Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

436
views

Published on

We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.

We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.

Published in: News & Politics

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
436
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. LAUGH WITH THE WORLD! RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) – STOR-ALL ALFRED MATTER REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST UNDERSTANDING WHY FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO EXTRADITE WHISTLEBLOWERS AS EDWARD SNOWDEN (i.e. Known for the National Security Agency [NSA] Scandal) and WIKILEAKS’ JULIAN ASSANGE to the United States of America’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM - - because it is TAINTED/CORRUPT and CONTROLLED BY TERRORISTS/WHITE SUPREMACISTS! YES - - United States of America’s PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, CONGRESS and SUPREME COURT along with their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz possess KNOWLEDGE and appears are the MAJOR PLAYERS in the United States of America’s COVER-UP of its Government Officials’/Lawyers’ CORRUPTION, CRIMINAL and CIVIL/HUMAN Rights VIOLATIONS!
  • 2. U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DELIVERY CONFIRMATIONS U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
  • 3. No. _____________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME PETITIONER V. STOR-ALL ALFRED, LLC; JUDGE JOHN ANDREW WEST/ HAMILTON COUNTY (OHIO) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 250 RESPONDENT(S) RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) – REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST1 COMES NOW Petitioner, Vogel Denise Newsome – a/k/a Denise V. Newsome (“Newsome” and/or “Petitioner Newsome”) – WITHOUT WAIVING HER RIGHTS and ARGUMENTS/ISSUES and DEFENSES raised and/or set forth in the October 9, 2010 “Emergency Motion to Stay; Emergency Motion for Enlargement of Time and Other Relief The United States Supreme Court Deems Appropriate To Correct The Legal Wrongs/Injustices Reported Herein” (“EM/ORS”) http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100910-emergency-motion as well as subsequent pleadings/submittals – i.e. wherein Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY demanded that the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States STEP DOWN IMMEDIATELY! http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071811-ltr-sctjusticerobertssuter This instant filing entitled, RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) – REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (response known as “040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN”) is in response to this Court’s return of the April 1, 2013, pleading – i.e. for cost sufficient purposes as required by the Rule(s) of this Court, a copy 1 BOLDFACE, ITALICS, UNDERLINE, CAPS/Small Caps, Font Coloring, Highlighting, etc. added for emphasis. Page 1 of 36
  • 4. may be obtained at http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040113-response-to-return-of-010413pleading-storall in accordance with the Rules of this Court and for cost efficient purposes. PLEASE NOTE: The 040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN document(s) was NOT STAMPED “RECEIVED” as customarily done with documents received by this Court in the past. Newsome gathers such NEGLIGENCE to stamp may be further efforts by this Court NOT to comply of with its practices although it has KNOWLEDGE PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL/GLOBAL interest in this lawsuit. Moreover, the concerns the of this Court NOT wanting to be LAUGHED at for its STUPIDITY in the handling of this matter – i.e. NOW that there is an INTERNATIONAL INTEREST! Nevertheless, this instant filing is submitted in GOOD FAITH and in support thereof, Newsome states: 1) FIRST and FOREMOST, Newsome has REPEATEDLY requested that this Court advise her of any/all CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST in its handling of this case. To date, this Court continues to DANCE AROUND and/or attempts to EVADE making KNOWN to Newsome the CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST known to it which appears PRECLUDE the Justices of this Court and/or this Court’s Administrative Staffs’ handling of this matter; however, does NOT preclude the filing of this instant pleading nor previous pleadings that were submitted for filing by Newsome. Therefore, through this INSTANT filing, Newsome CONTINUES to DEMAND and REITERATES to be Page 2 of 36
  • 5. notified of any/all CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST in its handling of the ORIGINAL Lawsuit she seeks to bring pursuant to Rule 17 of the Supreme Court of the United States and other laws of the United States of America governing said matters. PLEASE NOTE: This lawsuit involves matters of PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS and appears to have CAPTURED the attention of Attorneys/Lawyers/Lawmakers in INTERNATIONAL Communities as well as individuals who are familiar with the laws NOT only in their respective countries/nations but here in the United States of America.  CLEARLY the Public/Foreign Nations are seeing for themselves the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL practices of the SO-CALLED most-powerful country in the wake of its DEMISE! 2) This instant “040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN” is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment, obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the ISSUES and rights of Newsome secured/guaranteed under the United States of America’s Constitution and other laws of the United States of America. Moreover, to address matters of PUBLIC/GLOBAL/ INTERNATIONAL importance and interests. 3) That the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America were TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY demanded to “STEP DOWN” by Friday, July 22, 2011; http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071811-ltr-sctjusticerobertssuter however, to date still remain on the bench with KNOWLEDGE of the CRIMINAL acts they have committed and CONTINUE to commit not ONLY against Newsome but the PUBLIC-AT-LARGE through their CORRUPTION and DECEPTIVE practices to HIDE/CONCEAL the criminal/civil wrongs of their Legal Counsel/Advisor and CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) – i.e. and Baker Donelson Clients such as United States of America PRESIDENT Barack Obama, United States of America CONGRESSIONAL Members, JUDICIAL Branch Members as the Justices of this Court, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company/Stor-All Alfred, etc. Page 3 of 36
  • 6. Page 4 of 36
  • 7. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: AFTER SEVERAL YEARS of posting the above information on Martindale Hubbell, it appears Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz moved SWIFTLY to have information SCRUBBED from the Martindale Hubbell Website about March/April 2010 – i.e. COINCIDENTALLY AFTER Newsome’s Release of the Page 5 of 36
  • 8. PowerPoint Presentation entitled, “NOVEMBER 2010/2012 ELECTIONS:” http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/03-2010-power-point-november-2010-elections OTHER Scandals The IRS Scandal and coming to light are attempts to keep the PUBLIC/WORLD ignorant of the fact that it was Newsome (i.e. and NOT the Tea Party, etc.) who REPEATEDLY brought such CRIMINAL and UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices of CORRUPT Government Officials to the proper Government Entities’/Officials’ attention through her COMPLAINTS, correspondence, emails, facsimiles, etc. that contain sufficient and adequate information as to HOW EARLY such concerns were made known and/or made a matter a PUBLIC record. Therefore, it is worthy to make note, that the EXPOSURE of SCANDALS coming to light is merely a PRELUDE to the SETTING-OF-THE-STAGE for a BACKDOORIMPEACHMENT of United States of America President Barack Obama and attempts to POSITION United States KENTUCKY Senator Rand Paul (i.e. who appears to be a RACIST Tea Party Member) for the 2016 Presidential Elections: Page 6 of 36
  • 9. Just as the Obama Administration’s Internal Revenue Service Steve Miller ADMITTED to the PLANTING of QUESTIONS asked contributing to the EXPOSURE of the IRS’ Criminal Activities, such information is pertinent/relevant for the PUBLIC/WORLD to see how PUPPETMASTERS as Baker Donelson and its CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS are going about OBSTRUCTING the Administration of Justice and engaging in CRIMINAL/FRAUDULENT practices in attempts to COVER-UP the CONSPIRACIES, CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL/CIVIL violations of Government Officials and their Legal Counsel/Attorneys. Newsome’s document entitled, “READ MY LIPS:” http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-read-my-lips-obamafraudgate-for-translation Page 7 of 36
  • 10. provides ADDITIONAL information into the FRAUDULENT practices of Baker Donelson and how it appears this law firm HIJACKED the United States of America’s Government and used access to Government positions to PROMOTE their WHITE SUPREMACY Agenda which has successfully brought about the DEMISE and COLLAPSE of the United States of America. Page 8 of 36
  • 11. EMPHASIS ADDED to marked positions as follows for TRANSLATION purposes:  CHIEF OF STAFF to the President of the United States  Members of the United States Senate  Members of the Representatives  Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts  CHIEF OF STAFF of the Supreme Court of the United States  ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT to CHIEF JUSTICE of the United States  United States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge  United States District Court Judges United States House Page 9 of 36 of the
  • 12. WHY PLEASE NOTE THIS IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL INTEREST: As a matter of law, this information is relevant and/or pertinent to those who may be seeking to CHALLENGE any DECISIONS and/or matters “INFRINGING UPON THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS and other RIGHTS” SIGNED into Law by President Barack Obama (i.e. who it appears under the 25th Amendment of the United States Constitution is NOT Legally/Lawfully in office – therefore, any/all laws and/or documents EXECUTED by Barack Obama and/or his Administration as well as Congressional Members during the Obama Administration CAN be CHALLENGED!) and CONGRESSIONAL Members as well as DECISIONS by the Supreme Court of the United States NOW have LEGAL GROUNDS to CHALLENGE the LEGALITY of any/all decisions NOT only from this Court but that of the United States of America’s EXECUTIVE Branch/White House, LEGISLATIVE Branch/Congress and JUDICIAL Branch/Supreme Court of the United States. WHY THIS INFORMATION IS PERTINENT/ RELEVANT: It appears from record evidence as well as information that may be obtained through RESEARCH, that the APPOINTMENT(S) of Supreme Court of the United States Justices to the High Court and other courts has been COMPROMISED due to CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST and the MAJOR/KEY Role the Law Firm Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) has played in the INFLUENCE and APPOINTMENT of Justices to this Court and lower courts as well as the DECISIONS handed down by this Court and lower courts. There is RECORD evidence to support the NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP of Baker Donelson – i.e. legal counsel for the JUSTICES of the Supreme Court of the United States, legal counsel for PRESIDENT Barack Obama and his Administration and legal counsel for CONGRESSIONAL Members. There is RECORD EVIDENCE to support NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz in this instant matter as well as a PATTERN-OF-PRACTICE and its MAJOR/KEY ROLE in any/all legal matters involving Vogel Denise Newsome (i.e. Petitioner in this instant lawsuit). Page 10 of 36
  • 13. 4) The April 9, 2013, Supreme Court of the United States’ letter states in part: The enclosed documents were received on April 9, 2013. These papers fail to comply with the Rules of this Court and are herewith returned. You may seek review of a decision only by filing a timely petition for writ of certiorari. The papers you submitted are not construed to be a petition for writ of certiorari. Should you choose to file a petition for writ of certiorari, you must submit the petition within the 90 day time limit allowed under Rule 13 of the Rules of this Court. A Copy of the Rules of this Court and a sample petition for a writ of certiorari are enclosed. Your case must first be reviewed by a United States court of appeals or by the highest state court in which a decision could be had. 28 USC 1254 and 1257. RESPONSE: The April 9, 2013, letter from this Court does NOT state WHICH Rule(s) (if any) that Newsome’s April 1, 2013 pleading(s) fail to comply with. Newsome’s April 1, 2013 pleading(s) CLEARLY states that filing is in RESPONSE to this Court’s letter received. Therefore, Newsome’s pleading is in the FORMAT and COMPLIANT with “APPLICATIONS to INDIVIDUAL Justices” pursuant to Rule 22 of the Supreme Court of the United States which states in part: As of June 1, 2013, CUT and PASTED from: http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices 1. An application addressed to an individual Justice shall be filed with the Clerk, who will transmit it promptly to the Justice concerned if an individual Justice has authority to grant the sought relief. 2. The original and two copies of any application addressed to an individual Justice shall be prepared as required by Rule 33.2, and shall be accompanied by proof of service as required by Rule 29. . . . Newsome believes that her Responses to this Court’s correspondence have been submitted in Compliance with Rule 33.2, which states in part: 2. 81⁄2 – by 11-Inch Paper Format: (a) The text of every document, including any appendix thereto, expressly permitted by these Rules to be presented to the Court on 81⁄2 -by 11-inch paper shall appear double spaced, except for indented quotations, which shall be single spaced, on opaque, unglazed, white paper. The document shall be stapled or bound at the upper left-hand corner. Copies, if required, shall be produced on the same type of paper and shall be legible. Page 11 of 36
  • 14. Furthermore, the record evidence will support that Newsome’s April 1, 2013 Response as well as prior responses have been APPLICATIONS made to an INDIVIDUAL Justice Chief Justice John G. Roberts: Page 12 of 36
  • 15. Nevertheless, it appears the Clerk’s Office (William K. Suter and his SIDEKICK/Redmond K. Barnes) are not only acting in VIOLATION of the Rules of this Court, but the United States of America’s Constitution and other laws of the United States of America in the handling of this matter for purposes of OBSTRUCTING Justice and COVERING UP the Criminal Activities of the Justices of this Court and Staff Members. The record evidence will SUPPORT/SUSTAIN Newsome has TIMELY initiated an ORIGINAL Action/Lawsuit pursuant to Rule 17 of the Supreme Court of the United States as well as REPEATEDLY provided her Petition(s) for EXTRAORDINARY WRIT(S) pursuant to Rule 20 of the Supreme Court of the United States and other statutes/laws of the United States of America governing said matters. In fact, the record evidence will support that this Court received Newsome’s TIMELY submitted: PETITION(S) FOR: ORIGINAL WRIT – WRIT OF CONSPIRACY – WRIT OF COURSE – WRIT OF DETINUE – WRIT OF ENTRY WRIT OF EXIGI FACIAS - WRIT OF FORMEDON - WRIT OF INJUNCTION - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - WRIT OF POSSESSION WRIT OF PRAECIPE - WRIT OF PROTECTION - WRIT OF RECAPTION - WRIT OF PROHIBITION - WRIT OF REVIEW WRIT OF SUPERSEDEAS - WRIT OF SUPERVISORY CONTROL WRIT OF SECURITATE PACIS - EXTRATERRITORIAL WRITS on or about November 5, 2012, and/or about January 4, 2013, provided this Court with her pleading entitled: RESPONSE TO NOVEMBER 5, 2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DOCUMENTS RECEIVEDREQUEST FOR AN ANSWER REGARDING WHAT IT IS THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOES NOT UNDERSTAND REGARDING VOGEL DENISE NEWSOMES PETITION(S) FOR: ORIGINAL WRITPage 13 of 36
  • 16. WRIT OF CONSPIRACY- WRIT OF COURSE- WRIT OF DETINUE- WRIT OF ENTRY- WRIT OF EXIGI FACIAS- WRIT OF FORMEDON- WRIT OF INJUNCTION - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - WRIT OF POSSESSION- WRIT OF PRAECIPE - WRIT OF PROTECTION - WRIT OF RECAPTION - WRIT OF PROHIBITION - WRIT OF REVIEW - WRIT OF SUPERSEDEASWRIT OF SUPERVISORY CONTROL- WRIT OF SECURITATE PACIS - EXTRA TERRITORIAL WRITS - AFFIDAVIT TO SUPPORT COMPLIANCE WITH SUPREME COURT FILING REQUIREMENTS- REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010413-response-to-110512-ussupreme-court-documents-returned; however, to date this Court REFUSES to set forth the DEFICIENCIES (if any) with said pleading although Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY demanded from this Court through her April 1, 2013 pleading, that she be provided with deficiencies (if any) pursuant to the Rules of Supreme Court of the United States. The record evidence will support that Newsome’s EXTRAORDINARY Writ(s) set forth the Lower High Court (Ohio Supreme Court) and rulings from said Court have been provided through said Petition – i.e. while such information is NOT relevant and/or is NOT required since the instant lawsuit sought to be pursuant to Rule 17 brought is an ORIGINAL action of the Supreme Court of the United States. Newsome’s November 5, 2012, pleading received by this Court further supports that document contains the required proof of service – i.e. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE – on opposing party(s)/counsel. Page 14 of 36
  • 17. While this Court’s letter dated April 9, 2013 (EXHIBIT “A”) states: A Copy of the Rules of this Court and a sample petition for a writ of certiorari are enclosed. Page 15 of 36
  • 18. This Court FAILED to provide Newsome with a “Copy of the Rules” of this Court as well as “a SAMPLE Petition” of a writ of certiorari – i.e. while there is RECORD EVIDENCE that this Court has before it EXTRAORDINARY WRITS other than Writ of Certiorari in its possession; nevertheless, selects a writ of certiorari rather than provide Newsome with a SAMPLE of other Extraordinary Writs (as Writ of Injunction, Writ of Protection, Writ of Supersedeas, etc) that has been filed with this Court. 5) No, it appears, the IRS Scandal and OTHER Scandals coming to light are SETTING-OF-THE-STAGE for a BACKDOOR-IMPEACHMENT of United States of America President merely a PRELUDE to the Barack Obama: YES, the United States of America’s GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION is MUCH MORE WIDESPREAD than the Internal Revenue Service as this instant ORIGINAL action sought to be brought by Vogel Denise Newsome has shed light on and will CONTINUE to EXPOSE the DEEP-ROOTED Racism and Criminal/Civil Violations of Members of United States of America’s EXECUTIVE Branch, LEGISLATIVE Branch, JUDICIAL Branch and their Lawyers/Attorneys as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz. Page 16 of 36
  • 19. PLEASE NOTE: Failure by this Court to handle Newsome’s pleadings in ACCORDANCE to the Rules of this Court has REPEATEDLY INFRINGED upon her CONSTITUTIONAL Rights as well as other RIGHTS secured under the laws of the United States of America.  Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Scandal – i.e. appears to be BIRTHED from Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL activities of the United States Department of the TREASURY as well as the United States Department of JUSTICE! In fact, it appears that United States of America President Barack Obama’s Administration (White House and Department of Justice) learning of the issue Petitioner Newsome was having with the Kentucky Department of Revenue (Thomas B. Miller) through her August 12, 2009 response entitled, CORRESPONDENCE TO KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THOMAS B. MILLER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER AND A COPY TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA PROVIDING THEM WITH REBUTTAL KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ISSUE: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/081209-letterkydormillerholderobamaproofofmailing in RETALIATION to Newsome’s July 13, 2010 email entitled, “U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: THE DOWNFALL/DOOM OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION - Corruption/Conspiracy/ Cover-Up/Criminal Acts Made Public” to President Barack Obama and provided to other CONGRESSSIONAL Members as well http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071310-email-toobamaholder The attachments to the following email may be obtained at: https://secure.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8a7169885f636fada9 Page 17 of 36
  • 20. CONSPIRED with the Kentucky Department of Revenue’s Thomas B. Miller and TOP/KEY Clients of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Bekowitz as J.P. Morgan Chase to come AFTER Newsome’s bank accounts for CHILD SUPPORT – i.e. when Newsome has NEVER birthed, adopted nor aborted child(ren) to warrant such ATTACKS against her. Neither was a COURT ORDER issued support the action(s) taken AGAINST Newsome:  JP Morgan Chase Bank is a TOP/KEY Client of Baker Donelson  JP Morgan Chase Bank is President Barack Obama’s Bank/Banker https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obamas-relationship-withjp-morgan-chase-bank  NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP was used for purposes of engaging in CRMINAL and CIVIL violations AGAINST Petitioner Newsome and in RETALIATION for Newsome’s REPORTING of Criminal and Civil violations of United States of America President Barack Obama and his Administration.  President Barack Obama relying upon his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s RUNNING/CONTROL of the White House and United States Department of the Treasury to engage in CRIMINAL acts which resulted in the THEFT and EMBEZZLEMENT of monies in Newsome’s bank account(s): Page 18 of 36
  • 21.  Associated Press (“AP”) Scandal – i.e. appears BIRTHED from what appears to be the United States of America’s Federal Bureau of Investigation’s/Central Intelligence Agency’s TERRORIST Plan to bring down a Jetliner which News coverage began to surface about May 7, 2012; however; it appears the United States of America’s TERRORIST Plot to bring down the Jetliner allegedly bound for the United States was SCRAPPED AFTER Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the United States of America’s CORRUPT Government Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’ http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092812-david-addington-article-english PLANNING and CARRYING OUT the September 11, 2001 DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other targets through her April 30, 2012, “OFFICIAL COMPLAINT/CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION FILED OF AND AGAINST THE GARRETSON FIRM RESOLUTION GROUP INC. AND/OR MESSINA STAFFING/MESSINA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WITH UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION – CINCINNATI AREA OFFICE and OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION – CENTRAL OFFICE; AND REQUEST FOR COMMISSIONER CHARGE TO BE ISSUED SUBMITTED FOR FILING ON APRIL 30, 2012” - i.e. which was posted about May 2, 2012: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/043012-eeoc-ocrccomplaintcharge Page 19 of 36
  • 22. which it appears led to the United States of America’s “PULLING-THE-PLUG” on its PLANS to bring down the Jetlinder bound for the United States: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/cia-foiled-plane-plot-2 http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/cia-foiled-plane-bomb http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-may-2012foiled-plane-plot Now it appears the President Obama’s Administration and Lawyer Baker Donelson are attempting to blame the Associated Press for being the reason for botching the plans of the United States of to bring down ANOTHER plane in MAY 2012 and was going to BLAME this on one of its America TERRORIST CELLS in the BOMBING of another plane – i.e. in that it appears the Obama Administration and its legal counsel Baker Donelson may have been behind the BOMBING and/or TERRORIST acts in the crash on or about February 12, 2009, which carried Beverly Ekert – i.e. the wife of a 911 victim killed in the 2001 World Trade Center bombings, who had met with President Barack Obama days earlier and reports allege she REFUSED to be BRIBED and/or bought out and was DETERMINED to get to the TRUTH behind the DOMESTIC Terrorist Acts of September 11, 2001: Page 20 of 36
  • 23. Then approximately TWO months later the downing of the attorney’s (Michael H. Doran) plane who was legal counsel to 911 victim(s): Page 21 of 36
  • 24. Newsome laughs because the record evidence will support that it appears the United States of America’s Government Agencies’/Officials’ Legal Counsel REPEATEDLY RELIED upon its TIES/CONNECTIONS and RELATIONSHIPS to the Government and TELECOMMUNICATION Companies (i.e. as AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, etc.) to HACK into Customer Accounts; moreover, Telecommunication Companies ALLOWING “THIRD-PARTY Access” such as Baker Donelson and Government Agencies UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL access to customers’ accounts for purposes of TRACKING them as well as seeing who they were communicating with. Additional investigations are yielding that the AP Scandal REACHES FAR BEYOND the Associated Press and such CRIMINAL and UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices are used on Newsome for purposes of TRACKING/STALKING her and contacting employers for purposes of having Newsome’s employment TERMINATED to preclude/prevent her from submitting court filings as this instant pleading. Acts in FURTHERANCE of the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Newsome. Newsome LAUGHS because she knows from the FEEDBACK she receives that information shared in her Social Forums and/or website provides CREDIBLE information and that from her PATTERN-OF-PRACTICES of Baker Donelson and its CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS they were going to FALL and provide ADDITIONAL evidence to support Newsome’s claims. Therefore, Newsome POSTING information in that documents/materials are DATED to support when information is POSTED – i.e. so it cannot be said that information was released AFTER the fact. For instance, Newsome’s POSTING regarding the Baker Donelson NEXUS/CONNECTION with Telecommunication GIANTS as Verizon, AT&T and Sprint for instant were posted on or about June 7, 2012: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelsonatt-insurance-universal-health http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/bakerdonelsonlabor-employment-telecommunications http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelsonverizon Page 22 of 36
  • 25. Such CRIMINAL HACKING Scandal that NOT only reaches Telecommunication Companies but appears Baker Donelson and the United States of America’s Government relies upon the Baker Donelson connections/relationships with PRIVATE Employers as ADECCO to UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY Stalk Citizens and HACK into their accounts (as Newsome’s) and “CHANGING PIN” for purposes of determining WHERE she is working and HOW much she is earning. Then proceed to have those with whom they are TARGETING employment TERMINATED for purposes of FINANCIALLY devastating and precluding/depriving them with a means of livelihood – life, liberties and pursuit of happiness, etc. For instance, from RESEARCH in the ADECCO hacking matter, Newsome was able to ESTABLISH a CONNECTION/ RELATIONSHIP between ADECCO and Baker Donelson’s TOP/KEY Client JP MORGAN CHASE BANK/JAMIE DIMON who just happens to be United States of America’s President Barack Obama’s Bank/Banker. Page 23 of 36
  • 26. HACKING into Newsome’s ADECCO Account on or about January 4, 2013:  Coming approximately 12 days AFTER Newsome’s December 23, 2012 FACSIMILE entitled: ObamaFraudGate – BENGHAZI COVER-UP STATUS Of EEOC COMPLAINT: Newsome vs. The Garretson Firm Resolution Group/Messina Staffing – BACK WAGES DEMANDED – By THURSDAY, January 10, 2013 to United States of America President Barack Obama DEMANDING Back Wages: Page 24 of 36
  • 27.  The record evidence will support that United States of America President Barack Obama was TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED via FACSIMILE of what appears to be his Administration’s and/or Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s HACKING into Newsome’s Account. http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010613-obama-faxconfirmation-adecco-notification-of-compromiseto-e-payollaccount IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Newsome’s was the ONLY Account This was NOT WIDESPREAD! ADECCO Account HACKED. Obama wanted GOVERNMENT – so here we GO! President Barack Page 25 of 36 OPEN
  • 28. REITERATED FOR TRANSLATION PURPOSES: United States of America President Barack Obama, while it appears that you and your Administration are using TAXPAYER’S DOLLARS to STALK Vogel Denise Newsome and DETERMINE where she is working so that you all can CONTINUE in your CRIMINAL/UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices in contacting her employers to have her TERMINATED and to keep her from SHARING this information, the THURSDAY, January 10, 2013 DEADLINE presented in the DECEMBER 13, 2012 Facsimile http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/122312-obama-faxenglish requesting BACK WAGES in the amount of approximately $39,640 is approaching. Hopefully, your time will be better spent seeing to it that Newsome obtain these BACK WAGES and PACKING YOUR BAGS to leave the White House!  Benghazi Attack Scandal – i.e. FAILED Attempts to BLAME on Muslim Video PAID for and FINANCED with JEWISH Support Page 26 of 36
  • 29. It appears that AFTER Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the “HILLARY CLINTON STINGERS” presentation released by Newsome on or about August 21, 2012: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/082112-hillary-clinton-dealingwith-the-united-states-of-americas-stingers said release SQUASHED the PLANS of President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell and and their CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS to have United States of America’s Ambassador Christopher Stephens KIDNAPPED and held in EXCHANGE for the Muslim Brotherhood’s Blind Sheik Page 27 of 36
  • 30. http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-benghazi-coveruppresentation-to-western-center-news-coverage  Boston Marathon Bombing Scandal/FRAMING of INNOCENT People (i.e. Muslims). Thanks to the OVER-KILL Media coverage and information RELEASED by the Government Agencies, Newsome believes there is SUFFICIENT evidence to support what appears to be the FRAMING of Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev for the Boston Marathon Bombing – i.e. which clearly appears to be the ANOTHER United States of America’s DOMESTIC Terrorist Attack by agencies as the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency TARGETING and FRAMING members of the MUSLIM Communities for their CRIMINAL acts Page 28 of 36
  • 31. as done in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombings where it appears the United States of America’s Government was INVOLVED in the PLANNING and CARRYING out of those attacks as well. The 1993 Bombing Attacks were BLAMED on the Muslim Brotherhood’s Blind Sheik: Page 29 of 36
  • 32. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The SAME Blind Sheik that from reports appears President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson had PLANNED to have United States of America’s Ambassador KIDNAPPED for on September 11, 2012, in the Benghazi Attacks so they could WORK-OUT-AHOSTAGE-NEGOTIATION EXCHANGE to provide Ambassador Stephens for the Muslim Brotherhood’s Blind Sheik: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-benghazi-coveruppresentation-to-western-center-news-coverage  RICIN Scandal – BIRTHED on or about April 16, 2013, COINCIDENTALLY one week AFTER the Supreme Court of the United States April 9, 2013, receipt of Newsome’s April 1, 2013 pleading(s). Coincidentally, FIRST allegedly targeting United States MISSISSIPPI Senator (Roger Wicker) and United States Page 30 of 36
  • 33. President Barack Obama. Coincidentally, a SUSPICIOUS package is received at the CINCINNATI, Ohio location in the vicinity where Newsome receives her mail. Clearly what appears to be a SUBLIMINAL message sent to Newsome by the Obama Administration for purposes of THREATS/INTIMIDATION and efforts to get her to back down from EXPOSING the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL activities of the United States of America’s HEADS-OF-STATE and CORRUPT Congressional Members, CORRUPT Justices/Judges and their CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/suspicious-package-cincinnati-ohio-week-that-ricinscandal-broke Attempts were made by the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/Federal Bureau of Investigation/Central Intelligence Agency to FRAME an INNOCENT Mississippi Man (Paul Kevin Curtis - i.e. who claims to be an ACTIVIST and post in his social forum the following quote: “To see a wrong and not expose it is to become a silent partner to its continuance." Page 31 of 36
  • 34.  United States of America’s own DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on 9/11/2001 of the WORLD TRADE CENTER Bombings and other Attacks  Supreme Court of the United States Scandal  United States of America CONGRESSIONAL Scandal The listing goes on-and-on. . . . The CONSEQUENCES of FAILURE TO ACT – i.e. the laws of the United States of America CLEARLY supports that when criminals (i.e. as CORRUPT Government Officials in the United States of America’s EXECUTIVE Branch, LEGISLATIVE Branch and JUDICIAL Branch) are NOT stopped when their crimes are TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY brought to the appropriate Government Agencies’ attention, these CRIMINALS go on to COMMIT more HIDEOUS crimes. For instance, it appears from the record evidence as well as from evidence obtained through RESEARCH and are matters of PUBLIC interests/records, FAILURE to act upon Newsome’s as well as other CONCERNED Citizens’ Complaints has LED to the MAJOR/KEY Role of the United States of America’s CORRUPT Government Officials/Heads of State have PLAYED in the GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL Economic and FINANCIAL demise of NOT only the United States of America but Countries/Nations abroad. Moreover, LEADING to the WARS and CIVIL unrest in regions such as the MIDDLE EAST! 6) The record evidence will further support that through this Court’s April 9, 2013, correspondence (i.e. attached as EXHIBIT “A” to this instant pleading), its CONTINUED FAILURE to provide Newsome with the DEFICIENCIES with the Petition(s) for Extraordinary Writs, is clearly an OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE and PRECLUDES her from making the necessary changes (if any are really needed) because, according to her, she believes that said Pleading was REDONE with the REQUIRED CORRECTIONS in accordance with the Rules of the Court. However, WITHOUT a letter from this Court in COMPLIANCE with Rule 14.5, it is both unlawful and unethical for this Court to REFUSE to file Petition(s); moreover, FAIL to provide Newsome with a list of deficiencies (if any). PLEASE NOTE: This Court’s review of Newsome’s CORRECTED Petitions in this instant lawsuit will support that with each filing CHANGES/CORRECTIONS were made; however, this Court CONTINUES to fail to DISTINCTLY INDICATE deficiency(s) – if any! Therefore, in compliance with the Rules of this Court and in good-faith efforts to mitigate costs, Newsome is PRECLUDED from making the necessary corrections and having booklets produced because this Court has FAILED to comply with its OWN Rules in the handling of this matter which clearly OBSTRUCTS JUSTICE and these proceedings. 7) Newsome having concerns that the DILIATORY actions of this Court are BAD FAITH actions for purposes of INCREASING COSTS as well as AIDING and ABETTING in the CRIMINAL and CIVIL WRONGS of United States of America President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel/Attorneys Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their interest in this lawsuit as well as that of the United States of Page 32 of 36
  • 35. America’s CONGRESS’ interest and the Supreme Court of the United States’ PERSONAL and FINANCIAL interest in the outcome of this lawsuit. 8) Newsome further believes that a reasonable mind may conclude that the DILATORY practices by the Supreme Court of the United States is in FURTHERANCE of the MAJOR/KEY ROLES played in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Newsome and the use of such time by this Court and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz who also represents United States President Barack Obama/Executive Branch Members, United States Congressional Members and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company – i.e. whose Client(s) is party to this instant lawsuit – to keep Newsome’s LAWSUIT and pleadings from being filed. Moreover, that such DILATORY practices by this Court have been used for the PURPOSES of AIDING and ABETTING its Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson) and President Barack Obama’s Administration in the CRIMINAL STALKING of Newsome and HACKING into her employer’s accounts and/or TELECOMMUNICATION Company records to determine where Newsome is working for purposes of getting her employment TERMINATED and FINANCIALLY devastating her to PRECLUDE/OBSTRUCT her from bringing this lawsuit which CLEARLY is a matter of PUBLIC IMPORTANCE as well as has gained GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL interest from FOREIGN NATION Leaders/Citizens. For instance, in effort to PRECLUDE/OBSTRUCT Newsome from filing the Petition(s) for Extraordinary Writ, it appears that this Court’s Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson) relied upon its TIES/CONNECTIONS/RELATIONSHIPS to one of its TOP/KEY Clients – J.P. Morgan Chase Bank – to BREACH/COMPROMISE records of Newsome’s employer (ADECCO) for purposes of obtaining information regarding where she worked as well as her earnings: AGAIN, it appears HACKING into the ADECCO account on or about April 26, 2013, for purposes of obtaining where Newsome may be working and her earnings as well for purposes of OBSTRUCTING the filing of this instant pleading. Newsome believes that the April 26, 2013 FISHING EXPEDITION of the Obama Administration and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’ MANIC OBSESSIONS with STALKING HER through the engagement of such CRIMINAL activities of this Court’s Legal Counsel’s (Baker Donelson) unlawful/illegal practices to OBSTRUCT the filing of this instant pleading. The April 26, 2013, HACKING Page 33 of 36
  • 36. MANIC ZEALOUS PURSUIT to determine where Newsome worked for purposes of getting her TERMINATED appears may have led to locating her at De-Bra Kuempel and her employment ABRUPTLY TERMINATED DESPITE Newsome’s EXCELLENT “Quality of Work!” Employment opportunity ABRUPTLY terminated Tuesday, May 28, 2013 (i.e. approximately one month from the ADECCO Computer HACKING!). It appears on or about putting Mary Jo Morey (White) and her co-conspirators (Kristie Toney – claiming to be a PREACHER’S Kid, Jordan and Tara – ALL White) up to the task of getting the ONLY African-America Service Administrator TERMINATED because Newsome’s work ethics and COMPUTER skills EXCEEDED those of who CONSPIRED to have her employment terminated and she gathered the racist/discriminatory practices to have her employment terminated is motivated by unlawful/illegal purposes. A work environment which it was clear these individuals wanted to make it a HOSTILE WORK environment and also REFERRED to Newsome’s AGE in their “SINGLED-OUT Lunch Meeting with Mary Jo (Office Manager)!” A work environment where Newsome’s co-workers were SO STRESSED out from their jobs that they were CRYING and then UPSET with Newsome because she was NOT OVERWHELMED nor STRESSED out in learning the duties of her new job. ANOTHER White Employer alleging equal employment opportunities with Joseph D. Clark (President/CEO) sitting at the helm of De-Bra Kuempel. Page 34 of 36

×