Collaborative Reference Desk Workstations

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Collaborative Reference Desk Workstations - Presentation Transcript

    1. Alan W. Aldrich I. D. Weeks Library University of South Dakota
      • Analysis of different models of reference
      • Design of a collaborative workstation
        • Easily implemented
        • Inexpensive
        • Appreciated by patrons and librarians
        • Multiple uses
      • Access Accuracy
      • Authority Individualism
      • Instruction Knowledge
      • Timeliness Thoroughness
      • Structure +
      • Values =
      • Outcomes
      • Traditional Reference Desk/Station
      • Teaching Library Model
      • Roving Reference
      • Physical desk or station
      • Computer workstation(s)
      • Synchronous in location
      • Synchronous in time
      • Access
      • Accuracy
      • Individualism
      • Knowledge
      • Timeliness
      • Instruction is deemphasized
      • Thoroughness is deemphasized
      • Reference librarian as expert
      • Patron is dependent (Doherty, 2006).
      • Lack of co-browsing or collaboration
      • Lack of socially constructed knowledge
      • Lack of active learning
      • Computer equipped classroom
      • One workstation per student
      • Master workstation under control of librarian
      • Synchronous in time
      • Synchronous in place (physically)
      • Asynchronous in the search space
      • Authority
      • Critical Thinking
      • Knowledge
      • Instruction
      • Thoroughness
      • Values of accuracy, timeliness, and individualism deemphasized
      • Control/expertise paradigm reinforced
      • Lack of socially constructed knowledge ala Vygotsky
      • Lack of active learning
      • Lack of a fixed desk or supplements a traditional reference point
      • Mobile devices to extend the reach of reference
      • Devices located near the stacks
      • Dedicated staffing
      • Access
      • Accuracy
      • Individualization
      • Knowledge
      • Timeliness
      • Meeting patrons at the point of need
      • Meeting patrons at the place of need
      • Opportunities for collaboration i.e., co-browsing
      • Very short interactions
      • Need to pass patron off to a traditional reference desk
      • Instruction is deemphasized
      • Email reference
      • Instant Messenger (IM) reference
      • Chat reference
      • Asynchronous for location
      • Asynchronous for time
      • Loss of most communication channels
      • Loss of question negotiation (Pomerantz, 2005)
      • Access
      • Accuracy
      • Individualism
      • Timeliness
      • Can be a long delay
      • Good for questions
      • Not as good for detailed help due to asynchronous response times
      • Instruction not valued due to timeliness concerns
      • Thoroughness not always valued
      • Freeware or commercial software
      • Asynchronous for location
      • Synchronous for time
      • Loss of most communication channels
      • Access
      • Accuracy
      • Individualism
      • Timeliness
      • Immediate and real time interaction
      • Good for quick questions/short answers
      • Uses the tools younger patrons are familiar with
      • Interaction limited to only text, hypertext links, files, and emoticons
      • Question negotiation (Pomerantz, 2005) is limited
      • Instruction deemphasized
      • Asynchronous location
      • Synchronous communication
      • Some to many communication channels available
      • Shared interface
      • Access
      • Accuracy
      • Individualism
      • Instruction(facilitated by the structure)
      • Thoroughness
      • Can enable co-browsing
      • Immediate and real time interaction
      • Potential for real collaboration and interactive learning
      • High costs of software and training
      • Dual staffing - need to have chat ref separate from the physical reference desk (Pomerantz, 2005).
      • to facilitate instruction?
      • that is simple?
      • that is inexpensive?
      • that is practical?
      • that supports the values of reference?
      • Doherty, J. (2006). Reference interview or reference dialog? Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11 (3), 97-109.
      • Pomerantz, J.(2005). A conceptual framework and open research questions for chat-based reference service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (12), 1288-1302.
      • Tyckoson, D. A. (2001). What is the best model of reference service? Library Trends, 50 (2), 183-196.

    + aaldrichaaldrich, 2 years ago

    custom

    756 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation delivered at the 2008 Mountain Plains more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 756
      • 756 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 12
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories