• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Reflection On Research Robin Pascoe
 

Reflection On Research Robin Pascoe

on

  • 583 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
583
Views on SlideShare
583
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Reflection On Research Robin Pascoe Reflection On Research Robin Pascoe Document Transcript

    • Reflection on research priorities for Error! Reference source not found. Field Code Changed Robin Pascoe, Murdoch University, Perth Western Australia A useful starting point for our preparation for the WAAE09 meeting in Newcastle is to review the research priorities in the recommendations of the UNESCO Road Map Road Map for Arts Education Building Creative Capacities for the 21st Century (UNESCO, 2006 p 20) Research, Evaluation and Knowledge-sharing • Promote ongoing evaluation of the emotional, social, cultural, cognitive and creative impacts of Arts Education; • Promote a regional system to gather and disseminate information on Arts Education; • Promote knowledge-sharing and networking through the establishment of Arts in Education Observatories (clearinghouses), with UNESCO Chairs and the UNITWIN Network;1 • Promote research in the arts in order to inform the development of future initiatives in this expanding field; • Establish an international data-base of research to provide scientifically sound evidence of the individual and social significance of Arts Education and creative involvement, including, but not limited to, such areas as the development of the integrated human being, social cohesion, conflict resolution, public health and the use of new technologies in creative expression in the schools; • Commission case studies and research that could then be used as a guide for engaging in more participatory and practice-led research. Such a case study could lead to the development of an international network of researchers sharing methodologies and building better models of assessment with students, artists, teachers and parents as active participants. This would build capacity for the future and inform lifelong learning and assessment; • Encourage research and rediscovery of the traditional use of arts in learning and every-day life; • Record and evaluate bibliographical resources and other sources of information on Arts Education, with a view to their analysis, re-packaging and dissemination; • Systematize significant experiences that can serve in preparing quality indicators for Arts Education, and promoting the exchange of experiences; • Facilitate the preparation and implementation of regional and international education and research projects; • Put into place international networks to facilitate regional cooperation and sharing of best practices in implementing Arts Education policies; A cool-headed reflection on these recommendations can conclude that most, but not all, of them have been to some extent successful though it is sometimes difficult to see the whole picture of how this is the case. There have been evaluations of the impacts of Arts Education; there are Arts in Education Observatories established; research in the arts and education has been promoted; there has been preparation of quality indicators of Arts Education; there have been international networks established – the WAAE being just one example. While there have been successes, there are also been questions about whether there has been comprehensive and cohesive attention to these recommendations across the members of UNESCO. It is possible to feel a sense of incompleteness in the ambitious research agenda set by the Road Map. Perhaps one of the mechanisms necessary for the next World Conference in Korea May 2010 is to develop a comprehensive overview of what has been achieved. This would however be a difficult task to plan and execute in the time before May 2010. A second thought is to review these recommendations. At one level, these recommendations serve as global aims for research in Arts Education. As such they are easy to agree to and accept. They are acceptable “parenthood statements” that are difficult to ague against. There is a need to separate the more general aims from specific target projects. What is needed is specific project based research recommendations developed under the umbrella of more general aspirational recommendations. A more pertinent discussion for WAAE09 is to focus on what has prevented – or enabled – this WAAE network to move towards these 2006 recommendations. 1. The meeting of researchers at the World Creativity Summit Taipei June 5-8 2008 was an important initiating point. The two proposals generated there, as outlined in Rachel Mason’s report (personal communication email 2009) are useful. Proposal 1 Reconceptualising the Field. This proposal was for research that builds capacity to articulate the nature of the field’s contribution to contemporary and future societies for internal and external audiences. Conceptual clarification of the nature of this contribution should take into account ecology, the environment and society, traditional and contemporary arts, professional arts, media, visual culture, amateur arts etc. Key questions for the profession now are ‘How should our educational enterprise position itself in relation to these fields and ‘What kinds of beliefs and attitudes should it foster in order to serve them? The group recommended WAEA go for an ambitious, large-scale, project, seek funding from regional and national arts associations, industry, media and education and buy in leading expert thinkers and practitioners. Promoting and resourcing this project through the advocacy and networking groups would enhance its potential and impact. Project 2 Arts Education and Creativity, Identity and Motivation This group argued a case for examining the role of the arts in re-generating creative heritage for sustainable humanity. Such a project should be informed by the underlying principle of difference. There is a need to (i) establish what is already known about relationships between knowledge and creativity, motivation and identity both in general and arts education studies in a range of cultural contexts; and (ii) to review theory and practice in each topic and indentify gaps in previous studies. Research questions were forthcoming for the three areas of interest flagged up in session 1. Namely: (i) ‘How can arts educators position creativity meaningfully within local national and global cultural and political contexts?’; (ii) ‘What motivates teachers and students in arts education’? and (iii) ‘How can arts education assist learners to construct and interpret cultural social and Field Code Changed Error! Reference source not found. Research Robin Pascoe 1
    • individual experiences in a diverse world’? The group suggested research is carried out by teams of association members focusing on concept evaluation and systematic reviews of theory and practice in arts and general education. Again, the anticipated impact is increased clarity thereby providing a better basis for advocacy. 2. Taking these proposals to action has been problematic. To move forward there does need to be funding capacity, leadership capacity and support from UNESCO. Perhaps in the time span between WAAE meetings, and given the other demands on the participants of the research group, it has been difficult to generate the necessary momentum to move forward. In a similar vein, it has been difficult to build a working group to approach UNESCO for institutional support and to develop funding applications. While there is agreement that there are potential sources of funding, it does require a significant amount of time and commitment to develop applications – particularly across disciplines and countries. It must also be recognized that individuals and the member associations of WAAE have their own research priorities. It is also perhaps important to remind ourselves about the limits of UNESCO and the difficulties of negotiating within the constraints and priorities of individual members of UNESCO. 3. It may be necessary to recognize that the development of concrete proposals is a time consuming business and a capacity building process. It is therefore important for us to look to the meeting at Newcastle as a time for reflecting and refining a research vision and for generating a working party to develop a concrete proposal for the Conference in Korea. This does mean identifying a prioritized research focus – while still encouraging the other research interests of individual researchers and WAAE member associations. In developing that proposal there will need to be more detailed work on funding and potential leadership; partnerships with UNESCO and other partners will need to be established as part of a proposal for consideration in Korea. It is important to move from the general and worthy research agenda to one of action. UNESCO (2006). Road Map for Arts Education, The world Conference on Arts Education: Building Creative Capacities for the 21st Century Available from http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id=6335 and http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.phpURL_ID=2916&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html Field Code Changed Error! Reference source not found. Research Robin Pascoe 2