elements of objects tend to be grouped
together, and therefore integrated into perceptual wholes if they are aligned within an object. In
cases where there is an intersection between objects, individuals tend to perceive the two objects
as two single uninterrupted entities. Stimuli remain distinct even with overlap. We are less likely
to group elements with sharp abrupt directional changes as being one object.
Law of Good Gestalt—The law of good gestalt explains that elements of objects tend to be
perceptually grouped together if they form a pattern that is regular, simple, and orderly. This law
implies that as individuals perceive the world, they eliminate complexity and unfamiliarity so
they can observe a reality in its most simplistic form. Eliminating extraneous stimuli helps the
mind create meaning. This meaning created by perception implies a global regularity, which is
often mentally prioritized over spatial relations. The law of good gestalt focuses on the idea of
conciseness, which is what all of gestalt theory is based on. This law has also been called the law
of Prägnanz. Prägnanz is a German word that directly translates to mean "pithiness" and
implies the ideas of salience, conciseness and orderliness.
Law of Past Experience—The law of past experience implies that under some circumstances
visual stimuli are categorized according to past experience. If two objects tend to be observed
within close proximity, or small temporal intervals, the objects are more likely to be perceived
together. For example, the English language contains 26 letters that are grouped to form words
using a set of rules. If an individual reads an English word they have never seen, they use the law
of past experience to interpret the letters "L" and "I" as two letters beside each other, rather than
using the law of closure to combine the letters and interpret the object as an uppercase U.
The gestalt laws of grouping have recently been subjected to modern methods of scientific
evaluation by examining the visual cortex using cortical algorithms. Current Gestalt
psychologists have described their findings, which showed correlations between physical visual
representations of objects and self-report perception as the laws of seeing.
Gestalt views in psychology
Gestalt psychologists find it is important to think of problems as a whole. Max Wertheimer
considered thinking to happen in two ways: productive and reproductive.
Productive thinking is solving a problem with insight.
This is a quick insightful unplanned response to situations and environmental interaction.
Reproductive thinking is solving a problem with previous experiences and what is already
This is a very common thinking. For example, when a person is given several segments of
information, he/she deliberately examines the relationships among its parts, analyzes their
purpose, concept, and totality, he/she reaches the "aha!" moment, using what is already known.
Understanding in this case happens intentionally by reproductive thinking.
Another gestalt psychologist, Perkins, believes insight deals with three processes:
1. Unconscious leap in thinking.
2. The increased amount of speed in mental processing.
3. The amount of short-circuiting that occurs in normal reasoning.
Views going against the gestalt psychology are:
1. Nothing-special view
2. Neo-gestalt view
3. The Three-Process View
Gestalt psychology should not be confused with the gestalt therapy of Fritz Perls, which is only
peripherally linked to gestalt psychology. A strictly gestalt psychology-based therapeutic method
is Gestalt Theoretical Psychotherapy, developed by the German gestalt psychologist and
psychotherapist Hans-Jürgen Walter.
Fuzzy-trace theory, a dual process model of memory and reasoning, was also derived from
Gestalt Psychology. Fuzzy-trace theory posits that we encode information into two separate
traces: verbatim and gist. Information stored in verbatim is exact memory for detail (the
individual parts of a pattern, for example) while information stored in gist is semantic and
conceptual (what we perceive the pattern to be). The effects seen in Gestalt psychology can be
attributed to the way we encode information as gist.
Uses in human–computer interaction
The gestalt laws are used in user interface design. The laws of similarity and proximity can, for
example, be used as guides for placing radio buttons. They may also be used in designing
computers and software for more intuitive human use. Examples include the design and layout of
a desktop's shortcuts in rows and columns. Gestalt psychology also has applications in computer
vision for trying to make computers "see" the same things as humans do.
James J. Gibson was a Gestalt Psychologist who focused on vision, and what he termed
ecological perception. He also coined the term affordance, which has been productive of various
human factors and usability research.
Quantum cognition modeling
Main article: Quantum cognition#Modeling of Gestalt perception
Similarities between Gestalt phenomena and quantum mechanics have been pointed out, among
others, by chemist Anton Amann, who commented that "similarities between Gestalt perception
and quantum mechanics are on a level of a parable" yet may give useful insight nonetheless.
Physicist Elio Conte and co-workers have proposed abstract, mathematical models to describe
the time dynamics of cognitive associations with mathematical tools borrowed from quantum
mechanics and has discussed psychology experiments in this context. A similar approach
has been suggested by physicists David Bohm, Basil Hiley and philosopher Paavo Pylkkänen
with the notion that mind and matter both emerge from an "implicate order". The models
involve non-commutative mathematics; such models account for situations in which the outcome
of two measurements performed one after the other can depend on the order in which they are
performed—a pertinent feature for psychological processes, as it is obvious that an experiment
performed on a conscious person may influencing the outcome of a subsequent experiment by
changing the state of mind of that person.
In some scholarly communities, such as cognitive psychology and computational neuroscience,
gestalt theories of perception are criticized for being descriptive rather than explanatory in
nature. For this reason, they are viewed by some as redundant or uninformative. For example,
Bruce, Green & Georgeson conclude the following regarding gestalt theory's influence on the
study of visual perception:
The physiological theory of the gestaltists has fallen by the wayside, leaving us with a set
of descriptive principles, but without a model of perceptual processing. Indeed, some of
their "laws" of perceptual organisation today sound vague and inadequate. What is meant
by a "good" or "simple" sh