Werksmans Construction & Engineering Seminar - Jason Smit presentation

329
-1

Published on

Dispute avoidance and dispute management in construction and engineering contracts

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
329
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Werksmans Construction & Engineering Seminar - Jason Smit presentation

  1. 1. CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING SEMINAR JASON SMIT
  2. 2. > “The Employer, the Contractor, the Project Manager and the Supervisor shall act as stated in this contract and in a spirit of mutual trust and co-operation” > NEC 3 Engineering and Construction Contract 2005 > Or: the parties will prepare a contract, ignore its provisions entirely and read it for the first time when a dispute arises > Many of the disputes which arise in these under these contracts are potentially avoidable if certain safeguards are put in place > Effective use of the dispute provisions can also potentially avoid protracted and costly litigation 2 DISPUTE AVOIDANCE AND DISPUTE MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS
  3. 3. > Common objective: finish the project on time and within budget > Is this ever attainable? > What steps can be put into place to try and achieve this > Use the contract provisions whenever applicable > Each party, ideally, should appoint a key person responsible for supervision of the project > Judicious use of the provisions of the contract has the effect of avoiding disputes, not promoting them 3 DISPUTE AVOIDANCE AND DISPUTE MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS
  4. 4. > Creation and maintenance of a programme > Adjudication of Contractor’s claims > Life, death, taxes and time-barring > Understanding of site conditions > What assumptions are built into the contract? > Are both parties aware of them? » Weather » Geological conditions » Free issue materials > Sub-contractors 4 SOME COMMON ISSUES
  5. 5. > Early warning notifications, site meetings, monthly reporting > The role of outside professionals as part of an advisory team > Use of Standing Dispute Adjudication Boards > Introduction of Step-In Rights into contracts > The role of the Engineer / Employer’s Representative / Principal Agent as the Employer’s agent 5 SOME COMMON ISSUES
  6. 6. > The Employer’s position is carefully governed by, amongst others, clause 2 > Employers are not automatically entitled to claim against Contractors > Design and execution of the Works, Contractor’s claims and Rate of Progress notifications must comply with Clause 8 > Notices to correct and termination under Clause 15 > Claims, disputes and Arbitration under Clause 20 > 28 day time period under clause 20.1 > Dispute Adjudication Boards > Arbitration 6 ISSUES ARISING FROM FIDIC CONTRACTS – “YELLOW BOOK” AS EXAMPLE
  7. 7. > Early Warning > Compensation Events > Changes to the Works Information > Events stopping completion of the Works > 8 week time period by default > Contractor may be obliged to put an instruction (which is a compensation event) into effect before agreement is reached on the cost consequences > Submitted compensation events may be deemed to be accepted 7 NEC3 – ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
  8. 8. > Contractor’s obligation to > “commence the Works with due skill, diligence, regularity and expedition within the period stated in the schedule > “Bring the Works to practical completion on the date for practical completion as stated in the schedule or any revision thereof” > Penalties and Practical Completion 8 JBCC 2000 PRINCIPAL BUILDING AGREEMENT
  9. 9. > “The Dispute Resolution Provisions are often overlooked, both at the tender stage and after the contract has been awarded. In the very early stages of a project, the parties will invariably wish to demonstrate a positive and constructive approach to the project ….. insufficient attention and consideration is sometimes given to the adequacy and completeness of the DRPs, with the parties proceeding in the hope that they will not have to be invoked” > Ellis Baker et al: FIDIC Contracts, Law and Practice (page 505) 9 IN CONCLUSION
  10. 10. THANK YOU Legal notice: Nothing in this presentation should be construed as formal legal advice from any lawyer or this firm. Readers are advised to consult professional legal advisors for guidance on legislation which may affect their businesses. © 2014 Werksmans Incorporated trading as Werksmans Attorneys. All rights reserved.

×