Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Planning Behaviour Change: Chances and Challenges

3,013

Published on

WASH 2011 conference: Dr. Christine Sijbesma, IRC …

WASH 2011 conference: Dr. Christine Sijbesma, IRC

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,013
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • DALY= The sum of all future years of life lost when a baby, young, or more mature person dies prematurely, PLUS all the years of productive life lost due to a person’s disability.
  • Bartram J, Cairncross S (2010) Hygiene, Sanitation, and Water: Laxminarayan R, Chow J, Shahid-Salles SA (2006) Intervention Cost-Effectiveness: Overview of Main Messages. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition. Washington DC: The World Bank. pp. 35–86. see also: Forgotten Foundations of Health. PLoS Med 7(11): e1000367. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000367
  • References FOAM (without S): Coombes, Y.; Devine, J. (2008). Introducing FOAM : a framework to analyze handwashing behaviors to design effective handwashing programs : global scaling up handwashing project. Washington, DC, USA, Water and Sanitation Program, WSPNguyen, N.K.; South Asia Hygiene Practitioners Workshop . Designing evidence-based communications programs to promote handwashing with soap in Vietnam : paper presented at the South Asia Hygiene Practitioners Workshop, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1 to 4 February 2010 . http://www.irc.nl/page/51638
  • Prüss-Üstün A, Bos R, Gore F, Bartram J. Safer water, better health: costs, benefits and sustainability ofinterventions to protect and promote health. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2008.WHO, 2008. Fewtrell et al., 2005 and Clasen 2006 in UNICEF 2008, http://www.unicef.org/wash/files/Scaling_up_HWTS_Jan_25th_with_comments.pdfHoque B A et al, 1995. Post-defecation handwashing in bangladesh: Practiceand efficiency perspectives Public Health, Vol.109, Issue 1 , Pages 15-24, http://www.publichealthjrnl.com/article/S0033-3506(95)80071-9/abstract
  • Women and girls already motivated; groups to convince are men (and women more influence on programs, so that sanitation and hygiene make it onto local development agenda Cairncross: Cairncross S, Bartram J, Cumming O, Brocklehurst C (2010) Hygiene, Sanitation, and Water: What Needs to Be Done? PLoS Med 7(11): e1000365. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000365
  • Women and girls already motivated; groups to convince are men (and women more influence on programs, so that sanitation and hygiene make it onto local development agenda Cairncross: Cairncross S, Bartram J, Cumming O, Brocklehurst C (2010) Hygiene, Sanitation, and Water: What Needs to Be Done? PLoS Med 7(11): e1000365. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000365Mc Cauley et al in Wijk, Christine van Wijk and Tineke Murre (1995). Motivating better hygiene behaviour. Importance for public health. Mechanisms for change . New York, USA: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/wash/files/behav.pdf
  • Women and girls already motivated; groups to convince are men (and women more influence on programs, so that sanitation and hygiene make it onto local development agenda Cairncross: Cairncross S, Bartram J, Cumming O, Brocklehurst C (2010) Hygiene, Sanitation, and Water: What Needs to Be Done? PLoS Med 7(11): e1000365. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000365
  • Transcript

    • 1. Planning Behaviour Change:
      Chances and Challenges
      Dr. Christine Sijbesma, IRC
      1
      Illustration: NEWAH, Nepal
    • 2. Why plan to promote good practices?
      • Sewerage can cost as much as US$ 270
      per Disability-Adjusted Life Year averted
      • Piped house connections cost US$ 223
      • 3. A hand pumps program costs US$ 94
      • 4. Promoting basic sanitation costs US$ 11
      • 5. Promoting hygiene costs < US$ 5
      2
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
    • 6. “In places with poor water supply, sanitation & hygiene, basic public health interventions are extremely cost-effective, and hygiene improvements most of all” (Jamison et al, 2006)
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
      3
    • 7. But: Impacts on health need a CRITICAL MASS of good practices!
      4
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
    • 8. Practical Planning Tool: FOAMS (adjusted from WSP)
      5
    • 9. Focus practices WHAT to practice?
      Handwashing + soap lessens diarrhoea 45%, ARI 23%, neonatal death 40-44% . Substitutes also work (Hoque et al, 1995)
      2) Toilet use ->32% lower diarrhoea
      (WHO, 2008)
      Safe drinking water chain management : 35-47% reduction diarrhoea (UNICEF, 2008)
      Under-researched: infants’ faecal-oral chain management
      6
    • 10. Focus Groups : WHO to practice?
      HWWS: esp. caregivers of children under five (mothers/grandparents) and birth attendants
      Toilets: men, children under 12 and adolescent boys ‘ since women, adolescent girls use most
      Safe drinking water chain management – source to cup: women primary role , men gender support role
      Under-researched: caregivers infants’ faecal-oral chain management (Cairncross et al 2010)
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
      7
    • 11. Opportunity: WHEN can practice?
      Good promotion program, with own objectives, budget, staff, skills? Necessities to practice present (e.g. water, soap)? Social/gender relations enable practice? E.g. in water-scarce area in Tanzania mothers-in-law & husbands did not allow extra water use to wash children’s faces to prevent eye infections and blindness
      8
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
    • 12. Ability: How will they practice?
      Do people have the required time, money, equipment ( or alternatives ) time, skills, knowledge to practice? E.g. handwashing by pouring instead of in same bowl, with women and young children (who have most risks) last in hierarchy
      9
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
    • 13. Motivation: WHY practice?
      What triggers certain groups to adopt certain practices? E.g. in Niger, 36 reasons for toilet use, 1 was better health.... Mostly socio-cultural & economic: convenience, privacy, safety, status (e.g. ‘star’ home in Sri Lanka), time saving, witchcraft prevention Different groups have different triggers, so formative research is needed to plan effective messages
      10
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change
    • 14. Sustained: HOW LONG is practice?
      Comparative study in six countries:
      • After 1 year only 1 of 17 practices had faded
      • 15. At longer interval 2 of 25 dropped significantly
      • 16. Access to water made no difference
      • 17. Better educated women= better practice
      • 18. In India men sustained HWWS and toilet
      use less than women, yet most programs
      targeted women
      SEUF
      11
    • 19. Five key lessons
      FOAMS analysis of cases at Hygiene Workshop Melbourne 2010 :
      Know your Focus Groups
      Prioritise Focus practices and avoid overload
      Ensure Opportunity for change at community & institutional level
      Motivate good behaviours through all drivers. Health is “Mekka”, but many roads lead to it - Health goal itself is seldom a strong trigger
      Determine if practice is Sustained
      12
      Session 1A2C – Planning for sustainable behaviour change

    ×