Help! We Have Assessment Data October 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Help! We Have Assessment Data October 2009 - Presentation Transcript

    1. HELP! WE HAVE ASSESSMENT DATA Beth Patton, Associate Dean College of Natural Science Gil Linne, Dean College of Social Science
    2. PROGRAM EXAMPLES
      • HEALTH
      • ADMINISTRATION
      • MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COUNSELING DEGREE
    3. HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT DATA CURRICULUM CHANGE
    4. ASSESSMENT DATA MEASURES
      • Identified six program outcomes and specific performance criteria for each outcome
      • Three measures were selected to assess each program outcome
      GRADES ASSIGNMENTS STUDENT/ALUMNI SURVEY
    5. COURSE GRADES
      • Six courses best aligned to program outcomes
      • Course grades reflect the faculty perspective of student performance and learning
      • Course grades are a quasi-direct measure of learning
    6. COURSE GRADE SCORES
    7. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS
      • Six specific assignments were identified as closely aligning with each program outcome
      • Assignment grades also reflect the faculty perspective of student learning
      • Assignment grades are considered a direct measure of learning
    8. COURSE ASSIGNMENT SCORES
    9. STUDENT OUTCOMES SURVEY
      • Survey provides information on the student perception of program effectiveness
      • Survey reflected the performance criteria for each outcome
      • Survey initially sent to 267 recent MHA graduates
      • Response rate of 20.6 %
      • Survey will also be embedded in the capstone course
    10. STUDENT SURVEY DATA
    11. COUNSELING ASSESSMENT
    12. COGNITIVE MEASURES.
      • Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Examination (CPCE)
      • Measures a student’s knowledge of counseling content
      • Program Benchmark – 75
    13.  
    14. AFFECTIVE MEASURES
      • Academic Alignment Review Process (AARP) Student Survey
      • Students respond to questions related to –
        • Alignment of objectives
        • Effectives of learning content
        • Effectiveness of Instruction
    15.  
    16. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
      • Measurement of clinical performance determined by-
        • Site supervision evaluations of practicum
        • Internship performance evaluations
    17.  
    18. ASSESSMENT DATA
      • SO NOW WE HAVE DATA – WHAT NEXT?
    19. DISCUSSION
      • POINT OF ASSESSMENT IS TO BEGIN DISCUSSING THE FINDINGS………….
        • What should we be looking at?
        • What needs further review?
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + WCETWCET Nominate

    custom

    95 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The focus of assessment has permeated our lives and more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 95
      • 95 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories