Publishing for impactElements for a publication strategyWouter Gerritsma, Wageningen UR Library
Publishing tips about:
IF in 2010 for Agricultural Systems
50% of articles generate 90% of all cites Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for e...
Full screen image with title
How are we able to compare numbers? Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 2001 with 17 citations Scientist M. Biology...
Baselines for Mathematics
Baselines for Molecular Biology
Bibliometric indicators: An example Zee, F.P.v.d., G. Lettinga & J.A. Field (2001) Azo dye decolourisation by anaerobic g...
Baseline data to normalize citation data? Citations data source      Baselines Web of Science             ESI or InCites S...
H-index           Balance between productivity             and citedness           To rule out the effect of one        ...
In practice
Omnipresent h-index
Wageningen Yield: all information at hand
Select WoS table
Strong growth of publications, high impact
There is still room for optimization
The actual publications, categorization andtheir impact are provided
Research credits report (partly)
And view the publications
After excellent research,where should you publish?
Look at the IF in a different way
Journal quality and article impact 2003- 2009, for Wageningen URJournalQuartile    Pubs     RI     T10(%T10)           T1(...
Journal quality and impact global universities
Highlighting Dutch Universities
But where is Wageningen UR? And TIFN?
Journal selection and impact @WUR
Document type and article impact 2003-2009, for Wageningen URDocument  type      Pubs    RI     T10(%T10)           T1(%T1...
Journal                                                     IF           ArticlesPLoS One                                 ...
The impact factor Matthew effectThe journal in which papers are published have a stronginfluence on their citation rates, ...
Final word on journal qualityIt is better to publish one paper in a quality journal thanmultiple papers in lesser journals...
Networking
International cooperation                  No Cooperation             International Cooperation  University   % output    ...
Cooperation is effective                           WTI2 report 2011
Cooperation...Teams increasingly dominate solo authors in theproduction of knowledge. Research is increasingly done inteam...
Networking is important Start early, make use of Social Networking tools    ● Facebook    ● LinkedIn    ● Social networks...
On social networking
On using social media                        Melissa Terras Blog
Consider the Wikipedia For better or worse, people are guided to Wikipedia when searching the Web for biomedical informat...
Self citations and more
Self citations The model [...] implies that external citations are enhanced by self-citations, so that we have the “chain ...
More on referencesArticles that cite more references are in turncited more themselves  Webster, G. D., P. K. Jonason, et a...
More articles per research project? Publishing more articles results in higher citation counts if the articles provide su...
Journal selection and referencing withmultidisciplinary research Higher citations are linked to the citation-intensive di...
Citations                 Avg            Social Sciences   Clinical Medicine
Consider Open Access publishing Be aware of your copyrights when publishing Golden Road    ● PloS Journals, BMC, etc. G...
Other useful information - WaY http://library.wur.nl/way/ - Information for authors Publishing dissertations      ● http...
Is there a citation advantage for OA? Evidence is mounting    ● There is certainly no dis-advantange    ● Van Raan has st...
Deposit author versions to WaY                    http://edepot.wur.nl/169331
Publish your data! Henneken et al. (2011) "articles with links to data result    in higher citation rates than articles w...
What is in a name?
Claim your publications ResearcherID (Web of Science) Scopus Author ID (Scopus) Google Scholar Citations AuthorClaim ...
Who is the author of this thesis?
On the inside
On her own publication list
Get your affiliation rightFor the university:Chair group + Wageningen UniversityPlant Production Systems Group, Wageningen...
Thank you! http://tinyurl.com/7r67fmmhttp://viaf.org/viaf/285392263/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-0698http://wu.academia...
Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy for nutrigenomics
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy for nutrigenomics

632

Published on

Published in: Education

Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy for nutrigenomics

  1. 1. Publishing for impactElements for a publication strategyWouter Gerritsma, Wageningen UR Library
  2. 2. Publishing tips about:
  3. 3. IF in 2010 for Agricultural Systems
  4. 4. 50% of articles generate 90% of all cites Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079): 497-502. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497
  5. 5. Full screen image with title
  6. 6. How are we able to compare numbers? Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 2001 with 17 citations Scientist M. Biology has a publication from 2007 with 32 citations
  7. 7. Baselines for Mathematics
  8. 8. Baselines for Molecular Biology
  9. 9. Bibliometric indicators: An example Zee, F.P.v.d., G. Lettinga & J.A. Field (2001) Azo dye decolourisation by anaerobic granular sludge. Chemosphere 44:1169-1176. ● Citations from WoS: 94 Journal: Chemosphere ● Categorised by ESI in Environment/Ecology Baseline data for Environment/Ecology. ● Article from 2001 in Environment/ecology: ● On average: 19.36 citations; top 10%: 44 citations; top1%: 141 citations Relative Impact: 94 / 19.36 = 4.9
  10. 10. Baseline data to normalize citation data? Citations data source Baselines Web of Science ESI or InCites Scopus SciVal Strata Google Scholar none Propriatary A&I database none
  11. 11. H-index  Balance between productivity and citedness  To rule out the effect of one or two highly cited papers  Applicable to authors, journals, research groups, compounds, subjects etc…  But there are some serious doubts about robustness Waltman, L. & N. J. van Eck (2011). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(2):406-415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21678
  12. 12. In practice
  13. 13. Omnipresent h-index
  14. 14. Wageningen Yield: all information at hand
  15. 15. Select WoS table
  16. 16. Strong growth of publications, high impact
  17. 17. There is still room for optimization
  18. 18. The actual publications, categorization andtheir impact are provided
  19. 19. Research credits report (partly)
  20. 20. And view the publications
  21. 21. After excellent research,where should you publish?
  22. 22. Look at the IF in a different way
  23. 23. Journal quality and article impact 2003- 2009, for Wageningen URJournalQuartile Pubs RI T10(%T10) T1(%T1) Q1 7170 2.26 2444(34%) 505(7%) Q2 2919 1.26 578 (20%) 61 (2%) Q3 1303 0.93 143 (11%) 10 (1%) Q4 587 0.66 30 (5%) 6 (1%)Aggregate 11917 1.79 3195(27%) 582(5%) Source: Wageningen Yield, Feb. 2012
  24. 24. Journal quality and impact global universities
  25. 25. Highlighting Dutch Universities
  26. 26. But where is Wageningen UR? And TIFN?
  27. 27. Journal selection and impact @WUR
  28. 28. Document type and article impact 2003-2009, for Wageningen URDocument type Pubs RI T10(%T10) T1(%T1) Article 11212 1.62 2777(25%) 437( 4%)Review 705 4.45 418 (59%) 145(21%)Aggregate 11917 1.79 3195(27%) 582(5%) Source: Wageningen Yield, Feb. 2012
  29. 29. Journal IF ArticlesPLoS One 4.092 12American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 6.669 8BMC Genomics 4.073 8The Journal of Nutrition 3.916 7Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular and Cell Biologyof Lipids 5.269 6Journal of Biological Chemistry 4.773 5Cell Metabolism 13.668 4Hepatology 11.665 4Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 6.368 3Diabetes 8.286 3Endocrinology 4.459 3Gut 10.111 3Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America 9.681 3
  30. 30. The impact factor Matthew effectThe journal in which papers are published have a stronginfluence on their citation rates, as duplicate paperspublished in high-impact journals obtain, on average,twice as many citations as their identical counterpartspublished in journals with lower impact factors.. Larivière, V. and Y. Gingras (2010). The impact factors Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(2): 424-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21232
  31. 31. Final word on journal qualityIt is better to publish one paper in a quality journal thanmultiple papers in lesser journals. [...]. Try to publish injournals that have high impact factors; chances are yourpaper will have high impact, too, if accepted. Bourne, P. E. (2005). Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published. PLoS Computational Biology 1(5): e57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010057
  32. 32. Networking
  33. 33. International cooperation No Cooperation International Cooperation University % output Impact % output Impact EUR 16 1.13 40 2.00 RUG 23 1.07 39 1.43 RUN 20 0.94 39 1.46 TUD 33 1.24 43 1.52 TUE 29 1.50 41 1.52 UL 20 0.90 46 1.38 UM 16 0.90 42 1.48 UT 33 1.33 37 1.36 UU 21 1.54 39 1.61 UvA 20 1.15 43 1.64 UvT 25 1.15 42 1.21 VUA 18 1.15 43 1.68 WUR 21 1.12 49 1.27 Aggregate 25 1.15 44 1.53 NOWT (2008). Wetenschaps- en Technologie- Indicatoren 2008. Maastricht, Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie (NOWT).
  34. 34. Cooperation is effective WTI2 report 2011
  35. 35. Cooperation...Teams increasingly dominate solo authors in theproduction of knowledge. Research is increasingly done inteams across nearly all fields.Teams typically produce more frequently cited researchthan individuals do, and this advantage has beenincreasing over time.Teams now also produce the exceptionally high-impactresearch, even where that distinction was once the domainof solo authors. Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, et al. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827): 1036-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
  36. 36. Networking is important Start early, make use of Social Networking tools ● Facebook ● LinkedIn ● Social networks for scientists ● Academia.edu, Researchgate.net
  37. 37. On social networking
  38. 38. On using social media Melissa Terras Blog
  39. 39. Consider the Wikipedia For better or worse, people are guided to Wikipedia when searching the Web for biomedical information. So there is an increasing need for the scientific community to engage with Wikipedia to ensure that the information it contains is accurate and current. Logan, D.W., M. Sandal, P.P. Gardner, M. Manske & A. Bateman (2010). Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia. PLoS Comput Biol, 6(9): e1000941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
  40. 40. Self citations and more
  41. 41. Self citations The model [...] implies that external citations are enhanced by self-citations, so that we have the “chain reaction:” Larger size leads to more self- citations, which lead to more external citations. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1631-1643. 11/28
  42. 42. More on referencesArticles that cite more references are in turncited more themselves Webster, G. D., P. K. Jonason, et al. (2009). Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979 – 2008. Evolutionary Psychology 7(3): 348-362. http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep07348362.pdfTo be the best, cite the best Borrowed from: Corbyn, Z. (2010). "To be the best, cite the best." Nature News, 13 October 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.539 Reporting on the publication of Bornmann, L., F. de Moya Anegón, et al. (2010). Do Scientific Advancements Lean on the Shoulders of Giants? A Bibliometric Investigation of the Ortega Hypothesis. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13327 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013327.
  43. 43. More articles per research project? Publishing more articles results in higher citation counts if the articles provide sufficient substantive content to other researchers. ● Beware of the ethical standards ● Bornmann looked at total citations, not to relative impact Bornmann, L. & H.-D. Daniel (2007). Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8): 1100-1107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20531
  44. 44. Journal selection and referencing withmultidisciplinary research Higher citations are linked to the citation-intensive disciplines. Articles citing citation-intensive disciplines are more likely to be cited by those disciplines and, hence, obtain higher citation scores than would articles citing non- citation-intensive disciplines. Larivière, V. & Y. Gingras (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1): 126-131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21226 Larivière looked at citations per article but not relative to the field
  45. 45. Citations Avg Social Sciences Clinical Medicine
  46. 46. Consider Open Access publishing Be aware of your copyrights when publishing Golden Road ● PloS Journals, BMC, etc. Green Road ● Self archived copies (final author’s version) ● Wageningen Yield, PMC, etc. Open Choice ● Hybrid system, author pays and library pays ● Sage model (only 10% of standard fees)
  47. 47. Other useful information - WaY http://library.wur.nl/way/ - Information for authors Publishing dissertations ● http://library.wur.nl/way/authors/dissertations.html Copyright Information (copyright transfer – license to publish) ● http://library.wur.nl/way/authors/policies.html Open Access ● http://library.wur.nl/way/authors/open_access.html
  48. 48. Is there a citation advantage for OA? Evidence is mounting ● There is certainly no dis-advantange ● Van Raan has started to self archive his preprints ● Publishers allow self archiving of the final peer reviewed authors version ● Open Citation Project OA is important for developing countries Evans, J.A., Reimer, J., 2009. Open access and global participation in science. Science. 323, 1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154562
  49. 49. Deposit author versions to WaY http://edepot.wur.nl/169331
  50. 50. Publish your data! Henneken et al. (2011) "articles with links to data result in higher citation rates than articles without such links" http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618 Piwowar et al. (2007) "Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 Also relevant in the view of the latest developments (KNAW) Library assists in curating datasets ● mailto:data.library@wur.nl
  51. 51. What is in a name?
  52. 52. Claim your publications ResearcherID (Web of Science) Scopus Author ID (Scopus) Google Scholar Citations AuthorClaim MendeleyEnserink, M. (2009). Scientific Publishing: Are You Ready to Become a Number? Science,323(5922): 1662-1664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.323.5922.1662 ORCID
  53. 53. Who is the author of this thesis?
  54. 54. On the inside
  55. 55. On her own publication list
  56. 56. Get your affiliation rightFor the university:Chair group + Wageningen UniversityPlant Production Systems Group, WageningenUniversity, P.O. box ..., 6700 HA Wageningen, TheNetherlandsFor the institutes:Institute + Wageningen University & Research CentreAlterra, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O.box ..., 6700 HA Wageningen, The Netherlands
  57. 57. Thank you! http://tinyurl.com/7r67fmmhttp://viaf.org/viaf/285392263/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-0698http://wu.academia.edu/WouterGerritsmahttp://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-4161-2008http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/wouter-gerritsmahttp://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wouter_Gerritsmahttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3iDBE-MAAAAJhttp://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/34373815http://www.narcis.nl/person/info:eu-repo/dai/nl/33714253X
  1. Gostou de algum slide específico?

    Recortar slides é uma maneira fácil de colecionar informações para acessar mais tarde.

×