05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT:  Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED

on

  • 784 views

05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights ...

05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED - - With PROOF OF MAILING (United States Postal Service RECEIPTS)
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!

Statistics

Views

Total Views
784
Views on SlideShare
784
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT:  Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED 05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED Document Transcript

    • VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME Mailing: Post Office Box 14731 Cincinnati, Ohio 45250 Phone: 513/680-2922 May 21, 2009 REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!!VIA PRIORITY MAIL: SIGNATURE CONFIRMATION TRACKING NO. 23061570000105855259The United States White HouseATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama1600 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington, DC 20500VIA PRIORITY MAIL: SIGNATURE CONFIRMATION TRACKING NO. 23061570000105855280U.S. Department of JusticeATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530-0001VIA PRIORITY MAIL: SIGNATURE CONFIRMATION TRACKING NO. 23061570000105855303U.S. Department of LaborATTN: Secretary Hilda L. SolisFrances Perkins Building200 Constitution Ave., NWWashington, DC 20210 RE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED1Dear President Obama, Attorney General Holder and Secretary Solis:I begin with the following questions: “IS THIS AN ADMINISTRATION OF COWARDS? IS THIS ANADMINISTRATION THAT PROMISED CHANGE THROUGH FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO THE PUBLICAND/OR A U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN PROMISING CHANGE WHICH WAS A SHAM JUST TO WIN –MAKING PROMISES THROUGH DECEPTIVE MEANS TO DUPE CITIZENS INTO GETTING THEIR VOTES?”If not, then when will the American people see such promise of CHANGE for all races and notfavoring one specific group (i.e. whites)? Surely I have not seen anything regarding such as itdirectly impact the lives of African-Americans and/or people of color within the first 100 days of 1 Boldface, italics and/or underline added for emphasis.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 2 of 118this Administration as it relates to Civil Rights, equality of the laws, etc. While this Administrationhas begun to address issues surrounding shutting down Guantanamo Bay, what about the issuesurrounding the unlawful seizure and arrests of African-Americans and/or people of color (such asmyself) who are have been unlawfully/illegally arrested and detained against their will in theprisons/jails that have been built in this country? What is being done to set them free and suchinjustices targeted towards African-Americans and/or people of color? What is being done toprosecute those who have engaged in the unlawful/illegal detention of African-Americans and/orpeople of color in the United States? It happened to me and has been brought to the properauthorities’ attention. However, through this instant correspondence you will find that our UnitedStates President, Barack Obama, and others are doing nothing to see that citizens regardless of thecolor of their skin receive equal protection of the laws and due process of laws – i.e. receiveprotection under the United States Constitution, Civil Rights Act and other governing laws. WhilePresident Obama is claiming to be everybody’s (regardless of race) President in the United States,my concern in the observation of his first 100 days as well as during the presidential campaign is thathe may be bent on appeasing one specific group of people – i.e. whites – while African-Americansand/or people of color issues have either gone unaddressed and/or do not receive much attention forfear that President Obama may be seen as favoring one specific group of people (African-Americans) over others. Concerns that President Obama is so bent on buttering one side of the breadwhile he begins to campaign for his second term for the White House when has not completed hisfirst term. In his quest for trying to be a Rock Star and strutting out on the stage during the last 100days, I have yet to see anything as it directly impacts African-American and/or people of color livesand communities. It appears that while President Obama is so busy trying to remain popular in thepolls, promote his Rock-Star status and appease more so his white-based groups and supporters,African-Americans and/or people of color concerns are going unnoticed and unaddressed. Merelyfilling some of the positions (for APPEARANCE PURPOSES) in the Obama Administration Cabinetwith African-Americans and/or people of color is not sufficient enough because it just creates anappearance when there are not actions being taken to bring about the unity President Obama hasasserted through his speeches to the public. From the observance of the first 100 days, the questionremains what is being done to see that all citizens are getting fair and equal treatment under the lawsand that such racial injustice that have plagued people of color of years are being addressed?I am contacting President Obama as our United States President who has welcomed citizens tocontact him and as one who is aware and/or should be aware of what is going on with me in that hewas timely, properly and adequately contacted as early as August 2008 regarding the majority of thematters addressed herein. I believe the American people should be made aware of how our UnitedStates President has handled my situation when brought to his attention and who knows who else– i.e. looking the other way, sticking his head in the sand and clearly ignoring this matter. I amcontacting Eric Holder (“Holder”) and Hilda Solis (“Solis”) because they are the head of each oftheir Departments (referenced above) in President Obama’s Cabinet. Please accept thiscorrespondence as my OFFICIAL Complaint and requests for status in matters pending before
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 3 of 118your Agency(s); creation/initiation of committees, investigations and findings from same and thatyou each provide me with the Case numbers assigned this matter and the matters presentlypending before your Department(s) and/or Agency(s). I believe you all will find from theinformation contained herein as it relates to your Department, that I have provided sufficientinformation and/or evidence to direct each of you to where additional materials and/orresources may be found – i.e your agency records, courts’ record, employers’ record. Throughthis instant correspondence I will be addressing very serious criminal/civil wrongs that have beenleveled against me because I have sought to engage in protected activities and exposeConstitutional/Civil Rights violations as well as discriminatory and prejudicial practices that haveplagued me and people of color for many years. Clark v. Board of Ed. of Shelbyville, Ky., 350 F.Supp. 149 (E.D.Ky.,1972) - Courts may not invade the domain of the legislature; where a plaintiff is asking for legislative relief or relief which would encroach on the legislative process the courts are without power to act. State of Ohio ex rel. Erkenbrecher v. Cox, 257 F. 334 (S.D.Ohio.W.Div.,1919) - The judicial department of the government cannot interfere with the proceedings of either the executive department or the legislative department with respect to matters committed by the Constitution to their charge. McGrain v. Daugherty, 47 S.Ct. 319 (U.S. Ohio 1927) – Congress may inquire into private affairs and compel disclosures only in so far as to make express powers effective. Marcello v. U.S., 196 F.2d 437 (1952) – A congressional inquiry may be as broad as the legislative purpose requires. Manning v. Sims, 213 S.W.2d 577 (Ky.,1948) - The sharp separation of powers of government must be preserved carefully by the courts, and judicial powers must not be permitted to encroach upon legislative powers. Const. § 27.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 4 of 118PLEASE LET ME CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD – IN THAT THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED (IN AN EFFORT TOCOVER UP THE TRUTH REGARDING RACIAL PREJUDICES/INJUSTICES OF OUR SOCIETY) TO PAINT MEIN ANOTHER LIGHT, THAT: (a) I am college educated and hold a B.S. Degree from an accrediteduniversity – Florida A&M University; (b) I am on no prescription drugs or medication; (c) I havenever been mentally institutionalized; (d) I have never been under psychiatric care or treatment; (e)I do not drink alcoholic beverages and do not smoke; and (f) I am a Christian and it is because of myfaith, Christian family/friends, parents, family, relatives, etc. support through these ordeals that Ihave been able to sustain such vicious and criminal/civil attacks leveled against me to destroy me,my life, my livelihood, pursuit of happiness, etc. If having such record/status subjects me to furtherbias prejudices, jealousy, hatred and discriminatory treatment in the handling of this matter, thenI need to know and the public needs to know. I find such information pertinent in that from myresearch and observation, I understand that from what I have had to endure, those who havecommitted the criminal/civil wrongs addressed herein, have knowingly done so with ill intent/motiveto drive me to mental/physical destruction – in that the unlawful/illegal tactics used against me havebeen known to drive other persons to commit crimes and/or wind up in mental institutions orincarcerated from crimes committed for taking justice into their own hands. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: During my December visit, I met Joel Segal (“Segal”) in Representative John Conyer’s office. Why he attempted to be flattery asking why a nice looking like me is homeless, I advised him had Conyers and others that I submitted my July 14, 2008 complaint to reviewed said complaint, he would know why. I provided him with an extra copy. Segal asking me to step out in the hallway to talk further because another person had come in. In the hallway, Segal asked me whether or not I have sought medical assistance – i.e. psychiatrist, have I ever been institutionalized, am I on any drugs, etc. I advised Segal of no need for such and how the system is designed to push a person to such a point, but to his disappointment I have not and it is because of my family, friends and loved ones support that I make it through the trials sent my way. Segal advising that he is Jewish and the conditions he suffers from. Moreover, how he has had to seek treatment. I thought to myself, after hearing his issues, if others in their department have similar issues and problems, no wonder nothing is being done. Not only that, if I had the issues he is dealing with, then that would have been used against me to make it seem that I have a psychiatric problem. I was not impressed. Segal was provided with an extra copy of the July 14, 2008 Complaint (Brief Only). Segal advised that I should hear
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 5 of 118 something by the end of the following week; however, to date, nothing. I thought to myself, from what Segal shared, what a waste. Given his heritage and his job, what is he doing to provide his input and/or feedback in bringing about a change and seeing that justice is rendered and the laws equally applied to all regardless of the color of their skin? Since my December 2008 visit Segal has received copies of e-mails to Representative Conyers.I am not a politician and those who know me, know that I am about being real and am not fake andphony. Believe upon review of the documents and records of the courts and government agencies atleast one may find the reasons why I have been targeted by certain whites to destroy my life – i.e.prejudice, discrimination, envy, jealousy, hatred, etc. Because I am a strong African-Americanwoman and regardless of the attacks on my life, liberties and pursuit of happiness will not allow themto shake me or break me down as is designed.Oh of course those committing such criminal/civil wrongs against me are not used to beingconfronted so directly and boldly of their racial, hateful, prejudicial and discriminatory acts as I havedone, am known to do and will continue to do. How can a nation be healed and move forward if it isin denial of such practices against African-Americans and/or people of color? SIMPLY TIPTOEING AROUND SUCH ISSUES AS IS BEING DONE NOW, IS NOT THE SOLUTION. DONOT COME OUT AND GIVE A AIRLESS SPEECH ABOUT TALKING ABOUT SUCH ISSUESAND THEN WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO, STICK YOUR HEAD IN THESAND!! Please let me clarify for the record, my passion and fight for justice, equal protectionof the laws, exercise of Constitutional rights, Civil Rights, etc. was way before I even heard ofBarack Obama – as others who know me and others who have committed to such cause before evenhearing of Barack Obama. So if this is the reason (wanting to be the first to be recognized and givencredit on everything, always upfront and on center stage) President Obama has neglected to fulfill hispromise made and has ignored this matter that was brought to his attention approximatelyNINE (9) MONTHS AGO, then the public needs to know because NOT SO! Furthermore, theevidence contained herein will in fact show that President Barack Obama was fully aware of whatwas going on with me and/or knew or should have known what was going on because he wascontacted and timely, properly and adequately notified of the criminal/civil violations beingcommitted against me by government/court officials and the aid of others. However, BarackObama (as others) elected to look the other way and do nothing!!!!!! IS THIS THE PROMISEOF CHANGE or MORE OF THE SAME!!! No there are many who have been pursuing similarcauses and working in their communities for change before President Obama came on the scene. Aswell as those who have lost their lives to see the improvement and equality for all. Therefore, Ibelieve it is wrong for our President (if he has done so) to take an attitude against those such asmyself who have actively challenged and pushed for equal treatment and application of the laws forAfrican-Americans and/or people of color. So please make no false assumptions that my contacting
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 6 of 118your department is motivated by the election of our first African-American President and that I amlooking for special favor because of this. The record evidence will support my fight and strugglesbegan way before the Barack Obama era. It is JUSTICE, EQUAL APPLICATION andPROTECTION of LAWS, DUE PROCESS OF LAWS, etc. that I and I am sure others seek. For therecord, I am certain the evidence will support that my fight, struggles and pursuit of justice has lastedwell over 20 years – before the Barack Obama era. This may be the reason why President Obamahas elected to ignore this matter as well although he has knowledge as to what is going on – ONLYTAKING ON MATTERS THAT WILL MAKE HIM LOOK GOOD IN THE PUBLIC EYES AND WILLMAKE FOR GOOD PRESS COVERAGE. AWARE OF THE FACT AND SENSITIVITY IN ADDRESSINGRACIAL INJUSTICES, PREJUDICES AND DISCRIMINATION THAT HAS PLAGUED PEOPLE OF COLOR. My fight,struggles and pursuit of justice continues to date.I believe each of you will find that I have followed the prerequisites prior to bringing these matters toyour attention. I am requesting that each of you address those issues that are within yourDepartment’s jurisdiction; as well as see that an investigation into the handling of complaints thatare addressed herein and the status thereof. Because of each of your Departments’ failure to act orto deter such unlawful/illegal practices, I am left to believe the criminal/civil wrongs that have beenleveled against me are being done with each of your Departments’ approval and/orknowledge/cooperation. I believe that an investigation into the issues raised herein will support yourDepartments’ failure to enforce the laws/statutes within its jurisdiction and to deter and/or preventsuch criminal/civil wrongs rendered me. I believe an investigation into the issues addressed hereinwill yield that I have been subjected to such criminal/civil wrongs for racial, prejudicial anddiscriminatory intent. Moreover, because I have engaged in protected activities and am confrontingracial, prejudicial and discriminatory acts which have plagued me and people of color for years. Ibelieve such injustices have been leveled against me because I am a strong, educated, African-American female and those who have leveled such attacks against me, doing so for purposes ofbreaking me down, destroying my life, depriving me of life, liberties and pursuit of happiness.I believe the record of the government agencies, courts and my former employers will support theirknowledge of my being stalked from job-to-job/employer-to-employer and state-to-state by pastemployers, their insurance companies and/or lawyers, etc. for purposes of notifying new employersof my engagement in protected activities and to have my employment terminated. Such acts taken instalking and contacting my employers regarding my engagement in protected activities (past and/orpresent) is clearly prohibited by statutes/laws. I believe an investigation into matters involvingemployment issues will also yield the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”)knowledge of the Title VII violations; however, deliberate and willful failure to impose thestatutes/laws to protect my rights. Moreover, the EEOC’s failure may be in retaliation of my filinglegal actions against it. The EEOC doing so because it knew that the Courts would aid it in coveringup such racial and discriminatory practices leveled against African-Americans. The EEOC being anagency created by the SYSTEM and merely there for appearance purposes ONLY!!! As with the GM
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 7 of 118chairman and CEO’s, Rick Wagoner, resignation that President Obama was behind,2 let the publicsee whether an investigation into my claims is initiated and (if violations are found by EEOCofficials/employees) will any heads such as the Wage and Hour Division, EEOCofficials/employees roll as a direct and proximate result of their allowing the cover-upviolations by employers that are clear and blatant. Not only that, that insurance companies mayhave unlawfully/illegally used its vast resources to obtain third-party CONFIDENTIAL informationregarding me for purposes of committing criminal/civil wrongs and invasion of private informationobtained to aid their insured against actions brought by me. Information which may have also beenused to track me from job-to-job and in contacting employers to notify them of protected activitiesthat I have engaged in. If such, such acts are clearly in violation of the laws and the use of a person’spersonal information obtained through other means for such purposes is also criminal and prohibitedby laws. Employer violated § 2000e-(3)(a) by discharging an employee AFTER learning he had filed charges of discrimination against a former employer. EEOC Decision No. 71-460, 1973, EEOC Decisions ¶ 6175.3 To establish a violation of § 2000e-3(a), it must be shown that the employer had actual or imputed knowledge that the plaintiff participated in a protected activity; and, further that based on such knowledge the discharge was in fact retaliatory – that is, motivated by the employee’s participation in protected activity with the intent to retaliate against the employee for such participation, and not by unrelated legitimate business reasons. However, while retaliation must be the principal reason for the discharge it need not be the sole reason; and an employment action based in part on an unlawful consideration is not rendered lawful by the coexistence of a nondiscriminatory reason. If any element of retaliation or reprisal played any part in the discharge, no matter how remote or slight or tangential, it is in violation of the law. The trier of fact determines the reasons for the employee’s discharge based on reasonable inferences drawn from the totality of facts, the conglomerate of activities, and the entire web of circumstances presented by the evidence. In 2 “The Obama administration asked Rick Wagoner, the chairman and CEO of General Motors, to step down and heagreed, a White House official said.” See EXHIBIT “92” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3 See EXHIBITS “74” and “75” respectively attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Supporting that suchpractices are in violation of Title VII and other governing laws, that the EEOC and proper authorities are aware of suchviolations; however, have failed to deter and/or prevent such criminal/civil wrongs brought to its attention and/or obtained duringhandling of matters brought to its attention.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 8 of 118 examining the evidence, the trier of fact may consider such factors as the timing of the discharge; departures from customary dismissal notice or procedures afforded other employees; harassment, surveillance, or other disparate treatment or special conditions of employment in comparison to similarly situated employees or to prior treatment of the plaintiff immediately following the protected activity and leading up to the discharge; threats or retaliation against other employees for engaging in similar conduct; absence of a reasonable alternative reason for the discharge. . . 7 Am Jur POF 2d 38, 39. (Tidwell v. American Oil Co., 332 F.Supp. 424)I take this matter very serious in that recent polls reveal that unemployment amongst African-Americans increased by 15%.4 Therefore, one may wonder whether such a drastic increase inunemployment amongst this group of people may be a direct and proximate result of theelection of President Obama. Why? Because I know that my recent termination of employmentfrom my former employer, Wood & Lamping LLP (W&L), is a direct and proximate result of notonly the November 4, 2008 election, but its knowledge of my engagement in protected activity.W&L thought it was going to be able to blame my recent January 9, 2009 termination on theeconomy; however, they have failed in such efforts – i.e. they have hired several whites since myJanuary 9, 2009 termination in an effort to establish an ALL white law firm. I was only one of twoAfrican-Americans employed at the time of my termination in a predominately white law firm. Iknow with my former employer, many voted for McCain/Palin and were very upset with the outcomeon November 4, 2008. Why one attorney the next day was so upset, I thought he was going tohyperventilate as he stormed into his office slamming the door. I know my present unemployment isa direct and proximate result of my race as well as my happiness of the November 4, 2008 election –in fact from information provided me, my former employer (Wood & Lamping) is attempting toblame it on the economy. However, they cannot do so. From my observation and research, mytermination had nothing to do with the economy and in fact, since my termination, Wood & Lampinghas hired several whites (the firm should be just about all white now). Not only that, W&L hasprovided false and misleading information during a federal investigation (Wage and Hour Divisionhandling of FMLA claim) to cover-up such civil wrongs.OF PUBLIC INTEREST: I have serious concerns that other private and/or employers may beusing the economy to terminate the employment of African-Americans in retaliation of theNovember 4, 1008 Presidential Election and Barack Obama’s victory. So please spare me and thepublic that the DRASTIC INCREASE in unemployment amongst African-Americans is due to theeconomy. I know my recent unemployment IS NOT due to economic reasons!!! Neither is theretaliation African-Americans faced after the November 4, 2008 elections – i.e. in Mississippi (who 4 See EXHIBIT “86” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 9 of 118knows where else) where I am from, African-American students were thrown of the school bus,athletes threatened, postal workers sent home/terminated for wearing Obama shirts and/or from themention of the new U.S. President’s name. See EXHIBIT “1” attached hereto and incorporated byreference. Yet in the first 100 days, and who knows how much longer, nothing is being done toaddress such prejudices and to see that our country is coming together. In 2008 and present, African-Americans and/or people of color are suffering because of racial bias/prejudices and the election ofthe first African-American President. Yet in the first 100 days in the White House and as Presidentof the United States, what has been done to work during the healing of this nation and acknowledgethat such RACIAL INJUSTICES/PREJUDICES and DISCRIMINATION will not be tolerated by theBarack Obama Administration?Employers and certain whites are fully aware of how difficult it is for one (i.e. African-Americansand/or people of color) to obtain the evidence – i.e. as stalking an employee from employer-to-employer/job-to-job and state-to-state - that I have been able to obtain because those committingsuch criminal/civil wrongs (as that which have been addressed by me over the years and now in thiscorrespondence) are professionals in covering up, shielding and masking such unlawful/illegal acts.However, there is not only sufficient evidence in the record of the courts but that of the governmentagencies and employers to support the racial, prejudicial and discriminatory treatment rendered me –employers notifying agency (i.e. in records of Wage & Hour, EEOC, etc) of its knowledge of myengagement in protected activities when contacted notifying of the complaint I have filed againstit. Rarely will employers, their insurance companies and the attorneys/law firms they retain leave asmoking gun revealing such criminal/civil wrongs addressed – relying on ties/relationships to obtainspecial favors from the factfinder. However, because of their obsession and determination to destroymy life, my former employers, their insurance carriers, attorneys, government agencies and courtshave repeatedly provided the smoking gun that definitely can be linked back to the employer andothers. Moreover, that there is factual documentation to sustain the allegations made herein in therecords of the courts and government agencies. However, to date, nothing is being done by those in aposition to deter such practices to prevent such criminal/civil wrongs leveled against me. Conducting a Thorough Investigation5 Because discrimination often is subtle, and there rarely is a “smoking gun,” [Fn. 45 - See Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1081-82 (3rd Cir. 1996)(“It has become easier to coat various forms of discrimination with the appearance of propriety, or to ascribe some other less odious intention to what is in reality discriminatory behavior. In other words, while discriminatory conduct persists, violators have learned not to leave the proverbial ‘smoking gun’ behind.”); cf. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 801 (1973). . .] determining whether race played a role in the 5 Taken from EEOC’s Compliance Manual Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 10 of 118 decisionmaking requires examination of all of the surrounding facts and circumstances. The presence or absence of any one piece of evidence often will not be determinative. Sources of information can include witness statements, including consideration of their credibility; documents; direct observation; and statistical evidence such as EEO-1 data, among others. See EEOC Compl. Man., Vol. I, Sec. 26, Selection and Analysis of Evidence.”Furthermore, in my case, the record evidence of not only the courts but government agencies createdto deter such unlawful/illegal practices will support the courts’ and government agencies’ fardeparture from the laws and engagement with my former employers, their insurance companies andlawyers to destroy my life for racial, prejudicial and discriminatory intent. Moreover, to COVER-UP the criminal/civil wrongs of government/court employees. All because I have elected to use thelaws to confront such discrimination, constitutional and civil rights violations.PLEASE BE ADVISED: That I am providing various media sources with a copy of thiscorrespondence and may provide attached documents to support the efforts I have taken to see thatthese matters are addressed; moreover, your Department employees’ knowledge of the criminal/civilwrongs and blatant and deliberate failure to correct such injustices that have been leveled against meto destroy my life, liberties and pursuit of happiness, etc. I believe that the evidence will support justhow patient I have been. Not only that, the years of abuse, obstruction of justice, deprivation ofrights, etc. that I have had to endure as I await justice to prevail; which, appears not to exist. I amfurther hoping that through such requested investigations, if violations are found and thoseagencies’ (i.e. Wage & Hour Division, EEOC, etc.) Directors, Supervisors, and/or employees foundto have committed such criminal/civil wrongs in the handling of my complaints filed, that they berequired to resign and rendered the applicable punishment (i.e. fines, imprisonment, disbarment,suspension) permissible under the laws governing said matters. Upon reading The New York Timesarticle of March 25, 2009 entitled, “Labor Agency is Failing Workers, Report Says.” and mysituations (and I am sure others) regarding the Wage & Hour Division, it appears that a completeoverhaul of the Wage & Hour Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, etc. may beneeded – beginning at the top as President Obama did with GM’s (Rick Wagoner). Hopefully,there will NOT be DOUBLE standards here. With the unemployment rate being as high as it is, Ibelieve there are many unemployed citizens who would be more than happy to go through thenecessary training for such government jobs (i.e. investigators with Wage & Hour, EEOC) andperform the ministerial duties of these departments to enforce the statutes/laws under which theyhave been created. The ministerial6 duties that I and others have demanded by each of yourDepartments are MANDATORY under governing statutes/laws and not discretionary. It is time 6 Black’s Law Dictionary: Of or relating to an act that involves obedience to instructions of laws instead of discretion,judgment, or skill.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 11 of 118out for the courts to quit covering up such abuse of such agencies as the EEOC, Wage & HourDivision, etc.PLEASE BE ADVISED: That the information and documentation contained herein will supportthat the United States President, Barack Obama, the United States Vice President, Joseph Biden,the United States Legislature/Congress (U.S. Senate and House of Representatives) are aware of thisproblem as well. Moreover, that the required Complaint was filed with the U.S.Legislature/Congress as early as July 2008 – a copy of the Brief ONLY is attached hereto atEXHIBIT “2” - “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; AlsoRequest for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” dated July 14, 2008. Because of the severity ofthe criminal/civil wrongs leveled against me, I have requested that United StatesLegislature/Congress create the required Court(s) to address the cases presented to it. However, todate, I have heard nothing. The original of my Complaint entitled, “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding,” was submitted for filing on or about July 14, 2008 to the attention of Senator Patrick Leahy as the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in the United States Senate (Tracking Confirmation No. 0307 1790 0000 7321 7940 - see copy of receipt attached hereto at EXHIBIT “3.”) Out of concerns that Leahy would attempt to cover this up if I provided the Complaint to him alone, I provided copies to others in the Legislature/Congress. A copy was provided to the U.S. Presidential Candidates, Barack Obama about August 2, 2008 (Tracking Confirmation No. 2305 1590 0001 6380 5130 - see copy of letter ONLY and receipt attached hereto at EXHIBIT “4.”) John McCain – about August 2, 2008 (Tracking Confirmation No. 2305 1590 0001 6380 5093 - see copy of letter ONLY and receipt attached hereto at EXHIBIT “5.”) A copy was provided to the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in the U.S. House of Representatives, Representative John Conyers, as well about August 2, 2008 (Tracking Confirmation No. 2305 1590 0001 6380 5116 - see copy of letter ONLY and receipt attached hereto at EXHIBIT “6.”)
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 12 of 118 A copy of the Complaint was provided to Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz of the U.S. House of Representatives as well about August 2, 2008 (Tracking Confirmation No. 2305 1590 0001 6380 5109 - see letter ONLY and copy of receipt attached hereto at EXHIBIT “7.”)Supporting the Complaint filed was submitted to the appropriate Senators and Representatives, to noavail. Not only that, sufficient and diligent work done in creating and producing each person with acopy. I provided sufficient sets to the appropriate persons so that the record would reflect theproper persons were contacted and in efforts of avoiding a COVER-UP. To no avail. Such effortsto cover this matter up and to keep it from the public’s eye are evident and now it appears with thehelp of our new United States President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden that suchcorrupt practices are continuing under the new Administration that has promised to bring aboutCHANGE! I ask, “IS THIS THE CHANGE THE PUBLIC IS LOOKING FOR or MORE OFTHE SAME????”To date, I have heard nothing as to the status of my Complaint. Clearly my contact information(phone and address) were provided. Therefore, I believe it is now necessary to bring this to each ofyour attention, the media and others so that they are aware that the problems and issues addressedherein as well as in a recent article in The New York Times’ article of March 25, 2008, are not onlyissues/problems Holder’s and Solis’ Departments are fully aware are going on, but that theLegislature/Congress, the White House and others are fully aware are going on. However, has madea decision to do nothing to correct the injustices timely, properly and adequately brought to itsattention. I strongly believe that the information contained herein is of public interest. Moreover,the public/citizens clearly do not need to be deceived by the false words and promises of thePresident Obama when he tells citizens that he needs them in their communities working with him onsuch problems; however, it appears that President Obama may have clearly made such a statement tomislead citizens for their votes and to give them FALSE HOPE of CHANGE. Not only that, basedon my efforts to address such issues with President Obama, it appears that he is attempting to washhis hands of the matters I have brought to his attention – a President who has made it known that hecan handle various tasks at once (supposedly falling into the qualifications for his being President ofthe United States) but may not be up to fulfilling promises and challenges regarding CHANGE.President Obama was provided a copy of my complaint submitted to the Legislature/Congress forhandling. He is aware of the situation and upon his victory in November, was requested to see thatthis matter was passed on to the proper person for handling. However, prior to becoming President(as a U.S. Senator) he neither took the time nor interest into seeing that my concerns were addressedalthough citizens repeatedly heard him say he wants to hear from them – i.e another example ofeloquent words and smooth talk of a politician – with no action and/or substance. To date, I haveheard nothing regarding this matter brought to President Obama’s attention. I have heard nothing
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 13 of 118from Barack Obama’s successor or who this matter was given to for handling. See EXHIBITS “8”and “9” – respectively letter ONLY dated November 12, 2008 and November 14, 2008 attachedhereto.To date, the United States Legislature/Congress has done nothing because the insurance company(s)and their lawyers apparently have vast financial resources and lobbyists to see that this informationdoes not reach the media and/or the public. The “Emergency Complaint and Request forLegislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding,” Isubmitted to the Legislature/Congress is within its jurisdiction for handling. Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hosp., 936 F.2d 870 (C.A.6.Ohio, 1991) - Fact that Congress used words “any individual” in provision making it unlawful employment practice to refuse to hire or discriminate against person, while it used term “employees or applicants for employment” in retaliation provision of Title VII, did not limit class of persons entitled to sue for retaliation; rather, Congress intended to prohibit discrimination on basis of race or sex and to prohibit discrimination against person who engages in protected activity under Title VII. Civil Rights Act of 1964, §§ 703, 704, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3.I BELIEVE IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE A KNOWN FACT THAT THE LEGISLATURE/CONGRESS DOES NOT ADEQUATELY REFLECT THE RACIAL MAKEUP OF THE UNITED STATES – I.E. THE LOW REPRESENTATION OF PEOPLE OF COLORSENATOR ALAN SPECTOR’S CONCERNS:While it has made the News of Senator Alan Spector’s considering switching political parties (i.e.from Republican to Democrat), what I found interesting is his concern regarding the makeup of ourjudicial system. Not everybody would be concerned about such issues because the system has beendesigned to see to it that the courts do not adequately reflect the racial makeup of this country. Ourjudicial system has been designed to adversely impact African-Americans and/or people of color. Asystem designed to put those on the bench to allow and implement the creation of false and maliciouscharges for the purposes of imprisonment without just cause. There has been a system created totarget one specific race (African-Americans) while there have been others that have gone through thesystem. If it happened to me, then a reasonable mind may conclude how many others are behind bars
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 14 of 118because of such corrupt practices as I was subjected to. If Senator Spector is aware of the lack ofdiversity in our judicial system, then I am sure there are others. Letter from Paul S. Minor, “Judge Wingate, is the first and only Black judge appointed to the federal bench from Mississippi. He was appointed by a Republican President. At the time of the second trial, the Bush White House was under attack by civil rights groups and others for nominating several white candidates from Mississippi for judgeships on the Fifth Circuit. Those persons had experienced confirmation difficulty.7 During the second trial, there was considerable pressure to appoint a Black from Mississippi for a judgeship on the Fifth Circuit. In short, Judge Wingate had considerable incentive to curry favor with the Bush White House during the second trial proceedings. For whatever reason, the judge’s rulings were of considerable assistance to the government in our prosecution.” See EXHIBIT “10” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.In an article in CBS News Political Hotsheet’s article entitled, “That’s Specter With A ‘D’”, it statesin part:Specter supported a broader range of experience on the Court and said the future Justice shouldrepresent minorities. . . . “I’d like to see more diversity,” he said. “I think another woman. Ultimately maybe now we need a Hispanic; African Americans are underrepresented. . . “I’d like to see more diversity,” he said. “I think another woman would be good. I think that ultimately maybe now we need an Hispanic. African-Americans are underrepresented.” Specter also said that he could envision, and could support, someone who was not a lawyer for the opening seat, acknowledging that there is no Constitutional requirement that a Supreme Court Justice be an attorney.. . .See EXHIBIT “10” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Specter appears to share the sameconcerns as that provided in my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress 7 I wonder why!
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 15 of 118Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” regarding lack ofrepresentation and lack of diversity in our judicial process and/or in employment with privateemployers. See at pp. 9 and 22 of Emergency Complaint. In regards to the appointment of a Justice,such qualification – there is no Constitutional requirement that a Supreme Court Justice be anattorney,” appears to be similar to that of a Hinds County, Mississippi Justice Court Judge. In thisinstant correspondence and supporting exhibits/documentation attached, you will find that the one ofthe judges (William L. Skinner) addressed herein is an attorney and such profession clearly does notqualify him to be a judge. Moreover, you will see from his conduct and behavior, apparently helearned nothing in law school regarding the laws nor has he upheld the oath of office taken.It is important to note, merely thinking of electing/selecting an African-American and/or person ofcolor to fill positions is going to solve the problems is a misconception. For instance, I would like touse Representative John Conyers. What, Conyers is about 80 years old, so one can gather from hisage what era he is from. While up on Capitol Hill, he is merely in the way. Information containedherein will support such views. Conyers is just so happy to be up on The Hill because it is a rareopportunity for African-Americans and/or people of color; however, clearly he has forgotten wherehe came from; moreover, what good has he done since he has been in there and what has he done inregards to bringing about equality – NOTHING!! Conyers has been too busy trying to keep his breadbuttered and steer clear of such issues regarding such matters. It appears that while having anopportunity to bring about CHANGE, Conyers has been too busy trying to kiss up and save his ownhide and position. All Conyers is doing is trying to stay in good graces with white constituents sothat he could remain in such office. He is not going to tackle such issues as that brought by me forfears of going against a system that has been designed to oppress African-Americans and/or peopleof color. Merely realizing that he is just a “coin” if I may use such a term for purposes of projectinga false image to the public – i.e. “well African-Americans are represented on The Hill.” It is clearlytime for Conyers to retire and leave because he serves no purpose and with knowledge as to what hastranspired with me, as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in the U.S. House ofRepresentatives, it is time for him to leave office, along with the Senate’s Chairman of theCommittee on the Judiciary, Patrick Leahy. They were timely, properly and adequately placed onnotice as to what was going on in the judicial system as well as government agencies and as the headof their Committees, they did nothing. Therefore, warranting an investigation into their handling ofMy July 14, 2008 Complaint - “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/CongressIntervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding”. No, merely selectingAfrican-Americans and/or people of color for positions is not enough if they have no sense of moralsand values, if they are cowards and standby and allow such racial injustices, discrimination andprejudices (as that to which I have been repeatedly subjected) to continue under their watch andsupervision. They are doing more harm than good and merely are in the way of progress andmoving this country forward.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 16 of 118I find Conyers’ ignorance and inability to comprehend (then again maybe not; however, but fullyaware) his constituents merely using him as a scapegoat and shield to further strip African-Americans of their voices.DECEMBER 2008 VISIT TO WASHINGTON, D.C./CAPITOL HILL – MORE OF THESAME. NO CHANGE. POLITICS AS USUAL!!PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That I was in Washington, D.C. in December 2008 to check on thestatus of my Complaint submitted for filing and handling on July 14, 2008. However, I was giventhe run around and while have since requested status, to date, I have heard nothing regarding thestatus of my Complaint. I was lied to during my visit and advised that this is a matter not in thejurisdiction of the Legislature/Congress which I knew to be false. As an attorney (KingDowning) I met in June 2008 at a conference I attended confirmed that I could take the matter toWashington, D.C. Not only that, I was able to gather information obtained from the websiteconfirming that I was correct in bringing this matter before the United States Legislature/Congressand its jurisdiction of said matters. However, I believe from the information contained herein, youwill find the reason for such lies, deceitful acts of the Legislature/Congress are a direct andproximate result of racial, prejudicial and discriminatory intent; moreover, by well known systematicprejudicial/racial establishments designed to hide/cover-up such practices. Continued practices andacts to keep myself, African-Americans and people of color oppressed and deprived of rights securedunder the Constitution, Civil Rights Act, etc. Moreover, law firms, insurance companies, lobbyists,etc. ties/relationships to see that such problems/issues are swept under the rug: U.S. SENATE – COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: About the Committee: . . . One of the most important functions of the Committee is to provide oversight of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/) A RECENT BILL OF THE SENATE: S.1946 - Public Corruption Prosecution Improvements Act of 2007 (Senate Report 110-239, December 10, 2007) Administrative Oversight and the Courts: (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/oversight.cfm): Jurisdiction: (1) Court administration and management; (2) Judicial rules and procedures; (3) Creation of new courts and judgeships; (4)
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 17 of 118 Bankruptcy; (5) Administrative practices and procedures; (6) Legal reform and liability issues; (7) Oversight of the Department of Justice grant programs, as well as government waste and fraud; (8) Private relief bills other than immigration; (9) Oversight of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission. The Constitution (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/constitution.cfm): Jurisdiction: (1) Constitutional amendments; (2) Enforcement and protection of constitutional rights; (3) Statutory guarantees of civil rights and civil liberties; (4) Separation of powers; (5) Federal-State relations; (6) Interstate compacts. Crime and Drugs (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/crime.cfm): Jurisdiction: (1) Oversight of the Department of Justices (a) Criminal Division, (b) Drug Enforcement Administration, (c) Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, (d) Office on Violence Against Women, (e) U.S. Marshals Service, (f) Community Oriented Policing Services and related law enforcement grants, (g) Bureau of Prisons, (h) Office of the Pardon Attorney, (i) U.S. Parole Commission, and (j) Federal Bureau of Investigation, as it relates to crime or drug policy; (2) Oversight of the U.S. Sentencing Commission; (3) Youth violence and directly related issues; (4) Federal programs under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as amended (including the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act); (5) Criminal justice and victims rights policy; (6) Oversight of the Office of National Drug Control Policy; (7) Oversight of the U.S. Secret Service; (8) Corrections, rehabilitation, reentry and other detention- related policy; and (9) Parole and prohibition policy. Human Rights and the Law (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/humanrights.cfm): Jurisdiction: (1) Human rights laws and policies; (2) Enforcement and implementation of human rights laws; (3) Judicial proceedings regarding human rights laws; and (4) Judicial and executive branch interpretations of human rights laws.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 18 of 118I found the following information on the U.S. House of Representative’s Committee on theJudiciary’s website to support it indeed handle Complaints such as mine: “Allegations of Selective Prosecution: The Erosion of Public Confidence in Our Federal Justice System.”Furthermore, supporting the prejudicial and discriminatory handling of my Complaint by the U.S.Legislature/Congress when it has taken the time to initiate investigations and request that saidinvestigation(s) be THOROUGH.8 However, when provided with my Complaint which may go tothe very claims/heart of such hearings, I was advised my Complaint and the copies provided wereshredded (according to Matthew in Senator Conyer’s Department - Committee on the Judiciary inthe U.S. House of Representatives). Conyer’s (as with his colleagues) aware that I was inWashington, D.C. but refused to meet with me. While I was in the right office and before thecorrect committee, to date nothing has been done. Although Conyer’s appears to be African-American, like so many he cowards to the fears of standing up for what is right and does whatever ittakes to keep his job – i.e. may be seen as a sellout. Thankful to make it up on the hill; however,ashamed and fearful of addressing such racial issues for fear of what his colleagues (majority ofwhich are white) may think. Therefore, doing what so many (while not all – but then there are veryfew people of color in the U.S. Legislature/Congress) African-Americans are doing once they obtainsuch prize (obtaining a job on the hill) – i.e. doing whatever it takes to keep the job andcompromising values, beliefs and loss of identity. It is obvious that I have been subjected to furtherprejudices, discriminatory and retaliatory treatment for addressing racial issues and racial practicessuch as this, that have plagued African-Americans and/or people of color for years. Given theimportance of the issues raised in my “Emergency Complaint and Request forLegislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding,”which support and warrants a thorough investigation, findings thereof and special committees and/orcourts created to handle same, to date, I have heard nothing. To date, I am continually subjected tosuch racial, prejudicial and discriminatory treatment under the watchful eyes of President Obama, 8 In a letter to Karl Rove, John Conyers Jr. and others, state, “We write your appearance before the House JudiciaryCommittee to testify concerning the troubling issue of the politicization of the Department of Justice during this Administration,including allegations regarding the prosecution of former Governor of Alabama Don Siegelman. As you know, the Committeehas received sworn testimony and reviewed extensive documents raising serious questions about actions you and your staff mayhave taken that brought political considerations to bear on prosecutorial operations of the Department. . . Given the importanceof these issues to the fair administration of justice in this country, your appearance to answer these charges is imperative. . . . Adetailed staff report released today puts Ms. Simpson’s testimony in the context of other testimony and evidence suggesting thatyou or other high-level Washington officials may have been involved in the Siegelman matter and describes several otherdisturbing and potentially political aspects of the prosecution.. . . In a recent interview with GQ Magazine, you respond bydescribing Ms. Simpson as a ‘complete lunatic’ and asserting that she never mentioned your name during the deposition that shesubmitted to before Committee staff. In fact, Ms. Simpson actually referenced you several times at deposition. In any event,particularly since you have briefly commented on this matter in GQ and while serving as a commentator on Fox News, webelieve the subject, like other serious charges regarding the role of politics at the Department of Justice, should be addressedbefore the key investigating Committee of Congress.” See EXHIBIT “76” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 19 of 118Vice President Joseph Biden, Congressman Conyers, 9 Senator Leahy, the Federal Bureau ofInvestigations (“FBI”), etc. All the hard work I put into bringing this matter and this is howPresident Obama and others handled my complaint. Then when I went to Washington, D.C. toaddress the matter, those contacted and advised of my coming ran and hid and failed to makethemselves available to discuss Senator Leahy advising his staff to lie to me and advise he was notin his office; however, while I was standing there a call came in for him which was handled. Areasonable mind may conclude deliberate acts to destroy evidence and to shield/maskcriminal/civil violations of government and court officials. At least let us find out whathappened to the copies of my Complaints sent to the Presidential Candidates. Did they meetthe same fate as that Matthews mentioned? Is this the CHANGE our new U.S. PresidentBarack Obama is condoning and promising? Surely one would agree this is not Change, butmore of the same and politics as usual to COVER-UP matters that would expose suchinjustices and illegal/unlawful wrongs rendered African-Americans and/or people of color. Areasonable mind may conclude what happened to the ones sent to the others since it is obvious thatthe puppet master pulling strings and committing criminal/civil wrongs behind the scene may belinked to a law firm and insurance company representing an employer I have sued. I believe aninvestigation into the Senators and Representatives handling of this Complaint as well asPresident Obama’s handling of Complaint is warranted and the status thereof! The Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: copyright, patent and trademark law, information technology, administration of U.S. Courts, Federal Rules of Evidence, Civil and Appellate Procedure, judicial ethics, other appropriate matters as referred to by the Chairman, and relevant oversight. (http://judiciary.house.gov/about/subcommittee.html) The Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: constitutional amendments, constitutional rights, federal civil rights, ethics in government, other appropriate matters as referred by the chairman, and relevant oversight. (http://judiciary.house.gov/about/subcommittee.html) 9 In a letter to Glenn A. Fine (Inspector General – Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice) and H.Marshall Jarrett (Counsel for Professional Responsibility – Office of Professional Responsibility, U.S. Department of Justice),John Conyers Jr. and others, state, “We are writing to request that your offices conduct a thorough investigation and report onthe troubling allegations of selective, politically-motivated prosecution in recent years by the Department of Justice. Just as youroffices have cooperated in the ongoing review of the unprecedented firing of nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 and allegations ofpolitically-motivated hiring at the Department, we believe it is important that your offices investigate this matter, whichseriously threatens the reputation and integrity of the Department and the federal justice system. . . . Under thesecircumstances, it is critical that the Department undertake a thorough and fair internal review of this problem, whichunfortunately has not yet been undertaken, to help determine any possible wrongdoing to restore the confidence of the Americanpeople in our federal justice system.” See EXHIBIT “77” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 20 of 118To date, I have heard nothing and they have failed to contact me regarding the complaint I. Neitherhave I been provided with the status of same although I requested this information during myDecember 2008 visit.THE NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE/WAGE AND HOUR MATTER:PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That this correspondence will also support the concerns shared by TheNew York Times in its article of March 25, 2009, entitled, “Labor Agency is Failing Workers, ReportSays.” See EXHIBIT “11” attached hereto. In The New York Time Article it states: “Ms. Solis’s predecessor, Elaine L. Chao, often defended the Wage and Hour Division, saying it had concentrated on larger, tougher cases, and secured back wages for more than 300,000 workers a year and collected more than twice as much annually as the division had done in the final years of the Clinton administration.”Yeah right! From the correspondence attached hereto [EXHIBIT “12,” - February 23, 2005,Correspondence to Secretary of Labor, Elaine L. Chao and Connie J. Klipsh – Deputy RegionalAdministrator, U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, - and incorporated by reference]it is obvious that Chao and others were fully aware of employers ripping off their employees andknowingly not paying them overtime wages and wages earned for the hours worked – i.e. as in mycase. While I provided EASY-TO-FOLLOW step-by-step analysis and FLSA violations along withthe applicable statute a former employer, Mitchell McNutt & Sams (“MMS”) was violating, theWage and Hour Division did nothing. This information was provided to the direct attention of ElaineChao and the applicable persons. Nevertheless, instead of correcting such injustices, Chao in herfailure as the Secretary of Labor to enforce the FLSA, supported employers in their theft and takingout of the mouths of many hard working citizens, such as myself, food or other things that could havebeen purchased with the money employers were stealing from employees through its unlawful/illegalpractices. In my case, rather than require MMS to compensate me for the wages earned andovertime payment withheld from my earnings, Chao and others COVERED UP the FSLA violationsof MMS and may have aided Billy Jones in his retirement from the agency to hush him up;moreover, keep the public from finding out about other employers Jones and he Wage and HourDivision aided in violating the FSLA. Moreover, Chao may have allowed such cover-up because ofknowledge that MMS would be required to provide all employees back wages for moniesunlawfully/illegally withheld owed its employees. Therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude fromthe evidence in the record of the Wage & Hour Division and Secretary of Labor, because of thefinancial ramifications to MMS in having to go back and pay its employees the overtime wages
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 21 of 118and/or earned wages that it unlawfully/illegally withheld, Chao and others elected to falsify itsfindings to me to cover-up the corrupt practices of MMS. A former attorney, Rajita Moss, I workedwith advised me that my understanding of the Wage and Hours/FLSA was correct and how a matterhad to be resolve regarding a client of theirs because said client was practicing in the same manneras MMS. However, keep in mind, the Wage and Hour covered this up and provided me with falseinformation advising no violations.I believe a reasonable mind may conclude that it is WRONG for the Wage and Hour Division toneglect to perform ministerial duties (not discretionary) MANDATED by governing statutes/laws.Not only that, but to force citizens to bring private lawsuits when it is their duty to see that employerscomply with statutes/laws as the FLSA. I believe an investigation into the way the Wage and HourDivision determines which cases it will prosecute is required. It appears the Wage and HourDivision’s own policies in determining which cases to prosecute and which ones not to may beprejudicial, discriminatory and retaliatory. In my case, most likely all of the above. Not onlythat, it is CLEARLY WRONG for the Wage and Hour Division to force citizens to bring PRIVATElawsuits! Why? Because it require employees who may not have the financial resources to retain anattorney or abandon such protected rights. If the employee can retain an attorney (or attorney take iton a contingency basis) at times – as in my case – attorneys are bought out, bribed and/or paid off toabandon the client and to convince the client he/she does not have a case. It is the ministerial dutyof the Secretary of Labor to bring the appropriate actions to prosecute employers that are found tobe in violation of the FLSA and to see that employers are complying with the FLSA – NOT TOFORCE CITIZENS TO BRING PRIVATE LAWSUITS TO PERFORM THE JOB THESECRETARY OF LABOR AND/OR SAID OFFICE IS TO PERFORM. If the employers do notwant to comply, then I would think they would reap from such consequences – i.e. fines, sanctions,shut downs, etc. But please, letting employers continue to steal monies from their employees is afederal crime and one punishable under the laws itself. With the economy in the state andcondition it is in and then to allow employers to knowingly steal and/or withhold wages and overtimewages earned, is UNACCEPTABLE and are criminal acts that should not be tolerated. If employersdo not want to comply with the FLSA and/or governing statutes/laws, then they probably should notbe in business and should be subject to the proper punishment for said violations. There is no excusefor the Wage and Hour Division’s knowingly allowing employers to violate the FLSA and tocontinue to allow employers to operate in violation of the laws. For the Wage and Hour Division tocontinue to allow employers to violate the FLSA, it leaves the employers with the impression thatthey are in the driver’s seat and will dictate to the Wage and Hour Division and/or government whatthey will and will not do. Employers are being allowed to snub the FLSA.Under the Barack Obama Administration, we were PROMISED CHANGE! I gather this is notsupposed to be more of the same as evidenced thus far. With the economy the way it is now also, Iam certain there are many employees and unemployed workers that could use the monies thattheir employers have stolen and/or illegally withheld from them. SO WHAT IS THIS NEW
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 22 of 118ADMINISTRATION GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS? It will bring many smiles to a great deal offaces to see justice prevail and not the employer, the employer’s lobbyists, corrupt politicians andgovernment officials, etc. prevailing through such corrupt practices on such matters. A matter to betaken to the doorsteps of the White House! U.S. President Obama welcomes challenges, so I ambringing this matter and welcome others to do likewise. I believe this is pertinent and keyinformation the public needs to be informed of and to find out whether or not our U.S. President is aman of his word or merely one with a slick tongue and smooth/flattery words to promote his RockStar agenda and a run for a second term when he has not made it out of his first term. WhilePresident Obama appears to be working on his second term as President, I believe a reasonable mindwould agree this is a bit premature and President Obama needs to concentrate on his first termand fulfilling the promises provided. He says he is everybody’s President and is working for us all,so let us see him go to work. Surely the first 100 days DO NOT reflect anything to support hisfighting for ALL citizens when it comes to such issues as Civil Rights, equal application of the laws –i.e. the struggles that people of color have been deprived of for years. President Obama wanted it toappear because of his biracial make up, he can be diverse; however, it is time to see some productivework from the White House and/or this Administration regarding addressing such issues as I addressherein. President Obama needs to quit running and face the music – i.e. doing more than making a“Race” Speech for appearance/campaign hype and now apparently backing down perhaps of thefeedback and concerns of what the white majority may think if he were to address such issues as thataddressed in this correspondence and the Complaint filed with the U.S. Legislature/Congress. Peopleof diverse races voted for President Obama because they are ready for CHANGE! However, if ournew President is going to wait, be jittery and shake like a Chihuahua for fears of the feedback fromthe white majority or his constituents, then something is wrong. It was people of diverse races(including whites) that on November 4, 2008 that was voting for CHANGE! It was people ofdiverse races (including whites) that pushed for the Civil Rights Act and other laws. Therefore, toallow certain ones to scoff at what so many people have fought for (Civil Rights, Equality) isclearly unacceptable and not the change promised, but more of the same.I believe it is important for the media to know that the reason why departments as the Wage & HourDivision are LAZY may be because such department heads as well as the U.S. President and U.S.Vice President of the United States are being LAZY on taking on such matters/issues and are takingthe “Ostrich Syndrome” route by sticking their heads in the sand because they do not want to dealwith such issues as raised in The New York Times’ article or my complaints. I believe the mediafurther should be aware that the reason why the Wage & Hour Division, EEOC, etc. may also beLAZY or refusing to perform ministerial duties may be because of the vast arsenal of attorneys,financial resources, D.C. ties, court ties (as high as the United States Supreme Court and WhiteHouse) that employers and their insurance carriers retain to be certain that rulings are made in theirfavor or dragged out until the employee gives up pursuit – wherein employers and their lawyers usesuch time to blacklist employees who complain, bribe the employees’ lawyers to throw the case, etc.and/or destroy their lives – such as has happened in my situations. In my case one of the many law
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 23 of 118firms working for an employer (Entergy) I sued, is Baker Donelson Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz(“Baker Donelson”) – one can see Baker Donelson’s boasting of such ties and/or relationships to theWhite House, courts, governors, congress, etc. In my situation, I believe they have relied uponsuch ties/relationships to interfere and/or have their insurance carrier and/or client (LIBERTYMUTUAL) to assist them in the destroying of my life. Why? Because you cannot have an educatedAfrican-American challenging and going against such racially motivated establishments designed tokeep her and people of color oppressed and in line. Using most likely third-party informationobtained for criminal/illegal intent to stalk me from job-to-job/employer-to-employer, state-to-stateand to destroy my life. CUT & PASTED FROM: http://www.martindale.com/Baker-Donelson-Bearman-Caldwell/ law- firm-307399.htm Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC Size of Organization: 540 Year Established: 1888 Main Office: Memphis, Tennessee Web Site: http://www.bakerdonelson.com Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, is ranked by The National Law Journal as one of the 100 largest law firms in the country. Through strategic acquisitions and mergers over the past century, the Firm has grown to include more than 540 attorneys and public policy and international advisors. Baker Donelson has offices located in five states in the southern U.S. as well as Washington, D.C., plus a representative office in Beijing, China. Current and former Baker Donelson attorneys and advisors include, among many other highly distinguished individuals, people who have served as: Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; U.S. Senate Majority Leader; U.S. Secretary of State; Members of the United States Senate; Members of the United States House of Representatives; Acting Administrator and Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration; Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control for the U.S. Department of the Treasury; Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Chief Counsel, Acting Director, and Acting Deputy Director of U.S.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 24 of 118 Citizenship & Immigration Services within the United States Department of Homeland Security; Majority and Minority Staff Director of the Senate Committee on Appropriations; a member of Presidents Domestic Policy Council; Counselor to the Deputy Secretary for the United States Department of HHS; Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court of the United States; Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice of the United States; Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade for the U.S. Department of Commerce; Ambassador to Japan; Ambassador to Turkey; Ambassador to Saudi Arabia; Ambassador to the Sultanate of Oman; Governor of Tennessee; Governor of Mississippi; Deputy Governor and Chief of Staff for the Governor of Tennessee; Commissioner of Finance & Administration (Chief Operating Officer), State of Tennessee; Special Counselor to the Governor of Virginia; United States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge; United States District Court Judges; United States Attorneys; and Presidents of State and Local Bar Associations. Baker Donelson represents local, regional, national and international clients. The Firm provides innovative, results-oriented solutions, placing the needs of the client first. Our state-of-the-art technologies seamlessly link all offices, provide instant information exchange, and support clients nationwide with secure access to our online document repository. Baker Donelson is a member of several of the largest legal networks that provide our attorneys quick access to legal expertise throughout the United States and around the world.At least one can see why my lawsuit against Entergy was tainted and where the SMOKINGguns were to see that justice was not rendered. Moreover, the driving force behind thosestalking me and contacting my former employers to see that I do not work. One may concludeBaker Donelson has a very impressive resume; moreover, connections to key officials. However,this is the beginning point supporting looking behind the scene to see who the puppet masters are andwho are pulling the strings. In The New York Times investigation, determining who the insurancecompanies are for these employers, who are these insurance companies’ lawyers and whether or notthere are any ties/relationships to the courts, congress, government agencies as has been found in mysituation. If so, this may provide reasons for the laziness of the White House, Wage & Hour Divisionand other departments to act and their failure to perform ministerial duties mandated by statutes/laws.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 25 of 118EXPOSING RACIAL INJUSTICES/CORRUPTON IN THE JUDICIARY;EXPOSING DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES; ANDFBI AND LEGISLATURE/CONGRESS COVER-UP:PLEASE BE ADVISED: That this correspondence is to advise you of the concerns I have andmake the media aware as to what great extremes your departments’ officials have gone to, to destroymy life for exercising and engaging in protected rights. Moreover, my exposing such criminal/civilwrongs of employees of your department as well as that of my employers; however, nothing is beingdone. Barela v. United Nuclear Corp., 317 F.Supp. 1217 (1970) - (n. 1) Refusal to process plaintiffs application for employment simply because he had filed with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a charge against another employer violated Civil Rights Act. (n.2) Filing of charge against employer with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is protected right under Civil Rights Act and conduct infringing upon that right cannot be permitted. Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 704(a), 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e- 3(a). . . .(N.2) - The evidence will support no other inference than that United . . . did not want the plaintiff only because of the charge against Kerr. . . The filing of such a charge is a protected right under the Civil Rights Act, and conduct infringing upon that right cannot be permitted. See Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 411 F.2d 998 (5th Cir. 1969): Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Assn. of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Indus. of the United States and Canada, Local Union No. 189, 311 F.Supp. 464 (S.D.Ohio, 1970). (n.3) Plaintiff was entitled to injunction restraining defendant from refusing to process his application for employment simply because he had a complaint pending before Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against another employer. Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 704(a), 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-3(a).So where does one begin? Because of the magnitude of the issues address herein, it is very difficultto be brief, however, I am simply providing enough and/or sufficient information to support THEINITIATION/CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURTS TO INVESTIGATE AND RENDER ITSFINDINGS, to show KEY OFFICIALS ARE AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS ADDRESSSED BY ME aswell as provide THE NEW YORK TIMES with information that may aid it in determining why the
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 26 of 118Wage & Hour Division is lazy. For fears of wanting to be popular, well liked and received nothing isbeing done to correct such violations/injustices and to protect the public/citizens rights and interests.At least now others will know where to look – insurance companies and their law firms and thelobbyist and/or tactics they use to evade the laws/JUSTICE. Moreover, using unlawful/illegalactivities to scoff at CIVIL RIGHTS laws because most likely such acts are being carried out bythose who think that CIVIL RIGHTS laws are a joke and are using their behind-the-scene powers toinduce/bribe officials to get the results their client seeks. There is also information herein tosupport the attacks of the GOVERNMENT, CORPORATE AMERICA and others on my life forexercising rights that I believe as a citizen of the United States I am entitled to exercise. I have beenrepeatedly targeted; my life repeatedly threatened, etc. while those in the position to deter andprevent such criminal/civil wrongs have actually authorized the carrying out of such criminal/civilwrongs against me or watched on while such crimes were being committed. Let me further clarifyfor the public’s information, that such attacks have been leveled against me to paint me as:paranoid, lunatic, a serial litigator, crazy, the boy-who-cried-wolf, etc. A method commonly usedby a predominately white-run system to cover-up and/or mask the truth from the public – i.e. paintthe person exposing such crimes and racial prejudices/discrimination in such a light. However, theinformation contained herein and in the record of the Courts, government agencies, and employersPROVE otherwise. Moreover, those in authority to deter and prevent such criminal/civil wrongsrendered against me did nothing, and, may have engaged in criminal/civil wrongs themselves.Taking the life of a United States citizen and turning it upside down for their own ill purposesand gains – stripping me of rights to life, liberties and the pursuit of happiness,CONSTITUTIONAL/CIVIL RIGHTS, etc. Why? Because being an African-American, I gather I wasnot supposed to be able to defend such matters and the message sent to me through such acts - is stayin your place!!! So for your understanding and that of the media what else do you need to addressand expose such legal wrongs and to address the racial issues that you know and/or should be awareof divides so many people?All I am required to do is show through evidence – which I have – is that a prima facie case as to thediscriminatory, retaliatory, criminal/civil wrongs, etc. leveled against me are a direct and proximateresult of my participation in protected activity(s). For example: Wille v. Hunkar Lab., Inc., 724 N.E.2d 492 (Ohio.App.1.Dist. Hamilton.Co.,1998) - To state a claim of retaliation, an employee must demonstrate that: (1) she engaged in a protected activity; (2) employer knew of her participation in the protected activity; (3) employer engaged in retaliatory conduct; and (4) the alleged retaliatory action followed employees protected activity sufficiently close in time to warrant the inference of retaliatory motivation.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 27 of 118This has been done. Not only that the government has made sure there is enough information outthere on the internet regarding me to support same – an unlawful/illegal action in itself and donewith ill intent to blacklist me and prevent me from obtaining employment. Not only that, the evidencein the possession of the government agencies, courts and FBI, etc. clearly support that I have beensubjected to criminal acts in which employees of the government/courts have participated in. TheFBI is a department which is now under Eric Holder’s supervision and watch; so let us see will therebe any change and push to clean up the agency and the criminal/illegal acts of its agents brought toits attention. Additional information pertinent to the concerns addressed herein: 1) Since I mentioned Baker Donelson (the huge law firm mentioned above), I guess it is important for the public to know what your Departments know and/or should be aware of: This law firm represents Entergy (business that provides utilities and other services) in New Orleans, Louisiana. It knew it would be unsuccessful in defending against the lawsuit I filed so it had to rely upon special favors from those it representatives knew in high positions/places – i.e. the courts, United States Supreme Court, White House, Congress, etc. to defend against the lawsuit filed by me. Even with such ties/relationships, they failed. Now the case is just sitting there in the New Orleans, Louisiana court stalled – No FINAL Judgment has ever been rendered and although I have repeatedly requested entry of judgment, the court has refused to do so. So through my July 2008 Complaint this matter is now presently before the United States Legislature/Congress. Where is it at? Good question. Neither U.S. President Barack Obama, Senator Leahy, Congressman Conyers nor others contacted are willing to address this matter. Keep in mind that Baker Donelson acknowledge ties/relationships to the White House, the U.S. Legislature/Congress and/or with government agencies/courts. So a reasonable mind may conclude that based on the fact that I have not heard anything regarding my July 2008 Complaint filed, that said OFFICIAL Complaint filed with the United States Legislature/Congress appears to have been bought off by Lobbyist (the very ones President Obama advised during his presidential campaign in taking on) and/or the appropriate persons with finances, special interests and favors here. Not only that, Matthews of Conyer’s Committee advising of Complaint being shredded may have been done with such ill/criminal intent to cover-up/mask wrongs. This matter has been timely, properly and adequately presented in the filing of my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding.” Why Baker Donelson is so PROUD of its achievements, accomplishments and special relationships and interest that it has established in the White House, United States Supreme Court, Congress, etc., that it has allowed such publication of information on Martindale- Hubbell’s website.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 28 of 118Through this correspondence and supporting Exhibits, the public/media will find that while I tried tomove on with my life and start afresh, there was no way Entergy, its attorneys and its insurancecompany was going to let me do this – oh one must not forget, and neither was theGOVERNMENT. Why? Because I decided to bring Mandamus actions against the EqualEmployment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for its failure to perform ministerial dutiesMANDATED by law and not discretionary – exposing its LAZINESS AND REFUSAL TOPERFORM DUTIES MANDATED BY STATUTES/LAWS. It is all public record. Oh, gatheredfrom the way I have been treated over the years I am being punished for exercising my rights andtaking on the EEOC and/or government officials and exposing what The New York Times’investigators found. You see when one comes as a sole person/litigator; it is like being thrown intoan ocean of sharks. However, in my case, I was able to fend and use the law in a positive way;however, I have been repeatedly stripped and deprived of justice and protected rights at the hands ofthe very entities – courts and government – for taking them on. How prejudicial and discriminatoryis that? So no, I do not want the public to be deceived to think that the problem is only with theWage & Hour Division. The problem is with our government – beginning at the top, with theWHITE HOUSE. President Obama accepted the challenge a few weeks ago to take fullresponsibility and asked the nation not to be pointing the finger - i.e. one party blaming the other. Hehas acknowledged taking full responsibility as the President of the United States. So I say, “LET USALSO TAKE THIS MATTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S - THE DOORSTEPS OF THEWHITE HOUSE!” Clearly our President wants it known that his area of practice in the law isCIVIL RIGHTS. So let him also be required to address such issues and not hide behind the curtainsof the White House and peep out while his Department Heads (Cabinet Heads) be left to face themusic of the LAZINESS of these government employees in their failure to perform ministerial duties.President Obama wants to be the Head Honcho and clearly takes full responsibility for actscommitted by Departments (and their employees) under his administration – while some of theseacts were committed under past administrations, the evidence will support President Obama’sknowledge of my situation prior to and AFTER the November 2008 election and his FAILURE TOACT and deter such practices upon receipt of information. Not even the courtesy extended advisinghow this matter was handled since it was brought to his attention. Now as President of the UnitedStates, will he act to assure equal protection and due process of laws and that those who committedsuch criminal/civil wrongs against me are prosecuted. President Obama has conveyed that he willtake up issues under his administration. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder advised that he will takeon such discriminatory matters.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE:2) I went to work for a law firm (Baria Fykes Hawkins & Stracener – a predominately white firm) in Jackson, Mississippi; however, that was not enough. AFTER David Baria’s (“Baria”) trip to New Orleans, Louisiana my employment with this firm was ABRUPTLY terminated. I believe it was a favor to my former contract employer (Entergy) and its
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 29 of 118 attorneys/insurance company – Baker Donelson. It is important to note that during my employment at that firm, David Baria was the former President of the Mississippi Trial Lawyers Association. So a reasonable mind may conclude Baria relied upon those connections. I believe a reasonable mind may conclude that based on the information contained herein that Baker Donelson (having an office in Jackson, Mississippi & New Orleans) relied upon its (or others) relationship with Baria and his firm. During my employment with Baria’s law firm my lawsuit against Entergy was still being litigated. However, information regarding Entergy’s counsel and insurance companies ties/relationships to key government/court officials10 I have since obtained was not known to me; however, based on the contradictory acts, conflicts and far departure from the laws, it was obvious to me that something was not right. Now it is obvious why I was deprived equal protection of the laws, due process of laws, civil rights, constitutional rights, government/court officials failure to uphold the laws, etc. because of the ties/relationships and vast resources of Entergy, its counsel and insurance companies to key government and court officials. It is addressed in my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” along with supporting evidence being provided/attached to sustain the statements made. Baria advised me my termination was being done to allow me to go and do what I wanted – attempting to mask it as though I was not happy working with his firm when no such unhappiness was ever conveyed to him. Supporting this issue is not new and has been timely raised.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE, I:3) SI went to work an assignment at the law firm of Brunini Grantham Grower& Hewes (“Brunini”) - predominately white firm. AFTER a few days (establishing and supporting my work ethics, skills and ability to perform tasks assigned – quick learner as well as knowledgeable of the applications used and ability to perform job), I was considered, approached and offered a job. However, this was disrupted by Baria’s acts and threats of bringing legal action against Brunini if they hired me. From my understanding Baria being the employer to provide an adverse and/or objection to my working with Brunini. As a direct 10 Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; U.S. Senate Majority Leader; U.S. Secretary of State;Members of the United States Senate; Members of the United States House of Representatives; . . . Director of theAdministrative Office of the United States Courts; . . .Majority and Minority Staff Director of the Senate Committee onAppropriations; a member of Presidents Domestic Policy Council; Counselor to the Deputy Secretary for the United StatesDepartment of HHS; Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court of the United States; Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justiceof the United States; . . . Governor of Tennessee; Governor of Mississippi; Deputy Governor and Chief of Staff for theGovernor of Tennessee; Commissioner of Finance & Administration (Chief Operating Officer), State of Tennessee; SpecialCounselor to the Governor of Virginia; United States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge; United States District Court Judges;United States Attorneys; and Presidents of State and Local Bar Associations
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 30 of 118 and proximate result of Baria’s actions, threats, etc., Brunini rescinded its job offer. It is addressed in my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” along with supporting evidence being provided/attached to sustain the statements made. Supporting this issue is not new and has been timely raised.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE, I:4) I continued to work at various law firms assigned. Taking pride in my abilities and work ethics in getting the job duties assigned to me accomplished. My resume speaks volume of my work ethics, skills and ability to perform the job duties assigned. See EXHIBIT “13” – Resume attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In fact I recall an Executive Officer at a place where I was employed advising of his reservations as to my qualifications upon reading my resume, thinking my resume was one that was puffed up as he had seen of others in the past; however, advising of his amazement to find that my resume was truthful (not puffed up/exaggerated) and that I proved the qualifications, skills and ability to do the job tasks assigned me. I attach references obtained over the years to support my ability to perform the jobs assigned to me and my work ethics. Doing so because I am fully aware of how the system is designed to paint me one way to the public to cover-up the truth and/or prevent the truth from coming out. However, due to such criminal/civil wrongs leveled against me for taking on the GOVERNMENT and exposing EMPLOYERS in violation of Title VII, Civil Rights Act, United States Constitution, etc., it has spiraled into even greater violations than one could imagine under the hands of government/court officials that are in the position to deter and prevent such legal wrongs/violations. This is nothing new, it is addressed in my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” along with supporting evidence being provided/attached to sustain the statements made. Supporting this issue is not new and has been timely raised. I believe because of the attacks that have been leveled against me by certain Whites and their co-conspirators, posting information on the internet to underhandedly slander my name and character in efforts of destroying my life, it is necessary to reiterate information I provided President Obama and others in my Complaint filed with the United States Legislature/Congress regarding facts/evidence/feedback I have received from others that I have worked with and are familiar with my work ethics and character:
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 31 of 118 A. Beginning first with test results to support my computer skills and the ability to effectively and efficiently use (or learn) software applications of employer – skills required in the performance of my job duties/responsibilities: Alphanumeric – 8844 kph / 2% error rate Typing – 60 wpm / 1% error rate Word 97 – 100 overall (100 on basic, intermediate & advanced) Excel 97 – 100 overall (100 on basic, intermediate & advanced) See EXHIBIT “14” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Such evidence ofcomputer skills will squash any such ideas and thoughts that I was not computer literate andable to perform my job duties – to the contrary. I take great pride in learning as well asimproving in such areas so that I can meet any challenges a job may offer me and believe infurther educating myself to learn various software applications that I believe will bebeneficial to me in my pursuits and/or endeavors. B. References obtained from those who have had an opportunity to work with me: This letter is to confirm and recommend Ms. Vogel Newsome to a position of Executive Assistant, Administrative Assistant or greater. While working with Lash Marine, she performed the duties of Executive Assistant with skill and energy. Her spirit and motivation acted as a beacon of light to others. Her leadership and training of others was a great service. Always willing to share; she possess a unique ability to teach complex skills to the beginner and bring them quickly up to speed. In addition, being a caring and concerned citizen she put aside her time to train and work with Training, Inc. employees to develop their office skills for a better future. She is an asset and will be sorely missed at Lash Marine. - - ROBERT K. LANSDEN (VICE PRESIDENT) I have been very, very pleased with Vogel, not only in terms of her work product, but also in terms of her attitude and personality. I would rate her as one of the best legal secretaries with whom I have ever worked. I would highly recommend
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 32 of 118 her to any one who is looking for a full-time legal secretary. If my previous secretary were not rejoining me, I would want Vogel to be my new permanent secretary. If any one would care to discuss Vogel with me, please do not hesitate to give them my name and number. I will be more than happy to talk with them. I am not certain of the exact day when my previous secretary will rejoin me. It could be immediately, or, it could be a couple of weeks. In light of that, we would like to request that we be allowed to continue to work with Vogel until further notice. However, the last thing I want to do is have Vogel miss another good opportunity that might lead to permanent employment. Therefore, if she must be reassigned, I will understand, but grudgingly so.. . . - - RALPH B. GERMANY, JR. (ATTORNEY) I was first introduced to Ms. Newsome over five (5) years ago. Since that time, she has been a Woman of integrity and intelligence. Ms. Newsome always has presented herself in a professional manner and has always addressed me and others with the uttermost of respect. Ms. Newsome outgoing personality and personal strengths would make her an excellent additional to anyone’s staff. I have had the opportunity to work with Ms. Newsome and she has demonstrated flexibility in working outside of her field of endeavor and doing an excellent job is a strong indicator of how well she will do in her chosen field of endeavor. Ms. Newsome demonstrated a willingness to perform any task assigned to her promptly and correctly with little supervision. Ms. Newsome is a very pleasant person to associate with, works as a team player, and would truly be an ASSET to your organization because she is the best one for the job. - - LISA J. WASHINGTON (COORDINATOR) See EXHIBIT “15” attached hereto and incorporated by reference
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 33 of 118 TOMMY PAGE EMAIL – 06/16/05: TP: “You looked very smart & professional as you walked toward the building!” VN: “Why thank you. I strive to dress and carry myself in the manner in which PKH requires. ” TP: “You do it well.” See EXHIBIT “16” attached hereto and incorporated by reference Vogel, First and foremost, you are doing an excellent job. These are just a few things that I thought of that might save us both some time and help things flow smoother. . . - - SUSAN O. CARR See EXHIBIT “17” - February 28, 2005 E-mail from Susan Carr, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE, I:5) I was offered a job at a law firm, Mitchell McNutt & Sams (“MMS”) – predominantly white. A law firm clearly conducting business in violation of Title VII, FLSA – i.e. ailing to pay overtime wages as well as wages agreed to, and OSHA – i.e. subjected me to dangerous conditions - in retaliation of my reporting or intent to report of such violations, etc. I reported these legal wrongs to the appropriate agencies – i.e. Wage & Hour Division, EEOC, and OSHA. However, to no avail. At least I know why now. This law firm has been notified that I will be bringing the appropriate lawsuit for the civil wrongs rendered me within the statute of limitations allowed [EMPHASIS ADDED – because now courts are trying to aid this employer and others in their criminal/civil wrongs and shut its doors to me to cover-up/mask/shield violations and to preclude me from obtaining relief from the injury/harm sustained]. What is so ironic about this employer, is that I was able to obtain the transcript and CD’s of the hearing before the Unemployment Commission, where under OATH, MMS’ employees admit to discriminating against me as well as treating me in a hostile manner.11 – See EXHIBIT “18” – Transcript excerpts from Mississippi 11 DeCarlo v. Bonus Stores, Inc., 413 F.Supp.2d 770 (S.D.Miss.,2006.) - In his complaint, McArn charged that Terminix maliciously defamed him before the Mississippi Employment Security Commission by stating he was fired for a “bad attitude.” At trial, McArn testified that Terminixs
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 34 of 118 Unemployment Commission hearing attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Transcript excerpts have been provided as well as remain in the record of this agency. A law firm with a former attorney, Donna Barnes, sitting on the bench of the Mississippi Court of Appeals [EMPHASIS ADDED – look at Baker Donelson. It is obvious these law firms rely upon their ties/relationships to government/court officials to obtain an undue/illegal/unlawful advantage]. See EXHIBIT “85” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. One knows how hard it is for one to get evidence such as this. Why? Because rarely does an employer leave such a SMOKING GUN! Especially African-Americans and/or people of color because normally they are left out of the loop and not included in the office politics – those who are included, merely sell out for a piece of cheese. contention that he was insubordinate was false. That is the extent of McArns evidence of defamation. (n. 10) Under Mississippi law, public policy exception to employment at will doctrine permits employee to bring action in tort for damages against his employer if he is terminated for: (1) refusing to participate in illegal act, or (2) reporting illegal acts of his employer to employer or anyone else. McArn v. Allied Bruce-Terminix Co., Inc., 626 So.2d 603 (Miss.,1993) - [3] McArn argues that the Mississippi Employment Security Commission was falsely told that he was terminated for a bad attitude and not told the true reason for his firing. McArn argues that Miss.Code Ann. §71-5-131 (1972) permits a claim for defamation whenever the employer makes statements to the Commission which are “false in fact and maliciously ... made for the purpose of causing a denial of benefits.” There is no question but that Miss.Code Ann. § 71-5-131 provides that communications between an employer and the Commission are privileged and “when qualified privilege is established, statements or written communications are not actionable as slanderous or libelous absent bad faith or malice if the communications are limited to those persons who have a legitimate and direct interest in the subject matter.” Benson v. Hall, 339 So.2d 570, 573 (Miss.1976). In his complaint, McArn charged that Terminix maliciously defamed him before the Mississippi Employment Security Commission by stating he was fired for a “bad attitude.” At trial, McArn testified that Terminixs contention that he was insubordinate was false. That is the extent of McArns evidence of defamation.See EXHIBIT “18” Testimony taken under cross-examination and former employer admitting to discriminatory practices andharassment of me.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 35 of 118 Conducting a Thorough Investigation12 Because discrimination often is subtle, and there rarely is a “smoking gun,” [Fn. 45 - See Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1081-82 (3rd Cir. 1996)(“It has become easier to coat various forms of discrimination with the appearance of propriety, or to ascribe some other less odious intention to what is in reality discriminatory behavior. In other words, while discriminatory conduct persists, violators have learned not to leave the proverbial ‘smoking gun’ behind.”); cf. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 801 (1973). . .] determining whether race played a role in the decisionmaking requires examination of all of the surrounding facts and circumstances. The presence or absence of any one piece of evidence often will not be determinative. Sources of information can include witness statements, including consideration of their credibility; documents; direct observation; and statistical evidence such as EEO-1 data, among others. See EEOC Compl. Man., Vol. I, Sec. 26, Selection and Analysis of Evidence.” Then when the employer provide witnesses who acknowledge its discriminatory and hostile acts and the Wage & Hour, EEOC, Unemployment Commission, etc. fail to correct such wrongs, is clearly an INJUSTICE and acts clearly evidencing and supporting discriminatory treatment, prejudices, etc. in the handling of complaints that I have brought to government entities’ attention.6) While I was able to obtain such DAMAGING testimony during cross-examination of MMS’ employees admitting to subjecting me to discriminatory and hostile treatment for reporting violations, nothing has been done and was not done to punish this employer and MMS has been allowed to continue practicing in such a manner. All under the watchful eyes of the Wage and Hour, EEOC, OSHA, FBI and others. Even with such testimony, do you know my unemployment compensation was denied? Why? Because MMS, Baker Donelson and others in cohorts with them having special ties/relationships/interests with government/court officials. Not only that an attorney sitting on the Mississippi Court of Appeals and who knows where else. This is nothing new, it is addressed in my “Emergency Complaint and 12 Taken from EEOC’s Compliance Manual Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 36 of 118 Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” along with supporting evidence being provided/attached to sustain the statements made. Does this sound familiar – Baker Donelson’s connections to Judges, courts, the White House, the United States Supreme Court, etc. Supporting this issue is not new and has been timely raised. I was also able to obtain information from government agency of MMS’ employees acknowledging knowledge of my participation in protected activity. Not only that, during the Wage & Hour Division’s investigation of my matter, the District Director – Billy Jones – retired from the Department. See EXHIBIT “19” – FSLA Narrative Report attached hereto. During my employment at MMS I was able to obtain information acknowledging MMS attorneys’ ties/relationship to the Wage and Hour Division; moreover, attorney, Mike Farrell, acknowledging connections and having direct line information to pertinent/key people at the Wage and Hour Division.U.S. Department of Labor – FLSA NARRATIVE REPORT: Evidence: Interviews of Supervisor Robert Gordon, Attorney Mike Farrell, and Secretary Ladye Margaret Townsend13 revealed that Ms. Newsome had been rebellious and insubordinate in job duties assigned her from the start of her employment. _______ interview (Exhibit ____) stated that every since Ms Newsome was hired she been looking for a way to get fired to pursue a lawsuit. . . After this incident Ms Newsome began working on whether she was paid properly . . . Newsome disagreed with Attorney Farrell and told Cochanuer and Townsend she was going to contact Wage Hour. ____ didn’t know if Newsome did or not because nothing came of it. ____ further confirmed other events of insubordination. (Exhibit ____). Further action: ________________________________________________________ ____________ (Note) During the course of this investigation, District Director (“DD”) Billy Jones retired from the department. Regional Administrator McKeon assigned Assistant District Director (“ADD”) 13 All of whom are “White” and having a personal interest and financial interest (either employment and/or businessinvestment related).
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 37 of 118 Oliver Peebles as Acting DD for the Gulf Coast District. DD Peebles has been advised through all actions of this case, and all of his instructions have been followed. See EXHIBIT “19” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In an effort to do damage control, MMS appears to have closed its Jackson, Mississippi office. At least all three people (Mike Farrell, Robert Gordon, and Ladye Margaret Townsend) in the FLSA Narrative Report that worked in the Jackson Office with me are no longer employed with at MMS. As with Robert Gordon and James Allen providing false testimony during the Unemployment Commission’s investigation, such unlawful practices were exercised during the Wage and Hour Division.CUT & PASTED FROM: http://miami.fbi.gov/statutes/title_18/section1001.htm Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 - False Statements or Entries Generally This statute makes it a crime for falsifying, concealing, or covering up material facts surrounding a civil rights investigation, or making false statements, representations, or writings. This law prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to make false statements or misrepresentations surrounding their individual or collective actions, during a civil rights investigation. It has been successfully applied to civil rights investigations involving the loss of life, where the subjects of the investigation lied to protect their careers and those of other co-conspirators. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to five years or both. Nevertheless, MMS under the watchful eyes of Elaine Chao (Secretary of Labor) and others was allowed to knowingly provide false testimony/information during a federal investigation. This being allowed to happen even AFTER my contacting officials in Washington, D.C. However, do you think the Secretary of Labor (at the time – Elaine Chao) stepped in to see that MMS comply with the Wage & Hour laws? Moreover, that the Wage & Hour laws were enforced, and my obtaining overtime wages unlawfully/illegally withheld, etc.? Do you think the Wage & Hour contacted me and advised of the violations found? No! Instead the Secretary of Labor (Elaine Chao), at the
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 38 of 118 time of these actions, and others involved covered-up/masked/shielded such unlawful/illegal acts of its employee, Billy Jones, MMS and its employees, government officials rather than uphold the statutes/laws mandated. Billy Jones retiring and most likely is collecting employee/retirement benefits from this job – benefits which may have been otherwise lost had the Wage & Hour Division exposed his corrupt practices; but instead covered up such criminal/civil wrongs. Moreover, the statutes/laws the agencies (Wage & Hour Division, EEOC, OSHA, etc.) were MANDATED to enforce and uphold, but failed to do so. Instead, such government agencies and its employees have allowed such criminal/civil wrongs to be committed as a direct and proximate result of knowledge of my engagement in protected activities and my bringing of legal actions exposing such corrupt practices by government/court officials. This issue is not new and has been timely raised. On or about December 11, 2004, MMS was timely, properly and adequately placed on notice that I will be bringing the proper lawsuit against it. See EXHIBIT “20” – Letter to L.F. Sams, Jr., attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In an effort of doing damage control, MMS appears to have closed its Jackson, Mississippi office – at least cleaned said office of its employees (Mike Farrell, Robert Gordon, and Ladye Margaret Townsend) that provided false information during a federal investigation. Under the statutes and laws governing said matters in the state of Mississippi, I have approximately six (6) years to bring a civil action under the applicable laws I seek. My deadline would be approximately December 2010. The complaint against MMS has been drafted and I intend to bring it in the appropriate time. It is important to note that the United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi-Jackson Division thought that I would be filing a lawsuit about December 2007, so what it did in efforts of financially burdening me and in efforts of obstructing the administration of justice, it entered a ruling requiring that I pay a security bond – which was not permissible and neither could such ruling be sustained and was timely contested - in efforts of precluding me from filing lawsuit. As recent as December 2008, said court has usurped its authority, abused its powers, etc. and closed case and is attempting to close the doors of its court to aid MMS and others so that I cannot bring the required lawsuit to recover from the injury/harm sustained. However, said court was disappointed when it was advised I was onto it and that under the statutes/laws that my civil action against MMS will be brought provides me with a statute of limitation of approximately six (6) years rather than the three years the court thought I was waiting to act under. Now with such knowledge that I intend to bring the proper lawsuit against MMS within the time allowed under the laws, said court is attempting to close its doors to me – ACTIONS THAT ARE CLEARLY UNCONSTUTIONAL and clearly PREJUDICIAL/DISCRIMINATORY. Such actions of this court are public record and can be seen through entries of said court in other lawsuits filed by me. This court aware that I will be filing a lawsuit against MMS has
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 39 of 118 acted in a manner that has compromised the integrity of said court and the judicial process. I BELIEVE SUCH INFORMATION FURTHER SUPPORTS THE NEED FOR THE CREATION OF COURT/COMMITTEE TO ADDRESS SUCH ISSUE SO THAT I AM NOT DEPRIVED OF RECOVERING DAMAGES FROM THE INJURY/HARM SUSTAINED AS A DIRECT AND PROXIMATE RESULT OF MMS’ VIOLATIONS.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE, I:7) Those who know me know that I do not take the deaths and bloodshed by of pioneers and/or citizens who fought and died to see that people of color enjoy the rights secured/guaranteed under the United States Constitution, Civil Rights Act, Fair Housing Act, etc. That I am proud to be an African-American and have never wanted to be any other race because I am happy within myself, who I am and who I have become. That I have no identity issues. In my July 14, 2009 Complaint filed with the United States Legislature/Congress I shared how my family suffered a tragedy in the loss of my great grandfather’s life because a white man wanted his land. When my great grandfather refused to give him this land, the white man shot and killed my great grandfather and took the land what was not his to take through unlawful/illegal means. To date this land has not been returned. Milligan Newsome (“Milligan”) is my great grandfather whose life was unjustly taken by a prominent white man in his community. My great grandfather Milligan was a very special young minister in his time that through the strength of empowerment for himself and for God’s people, it became embedded in his heart, thoughts and actions. Who knew that when his life would be unjustly taken, he said “I will stand tall like a giant for my God.” While I did not have the pleasure of meeting my great grandfather I realize the Holy Spirit within him works within me today and I share his same passion and determination to stand tall against all odds and the refusal to let people break me down because of the color of my skin. As told in my Aunt’s book, “Naomi’s Story: You Don’t Have to Be Broken,” my great grandfather’s life was unjustly taken as told as follows: I learned that Rev. Milligan Newsome, her husband and my grandfather, was a special kind of person who took God’s work very seriously. He was a preacher, educator, teacher, and one who felt that it was his duty to look out for all those who lived in Spindle Bottom. Everyone loved and depended on him. All of this land around our houses, church, and school once belonged to him. He, along with one deacon, built Clark Creek Church and school. He was supported by two very powerful men of God, Rev. Charles Harrison Mason and Rev. Charles Price Jones. “When the white community saw the progress that your grandpa
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 40 of 118 was making, they tried to force him to sell all of his land. He refused to even discuss it with them. He then bean to advise others not to sell their land.” . . .“Naomi, your grandfather was a wonderful, stubborn, black Indian, God fearing preacher who did not fear what man could do to him. “Within a year the head of a prominent white family came to him and let him know that if he did not sell his land, he would be killed. Your grandfather, looked him straight in the eye and said, ‘If I don’t sell, you’re going to kill me. If I sell, you’re still going to kill me. Therefore, I’m going to die standing like a giant for my God.’ “ Shortly after this encounter, your grandfather went down to the covered bridge to cut firewood. Your papa, who was only seventeen years of age and very devoted, went with him. The man who had voiced the threat came by the house and asked me where had that nigger gone. He was carrying a rifle and a baseball bat. He stated the he only wanted to talk to that stubborn boy. I made the mistake of letting him know where they had gone. “As the white man walked away from me, I knew within my heart that your grandfather would be killed. When he found your grandfather and shot him, your papa stood and watched. Your papa helped his dad to climb into the wagon. Your grandpa always carried the Holy Bible with him. He took the Bible from the wagon and stumbled into the house to let me know that he had been shot. Your papa and I put him in the bed. He asked me to place the Bible under his pillow, but he could hardly speak as he said, ‘My love, teach our five children not to hate anyone.’ He then gasped for breath and fell asleep.” . . . “To this day, I feel so guilty. I knew that your papa would never be the same. He seemed to be falling apart. He was truly a broken young man.” . . . “Within a year after this, the man who murdered your grandpa took all of the land. He went around bragging about how he had killed that nigger Indian and then took his land. There was no law in Mississippi that would help the family. They were left at the mercy of the murderer. “About two years later, the murderer offered to give back part of the land. Your grandma refused to accept the offer. She said that she wanted all or none. None is what she received. Within this same year, the murderer entered the hospital in Vicksburg,
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 41 of 118 Mississippi. He was suffering and dying from cancer that had consumed his whole body, including his brain. The word got around that as he was dying, he continued to scream these words, “I’m sorry that I killed that nigger Indian preacher for nothing.’ Still the law did nothing about it.” Excerpt from Naomi Brookins’ book, “Naomi’s Story – You Don’t Have To be Broken ”at pp. 8-10. (See EXHIBIT “21” attached hereto and incorporated by reference) HISTORY IS ATTEMPTING TO REPEAT ITSELF – BUT NOT WITHOUT A LEGAL FIGHT: For the past several years, there have been certain whites that have continued this pattern and the attacks on me, my life and liberties. On February 14, 2006, I had to endure the criminal/civil wrongs of certain whites coming in and unlawfully/illegally seizing and taking my residence and property among other things away from me; in April/May 2008, again certain whites unlawfully/illegally seizing and taking my property; and again in October 2008, certain whites coming in and unlawfully/illegally seizing and taking my property. All of these criminal activities are being done under the watchful eyes of the FBI, courts and government officials. Believe me, enough people knew what was going on in my life; however, elected to scuff at the rights secured to me under the applicable laws – i.e. Landlord & Tenant Act, Fair Housing Act, Civil Rights Act, Constitution (State and U.S.). IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Landlord/Spring Lake Apartment Management was timely, properly and adequately placed on notice that I was seeking an Injunction and Restraining Order – notified via facsimile and other means. In fact, upon returning home and finding unauthorized persons in my residence, I provided a copy of Injunction and Restraining Order filed. I requested that they leave my residence which persons refused.8) I began working at Page Kruger & Holland (“PKH”). Again, not happy with my efforts, this firm with the assistance of others sought to destroy my life. On February 14, 2006, I was victimized and subjected to the similar crimes that O.J. Simpson was arrested, charged and found guilty of. Government officials and other persons, who were solicited to engage in such criminal/civil wrongs against me, did so with knowledge and or should have known they, were violating the laws. I was a victim of the following (however, this is not an exhaustive list and should not be limited to these alone):
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 42 of 118 (a) Conspiracy;14 (b) Burglary;15 (c) Robbery;16 (d) Assault;17 (e) Kidnapping;18 (f) Battery;19 (g) Theft;20 (h) Larceny;21 (i) 14 Conspiracy - An agreement by two or more persons to commit an unlawful act, coupled with an intent to achieve theagreements objective, and (in most states) action or conduct that furthers the agreement; a combination for an unlawful purpose.18 USC ~371. . . . "When two or more persons combine for the purpose of inflicting upon another person an injury which is unlawful in itself, or which is rendered unlawful by the mode in which it is inflicted, and in either case the other person suffers damage, they commit the tort of conspiracy." P.H. Winfield, A Textbook of the Law of Tort ~128, at 434 (5th ed. 1950) Chain Conspiracy - A single conspiracy in which each person is responsible for a distinct act within the overall plan. . . .*All participants are interested in the overall scheme and liable for all other participants acts in furtherance of that scheme. (Conspiracy ~24(3) C.J.S. Conspiracy ~~~117-118. Conspire - To engage in conspiracy; to join in a conspiracy. Conspirator - A person who takes part in a conspiracy. 15 Burglary - (2) The modern statutory offense of breaking and entering any building - not just a dwelling, and not onlyat night - with the intent to commit a felony. Burglar - One who commits burglary. Burglarized - To commit burglary. Breaking - (Criminal Law): In the law of burglary, the act of entering a building without permission. "[T]o constitute a breaking at common law, there had to be the creation of a breach or opening; a mere trespass at law was insufficient. If the occupant of the dwelling had created the opening, it was felt that he had not entitled himself to the protection of the law, as he had not properly secured his dwelling . . . In the modern American criminal codes, only seldom is there a requirement of breaking. This is not to suggest, however, that elimination of this requirement has left the entry element unadorned, so that any type of entry will suffice. Rather, at least some of what was encompassed within the common law breaking element is reflected by other terms describing what kind of entry is necessary. The most common statutory term is unlawfully, but some jurisdictions use other language, such as unauthorized, by trespass, without authority, without consent, or without privilege. Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott Jr., Criminal Law ~8.13 at 793-94 (2d ed. 1986). 16 Robbery - The illegal taking of property from a person of another, or in the person’s presence, by violence orintimidation; aggravated larceny. Aggravated Robbery – Robbery committed by a person who either carries a dangerous weapon – often called armedrobbery – or inflicts bodily harm or someone during the robbery. Armed Robbery – Robbery committed by a person carrying a dangerous weapon, regardless of whether the weaponwas revealed or used.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 43 of 118 17 Assault – Criminal & Tort Law. The threat or use of force on another that causes that person to have a reasonableapprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact; the act of putting another person in reasonable fear or apprehension of animmediate battery by means of an act amounting to an attempt or threat to commit a battery. 2. Criminal law. An attempt tocommit battery, requiring the specific intent to cause physical injury. Aggravated Assault – Criminal assault accompanied by circumstances that make it more severe, such as the intent tocommit another crime or the intent to cause serious bodily injury, esp. by using a deadly weapon. See Model Penal Code §211.1(2). 18 Kidnapping – The crime of seizing and taking away a person by force or fraud. Aggravated Kidnapping – Kidnapping accompanied by some aggravating factor (such as a demand for ransom or injuryof the victim). Kidnapping for Ransom – The offense of unlawfully seizing a person and then confining the person in a secret placewhile attempting to extort ransom. 19 Battery – Criminal Law. The use of force against another, resulting in harmful or offensive contact. Aggravated Battery – A criminal battery accompanied by circumstances that make it more severe, such as the use of adeadly weapon or the fact that the battery resulted in serious bodily harm. 20 Theft - (1) The felonious taking and removing of anothers personal property with the intent of depriving the trueowner of it; larceny [Cases: Larceny ~1. C.J.S. Larceny ~~1(1,2), 9.] (2) Broadly, any act or instance of stealing, includinglarceny, burglary, embezzlement, and false pretenses. Under such a statute it is not necessary for the indictment charging theft to specify whether the offense islarceny, embezzlement or false pretenses." Rollin M. Perkins & Ronald N. Boyce, Criminal Law 389-90 (3d ed. 1982). Theft by Deception - The use of trickery to obtain anothers property, esp. by (1) creating or reinforcing a falseimpression . . . (2) preventing one from obtaining information that would affect ones judgment about a transaction, or (3) failingto disclose, in a property transfer, a known lien or other legal impediment. Theft by Extortion - Larceny in which the perpetrator obtains property by threatening to (1) inflicts bodily harm onanyone or commits any other criminal offense. . . (4) take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withholdaction, (5) bring about . . .collective unofficial action, if the property is not demanded or received for the benefit of the group inwhose interest the actor purports to act, (6) testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect toanothers legal claim or defense, or (7) inflict any other harm that would not benefit the actor. Theft of Services - The act of obtaining services from another by deception, threat, coercion, stealth, mechanicaltampering, or using a false token or device. 21 Larceny - The unlawful taking and carrying away of someone elses personal property with the intent to deprive thepossessor of it permanently. *Common-law larceny has been broadened by some statutes to include embezzlement and falsepretense, all three of which are often subsumed under the statutory crime of "theft." "The criminal offence of larceny or theft in the Common Law was intimately connected with the civil wrong of trespass. Where there has been no trespass, said Lord Coleridge, there can at law be no larceny. Larceny, in other words, is merely a particular kind of trespass to goods which, by virtue of the trespassers intent, is converted into a crime. Trespass is a wrong, not to ownership but to possession, and theft, therefore, is not the violation of a persons right to ownership, but the
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 44 of 118 Invasion;22 (j) Unlawful Entry/Forcible Actions;23 (k) False Imprisonment;24 (l) False Arrest;25 (m) Malicious Arrest;26 (n) infringement of his possession, accompanied with a particular criminal intent." Aggravated Larceny - Larceny accompanied by some aggravating factor (as when the theft is from a person). Grand Larceny - Larceny of property worth more than a statutory cutoff amount, usu. $100. Mixed Larceny - (1) Larceny accompanied by aggravation or violence to the person. (2) Larceny involving a taking from a house. 22 Invasion - (1) A hostile or forcible encroachment on the rights of another. Intentional Invasion - A hostile or forcible encroachment on anothers interest in the use or enjoyment of property, esp. real property, though not necessarily inspired by malice or ill will. Invasion of Privacy - An unjustified exploitation of ones personality or intrusion into ones personal activities,actionable under tort law and sometimes under constitutional law. Invasion of Privacy by Intrusion - An offensive, intentional interference with a persons seclusion or private affairs. Intrusion - (1) A person entering without permission. (2) In an action for invasion of privacy, a highly offensiveinvasion of another persons seclusion or private life. Intruder - A person who enters, remains on, uses, or touches land or chattels in anothers possession without thepossessors consent. 23 Unlawful Entry - (1) The crime of entering anothers real property, by fraud or other illegal means, without theowners consent. Forcible - Effected by force or threat of force against opposition or resistance. Forcible Detainer - (1) The wrongful retention of possession of property by one originally in lawful possession, oftenwith threats or actual use of violence. Forcible Entry and Detainer - (1) The act of violently taking and keeping possession of lands and tenements withoutlegal authority. (2) A quick and simple legal proceeding for regaining possession of real property from someone who haswrongfully taken, or refused to surrender, possession. Forcible Entry - (1) The act or an instance of violently and unlawfully taking possession of lands and tenements againstthe will of those in lawful possession. (2) The act of entering land in anothers possession by the use of force against another orby breaking into the premises. 24 False Imprisonment – A restraint of a person in a bounded area without justification or consent. 25 False Arrest – An arrest made without proper legal authority. 26 Malicious Arrest – An arrest made without probable cause and for an improper purpose; esp., an abuse of process bywhich a person procures the arrest (and often the imprisonment) of another by means of judicial process.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 45 of 118 Harassment; (o) Obstruction of Justice/Process;27 (p) Color of Law;28 (q) Malicious Prosecution;29 (r) Abuse of Process;30 (s) Conspiracy Against Rights;31 (t) Conspiracy to Interfere With Civil Rights;32 and (u) Power/Failure to Prevent,33 as well as other 27 Obstruction of Justice - Interference with the orderly administration of law and justice, as by giving false informationto or withholding evidence from a police officer or prosecutor, or by harming or intimidating a witness or juror. *Obstruction ofjustice is a crime in most jurisdictions. Obstruction of Process - Interference of any kind the lawful service or execution of a writ, warrant, or other process.*Most jurisdictions make this offense a crime. 28 Color of Law: The appearance of semblance, without the substance, of a legal right. *The term u.s.u. implies amisuse of power made possible because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of the state. 29 Malicious Prosecution – (1) The institution of a criminal or civil proceeding for an improper purpose and withoutprobable cause. (2) The cause of action resulting from the institution of such a proceeding. 30 Abuse of Process – The improper and tortuous use of a legitimately issued court process to obtain a result that iseither unlawful or beyond the process’s scope. 31 If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory,Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by theConstitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder hisfree exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the actscommitted in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or anattempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term ofyears or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 32 Conspiracy to Interfere With Civil Rights (42 U.S.C. § 1985): (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges:
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 46 of 118 crimes - wherein guns and/or assault weapons were present and/or used for threatening purposes. A matter in which a formal complaint was filed with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”) on June 26, 2006, who has jurisdiction over such issues and in July 2008 was brought to the attention of the United States Legislature/Congress. I believe this matter is presently pending – my recent investigation is finding that those involved having ties and relationship to courts, judges, etc., thus, in the interest of justice, I knew that other legal resources would be required to assure equal protection of the laws and that those committing crimes brought to justice. I have concerns that agencies (i.e. such as the FBI) aware of these crimes being committed against me, has taken a far departure from the laws and has taken great measures to cover-up and/or fail to prosecute those who are guilty of such legal wrongs because those involved in such crimes include: Judges, court officials, agency officials, etc. Moreover, may have taken and/or agreed to some type of deal compromising the investigation and/or the upholding If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. 33 Power/Failure to Prevent (42 USC § 1986): Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; . . .
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 47 of 118 of statutes/laws. So now I submit this information to your attention. AT LEAST THE PUBLIC WILL FIND OUT WHETHER OR NOT PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION UNDER HIS ADMINISTRATION AND ERIC HOLDER (THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) IS GOING TO ADDRESS IT and see THAT JUSTICE IS EQUALLY APPLIED AND THOSE WHO COMMITTED SUCH CRIMES (i.e. SIMILAR TO O.J. SIMPSON’S CRIMINAL ACTS) AGAINST ME ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE! MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972 SEC. 97-1-1. Conspiracy.34 If two (2) or more persons conspire either: (a) To commit a crime; or (b) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for a crime, or to procure to be complained of or arrested for a crime; or (c) Falsely to institute or maintain an action or suit of any kind; or (d) To cheat and defraud another out of property by any means which are in themselves criminal, or which, if executed, would amount to a cheat, or to obtain money or any other property or thing by false pretense; or (e) To prevent another from exercising a lawful trade or calling, or doing any other lawful act, by force, threats, intimidation, or by interfering or threatening to interfere with tools, implements, or property belonging to or used by another, or with the use of employment thereof; or (f) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, trade or commerce, or for the perversion or obstruction of justice, or of the due administration of the laws; or 34 See EXHIBIT “91” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 48 of 118 (g) To overthrow or violate the laws of this state through force, violence, threats, intimidation, or otherwise; or (h) To accomplish any unlawful purpose, or a lawful purpose by any unlawful means; such persons, and each of them, shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction may be punished by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or by both. Provided, that where the crime conspired to be committed is capital murder or murder as defined by law or is a violation of section 41-29- 139 (b)(1) or section 41-29-139 (c)(2)(D), Mississippi Code of 1972, being provisions of the Uniform Controlled Substances Law, the offense shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than twenty (20) years, or by both. Provided, that where the crime conspired to be committed is a misdemeanor, then upon conviction said crime shall be punished as a misdemeanor as provided by law.35 CUT & PASTED FROM: http://www.mscode.com/free/statutes/97/001/0001.htm. Remember, O. J. Simpson (an African-American male) was found guilty for similar crimes as those committed against me in trying to get his property back. The majority of those who are orchestrating and directing/instructing the carrying out of such crimes against me, I believe are white and hold positions with government agencies and/or courts. In my situation, it was my property that was unlawfully/illegally seized at the direction of a corrupt Judge – William Skinner (“Skinner”). Skinner is corrupt and used his sidekick, a corrupt Constable – Jon Lewis (“Lewis”) – and others to carry out such crimes. Neither Judge Skinner nor Constable Lewis having jurisdiction nor legal authority to authorize the action/crimes rendered against me. The last I was advised, Judge Skinner, Constable Lewis and others are still acting in full form and have not been arrested and charged although a formal complaint has been filed with the proper authorities (FBI and the United States Legislature/Congress). My complaint filed with the FBI entitled, Complaint and Request for Investigation to the United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigations” was filed on June 26, 2006. See EXHIBIT “22” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. However, the FBI 35 SOURCES: Codes, 1892, Sec. 1006; 1906, Sec. 1084; Hemingways 1917, Sec. 810; 1930, Sec. 830; 1942, Sec.2056; Laws, 1954, Ex. ch. 20; 1968, ch. 343, Sec. 1; 1981, ch. 488, Sec. 1, eff from and after passage (approved April 15, 1981.)
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 49 of 118 due to its relationships ties and special interest in Skinner (i.e. involvement in the raid on a African-American group that ended in Skinner’s father being killed) appears to be refusing to prosecute him and others for the crimes committed against me on February 14, 2006. Judge Skinner was aware or should have been aware that he was engaging in criminal activities. If his resume is true it will support Skinner has been educated and trained in diverse areas to sustain his knowledge of knowing right from wrong: SOME OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS JUDGE SKINNER IS ASSOCIATED WITH: Mississippi Justice Court Judges Association – President (2005-2006 and 2006-2007) The National Judges Association Mississippi Center for Police and Sheriffs – President and Chairman POST GRADUATE EDUCATION: Landlord/Tenant – 2006 Lorman Education Services Landlord/Tenant – 2005 Lorman Education Services Evictions and Landlord/Tenant Law in Mississippi – May 2003 National Business Institute Landlord/Tenant Update Seminar – 2001 Continuing Education SPECIAL SCHOOLS: SWAT Training - FBI Crisis Management - FBI FBI Defensive Tactic Instructor Certification Semi-Automatic Weapon – FBI/JPTA Pistol Transition for Instructors - FBI
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 50 of 118 AWARDS: Former Board of Directors State SWAT AssociationSee EXHIBIT “23” – Resume attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Judge Skinner’s unlawful/illegal conduct was timely, properly and adequately reported to theMississippi Commission of Judicial Performance. To no avail. Judge Skinner, it appears, is blazinga trail to the Mississippi Supreme Court. Since he lost his bid for said court in elections he may havedecided to climb through the top as he works his way through the courts – i.e. beginning as judge inthe Justice Court and now he is in the County Court. See EXHIBIT “93” attached hereto andincorporated by reference. What a travesty that would be to have him sitting on the MississippiSupreme Court. The Jackson, Mississippi Police Academy is named after Judge Skinner’s father, WilliamSkinner (William L. Skinner Training Academy).36 Lieutenant William Skinner was shot and killed during a standoff with a group of militants who were barricaded in a house. Lieutenant Skinner was standing beneath a tree when he was struck in the head by a single round that had been fired from underneath the house. The Black Liberation Army37 was a violent, radical group that attempted to fight for independence from the United States government in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The BLA was responsible for the murders of more than 10 police officers around the country. They were also responsible for violent attacks around the country that left many police officers wounded.One may question, whether or not Officer Skinner was standing beneath a tree, or was he in his car?See EXHBIT “84” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. There are conflicting stories as towhere he was when he was shot. Therefore, raising some serious and reasonable doubts surroundingthe shooting of Officer Skinner. In January 2006, there was a matter brought before Judge Skinner by my landlord (SpringLake Apartments). My landlord using unlawful/illegal tactics it has repeatedly relied upon to have 36 See EXHBIT “84” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 37 It appears the RNA’s name was changed to the “Black Liberation Army” (what was the correct name) –apparently a name used by the media to portray the RNA in a negative light.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 51 of 118African-Americans and/or people of color unlawfully/illegally removed from its property. In that Iwas told I had to be in court, I went. Judge Skinner attempted to get me to argue the merits of thelandlord’s case. I refused and advised I was there to confirm the improper service of process.During the process (upon reviewing the paperwork), Judge Skinner asked whether or not I was anattorney and I advised him no; and neither did I provide him with information that I worked for a lawfirm. I believed that justice should be applied to the laws whether one is an attorney or not. I cameaway with the impression that if I were an attorney, Judge Skinner would not have acted in theunlawful/illegal and unethical manner in which he did. When Judge Skinner insisted that I defendagainst the landlord’s claims, I simply refused, turned and walked out of his court. I was notrequired to be there and I found the acts of Judge Skinner to be atrocious. Clearly Judge Skinnerwas making a MOCKERY of the judicial process – to his amusement. In retaliation of my leavinghis courtroom, Judge Skinner took it upon himself to date and sign a “REMOVAL” document as myattorney in which he was not. (See EXHIBIT “24” attached hereto and incorporated by reference).JUDGE SKINNER IS CLEARLY OUT OF CONTROL AND OPERATING UNDER HISOWN PERSONAL LAWS AND PERSONAL THEORIES!!! However keep in mind, it took authorities no time to move in on O.J. Simpson (an African-American); and in about a one-year period, try O.J. Simpson and succeed in getting a guilty verdict. Nevertheless, those involved in the crimes rendered against me on February 14, 2006, remain free and are being allowed to carry on without being brought to justice. Neither am I aware of those committing such crimes against me being arrested, charged or tried for the criminal acts rendered against me – Here it is OVER THREE (3) YEARS and the FBI has failed to provide me with reasons why criminal charges have not been brought against Judge Skinner, Constable Lewis and those who engaged in such criminal/civil wrongs! A reasonable mind might conclude given the facts, evidence and legal conclusions in the record of the government agencies/courts, that those overseeing the charges/complaints I have filed are prejudice against me and aware of the discriminatory practices. THE FBI AND THOSE IN AUTHORITY AND WITH THE POWER TO DETER SUCH PRACTICES, APPROVING OF SUCH METHODS THAT A PREDOMINATELY WHITE-RUN SYSTEM HAS DESIGNED TO KEEP AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN LINE. Moreover, said failure may be a direct and proximate result of lobbyists at work on behalf of corrupt employers, corrupt law firms, corrupt insurance agencies, corrupt judges and corrupt politicians. What also makes this situation bad, is that not only is President Obama, the FBI, the United States Legislature/Congress and others aware of the situation and has done nothing about it, the Clerk of the Hinds County Justice Court – Patricia Woods -
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 52 of 118 addressed concerns regarding the practices of Constable Lewis. See EXHIBIT “25” attached hereto. WLBT Channel 3 TOP STORY – 04/19/06 – Supervisors Looking Into Constable’s Methods: The Hinds County Board of Supervisor’s is looking into the methods used by the county’s constable. At issue, is how he collects his fees. The constable says he has done nothing wrong. In a letter to the county administrator, Justice Court Clerk Patricia Woods accused Constable John Lewis of using questionable tactics. “There is absolutely nothing criminal here, nothing wrong,” said Constable Jon Lewis. The clerk said Friday, April 7th, several defendants appeared at justice court to pay fines, but a judge wasn’t present. A Utica man received a letter telling him to appear, but the man had already paid his speeding ticket in January. After learning that, the clerk told her staff not to collect any fees from defendants who did not have outstanding warrants. “I refuse to be a part of his collection process,” said Woods in her letter to County Administrator Anthony Brister. “I cannot imagine how many letters were mailed or payments received at his home address.” “I am welcoming an investigation from the auditor’s office. I would like it to be looked into very thoroughly,” said Lewis. Constable Lewis says the letter to the defendant about the speeding ticket was a mistake on his part,38 but he makes no apologies for using tough methods. 38 Only because he has probably been practicing in such unlawful/illegal ways for so long and never expected to beexposed or that they would find out that he was having payments coming directly to him at home – were these paymentsreported? Hopefully, an investigation by the Legislature/Congress will yield this information. Providing Constable Lewis withthe investigation he is requesting.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 53 of 118 See EXHIBIT “25” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Hinds County is fully aware that Lewis falsified process and/or abused service of process and provided false returns regarding same – clearly criminal acts. Lewis committing such criminal acts to obtain fees he charge; moreover, to unlawfully/illegally collect fees for services he has not rendered in accordance with the statutes/laws governing process – criminal acts known to government officials and judges. However, to date and to my knowledge, nothing has been done. Such corrupt officials as Lewis and Skinner are still in office. Mississippi has been ranked as No. 2 in a report addressing corruption amongst public officials – Corporate Crime Reporter, based on U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section’s. See EXHIBIT “26” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In a January 16, 2004 Report, Mississippi ranked as No. 1 as most corrupt state.39 See EXHIBIT “27” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. I provided members of the United States Legislature/Congress with my July 14, 2008 Complaint because I did not believe contacting Mississippi’s Senators and/or representatives would prove to be fruitful and I was correct. In fact, look at correspondence dated June 1, 2006, received from Senator Thad Cochran which provides: This appears to be a private, legal matter. However, in an effort to be of assistance, I have contacted the proper Office of the Attorney General officials on your behalf. As soon as I receive a report from them, I will get back in touch with you. See EXHIBIT “28” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. NOTE: Unless Cochran’s follow-up correspondence was misplaced, to date I have not heard anything from him or the Attorney General’s Office. SO I AM HOPING 39 If former Hinds County (Mississippi) District Attorney, Ed Peters, was identified as a participant in an allegedbribery scheme involving Hinds County Circuit Judge, Bobby DeLaughter, and disbarred lawyer Dickie Scruggs, turned in hislaw license, a reasonable mind may conclude why he did so. See EXHIBIT “78” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.Not only that supporting why Mississippi ranked No. 1 (in 2004 report) and No. 2 (in 2007 report) as the “Most Corrupt State”regarding those in public office. Judge Bobby DeLaughter working in the same court and system as that in which Newsome hasbrought legal actions and in which Judge William Skinner now resides. Clearly, this is a way of life in Mississippi for judges andattorneys – i.e. relying upon corrupt and criminal practices to deprive citizens constitutional rights, civil rights and legal rights fortheir own ill purposes and illegal gain. Nevertheless, Skinner still remains on the bench and has not been prosecuted for hiscriminal activities against me. Judge Skinner and others committed similar crimes as that in which O. J. Simpson was arrested,charged and found guilty of. So where is the justice? Why are certain whites allowed to break the laws and not subject to equalpunishment as African-Americans and/or people of color when they commit such crimes?
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 54 of 118 ERIC HOLDER CAN FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED HERE! WAS THE BALL DROPPED? WAS THERE A COVER-UP? Moreover, there are statutes/laws in place to support that the U.S. Legislature/Congress may get involved. Leaving me with very serious and valid concerns as to what ties/relationships THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THIS MATTER WAS FORWARDED TO and/or COCHRAN may have with the parties involved in the conspiracy leveled against me to destroy my life. Information I believe also pertinent in my repeated quests for investigations. IT IS IMPORTANT TO REITERATE: Judge Skinner’s father was killed during an FBI raid on an African-American group (New Republic of Africa). See the ties/relationship and connection between the government/courts – in this case the FBI and Judge Skinner. Based on said information and evidence in this record, one guess as to why Judge Skinner, Constable Lewis and others have not been arrested. See EXHIBITS “23, 29, 83, and 84” – respectively attached hereto and incorporated by reference. A reasonable mind may conclude, the FBI is covering up the criminal acts of Judge Skinner because of such special ties/interests and connections to him and others. Moreover, the FBI may feel it owes Judge Skinner because of a botched FBI sting. WAS THERE AN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE BULLET THAT RESULTED IN THE DEATH OF SKINNER’S FATHER WAS FROM A GUN OF A MEMBER OF THE NEW REPUBLIC OF AFRICA? WAS SKINNER’S FATHER’S DEATH A RESULT OF FRIENDLY FIRE (BY AN AGENT OF THE FBI) WAS THERE SUCH AN INVESTIGATION or DID THE FBI MERELY WANT TO COVER THIS UP AND HOPE IT WOULD GO AWAY? COULD THIS BE A SECRET THE FBI HAS BEEN HIDING FOR SO MANY YEARS IN THAT AFRICAN-AMERICANS WERE CHARGED, TRIED AND CONVICTED FOR SUCH CRIME? Such guilt by the FBI that Judge Skinner relies upon to exact revenge on African-Americans as evidenced in the handling of my matter. Such outrage is evidenced in an article (as there were many surrounding the FBI’s botched 40raid) where Skinner makes statements against the person he believes to be responsible for his 40 Shot during the 1971 FBI unannounced raid on the RNA (Republic of New Africa): Note – Only fatally of this raid(?). While I have not viewed the record, I am left with doubts and/or wondering whether or not Officer Skinner was shot byfriendly fire (from another police officer or an FBI agent) and the FBI covered up such information. Moreover, Officer Skinner’sson, Judge Skinner’s, using his father’s death as a ransom over the head of the FBI and relying upon the FBI’s guilt forOfficer Skinner’s death to obtain special favors from the FBI. Surely the record will support that the FBI is required to handleinvestigations into the civil/criminal wrongs rendered me; however, they failed to do so. So the question would need to beanswered through an Investigation and Hearings why the FBI has taken such a far departure from the laws and has elected todeprive me equal protection of the laws and/or due process of laws in the handling of the complaint I filed with its agency.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 55 of 118father’s death. Skinner making such statements as, “This man is a terrorist” and “He ran a terroristorganization, and there is no difference between him an Osama bin Laden,” as he refers to ImariObadele who was invited to speak at an event honoring Black History Month. Judge Skinner goingto on to say, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this crap” as according to reporter. (SeeEXHIBIT “29” attached hereto). Neither was Obadele present at the shootout/raid, according toreports, when Judge Skinner’s father was shot. Such needless outrage by Judge Skinner apparentlyagainst a man (Obadele) who was not present at the shootout that eventually led to the death of hisfather. So what exactly did Skinner mean from such statements? What were his intent in retaliationand protest – i.e. did such hostility displayed and conveyed by Skinner mean he was going to exacthis hostility and revenge against African-Americans that are brought before him? If so, CLEARLYSUCH BEHAVIOR IS UNLAWFUL and UNACCEPTABLE!!! Not only that, I believe Judge Skinner may have become a judge for ill intent/motives – i.e. for purposes of wreaking havoc on African-Americans and/or people of color. Placing himself in the judicial system so that he can have the opportunity to get to African-American males (juveniles) at an early stage and have a role in systematical designed practices (i.e. as the Jena 6 situation) to incarcerate this race of males at an early age – keeping with the design of breaking down and destroying them. Clearly from his training and credentials on display – EXHIBIT “23” - he knew that he was violating the statutes/laws as it relates to me. Therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that he is not fit to be on the bench rendering decisions that are designed to adversely affect and target specific racial groups. Moreover, when a corrupt Constable would trump up and bring malicious charges against me under Judge Skinner’s direction and/or watch, then most likely such criminal acts may be expected under Judge Skinner’s watch in other matters. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”) immediately targeted the RNA and began raiding their meetings. In August 1971, the FBI and the Jackson Police Department, without warning, attacked the RNA government residence with arms, tear gas, and a tank. One Jackson police officer, William Skinner, was killed, one patrolmen and an FBI agent were wounded but there were no RNA casualties . . . The RNA protested the arrests and verdicts, pointing out that the RNA 11 part of a “long pattern” of violence and injustice against Blacks in Mississippi.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 56 of 118 See EXHIBIT “83” information on RNA - attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Lewis’ pattern-of-criminal activities are known by his employer (Hinds County and/or Hinds County Board of Supervisors); however, the Hinds County Board of Supervisors has allowed him to continue to conduct business in an unlawful/illegal/unethical manner. I filed a timely complaint with the Hinds County Board of Supervisors regarding Constable Jon Lewis which went ignored and to date I have heard nothing regarding said complaint. See EXHIBIT “30” - “Notice Of Intent to File Lawsuit and Official Complaint Against Hinds County Constable Jon C. Lewis,”attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Hinds County Board of Supervisors are aware of Jon Lewis’ collecting fees through the use of illegal/unlawful methods, stealing citizens’ property and tampering/destroying evidence during his unlawful/illegal seizure of citizens’ property. Moreover, Hinds County knew and/or should have known of Lewis’ practices in tampering and destroying evidence that he knew would be used against him. Lewis intentionally and knowingly destroyed, concealed and removed evidence with deliberate intent to impair its use, verity or availability in any legal proceedings (i.e. lawsuits) that may result out of his criminal practices. As in my situation, Lewis illegally confiscated my tape recording because he knew that it contained evidence to support that the malicious criminal charges against me were false and said recording would evidence violations and abuse of authority, abuse of process, etc. Moreover, that I did not commit the crimes set forth in malicious charges brought by Lewis against me. I requested the return of my property. To no avail. See EXHIBIT “31” - “Request for Arrest Report & Return of Personal Property Retrieved by Constable Jon C. Lewis – Arrest of Vogel Newsome by Constable Jon C. Lewis on February 14, 2006” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Lewis knew and/or should have was committing criminal acts.CUT & PASTED: http://www.michie.com/mississippi/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=main-h.htm&cp=mscode § 97-9-125. Tampering with physical evidence. (1) A person commits the crime of tampering with physical evidence if, believing that an official proceeding is pending or may be instituted, and acting without legal right or authority, he: (a) Intentionally destroys, mutilates, conceals, removes or alters physical evidence with intent to impair its use, verity or availability in the pending or prospective official proceeding;
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 57 of 118 (b) Knowingly makes, presents or offers any false physical evidence with intent that it be introduced in the pending or prospective official proceeding; or (c) Intentionally prevents the production of physical evidence by an act of force, intimidation or deception against any person. (2) Tampering with physical evidence is a Class 2 felony. Sources: Laws, 2006, ch. 387, § 13, eff from and after July 1, 2006. § 97-9-129. Sentencing (1) A person who has been convicted of any Class 1 felony under this article shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not more than five (5) years or fined not more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), or both. (2) A person who has been convicted of any Class 2 felony under this article shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not more than two (2) years or fined not more than Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00), or both. (3) A person who has been convicted of any misdemeanor under this article shall be sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a term of not more than one (1) year or fined not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or both. Sources: Laws, 2006, ch. 387, § 15, eff from and after July 1, 2006. See EXHIBIT “32” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. On the way to the Hinds County Detention Center, I advised Lewis that he was breaking the laws. I also advised Lewis that I would be bringing legal action(s) against him for such violations. This is such information which would support the reasons for Lewis’ tampering with evidence. Not only that Lewis’ advising the Hinds County Board of Supervisors, “Constable Lewis discussed a potential class action lawsuit. Extensive discussion was had on this matter. No action was taken.” “The Board Attorney next updated the Board on the status of the internal investigation that the Board Attorney was instructed to conduct regarding allegations that Constable Jon Lewis had violated state law. The Board Attorney advised the Board that all information regarding this matter had been turned over the Attorney General’s Office (FBI) as previously instructed by the Board at a prior Board
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 58 of 118 meeting. No action was taken on this matter.” See EXHIBIT “33” - Hinds County Board of Supervisors Minutes attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Nevertheless, just as the Hinds County Board of Supervisors has elected to allow Jon Lewis to continue to commit such criminal acts so has the FBI. Therefore, warranting and justifying my contacting you. Further supporting my concerns of an FBI cover- up. From information I found regarding another citizen, Frank Baltimore (“Baltimore”), it appears that Lewis’ has established a pattern-of-abuse and/or pattern-of-criminal behavior in the wearing of his badge – i.e in the collecting of fees, the taking, tampering and destroying of evidence. In Baltimore’s blog he states in part: I know Jon Lewis has been taking money his whole term in office because his stolen money and property from me. I feel he should have criminal charges filed against him for his criminal behavior. No one wants to help me and every Law enforcement agency and official have not done their jobs. My name is Frank D. Baltimore Sr., Sr., I am an African American citizen who resided in Jackson Mississippi and was run out by threats made and Constitutional rights violations performed by Constable Jon Lewis against me. I currently reside in Los Angeles, CA…. I contacted the board of supervisors and the board’s attorney back in 2004, 2005, and 2006. I have asked you to help me on numerous occasions to no avail from any board member…. I am asking that you call for and add my complaint to our already internal investigation presently going on against Jon Lewis. He took my badges, stun gun, diamond earring, and $100 dollars in cash from me, and never returned them to me to his present date…. On October 30, 2003, while you were enforcing a simple eviction at 23 N. Hill Pkwy, Apt. F, Jackson, MS 39206, you willfully and deliberately without probable cause and without a search warrant illegally searched and seized the Personal Business property owned by Frank D. Baltimore, Sr., Damon Baltimore, and Baltimore Enterprises, who had and has a legal right to the said property illegally seized.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 59 of 118 This letter is a demand for you to return all said property seized by you on October 30, 2003, November 1, 2003, and November 2, 2003 dates. Please be advised that if the said property is not returned within 5 days, a civil lawsuit is prepared and will be filed against you in your official and individual capacities, the County of Hinds, and the County of Hinds Board of Supervisors for constitutional and civil rights violations of my 1st, 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments, discrimination, and other Federal and State amendments not mentioned herein. Furthermore, criminal charges will also be filed against you.... See EXHIBIT “34” – May 9, 2006 Blog of Frank Baltimore attached hereto and incorporated by reference. What is sad about Baltimore’s situation, it appears (as with myself) he had to move away (just as myself) because of such criminal activities and because of those in positions to deter and prevent such practices, allowed Lewis, Skinner and others to break the laws and remain unpunished. What I also found disturbing from the information in Baltimore’s blog, is that Lewis has been committing such acts several years prior to my February 14, 2006 arrest. Clearly the Hinds County Board of Supervisors and the FBI are fully aware of Lewis’ criminal behavior and has condoned and approved such practices. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR SUCH CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR! NO EXCUSE AT ALL!!!! BECAUSE OF SUCH NEGLIGENCE BY THE HINDS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND THE FBI, ON FEBRUARY 14, 2006 (AS MY GREAT GRANDFATHER) I COULD HAVE VERY WELL LOST MY LIFE. LEWIS CARRIED AND WAS IN POSSESSION OF GUN/WEAPON!9) No, I did not resort to taking the laws into my own hand as such as those who have taken it upon themselves and their cohorts to commit such criminal actions against me had hoped. Instead, I filed the required lawsuits and brought complaints in a timely manner before the proper authorities. Guess who represents Judge Skinner, Constable Lewis, and Hinds County in the lawsuit filed? None other than Page Kruger & Holland – my former employer and my employer at the time of the criminal/civil wrongs rendered me on February 14, 2006. It is important to note that PKH having attorneys in key positions such as President and President-Elect with the Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association. Not only that, PKH during my employment with it, also employed the son (John Noblin) of the Clerk of the Court (J.T. Noblin) – United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson Division. See EXHIBITS “35” respectively – PKH Directory and Information from
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 60 of 118 Mississippi Bar Directory regarding J.T. Noblin attached hereto. United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi in which I filed two lawsuits and said Court fully and adequately aware that the filings of future lawsuits regarding other matters are inevitable. Clearly, a BREACH OF LAWS GOVERNING CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, ETC., and clearly CONFLICT OF INTEREST. This is nothing new, it is addressed in my “Emergency Complaint and Request for Legislature/Congress Intervention; Also Request for Investigations, Hearings and Finding” along with supporting evidence being provided/attached to sustain the statements made. Supporting this issue is not new and has been timely raised. When I returned to work at PKH after my February 14, 2006 horrific ordeal (kidnapping, false imprisonment, etc.), one of the attorneys – Raymond Fraser (“Fraser”) – asked me if I was okay in that I contacted him at the time the criminal acts were being committed and I had requested that they leave my residence. Fraser advised he had tried to call me and expressed his concerns when he was not able to reach me. Why was he unable to reach me? Because I had been kidnapped, unlawfully/illegally detained, incarcerated, denied a phone call, etc. When I returned to work Fraser advises me of his shock since he was aware of the matter and pleadings filed which would prohibit the unlawful/illegal acts taken against me. However, I gather because Fraser is African-American it would be said he does not know the law and/or have no understanding the laws. It was Fraser who advised me that Judge Skinner went to law school with attorney(s) at PKH – i.e. Jamie Travis (African-American). Travis shortly after the February 14, 2006, criminal activities was given shareholder/partner status at PKH. From my understanding Travis had been trying for quite a while to become a shareholder/partner; however, denied. Nevertheless, apparently Travis after the February 14, 2006 incident had no problems in obtaining shareholder/partner status after the criminal/civil wrongs leveled against me –i.e. unlawful/illegal arrest, termination, etc. A reasonable mind may conclude PKH’s offering Travis such status was for damage control purposes and for hush-hush/sellout purposes. The reasons provided me at the time of my termination are set out in my e-mail of May 15, 2006. Although I requested whether or not I would be given written reasons (pink slip) for my termination, PKH denied providing me with the grounds upon which they were basing their termination of my employment. Singling me out and targeting me to eliminate the CONFLICT OF INTEREST which it knew and/or should have known existed as a direct and proximate result of my being an employee of PKH and PKH’s representing Hinds County, Judge Skinner, and other(s) in a lawsuit brought. Therefore, as a follow-up and to memorialize the reasons provided for my termination, I submitted PKH’s reasons for my termination in an e-mail:
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 61 of 118 E-MAIL of 05/16/06 from Vogel Newsome to Louis J. Baine III (shareholder), Thomas Y. Page, Jr. (shareholder), Linda Thomas (Office Administrator) – providing the reasons given for my termination. Page Kruger & Holland’s advising being contacted and having knowledge of lawsuit filed by me. See EXHIBIT “37” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. E-MAIL of 03/30/06 regarding CONFLICT CHECK to Lawson Hester (shareholder) and providing Linda Thomas (Office Administrator) a copy on 06/31/06: VN: Lawson: I recently had a matter occur with a Constable of Hinds County, where I am presently considering. Would this present a conflict? Thanks. NOTE: My concerns went unaddressed. See EXHIBIT “38” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.10) PKH knew and or should have known that in its termination of my employment that it was violating the laws governing said matters. While I requested whether or not a pink slip would be provided and/or written reasons for its termination of employment, I was advised that no such reasons would be provided to me in writing. Therefore, to memorialize said reasons given to me for my termination, I provided PKH with documentation outlining the reasons it provided me for my termination. PKH singling me out and relying upon prejudicial and discriminatory practices for its reasons to terminate my employment. PKH making known its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities and being contacted and notified that I had filed lawsuit. See EXHIBIT “37” – May 16, 2006 E-mail attached hereto and incorporated by reference. PKH not wanting to provide grounds for its termination of my employment because it knew that it was acting in violation of the laws. PKH was fully aware of the CONFLICT OF INTEREST that would exist in its representation of Hinds County employees/ officials. PKH was timely, properly and adequately placed on notice of any potential conflict that would arise in its representation of Hinds County Sheriff’s Department in that I advised during its inquires through the policies/procedures relied upon to determine potential adversities through “Conflict Check.” See EXHIBIT “38” – March 30, 2006 E-mail regarding “Conflict Check” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Nevertheless, approximately one-and-a-half (1½) later my employment with PKH was terminated. On or about February 14, 2007, I moved forward with filing the applicable lawsuit against Hinds County, Sheriff McMillan, William Skinner, Jon Lewis and the applicable defendants – such lawsuit which is of public record and will reflect PKH’s
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 62 of 118 representation of Hinds County defendants. Attorneys and/or those schooled in the laws know that the acts of PKH in its termination of my employment as well as its representation of Hinds County defendants is a violation of the Code of Professional Conduct, Code of Ethics, and/or applicable statutes/laws governing said matters. There was no legal or just cause to terminate my employment at PKH, said termination was also in keeping with the conspiracy leveled against me by certain whites to deprive me rights based upon knowledge of my engagement in protected activities. As evidenced and presented in PKH’s/Tommy Page’s June 16, 2005 E-mail addressed above, I carried and conducted myself in a professional manner. See EXHIBIT “16” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Employer’s repeatedly resorting to prejudicial and discriminatory practices upon learning of my engagement in protected activities. Tommy Page providing such a nice e-mail; however, a culprit in the decision and an attendant at the meeting announcing my termination of employment with PKH. TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE:11) Knowing that I had been blacklisted in Mississippi (who knows where else) I decided to move away and start afresh. However, this was not enough. Just as in Mississippi, I have been stalked to Kentucky/Ohio. Out of concerns of further criminal acts and harm/injury to my life, I had to seek the court for an Injunction and Restraining Order – which was GRANTED. See EXHIBIT “39” – Order regarding Injunction and Restraining Order attached hereto. To no avail. Again I was a victim of certain Whites who were determined to track me down, rely upon their ties and special relationships to the courts and destroy my life. On October 9, 2008, similar to what happened to me in Mississippi I was subjected to: (1) Conspiracy, (2) Burglary, (3) Theft, (4) Larceny, (5) Invasion, (6) Unlawful Entry/Forcible Actions, (7) Obstruction of Justice, (8) Color of Law, (9) Conspiracy Against Right, (10) Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights, (11) Power/Failure to Prevent. NO PRIOR NOTICE BEFORE CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!! The irony in this matter, one of the attorneys at the law firm (Wood & Lamping) I was employed at advised me that one of the attorneys representing landlords in a matter I brought against them and the judge assigned my lawsuit worked at the same law firm together prior to the judge taking the bench. How bad is that? So I gathered this attorney and other attorneys representing landlords thought that their connections to judges and with the police department would shield them. In fact, one of the landlords’ attorneys actually contacted the Covington, Kentucky Police Department and advised them not to take my report. A friend of mine
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 63 of 118 who was a police officer with the Cincinnati Police Department advised me that the Covington Police Department was to take my complaint. However, the Covington Police Officer that was sent out refused to take my complaint. Not only that the Covington Police Department was not going to come out at all. From feedback provided by the Officer the department had been contacted and prejudiced with information prior to making its arrival at the crime scene. However, to their disappointment I have filed a CRIMINAL Complaint with the FBI. See EXHIBIT “40” – Complaint and Request for Investigation Filed by Denise Newsome with the Federal Bureau of Investigation – Louisville, Kentucky October 13, 2008 – Brief ONLY attached hereto and incorporated by reference. To date I do not know what the status is although I have requested status. The FBI’s investigator, Timothy Cox, has ignored my request for a status report. I filed a timely and a proper complaint; however, I cannot even get a status report. See EXHIBIT “41” – Compilation of correspondence to Timothy Cox attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Get this, prior to the unlawful/illegal acts committed in this incident, the Deputy/Constable noted on the back of the Eviction Notice: Warrant for Possession issued that there was an injunction and restraining order in place – writing the contents of the notice on my door on the back of warrant which read: IMPORTANT NOTICE The Circuit Court has ORDERED Injunction and Restraining Order against owners, GMM Properties from taking any type of eviction (Removal or Obtaining Premises) action against this tenant. See EXHIBIT “42” - Eviction Notice: Warrant for Possession attached hereto and incorporated by reference. I was able to obtain a copy from the Kenton County Sheriff’s Department. Do you think that stopped them? No. They proceeded to pull an O.J. Simpson. Those involved ALL white. I am still waiting to see whether those who committed and/or involved in the October 9, 2008 criminal acts are arrested, charged and prosecuted for the crimes they have committed. From my understanding these criminals are still walking the street and have not been arrested, charged and tried. Oh, the FBI and the United States Legislature/Congress are aware of this matter; however, to date has done nothing. Yes, President Obama, Vice President Biden and others are aware or should be aware of this situation as well. AGAIN, IT IS IMPORTANT TO LET YOU AND THE PUBLIC KNOW THAT THOSE AS HIGH AS THE WHITE HOUSE IS FULLY AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON!
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 64 of 118 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the monies I paid into the court (approximately $16,250) has been EMBEZZLED with the aid of court officials as well as landlords’ attorney. The last time I checked the monies paid in the court, said monies was missing and there is no legal authority and/or legal reason provided to support such theft and/or embezzlement. Monies being placed with the Kenton County Circuit Court for safekeeping; however, under its watched said monies have been embezzled by officers of the court. ACTS CLEARLY WARRANTING PROSECUTION! What make this so bad the court records will reveal that landlords’ attorney, Gailen Bridges – having a reputation of being corrupt and a slumlord, etc., and court officials knew that monies paid into escrow was not to be withdrawn! Nevertheless, from my understanding, monies paid into escrow and placed with the court for safekeeping has been embezzled. Acts committed by officers of the court clearly criminal and warranting prosecution. The court records will support that I filed a timely civil action against my landlords and obtained a binding Injunction and Restraining Order. See EXHIBITS “39” and “43” respectively and attached hereto and incorporated by reference. To no avail. The record evidence clearly supports that my civil action filed against my landlord/GMM Properties was filed prior to any action initiated by it. Moreover, GMM’s, Gary Martin, saw me heading to the courthouse to file my complaint against GMM Properties/him and others. Therefore, he rushed to his attorney’s office and notified of such and in an effort to beat me in filing my civil action, GMM Properties’ counsel, Gailen Bridges (“Bridges”), merely scribbled a pleading and submitted. Bridges failed in his efforts to file legal action on behalf of his clients before me. 63C Am.Jur2d Prohibition ~43: Exclusive Jurisdiction Vested in Another Court - A court may be restrained by prohibition from interfering with the exclusive jurisdiction acquired by another court by reason of its being the first court to assume and exercise such jurisdiction in the particular case if both cases are predicated on the same cause of action, between the same parties, and brought in courts of competent jurisdiction of the same state. . . In jurisdictions in which this view prevails, the aggrieved party must raise the defense of former suit pending by an appropriate pleading in the second suit and by an appeal from the decision of the court in that suit, rather than a writ of prohibition. My civil lawsuit was filed December 4, 2006 at 3:41 p.m. and Bridges filing his clients’ frivolous action on December 4, 2006 at 3:51 p.m. - as evidenced in EXHIBIT “43”
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 65 of 118 attached hereto and incorporated by reference. As an attorney is fully aware, it is the court in which the party who files his/her lawsuit first that acquires jurisdiction.41 Therefore, in this case, it was the Kenton County Circuit Court who had jurisdiction over this matter and not the Kenton County District Court in which Bridges filed legal action on behalf of his clients. The record evidence will support that on December 6, 2006, Bridges was timely, properly and adequately notified to withdraw the legal action filed on behalf of his client via facsimile entitled, “GOOD FAITH REQUEST – For the Withdrawal of Complaint Your Clients’ Complaint Filed in the District Court of Kenton County, Kentucky” - See EXHIBIT “89” December 6, 2006 Facsimile attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The record evidence will support that on December 11, 2006, the District Court of Kenton County, Kentucky was timely, properly and adequately placed on noticed that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter Bridges brought on behalf of his clients. Moreover, that I would not be waiving my rights to service of process – I was not properly served in accordance to the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. I filed the proper pleading entitled, “Notice of Non-Waiver of Service of Process” to support good faith efforts. To no avail. See EXHIBIT “90” attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 41 KENTUCKY LAW: Hawes v. Orr, 73 Ky. 431 (1874) - The court first acquiring jurisdiction has a right to go onuntil it has performed its office in reference to the subject-matter in litigation, and will not allow itself to be ousted of itsjurisdiction or permit the thing in litigation to be wrested from it, so that it cannot execute its judgment. Akers v. Stephenson, 469S.W.2d 704 (Ky.,1970) - Where parties and subject matter are the same, once court of concurrent jurisdiction has begun exerciseof jurisdiction over case, its authority to deal with action is exclusive and no other court of concurrent jurisdiction may interferewith pending proceedings. Riddle v. Howard, 357 S.W.2d 705 (Ky.,1962) - When a court of competent jurisdiction acquiresjurisdiction of subject matter of a case, its authority and control continue until final disposition, and, as a matter of principle andcomity, another court of concurrent jurisdiction will recognize the prior jurisdiction and will not interfere by taking over thesame case; but to apply such rule it is essential that the first action shall afford the parties in the second action an adequate andcomplete opportunity for the adjudication of their rights.Delaney v. Alcorn, 193 S.W.2d 404 (Ky.,1946) - Where two actionsbetween the same parties, on the same subject, and to test the same rights, are brought in different courts having concurrentjurisdiction, the court which first acquires jurisdiction, its power being adequate to the administration of complete justice,retains jurisdiction and may dispose of the whole controversy without interference by any court of coordinate power. OTHER COURTS: State ex rel. Phillips v. Polcar, 50 Ohio St.2d 279, 364 N.E.2d 33 (Ohio 1977) - (n. 3) As between courts of concurrent jurisdiction, tribunal whose power is first invoked by institution of proper proceedings acquires jurisdiction, to the exclusion of all other tribunals, to adjudicate upon whole issue and to settle rights of the parties. Buck v. Colbath, 70 U.S. 334 (U.S.Minn.,1865) - The rule that, among courts of concurrent jurisdiction, that one which first obtains jurisdiction of a case has the exclusive right to decide every question arising in the case, is subject to some limitations, and is confined to suits between the same parties or privies seeking the same relief or remedy, and to such questions or propositions as arise ordinarily and properly in the progress of the suit first brought, and does not extend to all matters which may by possibility become involved in it.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 66 of 118 THEREFORE, AS A MATTER OF LAW, the Eviction Notice: Warrant of Possession executed by Judge Ruttle is NULL/VOID and cannot be enforced. MOREOVER, removing Judge Ruttle from the cloak of immunity and subjecting her to criminal prosecution in the District Court of Kenton County’s failure to obtain jurisdiction and Ruttle’s acting with malicious and willful intent to cause the injury/harm sustained. Bryant v. Crossland, 182 Ky. 556, 1918 Ky. LEXIS 403 - HN3 - . . . This principle, however, does not extend to make a judicial officer immune from damages for illegal acts, which result in injuries to others or deprive them of their legal rights, when his acts are without the scope and limits of his jurisdiction. It follows that if his illegal acts are without the scope and limits of his jurisdiction, he is liable, if damages result to others from such acts, whether he is actuated by malice, corrupt and impure motives or not. In the last state of case, the fact that his motives are impure and bad are considered, only, as aggravating the damages. When the judge acts illegally, without the limits of his jurisdiction, he becomes a trespasser, and is liable in damages as such. Also see, Cox v. Perkins, 299 Ky. 470, 1945 Ky. LEXIS 449 at HN4; King v. Cawood, 223 Ky. 291, 1928 Ky. LEXIS 317 at HN1. Liability of Judges: Pepper v. Mayes, 81 Ky. 673, 1884 Ky. LEXIS 29 – HN 2: Where a judicial officer has jurisdiction of the person and of the subject-matter he is exempt from suit by a private individuals for damages so long as he acts within his jurisdiction and in a judicial capacity. HN3 - Whenever the State of Kentucky confers judicial powers upon an individual, it confers them with full immunity from private suits. In effect, the State says to the officer that these duties are confided to his judgment; that he is to exercise his judgment fully, freely, and without favor, and he may exercise it without fear; that the duties concern individuals, but they concern more especially the welfare of the State and the peace and happiness of society; that if he shall fail in a faithful discharge of them he shall be called to account as a criminal. . . Also see McBurnie v. Sullivan, 152 Ky. 686, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 698 at HN4. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE PATTERN AND PRACTICE (IN CRIMINAL/CIVIL VIOLATIONS) BEING COMMITTED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND/OR THOSE ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW AGAINST ME – i.e. the February 14, 2006
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 67 of 118 incident in Jackson, Mississippi, the October 9, 2008 incident in Covington, Kentucky, acts committed about April/May 2008 in Cincinnati, Ohio as well as that involving the stalking of me from job-to-job and state-to-state to keep me from obtaining employment and to preclude me from exercising protected rights (rights secured under the Constitution, Civil Rights Act, FMLA, Title VII, Landlord & Tenant Act, etc.) Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration . . . justice or the incarceration . . . that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: 1. Excessive Force 2. Discriminatory Harassment 3. False Arrest 4. Coercive Sexual Conduct 5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or ArrestsCUT & PASTED FROM: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm.d12) The Governor of the State of Kentucky, Steve Beshear (“Beshear”), is also aware of the October 9, 2008 incident. A reasonable mind may conclude Beshear is aware of a great deal more. On or about November 8, 2008, I submitted correspondence to Governor Beshear regarding October 9, 2008 criminal acts of the State’s City/County/Court officials. To no avail. Said concerns and request for meeting to discuss was ignored. See EXHIBIT “44” – November 8, 2008 letter ONLY attached hereto. To date nothing. Yes, the Governor of the
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 68 of 118 State of Kentucky is fully aware of criminal/civil wrongs committed by county and city officials in his state. I gather from the most recent acts of the Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Revenue, another plan is being hatched and they are now attempting to use said department’s office to commit further criminal/civil wrongs against me. I have placed the Commissioner of the Department of Revenue on notice of such intents and he has been notified that this matter is being brought to your attention. As recent as March 25, 2009, I have been advised that the State is attempting to conduct an unlawful/illegal seizure of my property/assets without any legal/lawful basis – attempts to cover-up and destroy evidence obtained retrieved from the streets during the October 9, 2008 illegal/unlawful invasion. What the criminals could not get away with on October 9, 2008, they fenced/left on the street for theft by others. Moreover, efforts to interfere with a federal investigation that I have requested of the FBI. This department thinks I am so stupid or ignorant and cannot see through their most recent criminal intents. Now the Kentucky Department of Revenue is attempting to seize my property (without legal authority and/or or supporting statutes/laws – i.e. abuse of process and failure to follow policies/procedures) so that it can destroy evidence and cover-up the crimes of its officers and others – doing so through the use of a state and government office, the Kentucky Department of Revenue. I believe a reasonable mind given the fact that neither Governor Steve Beshear nor the FBI has contacted me to address the October 9, 2008 criminal activities, may conclude they are fully aware of what is going on. Therefore, warranting my contacting you as well as notifying the media as to what is going on.13) I believe there is sufficient evidence contained herein and attached to support that I timely, properly and adequately contacted a Representative, Geoff Davis, to notify him of the criminal activities occurring under this watch. To no avail. Just as others, Geoff Davis has done nothing although he has knowledge as to what criminal acts have occurred in his District. See EXHIBIT “45” - Compilation of correspondence to Geoff Davis, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE:14) Now furniture and/or property given to me by my former employer, Wood & Lamping, have been unlawfully/illegally seized by a company called Stor-All Alfred, LLC (“Stor-All”) without legal/lawful authority and without court order. I NEVER HAD A LEASE WITH STOR-ALL. When advised that Stor-All was assuming ownership of the property, it was advised that I did not want to enter a lease with it. Refusing to allow me to obtain my propery. The unlawful taking of my property is a direct and proximate result of Stor-All’s employees obtaining knowledge of my engagement in protected activities. Moreover,
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 69 of 118 involve the participation of attorneys with knowledge that its client (Stor-All) has committed criminal acts. This unlawful/illegal seizure of my storage unit and property has been done without probable cause and/or legal authority – i.e. done without a court order. While I have requested the return of my property, this company has failed to do so and has repeatedly attempted to extort and/or bribe monies from me in exchange for property. This being done over my objections. The latest criminal acts being carried out by their attorney, David Meranus at the law firm of Schwartz Manes Ruby & Slovin (513) 579-1414 and now under the watchful eyes of the court(s). Stor-All and its attorneys have gone as far as contacting my former employer (Wood & Lamping) and succeeding in getting me terminated. Doing so with its intent to sue me; however, having knowledge of CONFLICT OF INTEREST engaged in criminal/civil conspiracy to obtain my termination from Wood & Lamping so that it could move forward with a lawsuit against me. Upon succeeding in obtaining my termination, Stor-All on January 20, 2009, filed a lawsuit against me – which is presently pending. Stor-All doing so because of its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities in New Orleans, Louisiana and perhaps other matters. On February 6, 2009, after the hearing and during the signing of Magistrate’s Order in the lawsuit brought against me, Stor-All’s counsel advised me of his knowledge of my engagement in protected activity in New Orleans, Louisiana. Stor-All’s counsel was upset and disappointed that he had lost on the matter regarding my motion to transfer the case to a higher court. Stor-All’s counsel, David Meranus (“Meranus”) – with the law firm of Schwartz Manes Ruby & Slovin (“Schwartz Manes”) - provided me with information regarding his knowledge of New Orleans matter in hopes that he could extort monies from me to which he and his client was not entitled; moreover for purposes of blackmailing me into dropping the Counterclaim I filed as a direct and proximate result of the lawsuit he filed on behalf of his client (Stor-All). During the February 6, 2009 matter, Meranus advised me that it would be the insurance company (which I later found out is Liberty Mutual) that would be paying the liability in the matter and not he or his client. Clearly, admitting to liability. See EXHIBIT “46” – February 6, 2009 letter to David Meranus attached hereto and incorporated by reference. By Meranus providing me with such pertinent information regarding his client’s insurance carrier (which was later revealed to be Liberty Mutual), I have been able to link said insurance carrier to Entergy (former employer in New Orleans that I have sued). Entergy is represented by the law firm of Baker Donelson and ties to Liberty Mutual. Nexus established and the continued carrying out of criminal/civil acts because of knowledge of my engagement in protected activities – i.e. following me from state-to-state and job-to-job. Contacting my employer and notifying of my engagement in protected activities. Acts clearly prohibited under statutes/laws governing said matters:
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 70 of 118 Employer violated § 2000e-(3)(a) by discharging an employee AFTER learning he had filed charges of discrimination against a former employer. EEOC Decision No. 71-460, 1973, EEOC Decisions ¶ 6175. Such civil rights violations repeatedly violated as a direct and proximate result of my being stalked from job-to-job and those bent on causing me injury/harm and the loss of my job repeatedly engaged such unlawful/illegal acts by contacting my employer(s) and notifying them of my filing EEOC charge(s) against former employer and/or my engagement in protected activities.TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE:15) On January 9, 2009, my former employer, Wood & Lamping (“W&L”), terminated my employment. Wood & Lamping doing so AFTER granting me medical leave on January 8, 2009 – clearly violations under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) – See EXHIBIT “47” – Request Form attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Not only that, my investigation yielded that one of the attorneys I assisted, Thomas J. Breed, prior to coming to Wood & Lamping, was employed by Schwartz Manes & Ruby – the law firm at which Stor-All’s counsel, Meranus, is employed. See EXHIBIT “48” - letter on Letterhead containing Thomas J. Breed’s name, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Not only did my termination from W&L come AFTER my January 8, 2009, medical leave approval; but came a day BEFORE the amnesty weekend (January 9, 10 and 11, 2009) of Stor-All. See EXHIBIT “49” - December 19, 2008 letter from Stor-All attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that Stor- All, its counsel and Wood & Lamping knew that my employment with Wood & Lamping would be terminated on January 9, 2009, so, ON THIS SAME DATE (January 9, 2009), Stor-All also served me with NOTICE TO LEAVE THE PREMISES. See EXHIBIT “50” – Notice attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Note the variation of my name/alias shown. Serving said notice when it was already unlawfully and illegally in possession of my property that it had unlawfully/illegally seized.I believe a reasonable mind may conclude that the acts of my former employer, Wood & Lamping, was to aid Thomas Breed’s former law firm (Schwartz Manes) in that it had knowledge that Schwartz Mane would be representing Stor-All and there would be a CONFLICT OF INTEREST – for Wood & Lamping to represent me in the matter with knowledge that I was providing legal support to Thomas Breed during my employment. Not only that Wood & Lamping has engaged in criminal/civil wrongs as well as a direct and proximate result of its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities. It is important to note that all key
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 71 of 118 players to the legal wrongs rendered me are ALL white. It is important to note, that Wood & Lamping was aware of the following: a) My engagement in protected activities (past and present) as well as pending litigation. In fact when I had to go home in August 2007, I believe Wood & Lamping was hoping that the Mississippi group would come through for them and that I would be found guilty of false charges (PKH may have instructed Jon Lewis to file against me) that had been trumped up and brought against me by Constable Lewis in failed efforts of defending and/or providing a defense against the allegations of my lawsuit filed as a result of the February 14, 2006 acts. When I returned from Mississippi, I saw where Wood & Lamping had its employee(s) go into my computer and, being in such a hurry, failed to put it back together properly. I e-mailed the IT person (Brian Knaur) regarding this matter. b) Wood & Lamping having knowledge of the problems I was having with my landlord in Kentucky. I approached it regarding representation – representation is provided to employees pursuant to the Policies & Procedures of W&L. I was assigned Elizabeth Horwitz (“Horwitz”). – a white attorney. From the behavior and conduct of Horwitz, I was left to conclude that her representation would not be in my best interest; it appeared to me her job was to work with opposing counsel and to convince me in surrendering my apartment. However, to their disappointment, I refused to do so standing on my rights under the Fair Housing Act, Civil Rights Act, Constitution and other applicable statutes/laws. Horwitz upset that she could not convince me to forego my rights became upset and refused to continue to work with me. Wood & Lamping abandoning me. Wood & Lamping failing to abide by its 42 “REPRESENTATION” policy outlined in their Policies & Procedures Handbook for employees. I recall a white employee even felt comfortable in sending out an e- mail advising of her intent to file complaint with the Ohio Department of Insurance: I recently had a very negative experience with our insurance coverage when attempting to refill a prescription ordered by my doctor. I was obliged to pay for the prescription myself, or go without for approximately 6 days while the pharmacist waited for approval of an insurance-generated change in the manner of dispensing the medication and contrary to my doctor’s instructions. 42 REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES - Assistance, guidance, advice, or suggestions offered to employees byan attorney of Wood & Lamping shall be deemed informal personal assistance and not official firm advise until such time thatfile is opened in the employee’s name. …
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 72 of 118 I have heard from a few people in the office who have had other delays with prescriptions. If you have had problems I would like to hear from you. I am getting ready to voice a complaint with the Ohio Department of Insurance over this incident. See EXHIBIT “51” - February 8, 2007 E-mail from Mary Lewis attached hereto and incorporated by reference. However, when it came to my concerns and need of representation, Wood & Lamping failed to uphold its own policies and procedures. Abandoning me and leaving me to fend for myself. Instead, electing to aid opposing counsel in depriving me of rights secured and/or guaranteed to me under the applicable statutes/laws governing matters I am involved in. Not only that W&L was prejudice against me as a direct and proximate result of its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities. Therefore, W&L has made a willful and conscious decision to discriminate against me and violate my civil rights based on its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities, deprived me benefits offered under its policies and procedures. Such acts which I believe are clearly racially, prejudicially and discriminatorily motivated. c) Wood & Lamping in efforts to aid Horwitz and opposing counsel then assigned me an attorney by the name of Brian Gillan (“Gillan”) – who I believe has Mississippi ties per a conversation I had with him. An attorney who had been known to create problems, have relationship with paralegal(s) – although he was a married man, and having been with the firm less than a year prior and going through two (2) Legal Assistants/Secretaries prior to being assigned me. His mission was to create a hostile and discriminatory work environment when assigned to me. I complained; however, Wood & Lamping failed to do anything. Said complaints are in e-mails. Although Wood & Lamping was fully aware of the affect such hostile, discriminatory, prejudicial acts were taking on me, it continued to allow such behavior to continue. When I advised that I was going to report this behavior, only then did Wood & Lamping pull Gillan from my desk; however, reluctantly – because Gillan advised he wanted to continue to work with me while also advising that it was not working out. Gillan sending e-mail of the great work I was doing (advising “You’re the best!”) – See EXHIBIT “52” – December 21, 2006 E-mail from Gillan attached hereto and incorporated by reference; however, when Wood & Lamping hatched conspiracy plan to get rid of me, it made sure that Gillan sent a well crafted/drafted e-mail attempting to assassinate my character, reputation, work ethics, etc. Noting such plan was hatched AFTER Horwitz’s failure to get me to
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 73 of 118 relinquish my residence as they those with an interest had hoped. Assigning Gillan to the mission to create situation as W&L conspired to set the stage to violate its own policies and procedures and cover-up blatant employment violations. Gillan did not want me to respond; however, I did respond seeing through such unlawful/illegal acts – doing so by sending the information to the Human Resources Manager, Andrea Griffith. This was Wood & Lamping’s efforts to set the stage to cover-up their illegal practices – knowledge of my engagement in protected activity. While they clearly state in their Policies & Procedures Handbook that they will not discriminate against an employee for exercising protected rights,43 they took a far departure when it came to me. Not only that, Wood & Lamping refused to represent me in matters it was aware of. The reason being, because it was knowingly participating and/or deliberately aiding those who had launched criminal/civil attacks against me for exercising my rights. Wood & Lamping’s role was to terminate my employment so that I would not have any financial means as well as acts taken to aid and provide those who were on the opposite side with an undue advantage in the handling of legal matters involving me. Disappointed that their acts were EXPOSED and in RETALIATION, Wood & Lamping on January 9, 2009, terminated my employment. Wood & Lamping doing so, thinking that if I were to bring a lawsuit against it, it would address my participation in protected activities AS A DEFENSE. Such reason which is clearly prohibited by law (Ohio and Federal). d) PRIOR to my termination and in an effort to cover-up their illegal/unlawful actions, Wood & Lamping had its employee(s) go through my desk to remove the Policies & Procedures Handbook so that I would not have a record or evidence of their policies and procedures it was violating. However, to its disappointment, in my watching and observation of Wood & Lamping employee’s change in behavior towards me and being warned by employees of Wood & Lamping how it stoops to such tactics – i.e. cover up for example so that there is no smoking gun - I made sure to make a copy of Policy & Procedure Manual as well as retained a copy of the W&L’s Employer’s Guide obtained from attending seminar – a guide that it distributed to the public. 43 POLICY AGAINST UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT - General: Wood & Lamping is committed to maintaining aprofessional and collegial work environment in which all individuals are treated with respect and dignity. The firm prohibitsdiscrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, veteran’s status, disability, or any other protectedstatus in accordance with applicable laws. Harassment is a form of discrimination and will not be tolerated. Wood & Lamping encourages individuals who believe they are subject to harassing behavior to clearly and promptlynotify the offender that his or her behavior is unwelcomed, but one is not required to do so. However, any individual whobelieves he or she has been subject to harassment of any kind must notify a partner of the firm or a member of management inorder for the matter to be resolved. (Wood & Lamping LLP Policies and Procedures Manual @ p. 20)
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 74 of 118 e) IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE: I was employed by Wood & Lamping as Estate Planning Coordinator. Where I was responsible for drafting, Wills, Trusts, Living Wills, Health Care Power of Attorney, Power of Attorneys, etc. These responsibilities were taken away and given to white employees as Wood & Lamping continued their unlawful/illegal practices in finding ways to terminate my employment because of its knowledge of my participation in protected activities. The taking away of said duties and giving them to white employees was a situation crated by W&L in its conspiracy and efforts to leave me with not much to do. Thomas J. Breed being the Department Head of the Estate Planning group; therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that said duties and responsibilities taken away from me were required and needed and that had W&L not taken these duties away from me – doing so without just cause – to favor white employees that the need for Estate Planning Coordinator, which I was hired for, was still required at the time of my termination. Again, the decision makers ALL being white – therefore, scoffing at the importance or meaning of what people of color see in the exercise of their rights under the Civil Rights Act, Fair Housing Act, etc. The right to live where a citizen elects to live and not allow such to be dictated by a landlord. Why enter such a business (i.e. landlord) if one is not going to comply with the statutes/laws governing said matters. Then such landlords having the nerves to think they are in a position to dictate and unlawfully/illegally force tenants out and take away their residence and property without legal authority. Wood & Lamping was made aware that I had filed a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT with the FBI regarding the October 9, 2008 incident. See EXHIBIT “53” - October 15, 2008 compilation of correspondence to Andrea M. Griffith (Human Resources) attached hereto and incorporated by reference. INFORMATION TO SUPPORT WOOD & LAMPING’S KNOWLEDGE OF MY ENGAGEMENT IN PROTECTED ACTIVITY AND FILING OF COMPLAINT WITH THE FBI. Wood & Lamping creating an environment that it knew was discriminatory, prejudicial, racist and bias towards African-Americans. Realizing that I was not a person to allow my rights to be violated and having voiced such, Wood & Lamping thought that terminating my employment and falsifying information that my termination was due to reduction in force – economic reasons - would shield it from liability. However, it does not. In fact, W&L has hired several employees since my termination – so there goes its sham and frivolous defense for the reason my employment was terminated. From information that I have been viewed on W&L’s website, it has hired at least two attorneys (Susan Cliffel and Joy Hall) since my January 9, 2008 termination. THE FACT THAT W&L WOULD GO THROUGH MY DESK TO REMOVE/DESTROY MATERIAL THEY KNEW WOULD EXPOSE THEIR CRIMINAL/CIVIL ACTS, SUPPORTS ITS INTENT TO COVER-UP LEGAL WRONGS AND THOUGHT THAT I
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 75 of 118 WOULD NOT HAVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT W&L VIOLATIONS OF ITS OWN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. MOREOVER, WAS DONE WITH WILLFUL AND MALICOUS INTENT TO DESTROY AND TAMPER WITH EVIDENCE SHOULD I DECIDE TO BRING LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST IT.CUT & PASTED FROM: http://miami.fbi.gov/statutes/title_18/section1001.htm Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 - False Statements or Entries Generally This statute makes it a crime for falsifying, concealing, or covering up material facts surrounding a civil rights investigation, or making false statements, representations, or writings. This law prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to make false statements or misrepresentations surrounding their individual or collective actions, during a civil rights investigation. It has been successfully applied to civil rights investigations involving the loss of life, where the subjects of the investigation lied to protect their careers and those of other co-conspirators. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to five years or both. There is evidence to support W&L hired of attorneys and/or employees since my termination. Clearly supporting farce and ill motives and W&L’s attempt to assert REDUCTION IN FORCE or economic reasons is a sham. Reduction in force is not a defense for deprivation of rights under the FMLA: Employer may not use reduction-in-force (RIF), reorganization, or improved-efficiency rationale as pretext to mask actual discrimination or retaliation for employee’s exercise of FMLA rights; the mere incantation of the mantra of “efficiency” is not a talisman insulating an employer from liability for invidious discrimination. Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp., 144 F.3d 151 (1998). Moreover, Hodgens goes on to find “an employer may not use its
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 76 of 118 RIF/reorganization/improved-efficiency rationale as a pretext to mask actual discrimination or retaliation; the mere incantation of the mantra of “efficiency” is not a talisman insulating an employer from liability for invidious discrimination. See McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804, 93 S.Ct. 1817 (employer may not use an ostensibly legitimate reason for an adverse action as a pretext for discrimination that is prohibited by statute); 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a); 29 C.F.R. § 825.220; cf. INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 944, 103 S.Ct. 2764, 77 L.Ed.2d 317 (1983): “Convenience and efficiency are not the primary objectives-or the hallmarks-of democratic government.” Nor are they the objectives of public policy underlying statutes like the FMLA or the ADA.” Nevertheless, from my understanding, W&L may be attempting to use RIF to cover up its unlawful/illegal acts – participation in conspiracy to deprive me rights secured under the statutes/laws of the State of Ohio and the United States. It is obvious that W&L terminated me the day prior to Thomas Breed’s former law firm’s (Schwartz Manes) client’s Amnesty Weekend of January 9, 10 and 11 2009, that my termination was ill motivated and done with intent to deprive me medical leave, medical benefits/insurance, employment opportunities free of discrimination and clearly in violation of Title VII, FMLA and other governing laws. W&L knowingly and deliberately worked with others in furtherance of destroying my life, reputation, livelihood, pursuit of happiness, depriving me equal protection of the laws, etc. I believe a reasonable mind can see the NEXUS established between my unlawful/illegal termination, Stor-All’s/Meranus’ filing of malicious complaint against me eleven (11) days later and its acknowledgement of my engagement in protected activities. Those who made such decisions – regarding termination and Stor-All’s filing of a lawsuit - ALL being white. My termination from W&L was to provide Breed’s former law firm (Schwartz Mane) and its client with an undue and unlawful advantage in the lawsuit it was aware would be brought against me – to financially devastate, destroy and preclude me from defending against the malicious lawsuit brought by Meranus/Schwartz Manes on behalf of Stor-All. I FIND IT INTERESTING HOW CERTAIN WHITES BAN TOGETHER TO DESTROY AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN’S LIFE – i.e. in my case they even ban together from state-to-state for such common causes and goals for purposes of oppression, degradation, harassment, humiliation, threatening one’s life, liberties and pursuit of happiness, etc.
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 77 of 118 f) This is how I also believe it was supposed to go down: On January 9, 2009 (day AFTER approval of my Medical Leave), Wood & Lamping terminated my employment in efforts of aiding Breed’s former law firm (Schwartz Manes) in the lawsuit it knew that would be filed against me by Meranus (attorney at Schwartz Manes). My termination was also done so that there would not be a conflict of interest in Meranus’/Schwartz Manes’ representation of Stor-All. Wood & Lamping and Schwartz Manes were aware of the conflict and knowledge that I was assisting Breed. Both law firms were also fully aware of my engagement in protected activities. Schwartz Manes and its client(s) contacted Wood & Lamping prior to my termination and advised of legal matters involved. In fact Stor-All’s representative sent a fax to me at Wood & Lamping for purposes of letting it know of the problem it was having with me. Schwartz Manes, Stor-All, Wood & Lamping and others (ALL White) decided that it would be best to deprive me of employment opportunities and rights secured under the Constitution, Civil Rights Act, FMLA, Title VII, etc. than to do the right thing. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE: MY TERMINATION ALSO COMING APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH (FROM DECEMBER 2008) FROM THE TIME THAT I VISITED WASHINGTON, D.C. AND BEGAN PURSUING MATTERS REGARDING MY JULY 14, 2008 COMPLAINT. WAS MY TERMINATION COINCIDENTAL AND COMING APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH FROM MY VISIT TO WASHINGTON, D.C.? I DO NOT THINK SO. AGAIN, CLEARLY SHOWING THE TIES/CONNECTIONS AND DETERMINATION OF THE GOVERNMENT AND PERHAPS POSSIBLY THE LEGISLATURE/CONGRESS – SENATOR LEAHY AND REPRESENTATIVE CONYERS AND OTHERS PERHAPS HAVING A HAND IN MY TERMINATION IN THAT THEY WERE VERY UPSET WITH MY COMING TO WASHINGTON, D.C. AND EXPOSING THEIR COWARDLY ACTS AND THE HANDLING OF ME DURING MY VISIT AS WELL AS THEIR FAILURE TO DETER SUCH CRIMINAL/CIVIL WRONGS REPORTED AND THE BEHIND-THE-SCENE TACTICS BEING USED TO APPEASE LOBBYISTS WHO ARE CAMPAIGNING HARD FOR MY FORMER EMPLOYERS IN THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO SEE SPECIAL COMMITTEE(S) ESTABLISHED TO ADDRESS THESE RACIAL/DISCRIMINAORY MATTERS THAT ARE AFFECTING AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND/OR PEOPLE OF COLOR. See EXHIBITS “3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 41, 45, 54, 55, and 56” respectively attached hereto and incorporated by reference – correspondence to President-Elect Barack Obama, Vice President Elect Joseph Biden, Senator Patrick Leahy, Congressman John Conyers, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Geoff Davis, FBI Agent Timothy Cox. So a reasonable mind may conclude that my
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 78 of 118 visit to Washington, D.C. and determination to get justice and address the racial and discriminatory practices and/or those of African- Americans/people of color may have resulted in some scrupulous actions to silence me and to interfere with my employment with Wood & Lamping. Probably figured if they succeed in getting me terminated then I would be unable to come back to Washington, D.C. The government and those in authority to deter such unlawful/illegal practices may engaging in continued practices to see that I am financially ruined and/or devastated in efforts of precluding me from speaking out and addressing such matters. Leaving a reasonable question as to whether or not any of the above individuals had anything to do with seeing that my employment with Wood & Lamping was terminated in retaliation for my visit to Washington, D.C. It is just strange that none of these people whom I have contacted to date has provided me with a status report nor have they contacted me regarding the Complaints I have filed and repeatedly have tried to obtain a status report on. Strange, Strange, Strange. . . On January 20, 2009, in keeping with the conspiracy and plan hatched against me, Schwartz Manes brought a lawsuit (Forcible Entry & Detainer action) against me on behalf of Stor-All. On January 29, 2009, Stor-All’s lawsuit filed against me was met with my Counterclaim. This is a forcible entry & detainer action in which Stor- All is ALREADY in possession of the storage unit and property through unlawful/illegal means – i.e. unlawful/illegal seizure without legal authority and/or a court order. Stor-All has repeatedly subjected me to extortion/blackmail methods in exchange of return of my property. However, upon my research, I found that such acts by Stor-All are criminal and illegal/unlawful as a matter of law. Therefore, I have repeatedly refused to give in to such criminal practices. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: While Stor-All brought this lawsuit against me, I have never entered a lease agreement with Stor-All. Neither is there a clause in the Lease Agreement that I entered with the previous owner which gave Stor-All landlord status. Stor-All was notified that I did not want to enter a lease with it. Nevertheless, Stor-All elected to violate the laws and unlawfully/illegally seize my storage unit and property without legal authority and/or court order. Stor-All and its counsel brought the lawsuit thinking that its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities would force me to abandon my Counterclaim. On
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 79 of 118 February 6, 2009, disappointed that he had lost on arguing against my Motion to Transfer, during the signing of the Magistrate’s Decision, Meranus advised of his knowledge of my engagement in protected activities in New Orleans, Louisiana – i.e. advising that he gather I will be doing as I had done in New Orleans. See EXHIBIT “46” – February 6, 2009 correspondence attached hereto and incorporated by reference. I advised Meranus, that I was aware of their acts and the stalking of me from state-to-state and job-to-job. Advising because of concerns of such illegal/unlawful practices, I had begun the process of addressing such criminal/civil wrongs leveled against me – stalking me from job-to-job, state-to state – which was the reason for a recent trip to Washington, D.C. in December 2008. Meranus smirking and advising that it would be neither he nor Stor-All that would be paying the liability for the injuries/harm I sustained, but the insurance company. At the time however, while I was certain as to who the law firm in New Orleans, Louisiana was, I still needed additional information – who the insurance company was that Meranus advised would be responsible for payment of liability/damages sustained. During Stor-All’s litigation against me, the information regarding the insurance company surfaced. The insurance company being Liberty Mutual. Pertinent information because this insurance company had just settled another claim (in January 2009) with me regarding injury/harm I sustained during a stay (as a result of October 2008 acts and having to find a place to live) at one of the hotels that it insured. See EXHIBIT “57” – January 21, 2009 letter from Liberty Mutual attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Stor-All brought the frivolous lawsuit against me thinking that it was going to be able to use a defense to paint me as: 1) a serial litigator, 2) paranoid, 3) boy-who-cried- wolf, 4) crazy and/or mentally unstable, 5) potential murderer, 6) hostile, etc. However, to its disappointment, I have addressed and exposed such sham defenses. Moreover, Stor-All, its counsel, Wood & Lamping’s continued efforts to destroy my life for exercising my right – for discriminatory/prejudicial purposes. Doing so in that they are fully aware of how the system has been designed to adversely and discriminatorily affect African-Americans and/or people of color. Wood & Lamping carried out their end of the bargain in hopes that Schwartz Manes would come through and be successful in the lawsuit filed against me. Not only that, Wood & Lamping was hoping that addressing its knowledge of my engagement in protected activities, taking away of my job duties and giving these job duties to white employees so that I would not have work – in hopes that I would leave – amongst other things, etc. would shield them from liability. To W&L’s disappointment, not so. Such willful and malicious acts and practices created and
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 80 of 118 orchestrated by W&L with the participation of others has met its fate with a brick wall and is presently being exposed through the appropriate legal avenues. g) It is important to note that I was one of ONLY two African-Americans at the law firm of Wood & Lamping. All other support staff was white. It is important to note, that during my employment, there were NO African-American attorneys employed at Wood & Lamping – over forty (40) attorneys. A law firm with over 50 employees. h) On January 16, 2009, I filed a formal Complaint with the Wage & Hour Division in Cincinnati, Ohio – to the Attention of the Secretary of Labor. See EXHIBIT “58” – BRIEF ONLY attached hereto. File No. 1537034. This matter has been assigned to an Investigator by the name of Joan Petric (in the Dayton, Ohio Office – (937) 225-2888). While I have set forth the required Prima Facie requirements, the Wage & Hour Division appears to not want to enforce the Family & Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and see that Wood & Lamping comply with the Act. In reading The New York Times’ article I believe the Wage & Hour Division is attempting to force me to bring a private lawsuit rather than THE SECRETARY OF LABOR bringing the required legal actions against Wood & Lamping for FMLA violations. If so, this would also be prejudicial and discriminatory in that there is evidence in the record of the courts and the Department of Labor to support that it has brought lawsuits on behalf of employees whose rights were violated. However, in my case, a reasonable mind may conclude that the Wage & Hour Division has obtained information regarding my participation in protected activities and may be prejudice in its handling of my January 16 2009 Complaint filed against Wood & Lamping. Moreover, prejudice because of my bringing legal action against a government agency in the past. If so, such acts are clearly prohibited. Leaving me with the impression that the Wage & Hour is refusing to perform its ministerial duties – duties that are not discretionary, but MANDATORY – and enforce the provisions of FMLA. Moreover, the Wage & Hour Division is failing to see that Wood & Lamping is complying with the provisions of the FMLA. In fact, from my understanding and feedback from Petric, Wood & Lamping is refusing to provide me with medical coverage and/or benefits afforded to other white employees, refusing to reinstatement, and/or provide me with relief required under the FMLA to correct the legal wrongs rendered me. Wood & Lamping is demanding that in order for me to receive the medical insurance/coverage that I am entitled to, that I must agree to release them from any lawsuits for their violations under the FMLA, Title VII and/or any other statutes/laws. GET THIS: the Wage & Hour Division is trying to make me believe that such illegal/unlawful acts and stipulation presented by Wood & Lamping is permissible under the laws
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 81 of 118 governing the FMLA – when it is not. The Wage & Hour Division advised me that Wood & Lamping had to downsize (i.e. let attorneys go, etc.) when from my last review of its website W&L has retained at least two additional attorneys (Susan Cliffel and Joy Hall) since my termination and most likely additional staff members since my January 9, 2009 unlawful termination. Believe they are white as well. Check out their website: http://www.woodlamping.com/sub/Attorneys.jsp;jsessionid=5069B143CCE8CA6503 A9ABB21E575774 However, I have not been able to obtain the medical attention sought and requested in a timely manner, unless I agree to not filing a lawsuit and/or not seek legal recourse for employment violations rendered me. Such demands of W&L are clearly prohibited by statutes/laws. THE GOVERNMENT’S/COURTS’ INVOLVMENTFor you and those who are receiving a copy of this correspondence, it is important for the public tonot be fooled and or deceived. While this new administration under President Barack Obamaappears to be shining and glittering – everything that glitters is not gold. It is important to seewhether this administration is determined to clean up the prejudicial, racist and discriminatory acts ofpast administrations THAT IT SAID WILL NOT BE TOLORATED and move this country forwarddespite the opposition of those who want to be bound by the OLD POLICIES/PRACTICES - “slavementality,” “superiority complex,” etc. of the past – having the mentality that people of color areinferior and certain whites using their vast financial resources, vast legal resources, vast arsenal ofattorneys, vast arsenal of lobbyists, vast ties/relationships to top key government officials, vastties/relationships to judicial officials, vast ties/relationships to department of labor officials, etc.Moreover, the well-orchestrated conspiracy that has been hatched and implemented by those inpositions working with employers to deprive citizens (specifically targeting African-Americansand/or people of color) of their civil rights, equal protection of the laws, etc.It is no secret that President Barack Obama thrives on his profession as an attorney prior to becomingPresident of the United States. The area of law he specialized in being CIVIL RIGHTS. So let us asa nation challenge and see whether this is a President of his word – or one with eloquent words and aslick tongue having no substance. He challenged the nation not to point fingers between theparties(Democrat blaming the Republicans and vice versa) regarding recent matters our country isfacing, that he is the President of the United States, so he will take responsibility. Such a statement I
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: REQUESTS FOR STATUS; REQUEST FOR CREATION OF COMMITTEES/COURT, INVESTIGATIONS AND FINDINGS – CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DISCRIMINATION; AND DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTEDMay 21, 2009Page 82 of 118believe the nation will welcome in bringing this problem to the doorstep of the White House.Especially since the notable “Race” speech Barack Obama gave during the presidential campaign.President Obama is or should be fully aware what has transpired with me – documentation to hisattention is attached with supporting “delivery receipts” of mailing and/or facsimile transmissionconfirmations. See EXHIBITS “4, 8 and 9".One of President Obama’s key choices for the Cabinet post of U.S. Department of Justice is that ofEric Holder as the United States Attorney General. In a Jet Magazine Article about March 9, 2009entitled, “Attorney General: Nation Must Do More To Overcome Race,” it states: As the nation’s first Black attorney general, Holder has already indicated that he will oversee a strong civil rights division that will vigorously pursue discrimination cases.Holder stating, “While the problems that continue to afflict the Black community may be more severe, they are an indication of where the rest of the nation may be if corrective measures are not taken...”See EXHIBIT “59” – March 9, 2009 Jet Article attached hereto and incorporated by reference.FROM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN SAID ARTICLE, LET US SEE WHETHER ORNOT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE VIGOROUSLY PURSUES DISCRIMINATIONCASES!!!! Based on the information contained herein and that evidence correspondence provided directly to the attention of Barack Obama, so much for his “Race Speech” and the push to bring about CHANGE!!! I believe a reasonable mind may conclude from Barack Obama’s failure to act and/or deter such discriminatory and racial practices and/or direct such matters I brought to his attention to the proper authority that his Administration is not about CHANGE (as his opponents advised the public of) and merely provide such campaign slogan to dupe and deceive citizens and get their votes. I can truly say that in the President Obama’s first 100 days, NOTHING was done to address my timely Complaint submitted to his attention in August 2008 and I have recently lost my job for racial, discriminatory and prejudicial reasons – being in the number provided by statistics of the drastic increase in African-Americans unemployment. NEVERTHELESS, President Obama wants you to
    • ATTN: U.S. President Barack Obama REQUEST FOR HIGH PRIORITY & URGENT ATTENTION!!!ATTN: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.ATTN: Secretary of Labor Hilda L. SolisRE: REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINAT