Feurt Practice And Potential Of Ebm

The Practice and Potential of Ecosystem-based Management Christine Feurt, Ph.D. Coordinator, Coastal Training Program Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Director, Center for Sustainable Communities University of New England Recognizing Ecosystem-based Management

Ecosystem Management Meffe et al., 2002
Retain, restore and sustain ecosystem integrity
Make the places we live, work and play noticeably better today and in the future.
Based upon a collaboratively developed vision of desired future outcomes that integrates ecological, socioeconomic and institutional perspectives
Applied within a geographic framework defined primarily by natural ecological boundaries.

Overview of Today’s Presentations
Watershed Management, Land Use Regulations, and Headwater Stream Conservation Steve Burns
Coastal Resiliency, Science and Community Planning for Sea Level Rise and the Perfect Storm Pete Slovinsky
Community Viz and Municipal Conservation Planning Judy Colby-George

Overview of Today’s Presentations
Beginning with Habitat: Challenges and Tools for Statewide Biodiversity Conservation Bethany Adkins
A Model for Science, Stewardship and Adaptive Management in Taunton Bay
John Sowles
Collaborative Learning for Stakeholder Engagement-Social Science and Ecosystem Management Chris Feurt

Elements of Ecosystem Management With a Focus on Land Use
A collaboratively developed vision of desired future outcomes
Indicators of success and a mechanism for tracking progress
Interdisciplinary science as a measure of ecosystem sustainability
Identification and engagement of stakeholders
Place – a workable geographic boundary

Collaborative Learning for Stakeholder Engagement:
Social Science and Ecosystem Management
Challenges
Overcoming barriers to:
Watershed Management Plan implementation
Science application to policy/management
Adoption of best management practices

Retain, restore and sustain ecosystem integrity
Make the places we live, work and play noticeably better today and in the future.
Based upon a collaboratively developed vision of desired future outcomes that integrates ecological, socioeconomic and institutional perspectives
Applied within a geographic framework defined primarily by natural ecological boundaries.
Ecosystem Management and Land Use

The Collaborative Learning Bridge A social science tool for Ecosystem Management Applying Social Science Tools Collaborative Learning Stakeholder Analysis Wells NERR Science Products Water Quality Data Watershed Surveys Watershed Management Plans Management & Policy Land Use Watershed Management Application of BMPs Perceptual Barriers Disciplinary Barriers Institutional Barriers Institutional Analysis Cultural Analysis

Working Through Environmental Conflict The Collaborative Learning Approach By Steven E. Daniels and Gregg B. Walker (2001)
“ A framework and set of techniques intended for multiparty decision situations…
A means of designing and implementing a series of events to promote:
Creative thought,
Constructive debate and the
Effective implementation of proposals that the stakeholders generate.”
Theoretical Grounding: Systems, Conflict, Adult Learning
Progress not Consensus

Knowledge of Stakeholder Values, Attitudes and Beliefs Applied to Collaborative Learning Model Watershed Management Assessment {Training in CL Skills} Implementation And Facilitation Evaluation Adapted from Daniels and Walker, 2001 Design

ASSESSMENT: Wells NERR Coastal Training Program Water is Threatened Coastal Trainers Provide Science-based Knowledge Municipal Decisions Contribute to Threats to Water Municipal Actions with Outcomes for Protecting Water Public Works Code Officer Planning Board ?

Logic Model/ Program Planning ADDIE Process Collaborative Learning Conflict Theory Adult Learning Theory Systems Theory (+ Diffusion of Innovations) (+ Community Based Social Marketing) Action Research Instructional Systems Design Environmental Communication Institutional Analysis How can knowledge of the perspectives and values of stakeholders be used to improve ecosystem management? Ethnographic Interviews Participant Observation Cultural Models Theory Grounded Theory: Constant Comparison Method Cultural Anthropology Discourse Analysis Stakeholder Analysis What are the perspectives and values of water, its management and pollution, used by stakeholders in municipal decision-making? Strategic Tools : Theory & Practice Linking Multiple Disciplines to EM Research Question

Understanding Stakeholder Perspectives and Values
Why is water important?
What are threats to water?
What can be done to protect water?

Stakeholder Values Nature Produces Water, the Source of Life Water is a Resource to Use and Manage

Perceptions of Threats to Water’s Value Water is Threatened Chemical Lawn Chemicals, Fertilizer, Petroleum/Car byproducts, Nutrients, N and Ph, Ammonia & Chlorine from sewage treatment plant (STP), Pesticides, Mercury, Atmospheric pollutants, Asphalt MTBE, Arsenic, Road salt, Sand & deicing chemicals Biological Human sewage, Pet Waste Red Tide, Domestic Livestock Waste, Wildlife Waste, E. Coli Physical Sediment (silt & soil), Trash, Amount and force of flowing water, Temperature Threats Loss is Experienced Beach Closures Property Values Fish Kills

7 Ways of Knowing A Knowledge Resource for Collaborative Learning Governance (GOV) Science (SCI) Local (LOC) Ecological (ECO) Educational Practices (EDU) Technological (TEC) Land Use (LAN) Knowledge

Combined Ways of Knowing Ecological Knowledge Public Works Director Educational Practices Knowledge Science Knowledge Local Knowledge Governance Knowledge Land Use Knowledge Land Use Knowledge Technological Knowledge Local Knowledge Town Planner Scientist

DESIGN Engaging the Kaleidoscope of Expertise Municipal Officials as a Resource not a Receptacle ECO Water is Threatened Water is Valued SCI LAN TEC GOV EDU LOC Water is Protected Planning & Land Use Land Conservation Drinking H2O Research & Monitoring Education & Outreach Regs & Enforcement Engineering & Public Safety Citizen Stewardship

IMPLEMENTATION & FACILITATION

Assemble and activate the kaleidoscope of expertise
Shared missions - Watershed Management Plan linked to Comprehensive Plans
Elected official approval
Municipal/State/Federal, NGO, water districts
An experiment for a summer
Meetings, field trips, breakfast at the Cockpit Café

Identify shared values of water and perceptions of threats as fuel for collaboration

Make conflicts explicit through dialogue and deliberation Sanford Regional Airport: Where water quality meets homeland security Property rights vs ….

… Property Responsibilities Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure Sustaining the Commons

EVALUATION:
Putting a face and a place on ecosystem management
Recognize ecosystem management at local scale
Share Lessons in the Landscape
Place-based opportunities for dialogue & deliberation
Track outcomes & progress

Evaluation to Assessment
Action Research Multi-media Approach
Progress on watershed action items
Stakeholder consensus to continue
Stakeholder survey
Stakeholder interviews
Elected official consensus to continue
Grant funding for group generated projects

Christine Feurt 207.646.1555 x111 [email_address] Collaborative Learning Guide November 2008 EBM Tools Training Wells NERR Nov 19 & 20 CICEET Project Explorer – Feurt/Final Report December 2008 http://www.ciceet.unh.edu/

Elements of Ecosystem Management With a Focus on Land Use
A collaboratively developed vision of desired future outcomes
Indicators of success and a mechanism for tracking progress
Interdisciplinary science as a measure of ecosystem sustainability
Identification and engagement of stakeholders
Place – a workable geographic boundary

Selected References Bernard, H. ed. 1998. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology . New York: Altamira Press. Daniels, S. and G. Walker. 2001. Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach. Westport, CT: Praeger Feurt, C. 2007. Protecting Our Children’s Water, Using Cultural Models to Frame and Implement Ecosystem Based Management. Ph.D. Dissertation, Antioch University New England. Keene, New Hampshire. Glaser, B. and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory . New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Greenwood, D and Levin, M. 1998. Introduction to Action Research, Social Research for Social Change . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gunderson, L. and C. Holling, eds. 2001. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature . Washington, D. C.: Island Press. Holland, D. and N. Quinn. 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lubchenco, J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279: 491-497. Kempton, W., J. Boster and J. Hartley. 1995. Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Krum, C. and C. Feurt. 2002. Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve, Coastal Training Program: Market Analysis and Needs Assessment. Wells NERR: Wells, ME. Lee, K. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating science and politics for the environment . Washington, D. C.: Island Press. Meffe, G., L. Nielsen, R. Knight, D. Schenborn. 2002. Ecosystem Management, Adaptive, Community-Based Conservation . Washington, DC: Island Press. NRC. 2005. Decision Making for the Environment. DC: National Academies Press. Paolisso, M. 2002. Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: A cultural model for understanding watermen’s reasoning about blue crab management. Human Organization 61 (3): 226-239. Quinn, N. ed. 2005. Finding Culture in Talk, A Collection of Methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Salafsky, N.,et al., 2001. Adaptive Management: A Tool For Conservation Practitioners. Available at www.fosonline.org Weiss, R. S. 1994. Learning from Strangers, The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies . New York: The Free Press.

Feurt Practice And Potential Of Ebm

by WellsReserve

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

Feurt Practice And Potential Of Ebm Presentation Transcript