09/03/14 - LACK OF JURISDICTION - RESPONSE TO 08/12/14 JUDGE RUSSELL ENTRY
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

09/03/14 - LACK OF JURISDICTION - RESPONSE TO 08/12/14 JUDGE RUSSELL ENTRY

on

  • 137 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
137
Views on SlideShare
135
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 2

http://www.slideee.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

09/03/14 - LACK OF JURISDICTION - RESPONSE TO 08/12/14 JUDGE RUSSELL ENTRY 09/03/14 - LACK OF JURISDICTION - RESPONSE TO 08/12/14 JUDGE RUSSELL ENTRY Document Transcript

  • H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y ( O H I O ) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff) vs. CIVIL ACTION: 14-CV-11786 DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant) COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION REITERA TION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
  • H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y (OHIO) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff) vs. CIVIL ACTION: 14-CV-11786 DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant) COUR T LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEA THER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED COMES NOW, Defendant Denise Newsome ("Newsome") WITHOUT WAIVER TO JURISDICTION DEFENSE in that this Court LACKS JURISDICTION of the Subject Matter as well as LACK JURISDICTION over Defendant Newsome as well as the defenses set forth in Defendant's: A. NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE COUNTER-COMPLAINT OF WHICH DAMAGES SOUGHT WILL EXCEED THE JURISDICATION OF THIS COURT - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO ALLOW REQUIRED TIME ALLOTTED BY LAW FOR PLAINTIFF TO ANWER COUNTER-COMPLAINT and FOR DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE A REBUTTAL SHOULD PLAINTIFF FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNTER-COMPLAINT - MOTION TO TRANSFER FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION BECAUSE DAMAGES SOUGHT WILL EXCEED THIS COURT'S JURISDICTION GOOD FAITH NOTIFICATION TO PLAINTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN TO WITHDRAW EVICTION ACTION BY FRIDAY, MAY 30, 2014 (1:00 P.M.) B. REQUEST COURT "UPDATE" CASE SCHEDULES OF THE DOCKET; REQUEST FOR WRITTEN DETAILED DECISION and, NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE "WRITTEN OBJECTIONS" To This Court's JUNE 3, 20J4 DENIAL OF CONTINUANCE Upon Receipt of Written Detailed Decision and if required EXHAUST The APPEAL PROCESS Begmmng With The Filing Of A NOTICE OF APPEAL; NOTICE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE FILING OF THIS LAWSUIT TO THE PUBLIC/MEDL4 C. NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JUNE 13, 2014 HEARING DUE TO THE CONCERNS OF THREATS ON DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S LIFE D. EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEAL and STAY OF EXECUTION JURY TRIAL TO BE DEMANDED Page 1 of 13
  • E. EMERGENCY RESPONSE: OBJECTION(S) TO JUNE 18, 2014 ENTRY GRANTING STAY OF EXECUTION ON WRIT, STA Y IS CONTINGENT UPON DEFT POSTING BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $396 PAYABLE 06-23-14 BEING RENT FOR THE CURRENT MONTH, JUDGE/MAGISTRATE: ELLEN WOLF A LIKE AMOUNT OF RENT IS REQUIRED TO BE POSTED ON THE OF EACH MONTH HEREAFTER DURING THIS APPEAL - ERRORS IN DECISION: THE COMPUTATION OF BOND AMOUNT and DATE FOR POSTING BOND IS CONTRARY TO STATUTES/MWS GOVERNING SAID ATATTERS - i.e. HOWEVER, NOT LIMITED TO THIS LIST ALONE F. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSION OF LAWS SUPPORTING THIS COURT'S JUNE 13. 2014 DECISION/RULING; DEMAND FOR NEW TRIAL and DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL - - DEMAND THAT THIS COURT RESPECT THE STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTERS TO ALLOW THE PROPER TIME FOR RESPONSIVE/REBUTTAL PLEADINGS AND NOT OBSTRUCT THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN FURTHER EFFORTS OF AIDING AND ABETTING PLAINTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN IN THIS LAWSUIT and PLAINTIFF'S CRIMINAL/CIVIL VIOLATIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME G. DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S MOTION TO DISMISS H. NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JULY 25, 2014 HEARING DUE TO THE CONCERNS OF THREATS ON DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S and ATTORNEY DAVID STENSON'S LIFE AS WELL AS DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S FILING OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT OF AND AGAINST PI^INTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN AND ITS CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS IN CRIMINAL ACTS BEFORE THIS COURT AS WELL AS CRIMINAL WRONGDOING BY THIS COURT AND PLALNTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN AND OTHERS ON OR ABOUT JUNE 30, 2014 I. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO JULY 25, 2014 MAGISTRATE DECISION REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED J. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST Page 2 of 13
  • 11, 2014 MAGISTRATE TYRONE YATES ENTRY REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED and fdes this, her: COUR T LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRA EE'S DECISION REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED (hereinafter, "CourtLachsJurisdiction-081214JudgeRussellReMAGDecision"). This instant fihng is filed in GOOD FAITH and for purposes of PRESERVING and PROTECTING Defendant Newsome's Claims and Defenses in this instant matter as well as in future CRIMINAL and CIVIL Actions resulting as a direct and proximate resuU of the injuries/harai Defendant Newsome has sustained and CONTINUES to be subjected to as well as THREATS TO HER LIFE as a DIRECT and PROXIMATE result of EXPOSING the CRIMINAL and CIVIL wrongs of the United States of America's President Barack Obama, United States of America Congress, Supreme Court of the United States and their LEGAL COUNSEL Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and others involved in the CONSPIRACIES/CHAIN CONSPIRACIES targetmg Defendant Denise Newsome. In fiirther support of this instant CourtLacksJurisdiction-0812I4JudgeRussellReMAGDecision, Defendant Newsome, in accordance with die Statutes/Laws governing said matters undertakes the DUTY, OBLIGATION and RESPONSIBILITY to make such Crimmal/Civil VIOLATIONS known to this Court as well as the PUBLICAVORLD and, therefore, does so by stating: (1) Under the Statutes/Laws governing said matters, Defendant has a duty and responsibility to REPORT Criminal Acts - i.e. in which she does through this instant pleading and her previous filings in this mstant lawsuit. (2) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that Plamtiff Anna Louise Inn is a TRANSITIONAL dwelling - i.e. Inn, Hotel, Motel, etc. (3) UNCONTESTED: Is die fact that Defendant Denise Newsome is a NON­RESIDENT of the State of Ohio. (4) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that at the TIME of the fding of Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn's lawsuit in this instant action, it was KNOWN to said Plaintiff, Defendant Denise Newsome is a NON-RESIDENT of the State of Ohio. Page 3 of 13
  • (5) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that Defendant Denise Newsome rented a Room at the Anna Louise Inn while "CONTRACTING - i.e. engaging in TEMPORARY Employment (EMPHASIS ADDED) - business in the State of Ohio; however, she is NOT a RESIDENT of Ohio. (6) Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure are CLEAR pursuant to Rule 4.3(A) PROCESS: OUT-OF-STATE SERVICE, which states in part: When service permitted. Service of process may be made outside of this state, as provided in this mle, an any action in this state, upon a person who, AT THE TIME OF SERVICE PROCESS, is a NONRESIDENT of this state . . . (1) Transacting any business in this slate; (2) Contracting to supply services. . . in this state. . . Rl L E 4.3 Process: Out of State Service (A) X'N'heu service permitted. Senice of process may be made outside of this state, as pro"iclecl in this mlc. iii any action m this slate, upon a pei-oii -.vho, a* tJie nnie of scivice ot process. IS a noaresjcleut of tins state or is a resident or this stale who is absent troiu this state. "Person" includes an individual, an uidividiial's execiuor. admmistiator, or other personal representative, or a coiporaiion. partnership, association, or any other legal or conunercia! entity, who. actiiia directly oi' by an agent, has caused an event io occur out of which tlie claiai that is the subject of the complaint arose, trom tiie person's: (1) Transactma any business m this state; (21 Contractuia to suppl;v senices or goods m this state: (7) UNDISPUTED: Defendant Demse Newsome did NOT VOLUNTARILY COMPLY with Vacation Request and/or Eviction demands brought by Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn. It is a GOOD THING that die record of this Court as well as the record of Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn will SUSTAIN Defendant Newsome, TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY CONTESTED Anna Louise Inn's Eviction Lawsuit as well as its and others CRIMINAL/CIVIL wrongdoings leveled against her. UNDISPUTED: Defendant Denise Newsome, TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, it Representatives as well as this Couit that they were ENGAGING in CRIMINAIJCivil wronsdoinss. To no avail! Defendant Newsome was THREATENED with legal proceedings against her by Anna Louise Inn's DIRECTOR OE OPERATION Robin Stanley and although Defendant Newsome WARNED and/or CAUTIONED Stanley as well as Anna Louise Inn's President/Chief Executive Officer Stephen T. MacConnell AGAINST Page 4 of 13
  • makins such THREA TS to her, said Plaintiff did KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY and MALLCTOUSLYproceed to Imns a FRIVOLOUS Eviction Action of and asainst Defendant Newsome as well as ENGAGE in committing FRAUD UPON THE COURT and other CRIMES! UNDISPUTED: Defendant made the proper DEFENSES to Aima Louise hm's and this Court's CRIMINAL wrongdoings in the handling of this instant Eviction Lawsuit against her. Therefore, providing Defendant Newsome NOW - i.e. in that CRIMINAL ACTS have been ACCOMPLISHED and/or CARRIED OUT - with the RIGHT to brmg the APPLICABLE CRIMINAL Complaint as well as CIVIL Complaint of and against Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, this Court and others who ENGAGED in such legal wrongdoings: 65 Ohio Jur.3d § 164 - Notice to vacate; brinsins possessory action: A notice by the landlord that the tenancy is being teiininated, combined with a demand by him or her for possession of die premises, and voluntary compliance dierewith by the tenant without protest, is not an eviction for which damages may be recovered. (Greenberg v. Murphy, 16 Ohio CD. 359, 1904 WL 1147 (Ohio Cn. Ct. 1904)). [Practice Guide: If the tenant is rightfully in possession and entitled to remain, the tenant SHOI1I.D AWAIT legal proceedings that are threatened, and make defense thereto, RATHER THAN COMPLY with the demand, and then bring an action for alleged damages that perhaps never would have resulted. (Greenberg)] Where a tenant, upon request or notice to vacate, VOLUNTARILY abandons the premises without protest, no action for damages against the landlord, based on fraud or misrepreseiitations as to the reasons for sue request can be maintained under rights recognized by the common law, or any statute of Ohio. {Ferguson v. Buddenberg, 87 Ohio App. 326, 42 Ohio Op. 488, 57 Ohio L. Abs. 473, 94 N.E.2d 568 (1'' Dist. Hamilton County 1950)). In an eviction action for nonpayment of rent brought by a landlord pursuant to RC Ch 1923, a tenant MAY mSPOND by asserting any legal defense he has to that action, pursuant to RC 1923.061(A), and/or by fding a COUNTERCLAIM for damages caused by the landlord's breach of the rental agi'eement and/or the landlord's breach of his duties under RC 5321.04. Smith v. Wright (Oluo App. 1979) 65 Oluo App.2d 101, 416 N.E.2d 655, 19 0.0.3d 59. A) REITERATION: HAmLTON COUNTY (OHIO) MUNICIPAL COURT AND/OR ITS PUBLIC OFFICIALS (CLERK(S), JUDGE(S), MAGISTRATE(S), DEPUTY(S), ETC.) HAVING Page 5 of 13
  • KNOWLEDGE AND/OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN IT LACKED JTJRTSDICTTON OVER THIS LAWSUIT: (8) This Court and its Pubhc Officials (Clerks, Judges, Magistrates, Deputies, etc.) LACK JURISDICTION OVER diis mstant lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Anna Louise hin. (9) Under the Statutes/Laws governing said matters, Service of Process was NOT completed and neither has this Court's Clerk of Court VALIDATED service of process as MANDATED hy the statute/laws uoverninti said matters to provide this Court with Jurisdiction pursuant to Rule XXL Evictions of the Hamilton County Ohio Municipal Court which states m part: SERVICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 1923.06: Where service is made by posting pursuant to RC. 1923.06(D)(2)(c) and the ordinary mail mandated by R.C. 1923.06(C) is returned by the postal authorities with an endorsement showing failure of delivery, service shall be deemed complete under R.C. 1923.06(G)(2). Where service is by certified mail, and the certified mail is returned for any reason, other than refused or unclaimed, the case shall be presented to a judge or magistrate, as appropriate, for a determination of whether service is complete. (Revised 4/29/08, Effective 5/12/08) If service in an eviction action is not complete for any reason, the defendant may nonetheless appear and waive service. RlLEIXl EVICTIONS mia presaxT TO SECTION i9:.ii!6: Wkre senice is icaiie k posting punuMi io R.C. 1923.06iDX2){c) and the ordinan- miO msndsied h R,C. 19L106{C) is remmed k the posui sMliorides mth sn endorseiBeiii shoiring failure af deliver, senice shall be deemed compleie under R,C, 192JI6fGHl). ttere senice is by cenified mail, and the certified mail is reninied lei' any reason, other than refused or anclainied, she case shaU be prtsfuied to a jadje or magistrate, as ipprapriaie, (or a deiemsiastion ofivhether serrite is complete. (Sensed 4/29(fiS. Efiectiie 5/12.IS) If senice in an eiictioa sctioii is m complete for any reasra, ihe defendant may sonetheiess appear and waive serrice, CUT & PASTED FROM: httiK//wwvv.hamihon-co.or2/municipalcourt/Civil Rules/rulel9 2S.htni#XX As well as Statute 1923.06 of the Ohio Revised Code CLEARLY states m part: 1923.06 Summons - service of process. (A) Any summons in an action, including a claim for possession, pursuant to this chapter shall be issued. . . . (B) Every summons issued under this section to recover residential premises shall contain the following language printed in a conspicuous manner: "A complaint to evict you has been filed with this court. No person shall be evicted Page 6 of 13
  • unless the person's right to possession has ended and no person shall be evicted in retaliation for the exercise of the person's lawful rights. I f you are depositing rent with the clerk of this court you shall continue to deposit such rent until the time of the court hearing. The failure to continue to deposit such rent may result in your eviction. You may request a trial by jury. You have the right to seek legal assistance. I f you cannot afford a lawyer, you may contact your local legal aid or legal service office. I f none is available, you may contact your local bar association." (C) The clcik of the court in which a complaint to evict is filed shall mail any summons by ordinary mail, along with a copy of the complaint. document, or other process to be served, to the defendant at the address set forth in the caption of the summons and to any address set forth in any written instructions furnished to the clerk. The mailing sliail bc evidenced by a certificate of mailing which the clerk shall complete and file. . . . L A W r / / g r ' Ohio Laws and R u l e s Route: Ohio Reised Code >• T i t l e t i g ] XLX COURTS - MUXICIP.AL ^ MAYOR'S - C O U y n ' •> Chapter mzi.: FORCIBLE EXTRV ASD DET.A.I-NXR 1923.06 Summons - service of process. {A; Any sumnnons m an action, including a claim for possession, pursuant to this chapter shall be issued, be in the form specified, and be served and returned as provided in this section. Such service shale be at least seven days before the day set for trial, (B) Every summons issued under this section to recover restdentiai premises shall contain the following language pnnted in a conspicuous manner; "A complaint to evict you has been filed •,«/!th this court. No person shall be evicted unless the person's nght to possession has ended and no person shall be evicted in retaliation for the exercise of the person's lawful nghts. If you are depositing rent with the clerk of this court you shall continue to deposit such rent until the time of the court heanng. The failure to continue to deposit such rent may result in your eviction. You may request a tnal by jury. You have the right to seek legal assistance, i f you carjnot afford a lawyer, you may contact your local legal aid or legal service office. If none is available, you may contact your local bar association." (C) The clerk of ttie court in which a complaint to evict is filed shall mail any summons by ordinary mail, along with a copy of the complaint document, or other process to be served, to the defendant at the address set forth in the caption of the summons and to any address set forth in any wntten instructions furnished to the clerk. The mailing shall be evidenced by a certificate of mailing which the clerk shall complete and file. CUT & PASTED FROM:: htt|3:././codes.ohtO.gov./orc/1923.06 (10) REITERATION OF L A C K OF JURISDICTION: Due to this Court's L.ACK OF .JlJRISDICTIOsN over this instant Lawsuit, die August 12, 2014 Judge Heather S. Russell's Entry IS WORTH NEITHER the INK NOR the PAPER it is ISSUED ON!" Page 7 of 13
  • Furthennore, Judge Russell's August 12, 2014 Entry! is NULLA-'OID and CANNOT be ENFORCED or UPHELD because of this Court's LACKS JURISDICTION'. FURTHER SUPPORTING die ONGOING of die CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES leveled against Defendant Denise Newsome and the STRING of Magistrates/Judges as Purcell that CONTINUE to line up and are to be ADDED to the CRIMINAL Complaint to he filed! We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitutfon but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. (Abraham Lincoln) RoseubJooifi v. Menwnedia. //?£._ 91 S.Ct. i S J l ( 1 9 ' l ) - Fu^t .lirteiidiiieiit protects all discussion and coniiiiiiiiicatioii im'oh'ing inatwrs of public or °eneraJ concern MirJiotn resord 10 niuNiier vt'rson^ inroivt'd ,^?Y faiuoiis or (inonvniints. (Per Mr, Justice Breminn witli the Chief Jii-Tice md one Ju-tice joining in rlie opinion and vno Justices concurring m the judgment.) U.S.C.A.Const. Aineiid. 1. Teddy Roosevelt: ''Unless a man is honest we have no right to keep him in public life, it matters not how brilliant his capacity, it hardly matters how great his power of doing good service on certain lines may be... No man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by the community. Pages of 13
  • ANN. UNDERSTANDING T H E UISE INN EVICTION SCANDAL ND THEIR R O L E S / 4 X J J ^ I * € C T I O NS V.^r^^D OTHER c m ^ s ^ ^ THAT.LEADS TO THE ' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S WHITE HOUSE (PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA),, HIS LEGAL COUNSEL http://'www.slideshai'e.net-Vog&lDemse./OTOTH-obamafraudgate- comiection-to-the-annalouiseinn-eviction-scandal- 36698826 Just think, 0. J. Sunpson received approximately 33 YEARS for allegedly engaging in CRIMINAL activities in the retrieval of his propeity. So just imagine what CRIMES v^ere coimnitted when Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, this Court and their CRIMINAL COHORTS/CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS committed criminal acts as ~ i.e. may this Court as well as Plaintiff do then HOMEWORK in regaids to the FOLLOWING possible Counts to be included m the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against them: • Conspiracy • Fraud Upon The Court • Public Corruption • Complicity • Corruption • Aiding & Abetting • Extortion • Bribery • Coercion • Retaliation • Pattern-Of-Conduct • Intiraidation • Deprivation of Rights • Power/FaOure To Prevent • Stalking/Menacing By Stalking • Burglary and Breaking & Entering • Theft • Criminal Trespass • Larceny • Invasion • Unlawful En try/Forcible Actions • Obstruction of Justice/Sei-vice of Process • Conspiracy Against Rights • Conspiracy To Interfere With CivU Rights • Violation of Code of Judicial Conduct Page 9 of 13
  • As SOCIAL FORUMS are allowing for the SHARING OF INFORMATION with the PUBLIC/WORLD, Defendmit Newsome KNOWS from HISTORY, that the FALL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S TERRORIST/WHITE SUPREMACIST REGIME is INEVITABLE! As President Barack Obama suggested, it appears CHANGE will be coming from the OUTSIDE/INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION! © s l i d e s h a r e updoes Exptore* VogeDenise. we me making SkteShare FW> fe^ures free. Le»n wha this means for y«j. It is about keeping the PUBLIC/WORLD INFORMED and COMMUNICATING m their LANGUAGES so they can SEE FOR THEMSELVES the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL acts of the United States of Ainerica's Government Officials. You see FOREIGN/INTERNATIONAL Nations have LAWYERS/ATTORNEYS as well and have studied here in the United States of America and ABROAD, so they KNOW that LEGAL ARGUMENTS as that presented by Defendant Newsome ARE SOUND! 4.Aug 5. .Aug .S.Aug 10. Aug i2.A,ug 14.Au,3 16. Aug 15.Ai;q 20. Aug 22.Aug 24. Aug 26. Aug 26. .Aug 30. Aug t.Sep - • - Viewi Top content fiame Chinese (tfadrtmnai) 040412 HEX'fT GiMGRlCH - V/ikipedia information PAT TILLMAM - Wikipedia info tU.S. Government COVER-UP Oi Kiilmg.'Murderj 08.'13? 12 - OBJECTiOMfS) TO 08/02/12 ORDER BY JUDGE TOM S LEE - Motion To Disquatify Views 3.657 1.616 1.290 548 Top countries JIame Ukraine United States Russian Federation Turkey India Viev.'s 12 567 4.4.38 879 583 564 MOTION TO STRIKE - Motion To SSay tPKH) 450 Page 10 of 13
  • • ^ s l t d o s h a r e four SiiaeShare stats from las: I'.'eek Total Stats vv^e*!, CMP.J* S26K -tK 96K • 40 IK.;, 65 52 ; : 71 Most vie wed this week Chinese (traditional) 040412 ; "EH*" • NEWT GINGRICH - Wikipedia Information PAT T I l l M AN • Wikipedia Info (U.S. Government C0VER4.Jp Of Killing/Murdef) mmAm 08/1 Mil • OBJECTION(S) TO 08/02/12 ORDER BY JUDGE TOM S. ir.si... u I f j t i j r l j SMSL lEF. - M o t i o n To Disqualify MOTION TO STRIKE - M o t i o n To Stay (PKH)
  • FOREIGN/INTERNATIONAL Nations/Leaders/Citizens also KNOW HOW STUPID United States of America's President Barack Obama is! WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ARE LAUGHING! It helps to EXPOSE WHO is RUNNING the United States of America's TERRORIST/WHITE SUPREMACIST Regime, WHERE they are HIDING and HOW they OPERATE! No Defendant Newsome is LOOKING GOOD in the EYES of the PUBLICAVORLD! HOW STUPID IS STUPID? WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT: for the above and forgoing reasons, m the INTEREST OF JUSTICE, PROTECTION OF LIVES, as well as the statutes/laws governing said matters, the August 11, 2014, Magistrate Entry entered by this Court is NULL/VOID for LACK OF JURISDICTION and other statutes/laws governing said matters! Furthermore, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, diat Defendant Denise Newsome is filing a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT of and against Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, its Representatives, Hamilton County Court Officials (i.e. Clerk of Court Tracy Winkler, Judge Heather Russell, Magistrates: Deborah Casey, Melissa E. West, Page 12 of 13
  • Ellen Wolf, Jacqueline Purnell, Tyrone Yates, Deputy Bailiff Mike Garvey, etc. - i.e. as it appears the list may continue to grow with this Court's Public Officials) and others PARTY to the Conspiracy(s)/Chain Conspiracy(s) and other Crimes leveled against her so said Plaintiffs and Public Officials' WILLFUL, MALICIOUS and WANTON acts in the Crimes committed of and against Defendant Denise Newsome. Furthennore, CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS exist as well as the PUBLIC-AT-LARGE has been ENDANGERED by such Criminal Acts that Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn as well as Public Officers of the Hamilton County (Ohio) Municipal Court are engaging m. Therefore, WARRANTEVG the ARRESTS, LNDICTMENTS, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS that are sought through Defendant Denise Newsome's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT! Respectfully submitted this 3"^*^ day of September, 2014. Denise Newsome Post Office Box 31265 Jackson, MS 39286 Phone: (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Notice is hereby given that in GOOD-FAITH that a true and correct copy of the above pleadmg is being FAXED and/or MAILED to the following in that Legal Counsel for Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn (from the Docket) is NOT clear (contact infomiation is NOT provided): ANNA LOUISE INN - FAX: (513) 768-6922 do Stephen T. MacConnell (President/CEO) 300 Lytle Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 Respectfully submitted this ^ day of September, 2014. Denise Newsome Post Office Box 31265 Jackson, MS 39286 Phone: (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536 Page 13 of 13
  • FACSIMILE COVER PAGE TO: Hamilton County (OH) Municipal Court (513) 946-5710 Anna Louise Inn/Stephen T. MacConnell (513) 768-6922 DATE: September 3,2014 FROM: Denise Newsome (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536 NO. PAGES: 14 (Including Cover Page) H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y (OHIO) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff) vs. CIVIL ACTION: I4-CV-1I786 DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant) COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION REITERA TION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
  • L a s t T r a n s m i s s i o n PAGE. 1/ 1 Sep.03.2014 05:29 AM Name : T e l : Date Time Type ID Sep.03 05:22AM Send 15139465710 D u r a t i o n Pages R e s u lt 06:11 14 OK
  • L a s t T r a n s m i s s i o n PAGE. 1/ 1 Sep.03.2014 05:40 AM Name : T e l : Date Time Type ID Sep.03 05:33AM Send 15137686922 Duration Pages R e s u lt 06:39 14 OK