Vladan Mlinar 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Vladan Mlinar 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting

on

  • 1,072 views

Contributed talk at the 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting:

Contributed talk at the 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting:

http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR09/SessionIndex2/?SessionEventID=104219

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,072
Views on SlideShare
1,064
Embed Views
8

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

2 Embeds 8

http://www.slideshare.net 6
http://www.linkedin.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Vladan Mlinar 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting Vladan Mlinar 2009 American Physical Society March Meeting Presentation Transcript

  • Effect of Atomic-Scale Randomness on the Optical Polarization of Semiconductor Quantum Dots Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado USA Vladan.Mlinar@nrel.gov
  • Structure – Spectra relationship: QD morphology: Single-dot spectroscopy: Ga1-xInxAs QDs (P. A. Dalgarno & (~105 atoms) R. J. Warburton)
  • Structure – Spectra relationship: QD morphology: Theory: Single-dot spectroscopy: Input structure Ga1-xInxAs QDs Strain minimization (P. A. Dalgarno & (~105 atoms) R. J. Warburton) Solve the single-particle problem Solve many-particle Problem (CI calc.) Emission Spectra
  • Structure – Spectra relationship: QD morphology: Theory: Single-dot spectroscopy: Input structure Ga1-xInxAs QDs Strain minimization (P. A. Dalgarno & (~105 atoms) R. J. Warburton) Solve the single-particle problem Solve many-particle Problem (CI calc.) Emission Spectra
  • Self-assembled QDs are usually alloyed: Ga1-xInxAs: As In Ga In Random realization (RR) - particular random assignment of the In and Ga atoms onto the cation sublattice.
  • Self-assembled QDs are usually alloyed: Ga1-xInxAs: As In Ga In Random realization (RR) - particular random assignment of the In and Ga atoms onto Different local environments: the cation sublattice.
  • Optical Properties vs Atomic-Scale Randomness Ga1-xInxAs: Large bulk solids: different random realizations (RRs) get self- averaged, so the measured physical property does not resolve features of individual RRs. Finite nanosystems (≤105 atoms): self-averaging of RRs may not be complete, so we can observe the effect of individual RRs (atomic- scale alloy randomness effect). What is the effect of atomic-scale randomness on the optical properties of Gax-1InxAs QDs?
  • X0: Fine structure splitting (FSS)
  • X0: FSS & Polatization directions vs RRs? S. Seidl et al., Physica E 40, 2153 (2008) –Conference proceedings.
  • X0: FSS & Polatization directions vs RRs? ? S. Seidl et al., Physica E 40, 2153 (2008) –Conference proceedings.
  • X0: Linear Polarization Ratio (P) vs RRs? • P is a measure of the in-plane polarization anisotropy P = (Ix - Iy)/(Ix + Iy) Where Ix and Iy are intensities defined along [110] and [1-10] direction • Atomic-scale randomness vs geometrical anisotropy? I. Favero et al., APL 86, 041904 (2005).
  • X0: Linear Polarization Ratio (P) vs RRs? ? • P is a measure of the in-plane polarization anisotropy P = (Ix - Iy)/(Ix + Iy) Where Ix and Iy are intensities defined along [110] and [1-10] direction • Atomic-scale randomness vs geometrical anisotropy? I. Favero et al., APL 86, 041904 (2005).
  • X0: FSS changes by more than a factor 7 with RRs
  • X0: FSS changes by more than a factor 7 with RRs FSS exhibits significant dependence on the RRs (from 1.1 - 8.5 μeV)
  • X0: FSS changes by more than a factor 7 with RRs FSS exhibits significant dependence on the RRs (from 1.1 - 8.5 μeV) FSS shows almost no sensitivity to piezoelectric field, irrespective of piezoelectricity was included via linear term only, or both linear and nonlinear terms.
  • X0: Polarization Directions vs RRs Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115416 (2009)
  • X0: Polarization Directions vs RRs Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115416 (2009)
  • X0: Polarization Directions vs RRs Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115416 (2009)
  • X0: P is not affected only by geometrical elongation • Even 50% elongation in [100] direction gives the same range of P, as in geometrically symmetric QD! • Measuring P cannot tell: (1) the geometrical anisotropy (2) composition
  • FSS & Polarization Directions of Multiexcitons • QD can be charged by controllable number of electrons and holes: X-2, XX0, XX-1, XX+1 • FSS of multiexcitons is sensitive to RRs. • Optically active transitions of different multiexcitons do not have fixed polarization directions Poem et al., PRB 76, 235304 (2007): Different multiexcitonic transitions have well defined polarization directions.
  • X-2: Conflicting experimental results Poem et al., PRB 76, 235304 (2007): Ediger et al., PRL 98, 036808 (2007): • Polarization directions of the optically Polarization directions of the optically active transitions oriented along active transitions oriented along [120] and [2-10] [110] and [1-10] • Optically active transitions of X-2 have well define polarization directions
  • X-2: Conflicting experimental results Poem et al., PRB 76, 235304 (2007): Ediger et al., PRL 98, 036808 (2007): • Polarization directions of the optically Polarization directions of the optically active transitions oriented along active transitions oriented along [120] and [2-10] [110] and [1-10] • Optically active transitions of X-2 have well define polarization directions Different X-2 emission lines DO NOT have fixed polarization directions!
  • Conclusions: We provided a clear evidence for the effect of atomic-scale randomness on the optical properties of alloyed Ga1-xInxAs QDs. • Fine structure splitting of the monoexciton changes by more than a factor of 7 with RRs. • For multiexcitons, the polarization directions strongly depend on the atomic scale randomness, so different multiexciton emission lines do not have fixed polarization directions. • Optical polarization is affected both by atomic-scale randomness and by possible geometric elongation of the QD in one direction. Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115416 (2009) Thank you for your attention!
  • Comparison with other calculations: PRB 77, 113305 (2008): This work: • Investigated effect of intermixing profiles • Investigated effect of atom-by-atom random substitution • EBOM does not have atomic resolution • LCBB full atomic resolution •Uniform composition profile vs. •Uniform composition profile, but nonuniform profile different random realizations • Linear polarization ratio as a tool for • Linear polarization ratio cannot be used structural characterization as a tool for structural characterization
  • FSS & Polarization Directions of Multiexcitons
  • FSS vs RRs of Multiexcitons:
  • Polarization Directions of Multiexcitons: