Kant (OCR exam board)

14,406 views
14,569 views

Published on

0 Comments
12 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
14,406
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
992
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
213
Comments
0
Likes
12
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Kant (OCR exam board)

  1. 1. KantKant RevisionRevision
  2. 2. • Theory based on reason/ logic (a priori) • Kant is a Rationalist • Not clouded by emotion or sense experience • Ethical dilemmas based on intention, not unknown future outcomes = Deontological
  3. 3. DutyDuty • Doing what is right for no other reason than because it is good/ the right thing to do. • Doing duty for duty’s sake. • No emotions, ulterior motives, or authority command • “ Duty involves freely choosing the action” • As long as you do your duty you are morally blameless. • • Duty is discovered through the categorical imperative.
  4. 4. GoodwillGoodwill • Act only good if its an act based on the sense of good will. • A moral action is one performed with goodwill, wanting to benefit others – good intention. • “Goodwill shines forth like a precious jewel.” • Goodwill is the highest form of good. Kant used example of shop keeper: • A shop keeper might be pleasant but it is basically because s/he wants the customers money, in order to make profit. • “it is impossible to conceive of anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be taken as good without qualification, except good will.” • All other qualities e.g. kindness can be misused.
  5. 5. Moral lawMoral law • Duty + goodwill = moral law. • To act morally is to do one’s duty and one’s duty is to obey the moral law. • All moral life strives for the summon bonum. • “The moral law within” meaning that everyone can reason how they ought to behave in a situation. • Free to choose to act towards moral law or not. Summon Bonum • Humans seek an ultimate end called the supreme good, • Not achievable in this life, therefore must be an afterlife and a God/ Deity to guarantee this.
  6. 6. • Imperatives – essential acts/ must do’s • In “The Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.” Two types of imperatives: • Hypothetical: “If I want x I must do y.” • E.g. if I want to go on holiday, I must save up for it. Kant did not agree with this imperative because: 1. There is no obligation to obey this imperative unless you want to achieve the outcome = teleological. 2. No good as a absolute moral rule 3. Deals with any situation rather than ethics focused • Categorical: “You should” “You must” “You will” = absolute/ objective
  7. 7. Formulation 1: Universalisability “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it will become a universal law.” •The action is right if the maxim (general rule) can be universalized. •E.g. if everyone had an abortion universally: they are breaking their duty to reproduce but human race would also die out. Kant’s four examples: 1.Lying Promise 2.Suicide 3.Neglecting one’s talents 4.Refraining from helping others Formulation 2: Means to an end Every rational being exists “ as an end in himself and not merely as a means to be arbitrarily used by this or that will.” •Do not use people as a means to your own end Formulation 3: Kingdom of ends •Every individual should behave as though every other individual was an ‘end.’ •Everyone should act as if everyone else was following the Categorical Imperative Categorical Imperative: 3 Formulations
  8. 8. EvaluationEvaluation Can we switch off emotions? Is there any such thing as an action that does not have an ulterior motive (personal gain)? Ethics based on culture –cultural relativism e.g. china/ abortion is part of the law of the land which cannot be universalised. Cold and inhuman basis for morality: morals based on love and compassion not classed as moral? Meant to be deontological but isn't the question “what happens in everyone did this universally” looking at end results? What if your duty cannot be universalised? What happens when duties conflict? What happens if your duty leads to a bad outcome – Hitler?
  9. 9. Axe Murder WeaknessAxe Murder Weakness • Axe murderer story • Kant would argue it is your duty not to lie. • So even though you know the outcome will be the person dies, it is your duty/ action to tell the truth so you are morally blameless!!!!
  10. 10. HTTPS://ITHINKTHEREFOREIHTTPS://ITHINKTHEREFOREI TEACH.WORDPRESS.COM/TEACH.WORDPRESS.COM/ If you would like further information please follow the link below to my blog:

×