Explain the complete organization of the content in the document. The main content of the document of group G is written about the method of the management of the sports shop. A final target is to make it to the shop to which the legendary athlete comes to a store building the sports shop in Aizu Wakamatsu. This sports shop is to make it to the shop that the name passes even all over the world.
Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. Yes, I do. The document of group G writes a very comprehensible, clear answer to an individual problem. People try to be told this document concisely very much. Because the document of the sports shop was written very enthusiastically, I thought it was wonderful because it was a content that really opened the shop.
What details are included in the document? It is written that the people of group G managed the sports shop. The difficulty of the management of the sports shop is written. It is written that it is few and the sports shop wants to build the shop in Aizu Wakamatsu in the document of this group. An individual role in the sports shop has been decided.
Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it? Yes, there was. I thought that the mistake of the grammar was found reading the document of group G. There is no signature of each people after Sincerely. The subject had come off after 'and' and there was a sentence with two per sentences verbs, too. I think that I become perfect overall if the respect is mended.
What is good about the writing? Why is it good? This document has gotten the problem a clear answer. Because the content was concisely very written reading the document of group G, I thought that it was very legible sentences. The document of the management of the sports shop was written and the interest sprang very much. The desire of building the sports shop was really seen.
Are there any errors that need to be corrected? I thought that the mistake of the grammar was found reading the document of group G. The subject had come off after and and there was a sentence with two per sentences verbs. There is no signature of each people after Sincerely. I think that I become perfect overall if the respect is mended.
What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make? The mistake of the grammar existed this document and there was dressing a lot, so I think that I become a wonderful document if the grammar is improved. I think the writing of the letter in the first question to become a very good document if the polite remark is used a little more.
Identify three basic differences between how your group authored the document and how this group authored it? The document of group G wrote a concise, clear answer though our document wrote a vague answer one by one. People of group G firmly thought about it while we had not thought the shop was really managed so much. The document of group G is written by a very legible form of a character.