citation analysis vlag

Bibliometric analysis for the peer review 2009 Wouter Gerritsma & Marianne Renkema Information specialists, Wageningen UR Library

Contents
Peer review 2009
Role of the library
Bibliometric indicators
Planning

Peer review of graduate schools in 2009
PE&RC, WIAS, EPS, VLAG, Ceres, Mansholt will be externally peer reviewed in 2009
3000 researchers published 9000 peer reviewed articles in the period 2002-2007
Criteria by QANU http:// www.qanu.nl / comasy / uploadedfiles /sep2003-2009.pdf
Quality
Productivity
Relevance
Vitality

What role does the library play?
Productivity of a group is extracted from METIS/WaY
Quality of a group based can be based on bibliometric indicators
Bibliometric analysis is not stipulated in the SEP !

Bibliometric indicators

I have been cited 33 times! But what does it mean?
Citation data from Web of Science
Research Fields from Essential Science Indicators
Baseline data from Essential Science Indicators

How do we compare numbers?
Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 1996 with 17 citations
Scientist M. Biology has a publication from 2003 with 24 citations

Baseline mathematics

Baseline Molecular Biology

Example
Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Contreras AML, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, de Vries SS, Weusthuis RA(1999) Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers . APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY , 52 (6): 741-755.
Time cited: 56 times
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (look up in journals menu ESI)
microbiology , ranked 13 th, 8.9 citations per article over past 10 years
Baseline data (from ESI)
Article from 1999 in microbiology: Average: 24.38 citations, 10%: 56 citations, 1%: 162 citations
RI= 56 / 24.38 = 2.3

Other bibliometric indicators
Number or percentage of highly cited articles
Number or percentage of uncited articles
H-index (g-index etc …)
Balancing productivity and citedness

h-index

Some results from candidates for professorship 9 4 1.34 11.23 348 31 Candidate F 8 11 4.92 8.70 235 27 Candidate E 8 1 0.83 7.21 137 19 Candidate D 4 0 0.65 7.69 123 16 Candidate C 9 8 2.61 10.61 191 18 Candidate B 8 3 1.23 8.19 172 21 Candidate A h-index Pubs top 10% RI Cits/Pub S cits Pubs Researcher

Some results for SENSE 68 9 215 60 19 474 1.69 1.56 22405.23 35002 2457 SENSE 60 8 105 35 18 254 1.67 1.59 14418.67 22872 1400 WIMEK 31 14 39 10 25 72 1.95 2.01 1763.53 3537 284 IVM 22 14 41 6 20 57 1.55 1.30 1906.09 2470 292 Copernicus 29 5 14 8 19 55 1.81 1.57 2525.22 3965 292 IES h-index As % of total pubs Uncited Pubs Pubs top 1% As % of total Pubs Pubs top 10% RI S Cits/ S Wavg S Wavg S cits Pubs Institute

Strengths Weaknesses 1.51(384) 0.98(338) Total 0.75(11) 1.66(1) Plant & Animal Science 0.88(12) Molecular Biology & Genetics 1.54(203) 1.05(29) Microbiology 2.30(45) 1.13(181) Environment/Ecology 3.35(1) 5.70(2) Engineering 0.36(8) 0.98(17) Chemistry 1.05(92) 0.59(100) Biology & Biochemistry 3.54(12) 0.94(6) Agricultural Sciences Group 2 Group 1

Planning

Planning
Sep. ’08 Searching WoS on basis of address fields, matching with Metis
Oct. ’08 Checking unmatched articles from Metis in WoS
Nov. ’08 Publication of personal reference lists with citation data in Way
Nov.-Dec. ’08 Checking publication lists by authors, feedback to contacts at chair groups
Feb. ’09 Update of citation data
Mar. ’09 Drafting reports in preparation for peer review

Thank you ! More info: http://wowter.net This presentation http:// www.slideshare.net/Wowter/citation+analysis vlag /

citation analysis vlag

by Wouter Gerritsma on Jun 17, 2008

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

citation analysis vlag — Presentation Transcript