Chapter 2   online materials
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Chapter 2 online materials






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



4 Embeds 2,046 1829 213 3 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Chapter 2   online materials Chapter 2 online materials Document Transcript

    • Chapter 2 Reinforcement (Positive Reinforcement) Circular Reasoning without Reifications Do all circular arguments result in a reification? No. For example: Why is Rudolph pressing the lever? Because, in the past lever pressing has produced drops of water. How do you know lever pressing has produced drops of water in the past? Because he’s now pressing the lever. That is a circular argument that not only does not involve the reification of any concepts, but it doesn’t even point to a mechanism of action, such as reinforcement; it just says production of the past drops of water is responsible for his current lever pressing. Circular Reifications I call one type of reification circular reification—inferring a cause, usually an internal entity, which is just a label for the behavior we’re trying to explain. In addition, I think there is also a second type of reification, which I call process reification—inferring an internal entity, which is just a label for a controlling process (typically contingencies). In other words, traditional psychologists infer an internal entity rather than deal directly with the behavioral contingencies that are really controlling the behavior. Why did Johnny act so selfishly? Because his id is strong and his superego and ego are underdeveloped. Freud perceptively identified three types of control processes, roughly those involving contingencies with unlearned reinforcers and aversive conditions, those involving moral and religious outcomes, and those involving the learned reinforcers and aversive outcomes associated with being logically correct or incorrect. Then he fell into our culture’s reification trap by inferring things called id, superego, and ego. That’s an example of process reification, which may be a subcategory of circular reification.