Risk and Return in World Markets

181
-1

Published on

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
181
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Risk and Return in World Markets

  1. 1. Risk and Return in World Markets October 16, 2001 By Students in QTM7010/MBA Statistics Professor Sharpe Babson College Fall, 2001
  2. 2. Objectives Deciding how to invest money is an important decision for many people but raw data can be misleading. By applying a variety of statistical tools to a sample of stock market data from 1995 the value of statistical analysis in making investment decisions becomes clear. The challenge then becomes one of interpreting the sample data to determine the degree of risk and return on investment for investors with differing objectives. Methods The sample data set is comprised of monthly and annual stock market returns for Australia, Europe, Japan and the US from 1975 to 1996. The data is presented in a box plot format for easier analysis1 because box plots provide a visualization of outliers, mean, standard deviation, and normal distribution. Since all of the sample data appears normal a comparison of the stock markets from different countries is possible. Descriptive statistics assign values to the mean, median, standard deviation, maximum values, minimum values and confidence intervals (CI). These statistics are useful for calculating more meaningful information such as the coefficient of variance (CV). The CV provides insight into the degree of risk taken by investing in the stock markets of various countries. Results1 The mean alone provides very little information but examination of both the mean and the median for the monthly returns indicates that the distribution for the US and European stock markets approximate normal curves. Conversely, Australia and Japan have greater variability most likely attributable to several large returns, causing the mean to be larger than the median and the data to be skewed to the right. By creating box plots for annual and monthly returns (Figure 1 and 2), the distributions are more easily compared. Australia clearly has the largest inter-quartile range indicating that the Australian stock market has the greatest variability in annual returns (excluding outliers). Not surprisingly, this is not as obvious in the monthly return box plot because annual returns often magnify what appear to be small variations in monthly returns. Neither the monthly nor annual box plots explain the volatility in the stock markets of Japan and Australia. Analyzing the standard deviation, CI and CV offers a more comprehensive explanation. The resulting data (Table 2 and 3) demonstrate that Japan has a larger standard deviation, CI and CV than Australia on the basis of annual return. In 1986 the Japanese stock market rewarded investors with a 72% return yet four years later investors suffered a 35% loss on their investment. A comparison of the CV calculations reveals that the US stock market appears to be less volatile, while providing the same average return as other, more volatile markets. Australia’s CV calculation varies more on a monthly basis while Japan tends to experience more variation on an annual basis. Since the CI for all countries overlaps, there is no statistically significant difference in the average returns between any countries in the sample from the case study. Nonetheless, it appears the US offers a more stable investment environment than Japan or Australia. Conclusion1 The concept of investing is based on the principle of risk and reward; the cliché “no free lunch” defines this principle. “No free lunch” represents investor’s appetite for risk, and the willingness to pay a premium in their search for maximizing total return. Historically investors have expected to be rewarded for taking risk. Some have invested in highly volatile markets, foregoing the safety of stable performance (premium payment) in exchange for the chance to make huge returns. However, Table 1 below (and Figures 3 and 4 of the appendix) illustrate that seeking additional risk does not necessarily correlate to higher returns on average (average investment return over time). Based on a sample time period (1/1/79 – 12/31/96), it is clear (based on annualized figures) that the United States and Europe offer investors higher returns with significantly less risk. Table 1: 1/1/79 - 12/31/96 Country Annualized Return, % Annualized StdDev, % United States 16.14 14.39 Europe 14.24 16.14 Japan 11.17 24.09 2 Australia 12.85 24.77
  3. 3. Despite posting some of the higher monthly returns, the volatility of the Australian and Japanese markets does not offer investors an appealing risk/reward scenario. According to the data provided in this case, the average return for the four stock markets in the sample are very similar. In the Risk/Return Diagram (Figure 3), areas toward the right (more standard deviation of returns) are only attractive with increases in total annualized return. The upper left corner is the point of optimization (high returns, low deviation). Therefore, the European and United States stock markets offered investors a more appealing risk/reward investment strategy. Japanese and Australian investors were not rewarded for investing in such volatile markets. Further analysis, using a 36-Month moving window, helps support our hypothesis. Based on a five year (12/31/91 – 12/31/96), rolling 36-month annualized window, Figure 4 provides a graphical illustration of the extreme volatility in the Japanese and Australian markets. “Spikes” in the Australian Market do go beyond any returns in the European or United States markets, but also dip below the low end of European returns. The Japanese market is shown to be very volatile in this graph, having extreme lows without the highs to reciprocate. This is an excellent example of how volatility may provide an opportunity for increased returns (Australia) over stable markets, but might also provide only poor to poorer results (Japan). In contrast to our suggested reasoning for investing in the United States and Europe, an additional attraction for risk-takers is the possibility to buy low and sell high over short periods of time. Again, the volatility presented in the Japanese and Australian markets gives high-risk takers the hunger for large returns. However, investors often “pay for their lunch” only to have it eaten by the market. 1 See Appendix 3
  4. 4. Appendix Monthly Returns Annual Returns Japan US-Annual US Japan-Annual Australia Europe Australia-Annual -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Europe -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 Australia-Annual Figures 1 and 2: Monthly and Annual Box Plots Table 2: Monthly Returns Variable Mean Median StDev 95.0 % CI 99.9 % CI CV* Europe 1.29 1.34 4.78 (0.71, 1.87) ( 0.31, 2.27) 3.71 Australia 1.32 1.15 7.03 (0.47, 2.17) (-0.12, 2.76) 5.33 US 1.30 1.35 4.19 (0.80, 1.81) ( 0.45, 2.16) 3.22 Japan 1.31 0.88 6.65 (0.50, 2.12) (-0.05, 2.67) 5.08 Table 3: Annual Returns Variable Mean Median StDev 95.0 % CI 99.9 % CI CV* Australia 15.84 18.30 23.17 (5.57, 26.12) (-3.03, 34.71) 1.46 Japan 15.71 19.81 23.77 (5.17, 26.25) (-3.65, 35.06) 1.51 US 15.65 17.98 12.07 (10.29, 21.00) ( 5.82, 25.48) .77 *Coefficient of Variation 4
  5. 5. Figure 3: Risk/Return Diagram RISK/RETURN 1/1/79 - 12/31/96 24 Eur ope 22 Austr alia United States 20 J apan Cash 18 Total Annualized Retur n, % 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 Created with MPI Stylus™ 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Total Annualized StdDev, % Figure 4: Rolling 36 Month Annualized Risk/Return Diagram 36-MONTH MOVING WINDOW* 12/31/91 - 12/31/96 25 Japan Australia 20 Europe United States Total Annualized Return, % Cash 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Total Annualized StdDev, % Created with MPI Stylus™ 5 Year (12/31/91 - 12/31/96) Countr y Annualized Retur n, % Annualized StdDev, % United States 15.06 8.65 Europe 13.16 11.00 Australia 12.36 16.96 Japan 0.26 23.60 5

×