Repurposing Existing Virtual Patients; an Anglo-German Case Study By Chara Balasubramaniam, Jonathan Round, Sophie Vaughan, Terry Poulton, Trupti Bakrania, Benjamin Hanebeck and Soeren Huwendiek E-Learning Unit, Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education and the Center for Virtual Patients in Heidelberg
REViP
R epurposing E xisting Vi rtual P atients
Small One Year case study (Mar 2008 to Feb 2009)
Supported by the JISC RePRODUCE Programme
To develop, run and quality assure technology enhanced courses using reused and repurposed learning materials sourced externally to the institution
REViP Aims
Repurpose 8 Paediatric virtual patients (VPs) from Germany to UK.
Embed repurposed VPs within a refreshed SGUL module.
Evaluate impact of the resources.
Share repurposed VPs with wider community.
What is a Virtual Patient?
“ an interactive computer simulation of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose of medical training, education, or assessment”
Ref: An architectural model for MedBiquitous virtual patients by R Ellaway, C Candler, P Greene, V Smothers (2006)
I just killed the patient!
Repurposing Workflow Translate linear system German VP to English 1 Test branched system English VP 7 Clear any IPR issues 6 Identify content to enrich VP 5 Storyboard and create additional pathways for branching scenario 4 Adapt VP text for English culture 3 Export VP text to MS Word/HTML 2
End User Perspectives
Project Team
Students
Project Team Lessons Learned
Repurposing existing content from one culture to another is efficient
Repurposing from one VP structure to another is less efficient
Repurposing VPs must have an educational purpose and fit
Project Team Views
The key challenges were :
Mapping proposed resources to the curriculum
Sourcing and recording patient/actor consent
Choosing an appropriate licensing model
Capturing and responding to staff and student feedback
Attracting external reviewers willing to evaluate resources
Planning appropriate exit and sustainability models
Documenting the lessons learned and disseminating
Student Views
Overall feedback from students was in favour of VPs.
Focus group (n=3) – Quick and easy-to-use in a safe environment, and available anytime, anyplace
Survey 1 (n=12) – 90% of students reported that resources were a worthwhile learning experience
Survey 2 (n=25) – 88% of students reported that VPs were an effective way to learn knowledge about disease
Survey 2 (n=25) – 75% of students reported that VPs were an effective way to learn clinical reasoning skills
“ ...makes learning a bit more interesting, rather than just learning from a textbook. It’s always more helpful going in and seeing cases, and this is a way to do that when there isn’t a patient, or when you just want to sit in bed with your laptop”
Conclusions
If it’s in a book –
most students prefer to use the book
If you can’t get it from a book –
students will really value it
You can’t ‘take decisions, and explore consequences’ – in a book
0 comments
Post a comment