Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Induction agents in renal transplantation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Induction agents in renal transplantation

5,826
views

Published on

Seminar on Induction agents in renal transplantation. …

Seminar on Induction agents in renal transplantation.
Author: Vishal Golay, DM trainee in Nephrology, IPGMER

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
5,826
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
249
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Daclizumab is classified as a humanizedantibody because it possesses 90% human sequencesand 10% murine sequences, whereas basiliximab isconsidered a chimeric antibody because it consistsof 70% and 30% human and murine proteins,respectively
  • Does not cause lysis or cell destruction
  • Transcript

    • 1. DM SEMINARINDUCTION AGENTS in renal transplantation
      Dr. Vishal Golay
      24/06/2011
    • 2.
    • 3. Three signal model
    • 4. Topic overview
      Need for induction agents.
      Various agents used in transplantation.
      Trials of various agents used for induction.
      Newer agents and future therapies.
    • 5. Background
      The risk of acute rejection is maximum in the initial weeks to months.
      Herein lies the need for strong initial immunosuppressant to deplete or modulate T-cell responses at the time of antigen presentation.
      Induction therapy can mean any agent used perioperatively but it is now synonymous with the use of antibodies against various components of the immune system
    • 6. Background
      Multiple trials show that induction agents either prevent or delay the development of acute rejection.
      As of 2008, induction agents were administered in 82% of kidney recipients.
      N Engl J Med 364;20
    • 7.
    • 8. WHY induction therapy ?
      Many trials showing decreased rejection rates and 1 yr post transplant survival.
      Vital role in patients at high risk for poor short-term outcomes.
      Prevention of CNI related damage by decreasing the dose or delaying the initiation of CNIs.
      These benefits of induction agents come with the risk of increased infections and malignancy.
    • 9. Induction agents
      Monoclonal
      (Daclizumab, Basiliximab,
      Alemtuzumab, OKT3)
      Polyclonal
      (Thymoglobulin, atgam)
      Depleting agents
      (Thymoglobulin, Alemtuzumab,
      OKT3)
      Non-depleting agents
      (Daclizumab, Basiliximab)
    • 10. Induction agents
      Monoclonal agents are produced using murinehybridoma techniques and sometimes are genetically engineered to create chimeric or humanized modifications.
      Polyclonal agents generally are produced by harvesting serum from animals previously inoculated with human thymocytes or lymphocytes.
    • 11. Monoclonal antibodies-nomenclature
      Random Target class
      Prefix- Substem A - Substem B - Suffix
      Species on which mab
      Ig sequence is based
    • 12. DAC-LI-ZU-MAB
      immunomodulatoryhumanized
      PREFIX SUBSTEM A SUBSTEM B SUFFIX
      immunomodulatorychimeric
      BASI-LI-XI-MAB
    • 13. Trends in use of induction agents
    • 14. Depleting agents
      Eg. Thymoglobulin, OKT-3, Alemtuzumab
      These agents cause T-cell lysis and/or clearance with a resultant depletion in circulating lymphocytes.
      Causes extensive release of cytokines due to cell destruction that may cause significant adverse events.
      Reconstitution of the immune system can take a long time.
      The depleting action is responsible for many adverse reactions like infections and malignancy.
    • 15. Depleting agents
      Advantages of using Depleting Antibodies:
      Improved graft survival for high-risk patients.
      Shortening of period of DGF.
      Onset of first rejection is delayed.
      Obviates early use of CNI
      May permit less aggressive maintenance regimens
      Disadvantages:
      Risk of first dose reactions.
      May prolong hospital stay
      Greater cost
      Higher incidence of CMV infection
      May increase short term and long term mortality.
    • 16. High risk factors for acute rejection
      The number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches
      Younger recipient age.
      Older donor age.
      African-American ethnicity.
      PRA >0%
      Presence of a donor-specific antibody.
      Blood group incompatibility.
      Delayed onset of graft function.
      Cold ischemia time >24 hours.
      KDOQI Transplant Guidelines
    • 17. Antithymocyte globulin
      Polyclonal antibodies produced by immunizing horse(Atgam) or rabbits(Thymoglobulin & ATG-Fresenius) with lymphoid tissue and then harvesting and stabilizing the resultant immune sera.
      Initially approved for the treatment of acute cellular rejection but is also used as induction agent.
      Most widely used polyclonal induction agent in the US
    • 18.
    • 19. Mechanism of action of ATG
      Rapid T-cell– depleting agent in both the blood and peripheral lymphoid tissues.
      The major pathways for T-cell depletion are complement-dependent cell lysis in the blood compartment and apoptotic cell death in the lymphoid tissues.
      Also modulates cell surface molecules that regulate T-cell activation as well as adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors involved in leukocyte-endothelial interactions.
      Repopulation leads to expansion of specific T-cell subsets that have been shown to exhibit regulatory-suppressor functions, such as CD8+CD57+CD28- T cells.
    • 20. DOSING of ATG
      The “optimal” dose - 6 mg/kg,
      Typical regimen of Thymoglobulin for induction consists of 1.5 mg/kg for 3 to 5 days. However, dosing protocols have a wide range from 1 to 6 mg/kg/dose for a duration of 1 to 10 days.
      Infusion in 500ml of dextrose or NS over 4-8 hours into a central vein/AVF with premedications is preferred.
      Side Effects: allergic reactions, cytopenias, infections (CMV), lymphomas.
    • 21. Evidence on ATG use as induction agent
    • 22. Anti cd25 antibodies
    • 23. Anti cd25 antibodies dosing
      Daclizumab:
      1 mg/kg within 24 hours of transplantation plus an additional four doses of 1 mg/kg at a schedule of every two weeks after surgery.
      Causes receptor saturation that lasts up to 120 days
      reduced dosing schedule with an initial dose of 1 mg/kg on the day of transplant and POD 4 is equally efficacious and safe compared with the 5-dose regimen.
      Basiliximab:
      20 mg IV given two hours prior to the transplant, followed by a second 20 mg dose on POD 4.
      causes a complete saturation of the CD25 receptor for 5-8 weeks
    • 24. Anti cd25 antibodies side effects
      Extremely safe agents.
      Hypersensitivity reactions is the only significant side effect (<1%) with both the agents.
      There is no increased risk of CMV infections and malignancies.
    • 25. Withdrawal of zenapax
      Feb 1999-introduced in the EU
      22 April 2008- Roche notified the EU of its decision to voluntarily withdraw the marketing authorization for Zenapax for commercial reasons. This decision was not supposedly to any safety concerns with Zenapax.
      1 January 2009- officially withdrawn from the EU
    • 26. Evidence of anti CD25 antibodies as induction agents
    • 27. Evidence of anti CD25 antibodies as induction agents
    • 28. Evidence of anti CD25 antibodies as induction agents
    • 29. ALEMTUZUMAB
      It is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD52.
      CD52 is present on virtually all B- and T-cells as well as macrophages, NK cells, and some granulocytes.
      When the alemtuzumab antibody binds to CD52, it is thought to trigger an antibody-dependent lysis of the cell.
      The depletion of lymphocytes is so marked that it takes several months to a year post administration for the immune system of a patient to be fully reconstituted.
    • 30. ALEMTUZUMAB
      Dosing:
      20-30 mg on the day of transplantation. A second dose on POD 1 or 4 can also be given.
      Side Effects:
      The depleting efficiency of alemtuzumab is so profound that it is invariably associated with side effects viz. neutropenia (70%), thrombocytopenia (52%), anemia (47%), nausea (54%), vomiting (41%), diarrhea (22%), headache (24%), dysthesias (15%), dizziness (12%), and AIHA(<5%).
    • 31. Renewed interest in alemtuzumab
      “prope tolerance,” a state in which maintenance immunosuppression may be markedly diminished owing to a nearly tolerant state.
      Lancet 1998;351:1701-2
      INTAC Study findings show favorable results with Alemtuzumab specially in low risk patients. However the long term acute rejection rates are higher.
    • 32. Evidence of Alemtuzumab as induction agent
    • 33. MUROMONAB- CD3(OKT3)
      OKT3 is a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the CD3 receptor.
      When OKT3 is bound to CD3, the TCR undergoes endocytosis resulting in an inert T-cell. T cells are then removed via opsonization and ultimately, phagocytosis.
      A substantial T-cell loss could occur within the first few hours after an initial dose.
      As the T-cell counts begin to fall, several T-cell-derived cytokines (eg,TNF, IL-2, and IFN-γ) are released into the circulation.
    • 34. MUROMONAB- CD3(OKT3)
      Dosage: 5mg iv bolus, daily for 10 days
      Side Effects:
      “Cytokine release syndrome”, typically 45 minutes after the injection.
      Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema
      Neurologic complications (mild headache, aseptic meningitis to severe encephalopathy)
      Infections and lymphoma
      Develpoment of neutralizing antibodies (anti-OKT3 response) seen in 50% of treatments.
    • 35. Rituxumab
      Most of the induction therapeutics focused on role of T-cell–mediated processes.
      However, there is increasing evidence that B cells may have a role by their ability to act as antigen-presenting cells and T-cell activators
      Because all mature B-cells express CD20, one such potential therapy would be to use the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab as an induction therapy in renal transplant patients.
    • 36. Rituxumab-mechanism of action
    • 37. Rituxumab
      Dosage is 375mg/m2
      The possibility of use of Rituxumab was postulated by Genberg et al after they found that patients with ABO incompatibilty did better than those with compatibility with the difference in Rx being the use of Rituxumab.
      However, when they performed a RCT with 140 patients (rituxumabvs placebo), there was no significant difference in the rejection rates.
      Thus, its use as an induction agent warrants further investigation.
    • 38. Immune tolerance-new strategies
      Use of hematopoietic cells (donor).
      Chimerism (macrochimerism and mixed chimerism).
      Total Lymphoid Irradiation.
      Lymphocyte Depletion and prope tolerance.
      Co-stimulation Blockade.
    • 39. Kdoqi guidelines
      1.1: We recommend starting a combination of immunosuppressive medications before, or at the time of, kidney transplantation. (1A)
      1.2: We recommend including induction therapy
      with a biologic agent as part of the initial
      immunosuppressive regimen in KTRs. (1A)
      1.2.1: We recommend that an IL2-RA be
      the firstline induction therapy. (1B)
      1.2.2: We suggest using a lymphocyte-
      depleting agent, rather than an
      IL2RA, for KTRs at high immunologic
      risk. (2B)
    • 40. TAKE HOME message
      Induction therapy in renal transplantation improves short-term outcomes in terms of improvement in acute cellular rejection after transplantation.
      Antithymocyte globulin (rabbit) is the most commonly used agent, whereas basiliximab appears safer.
      There is no standard immunosuppression regimen that is considered the most effective; therefore, the agent of choice must be determined by individual clinicians and institutions.
      The possible benefits of Alemtuzumab needs to be verified with further trials
    • 41. THANK YOU