Driving Health Equity in Tough Times
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Driving Health Equity in Tough Times

on

  • 969 views

This presentation talks about the importance of health equity during difficult times. ...

This presentation talks about the importance of health equity during difficult times.

Bob Gardner, Director of Policy
www.wellesleyinstitute.com
Follow us on twitter @wellesleyWI

Statistics

Views

Total Views
969
Views on SlideShare
736
Embed Views
233

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 233

http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com 233

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • In:crucial impt of SDoHbut complexcumulative and inter-dependent impact on indiv and pop’nThis captures the complex and dynamic environments in which SDoH play outOut: shows that paying attention to equity within health care system and building community resilience and capacities is crucial also highlights the need for action across various policy spheres and sectors
  • another angleneed to specify different levels in which SDoH and structured inequality affect health -> different policy solutions
  • In: even though roots of health disparities lie in far wider social and economic inequality, it is crucial to ensure equitable access to health care regardless of social positionit’s in the health system that the most disadvantaged in SDoH terms end up sicker and needing careequitable healthcare and support can help to mediate the harshest impact of the wider social determinants of health on health disadvantaged populations and communitiesin addition, there are systemic disparities in access and quality of healthcare that need to be addressedpeople lower down the social hierarchy can have poorer access to health services, even though they may have more complex needs and require more careunless we address inequitable access and quality, healthcare and community support services could make overall disparities even worse
  • also makes an interesting pt for defenders of Medicare – can’t be defensive – do need to acknowledge the need for reformbut,he seems to open way for privatization – with all of adverse equity impact that entails
  • we see this missing element drilling down everywhere in Rpt
  • In: SDoH lead to gradient of health in chronic conditionsplus affect how people can deal with the conditionsOut: complex and reinforcing nature of social determinants on health disparities
  • fiscal prudence means spending wisely, reducing waste, collecting sufficient taxes to pay for the public goods and services we want, and keeping debt coming down, at least during reasonably good times

Driving Health Equity in Tough Times Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Driving Health Equity in Tough Times Presentation to the Hospital Collaborative on Marginalized Populations April 2012 Bob Gardner
  • 2. Social Determinantsof Health + ComplexSystemsNeed to look at how theseother systems shape theimpact of SDoH: •access to health services can mediate harshest impact of SDoH to some degree •community resources and resilience are importantPOWER Study: Gender andEquity Health IndicatorFramework 2
  • 3. Three Cumulative and Inter-Dependent Levels Shape Health Inequities1. because of inequitable access to 1. gradient of health in which more wealth, income, education and other disadvantaged communities have fundamental determinants of health poorer overall health and are at → greater risk of many conditions2. also because of broader social and 2. some communities and populations economic inequality and exclusion have fewer capacities, resources and → resilience to cope with the impact of poor health3. because of all this, disadvantaged 3. these disadvantaged and vulnerable and vulnerable populations have communities tend to have greater/more complex needs, but inequitable access to services and face systemic barriers within the support they need health and other systems → 3
  • 4. Towards Solutions: Building Equity Into the Health System1. building health equity into all health care planning and delivery • doesn’t mean all programs are all about equity, but all take equity into account in planning their services and outreach2. aligning equity with system drivers and priorities: • such as chronic disease prevention and management, quality – won’t succeed without building equity into planning/delivery • also to enhance chance for success of equity agenda3. identifying those levers that will have the greatest impact on reducing health inequities and driving system change: • enhanced primary careApril 20, 2012 4
  • 5. Towards Solutions: Building Equity Into the Health System II4. embedding equity in provider organizations’ deliverables, incentives and performance management5. targeting some resources or programs specifically to addressing disadvantaged populations or key access barriers • looking for investments and interventions that will have the highest impact on reducing health disparities or looking to improve the health of most vulnerable, fastest6. while investing up-stream: • in health promotion and prevention – crucial to long-term sustainability and pop’n health • addressing the underlying determinants of health – crucial to reducing health inequities 5
  • 6. Drummond on Health• The Drummond Report’s emphasis on reform and innovation in the way health care is organized and delivered is vital: • focus on quality and patient-centred care • emphasis on value, efficiency and innovation • integration of health services • long-term planning – call for 20 year plan with coherent principles (ironically – has been draft within MOHLTC for years) • a shift to home and community care • prevention• argues that there are many opportunities for reform – and that many are underway across the system• But…. 6
  • 7. Huge element is missing: equity• equity is not included in his key principles of an ideal system • which contradicts ECFFA• equitable access to services, equitable outcomes and improved population health must also be fundamental goals of reform.• without taking equity into account: • reforms being contemplated could make access to health care less equitable • good idea of more home and community-based care – but what of poor home and living conditions of so many? • or worsen the health of marginalized populations • good idea of self-care and better information to promote one’s own health – won’t work for poor, marginalized or those facing language/literacy barriers 7
  • 8. Drummond on Health: Misdiagnosis• Drummond highlights that a small proportion of patients with complex needs account for a high proportion of overall health system costs • but this isn’t just elderly or end-of-life, or complex mental health • consistent inequitable gradient of health = higher needs/utilization of disadvantaged • that can be avoided with more equitable strategy and outcomes• emphasizes that preventing ill health and controlling chronic diseases is crucial moving forward • again, can only work if we take inequitable risk and burden of chronic diseases into account • and if we address social and economic inequality that underlie these health inequities 8
  • 9. Canadians With Chronic Conditions Who Also Report Food Insecurity 9
  • 10. Drummond on Health: Primary Care• The report also highlights the importance of primary care. • emphasizes Family Health Teams, with their more integrated model of care than sole practices • but without addressing their inequitable distribution, incentives and outcomes • and ignoring Community Health Centres, who have explicit mandate and solid record in addressing needs of health disadvantaged populations and community building• An equity approach would ensure that expanded family health teams, community health centres and other key reforms are concentrated in under-served and higher need areas • highlighting that his good idea of integration needs to be clarified – integrated for what? • not just efficiency but to reduce inequitable access and improve health of most disadvantaged 10
  • 11. Drummond on Health: System Drivers• pays remarkably little attention to how fundamental transformation could actually be driven• pay attention to incentives: • e.g. of Family Health Teams – when OMA negotiations drive policy • dangers of performance or activity-based funding to come – avoid the complex and challenging• and performance measurement: • success conditions – equity-relevant data • embed equity in provider and LHIN level indicators and targets: • not just reduce overall hospital readmission rates or incidence of diabetes • reduce differentials by gender, income, language, neighbourhood • provider equity plans • building equity deliverables into Quality Improvement Plans 11
  • 12. Drummond on Health: Integration• the report rightly points to the need for coordination and integration of services • essential to major provincial priorities such as reducing hospital readmissions • discharging a patient into overcrowded or unsafe housing means that they are likely to end up back in the hospital → undermining the savings and efficiencies the Commission is looking for• it highlights that the LHINs are most appropriate vehicle for this integration, but limited by MOHLTC policy/admin • importance of building solid equity strategy and action at LHIN level • also speaks to the importance of coordination beyond health care to social services, housing and other determinants-related spheres • could be positive role for LHINs moving forward 12
  • 13. Drummond on Health: Neglected Social Determinants• Drummond did recognize – although unevenly – that not investing in the social/community foundations of a healthy society will lead to higher costs down the road• but didn’t recognize in its health analysis how inequitable social determinants of health will undermine efforts at reform and continue to create poorer health• health providers and institutions have considerable credibility and influence → use as platform to highlight these wider connections • e.g. power of hospital CEOs saying that welfare cuts will increase pressure on ER and strain health care delivery 13
  • 14. Look for Areas to Intervene•Commission on the Reformof Social Assistance inOntario•A broad collaborative ofleading Toronto healthsector institutions andexperts came together to: • Define a vision of health- enabling social assistance system; and • Practical actions to implement such a system 14
  • 15. Public Policy Post-Drummond• an enormous range of specific recommendations and welcome recognition of need for govt and public services to be more innovative and responsive• but most important influence may be in shaping the tenor/parameters of public policy • it justifies and ushers in an era of austerity, restraint and limited public investment• this poses a real danger to health • reducing vital support for affordable housing, safe communities, transportation, and other community infrastructure will undermine the foundations of strong and healthy communities • will have an adverse impact on overall health and will increase health inequities — in turn, putting more pressure on the health care system 15