Tuskegee tests
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Tuskegee tests

on

  • 2,050 views

Tuskegee Tests ...

Tuskegee Tests
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,050
Views on SlideShare
1,651
Embed Views
399

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0

5 Embeds 399

http://vogeldenisenewsome.net 315
http://www.vogeldenisenewsome.net 74
http://sitebuilderpro.com 8
https://www.google.com 1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Tuskegee tests Tuskegee tests Document Transcript

  • FROM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experimentIn accordance with Federal Laws provided For Educational and Information Purposes – i.e. of PUBLIC InterestTuskegee syphilis experimentFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA doctor draws blood from one of the Tuskegee test subjectsThe Tuskegee syphilis experiment[1] (also known as the Tuskegee syphilis study or Public Health Servicesyphilis study) was an infamous clinical study conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama by theU.S. Public Health Service to study the natural progression of untreated syphilis in poor, rural black men whothought they were receiving free health care from the U.S. government. [1]The Public Health Service, working with the Tuskegee Institute, began the study in 1932. Investigators enrolled inthe study a total of 600 impoverished, African-American sharecroppers from Macon County, Alabama; 399 whohad previously contracted syphilis before the study began, and 201 without the disease. For participating in thestudy, the men were given free medical care, meals, and free burial insurance. They were never told they hadsyphilis, nor were they ever treated for it. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the men were told theywere being treated for "bad blood," a local term used to describe several illnesses, including syphilis, anemia andfatigue.The 40-year study was controversial for reasons related to ethical standards; primarily because researchersknowingly failed to treat patients appropriately after the 1940s validation of penicillin as an effective cure for thedisease they were studying. Revelation of study failures by a whistleblower led to major changes in U.S. law andregulation on the protection of participants in clinical studies. Now studies require informed consent (withexceptions possible for U.S. Federal agencies which can be kept secret by Executive Order[2]), communication ofdiagnosis, and accurate reporting of test results. [3]By 1947, penicillin had become the standard treatment for syphilis. Choices available to the doctors involved in thestudy might have included treating all syphilitic subjects and closing the study, or splitting off a control group fortesting with penicillin. Instead, the Tuskegee scientists continued the study without treating any participants andwithholding penicillin and information about it from the patients. In addition, scientists prevented participants fromaccessing syphilis treatment programs available to others in the area. [4] The study continued, under numerous USPublic Health Service supervisors, until 1972, when a leak to the press eventually resulted in its termination. The
  • victims of the study included numerous men who died of syphilis, wives who contracted the disease, and childrenborn with congenital syphilis.[5]The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, cited as "arguably the most infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history," [6]led to the 1979 Belmont Report and the establishment of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).[7] Italso led to federal laws and regulations requiring Institutional Review Boards for the protection of human subjectsin studies involving human subjects. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) manages thisresponsibility within the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).[8]Contents[hide]  1 History o 1.1 Study clinicians o 1.2 Study details  2 Non-consensual experiments in Guatemala  3 Study termination  4 Aftermath  5 Ethical implications  6 In popular culture  7 See also  8 References  9 Further reading o 9.1 Primary sources o 9.2 Secondary Sources  10 External links[edit] History[edit] Study clinicians“ ” For the most part, doctors and civil servants simply did their jobs. Some merely followed orders, others worked for the glory of science. — Dr John Heller, Director of the Public Health Services Division of Venereal Diseases [9]Dr. Taliaferro Clark
  • Dr. Oliver WengerThe venereal disease section of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) formed a study group in 1932 at its nationalheadquarters. Dr. Taliaferro Clark was credited with its origin. His initial goal was to follow untreated syphilis in agroup of black men for 6 to 9 months, and then follow up with a treatment phase. When he understood theintention of other study members to use deceptive practices, Dr. Clark disagreed with the plan to conduct anextended study.[clarification needed] He retired the year after the study began.Representing the PHS, Clark had solicited the participation of the Tuskegee Institute (a historically black college(HBCU) that was well-known in Alabama) and also the inclusion of the Arkansas regional PHS office. Dr. EugeneDibble, an African American doctor, was head of the John Andrew Hospital at the Tuskegee Institute. Dr. OliverC. Wenger, a Caucasian, was director of the regional PHS Venereal Disease Clinic in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Heand his staff took a lead in developing study procedures.Wenger and his staff played a critical role in developing early study protocols. Wenger continued to advise andassist the Tuskegee Study when it turned into a long-term, no-treatment observational study.[10]Dr. Raymond H. Vonderlehr was appointed on-site director of the research program and developed the policiesthat shaped the long-term follow-up section of the project. For example, he decided to gain the "consent" of thesubjects for spinal taps (to look for signs of neurosyphilis) by depicting the diagnostic test as a "special freetreatment". Vonderlehr retired as head of the venereal disease section in 1943, shortly after penicillin had first beenshown to be a cure for syphilis.Nurse Eunice Rivers, an African-American trained at Tuskegee Institute who worked at its affiliated John AndrewHospital, was recruited at the start of the study. Dr. Vonderlehr was a strong advocate for her participation, as shewas the direct link to the community. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, the Tuskegee Study began byoffering lower class African Americans, who often could not afford health care, the chance to join "Miss RiversLodge". Patients were to receive free physical examinations at Tuskegee University, free rides to and from theclinic, hot meals on examination days, and free treatment for minor ailments.As the study became long term, Nurse Rivers became the chief person with continuity. Unlike the changing stateof national, regional and on-site PHS administrators, doctors, and researchers, Rivers stayed at TuskegeeUniversity. She was the only study staff person to work with participants for the full 40 years. By the 1950s, NurseRivers had become pivotal to the study—her personal knowledge of the subjects enabled maintenance of long-termfollow up. In the studys later years, Dr. John R. Heller led the national division.By the late 1940s, doctors, hospitals and public health centers throughout the country routinely treated diagnosedsyphilis with penicillin. In the period following World War II, the revelation of the Holocaust and related Nazimedical abuses brought about changes in international law. Western allies formulated the Nuremberg Code toprotect the rights of research subjects. No one appeared to have reevaluated the protocols of the Tuskegee Studyaccording to the new standards.In 1972 the Tuskegee Study was brought to public and national attention by a whistleblower, who gaveinformation to the Washington Star and the New York Times. Heller of PHS still defended the ethics of the study,
  • stating: "The mens status did not warrant ethical debate. They were subjects, not patients; clinical material, notsick people."[11]  Dr. Raymond Vonderlehr  Dr. John Heller  Dr. Eugene Dibble  Eunice Rivers, nurse and study co-ordinator[edit] Study details
  • Subject blood draw, circa 1953A Norwegian study in 1928 had reported on the pathologic manifestations of untreated syphilis in several hundredwhite males. This study is known as a retrospective study since investigators pieced together information from thehistories of patients who had already contracted syphilis but remained untreated for some time.Subjects talking with study coordinator, Nurse Eunice RiversThe Tuskegee study group decided to build on the Oslo work and perform a prospective study to complement it. Inthe earlier phases of the study this was not inherently unethical since there was nothing the investigators could dotherapeutically at the time. Researchers could study the natural progression of the disease as long as they did notharm their subjects. They reasoned that the knowledge gained would benefit humankind; however, it wasdetermined afterward that the doctors did harm their subjects by depriving them of appropriate treatment once ithad been discovered. The study was characterized as "the longest non-therapeutic experiment on human beings inmedical history."[4]The US health service Tuskegee study began as a clinical trial of the incidence of syphilis in the Macon Countypopulation. Initially, subjects were studied for six to eight months and then treated with contemporary methodsincluding Salvarsan, mercurial ointments, and bismuth. These methods were, at best, mildly effective. Thedisadvantage that these treatments were all highly toxic was balanced by the fact that no other methods wereknown. The Tuskegee Institute participated in the study, as its representatives understood the intent was to benefitpublic health in the local poor population. [12] The Tuskegee University-affiliated hospital effectively loaned thePHS its medical facilities and other predominantly black institutions and local black doctors participated as well.The Rosenwald Fund, a major Chicago-based philanthropy devoted to black education and communitydevelopment in the South, provided financial support to pay for the eventual treatment of the patients. Studyresearchers initially recruited 399 syphilitic Black men, and 201 healthy Black men as controls.Table from U.S. Public Health Service summarising participants in the study.
  • Continuing effects of the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the beginning of the Great Depression led theRosenwald Fund to withdraw its offer of funding. Study directors issued a final report as they thought this mightmean the end of the study once funding to buy medication for the treatment phase of the study was withdrawn.Medical ethics considerations were limited from the start and rapidly deteriorated. To ensure that the men wouldshow up for the possibly dangerous, painful, diagnostic, and non-therapeutic spinal taps, the doctors sent the 400patients a misleading letter titled "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment" (see insert). The study also required allparticipants to undergo an autopsy after death in order to receive funeral benefits. After penicillin was discoveredas a cure, researchers continued to deny such treatment to many study participants. Many patients were lied to andgiven placebo treatments so researchers could observe the full, long term progression of the fatal disease. [12]Doctor injects test subject with placebo as part of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.The Tuskegee Study published its first clinical data in 1934 and issued their first major report in 1936. This wasprior to the discovery of penicillin as a safe and effective treatment for syphilis. The study was not secret sincereports and data sets were published to the medical community throughout its duration.During World War II, 250 of the subject men registered for the draft. These men were consequently diagnosed ashaving syphilis at military induction centers and ordered to obtain treatment for syphilis before they could be takeninto the armed services.[13]PHS researchers attempted to prevent them from getting treatment, thus depriving them of chances for a cure. APHS representative was quoted at the time as saying: "So far, we are keeping the known positive patients fromgetting treatment."[13] Despite this, 96% of the 90 original test subjects reexamined in 1963 had received eitherarsenical or penicillin treatments from another health provider. [14]By 1947 penicillin had become standard therapy for syphilis. The US government sponsored several public healthprograms to form "rapid treatment centers" to eradicate the disease. When campaigns to eradicate venereal diseasecame to Macon County, study researchers prevented their patients from participating. [13]By the end of the study in 1972, only 74 of the test subjects were alive. Of the original 399 men, 28 had died ofsyphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected and 19 of their children wereborn with congenital syphilis.[edit] Non-consensual experiments in GuatemalaMain article: Syphilis experiments in GuatemalaIn October 2010 it was revealed that in Guatemala, Public Health Service doctors went even further. It wasreported that from 1946 to 1948, American doctors deliberately infected prisoners, soldiers, and patients in amental hospital with syphilis and, in some cases, gonorrhea, with the cooperation of some Guatemalan healthministries and officials. A total of 696 men and women were exposed to syphilis without the informed consent of
  • the subjects. When the subjects contracted the disease they were given antibiotics though it is unclear if all infectedparties were cured.[15]Wellesley Colleges historian Susan Reverby discovered records of the experiment while examining archives ofJohn Charles Cutler, a government researcher involved in the now infamous Tuskegee study. [16] In October 2010,the U.S. formally apologized to Guatemala for conducting these experiments. [17][edit] Study terminationPeter Buxtun, a PHS venereal disease investigator, the "whistleblower".Group of Tuskegee Experiment test subjectsCharlie Pollard, survivorHerman Shaw, survivorIn 1966 Peter Buxtun, a PHS venereal-disease investigator in San Francisco, sent a letter to the national director ofthe Division of Venereal Diseases to express his concerns about the ethics and morality of the extended TuskegeeStudy. The Center for Disease Control (CDC), which by then controlled the study, reaffirmed the need to continuethe study until completion; i.e., until all subjects had died and been autopsied. To bolster its position, the CDCsought, and gained support for the continuation of the study, from local chapters of the National MedicalAssociation (representing African-American physicians) and the American Medical Association (AMA).
  • In 1968 William Carter Jenkins, an African-American statistician in the PHS, part of the Department of Health,Education, and Welfare (HEW), founded and edited The Drum, a newsletter devoted to ending racialdiscrimination in HEW. The cabinet-level department included the CDC. In The Drum, Jenkins called for an end tothe Tuskegee Study. He did not succeed; it is not clear who read his work.[18]Buxtun finally went to the press in the early 1970s. The story broke first in the Washington Star on July 25, 1972.It became front-page news in the New York Times the following day. Senator Edward Kennedy calledCongressional hearings, at which Buxtun and HEW officials testified. As a result of public outcry the CDC andPHS appointed an ad hoc advisory panel to review the study. It determined the study was medically unjustified andordered its termination. As part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit subsequently filed by the NAACP, theU.S. government paid $9 million (unadjusted for inflation) and agreed to provide free medical treatment tosurviving participants and to surviving family members infected as a consequence of the study.[edit] AftermathIn 1974 Congress passed the National Research Act and created a commission to study and write regulationsgoverning studies involving human participants. On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized andheld a ceremony for the Tuskegee study participants: "What was done cannot be undone. But we can end thesilence. We can stop turning our heads away. We can look at you in the eye and finally say on behalf of theAmerican people, what the United States government did was shameful, and I am sorry ... To our AfricanAmerican citizens, I am sorry that your federal government orchestrated a study so clearly racist." [19] Five of theeight remaining study survivors attended the White House ceremony.The Tuskegee Syphilis Study significantly damaged the trust of the black community toward public health effortsin the United States.[20] As a result, many distrust the medical community and are reluctant to participate inprograms such as organ donation. The study may also have contributed to the reluctance of many poor blackpeople to seek routine preventive care.[21] However, recent studies have challenged the degree to which knowledgeof the Tuskegee experiments have kept black Americans from participating in medical research. [22][23][24][25]Distrust of the government because of the study contributed to persistent rumors in the black community that thegovernment was responsible for the HIV/AIDS crisis by introducing the virus to the black community. [citation needed][edit] Ethical implications This section requires expansion.Depression-era U.S. poster advocating early syphilis treatment. Although treatments were available, participants in the studydid not receive them.
  • After penicillin was found to be an effective treatment for syphilis, the study continued for another 25 yearswithout treating those suffering from the disease. After the study and its consequences became front-page news, itwas ended in a day.[26] The aftershocks of this study, and other human experiments in the United States, led to theestablishment of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and BehavioralResearch and the National Research Act. The latter requires the establishment of institutional review boards (IRBs)at institutions receiving federal support (such as grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts).[edit] In popular culture  Dr. David Feldshuh wrote a stage play in 1992 based on the history of the Tuskegee study, titled Miss Evers Boys. It was a runner-up for the 1992 Pulitzer Prize in drama.[27] In 1997 it was adapted for an HBO made-for-TV movie. The HBO adaptation was nominated for eleven Emmy Awards,[28] and won in four categories.[29]  Don Byrons debut album, Tuskegee Experiments, is named after the study. [30]  Marvel Comics limited series Truth: Red, White & Black reinterpreted the Tuskegee Experiment as part of the Weapon Plus program.[31]  Carlo Boccadoros composition Bad Blood, takes inspiration from the tragic facts and discrimination related to the study.[32]  The book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks briefly discusses the study, when discussing African Americans and science. [33]  In the movie Half Baked, Dave Chappelles character Thurgood Jenkins states that his grandfather was a participant in the Tuskegee Experiment. [34][edit] See also  Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church  Human experimentation in the United States  Guatemala syphilis experiment  Human subject research  World Medical Association  International Conference on Harmonisation for Registration of Pharmaceuticals  Declaration of Geneva  Declaration of Helsinki  Operation Whitecoat  Frank Zappas album Thing-Fish[edit] References 1. ^ a b "Tuskegee Study - Timeline". NCHHSTP. CDC. 2008-06-25. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 2. ^ "Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46 Protections of Human Subjects 46.1.1(i)" (PDF). U.S. Department of Health and Humand Services. 2009-01-15. Retrieved 2010-02-22. 3. ^ "Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee". Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee. 1996-05-20. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 4. ^ a b Jones J (1981). Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0029166764. 5. ^ Heller J (1972-07-26). "Syphilis Victims in U.S. Study Went Untreated for 40 Years; Syphilis Victims Got No Therapy". New York Times (Associated Press). Retrieved 2008-12-04. 6. ^ Katz RV, Kegeles SS, Kressin NR, et al. (November 2006). "The Tuskegee Legacy Project: willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research". J Health Care Poor Underserved 17 (4): 698–715. doi:10.1353/hpu.2006.0126. PMC 1780164. PMID 17242525. 7. ^ Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) (2005-06-23). "Protection of Human Subjects". Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46. US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 8. ^ "Office for Human Research Protections". Department of Health and Human Services. 2008-09-28. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 9. ^ Cockburn, Alexander; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press. London: Verso. pp. 67. ISBN 1859841392.
  • 10. ^ DiClemente RJ, Blumenthal DS (2003). Community-based health research: issues and methods. New York: Springer Pub. pp. 50. ISBN 0-8261-2025-3. 11. ^ "Impact on Health Care". Tuskegee University. Retrieved 2011-02-26. 12. ^ a b Parker, Laura (1997-04-28). "Bad Blood Still Flows In Tuskegee Study". USA Today. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 13. ^ a b c "Doctor of Public Health Student Handbook" (PDF). University of Kentucky College of Public Health. 2004. pp. 17. 14. ^ http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CA34A.htm 15. ^ Chris McGreal (2010-10-01). "US says sorry for outrageous and abhorrent Guatemalan syphilis tests Experiments in 1940s saw hundreds of Guatemalan prisoners and soldiers deliberately infected to test effects of penicillin". Guardian UK (Guardian News and Media Limited). Retrieved 2010-10-01. 16. ^ Stephen Smith (2010-10-02). "Wellesley professor unearths a horror: Syphilis experiments in Guatemala". Boston Globe (Boston.com). Retrieved 2011-01-18. 17. ^ Maggie Fox (2010-10-01). "US apologizes for 40s syphilis study in Guatemala". Reuters. Retrieved 2011-01-18. 18. ^ Bill Jenkins left the PHS in the mid-1970s for doctoral studies. In 1980, he joined the CDC Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, where he managed the Participants Health Benefits Program that ensured health services for survivors of the Tuskegee Study. 19. ^ "Remarks by the President in apology for study done in Tuskegee". Office of the Press Secretary, The White House. 1997-05-16. Retrieved 2009-09-06. 20. ^ Thomas SB, Quinn SC (November 1991). "The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community". Am J Public Health 81 (11): 1498–505. doi:10.2105/AJPH.81.11.1498. PMC 1405662. PMID 1951814. 21. ^ Cohen E (2007-02-26). "Tuskegees ghosts: Fear hinders black marrow donation". CNN. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 22. ^ "Did Tuskegee damage trust on clinical trials?". CNN. 2008-03-17. Archived from the original on 2008-06-13. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 23. ^ Ralph V. Katz, DMD, MPH, PhD, S. Steven Kegeles, PhD, Nancy R. Kressin, PhD, B. Lee Green, PhD, Min Qi Wang, PhD, Sherman A. James, PhD, Stefanie L. Russell, DDS, MPH, PhD, Cristina Claudio, PhD (November 2006). "The Tuskegee Legacy Project: Willingness of Minorities to Participate in Biomedical Research". Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 17 (4): 698-715. doi:10.1353/hpu.2006.0126. PMC 1780164. 24. ^ Brandon DT, Isaac LA, LaVeist TA. (2005). "The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?". J Natl Med Assoc. 97 (7): 951-6. PMC 2569322. PMID 16080664. 25. ^ Ralph V. Katz, DMD, PhD, MPH, S. Stephen Kegeles, PhD, Nancy R. Kressin, PhD, B. Lee Green, PhD, Sherman A. James, PhD, Min Qi Wang, PhD, Stefanie L. Russell, DDS, PhD, MPH and Cristina Claudio, PhD (September 2008). "Awareness of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the US Presidential Apology and Their Influence on Minority Participation in Biomedical Research". American Journal of Public Health 98 (6): 1137-1142. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.100131. PMC 2377291. PMID 17901437. 26. ^ Chadwick A (2002-07-25). "Remembering the Tuskegee Experiment". NPR. Retrieved 2008-12-04. 27. ^ "The Pulitzer Prizes : Drama". The Pulitzer Prizes -- Columbia University. 28. ^ Geddes, Darryl (1997-09-11). "HBOs adaptation of Feldshuhs play Miss Evers Boys is up for 12 Emmys". Cornell Chronicle. 29. ^ "Awards for Miss Evers Boys". IMDb. 30. ^ http://www.nonesuch.com/albums/tuskegee-experiments 31. ^ Black in Action, Entertainment Weekly. 32. ^ http://www.sentieriselvaggi.org/multimedia/audio 33. ^ Rebecca Skloot (16 August 2011). The Immortal Life of Henreitta Lacks. Crown Books. p. 135. 34. ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120693/quotes[edit] Further reading[edit] Primary sources  Caldwell, J. G; E. V. Price, et al. (1973). "Aortic regurgitation in the Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis". J Chronic Dis 26 (3): 187–94. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(73)90089-1. PMID 4695031.  Hiltner, S. (1973). "The Tuskegee Syphilis Study under review". Christ Century 90 (43): 1174–6. PMID 11662609.  Kampmeier, R. H. (1972). "The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis". South Med J 65 (10): 1247–51. PMID 5074095.
  •  Kampmeier, R. H. (1974). "Final report on the "Tuskegee syphilis study". South Med J 67 (11): 1349–53. PMID 4610772. Olansky, S.; L. Simpson, et al. (1954). "Environmental factors in the Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis". Public Health Rep 69 (7): 691–8. PMC 2024316. PMID 13177831. Rockwell, D. H.; A. R. Yobs, et al. (1964). "The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis; the 30th Year of Observation". Arch Intern Med 114: 792–8. PMID 14211593. Schuman, S. H.; S. Olansky, et al. (1955). "Untreated syphilis in the male negro; background and current status of patients in the Tuskegee study.". J Chronic Dis 2 (5): 543–58. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(55)90153-3. PMID 13263393. Photocopied documents from the study The Tuskegee Study Group Letter inviting subjects to receive "special treatment", actually a diagnostic lumbar puncture. Document from Tuskegee Syphilis Study, requesting that after test subjects die, an autopsy be performed, and the results sent to the National Institutes of Health Draft report of study results up to 1949, page 1 Draft report of study results up to 1949, page 2
  •  Table depicting number of subjects with syphilis and number of controlled non-syphlitic patients, and how many of the subjects have died during the experiments, 1969  Memo ordering termination of the study[edit] Secondary Sources  Gjestland T (1955). "The Oslo study of untreated syphilis: an epidemiologic investigation of the natural course of the syphilitic infection based upon a re-study of the Boeck-Bruusgaard material". Acta Derm Venereol 35 (Suppl 34): 3– 368.  Gray, Fred D. (1998). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The Real Story and Beyond. Montgomery, Alabama: NewSouth Books.  Jones, James H. (1981). Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press.  The Deadly Deception, by Denisce DiAnni, PBS/WGBH NOVA documentary video, 1993.  Reverby, Susan M. (1998). "History of an Apology: From Tuskegee to the White House". Research Nurse.  Reverby, Susan M. (2000). Tuskegees Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. University of North Carolina Press.  Reverby, Susan M. (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and its Legacy. University of North Carolina Press.  Jean Heller (Associated Press), "Syphilis Victims in the U.S. Study Went Untreated for 40 Years" New York Times, July 26, 1972: 1, 8.  Thomas, Stephen B; Sandra Crouse Quinn (1991). "The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932–1972: Implications for HIV Education and AIDS Risk Programs in the Black Community". American Journal of Public Health 81 (1503). doi:10.2105/AJPH.81.11.1498. PMC 1405662. PMID 1951814.  Carlson, Elof Axel (2006). Times of triumph, times of doubt : science and the battle for the public trust. Cold Spring Harbor Press. ISBN 0-87969-805-5.  Washington, Harriet A. (2007). Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans From Colonial Times to the Present.[edit] External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Tuskegee syphilis experiment  CDC Tuskegee Syphilis Study Page  Excellent review of the TSS  Patient medical files held at National Archives and Records Administration Southeast Region, Morrow, GA  Mary Harper; Leader in Minority Health
  •  Interview at Democracy Now!: Ogg Vorbis recording, interview transcript Interview at NPR: Medical Apartheid Tracks History of Abuses IHT book review: Book Review: Medical Apartheid Tuskegee Syphilis Study article, Encyclopedia of Alabama New York Times review of HBO movie "Miss Evers Boys" Susan Reverby, author of Examining Tuskegee - video interview by Democracy Now!