Managing partner’s feedbacks through the web Jean-Marc Viglino, IGN-France 1st EuroSDR Workshop Crowd Sourcing for Updating National Databases

The Large Scale Reference system (RGE®) Orthophoto component Topographic component Parcel plan component Address component from classical to on the fly updating Main difficulties: to be informed of all changes to capture geometry of features main roads, railways, major facilities electric networks, administrative data, addresses, facilities buildings, orography, hydrography, … on the fly updating annual updates classical updates every 5 years (down to 3?)

Main difficulties:

to be informed of all changes

to capture geometry of features

The partnership policy Aim: to save public money by integrating data already produced and maintained by institutional partners. Post Office, Cadastral Agency, Forestry Agency, Electric network company, Railroad network company, Provincial Councils , Fire departments Partner GIS application Today’s workflow Periodic bulk exchanges between GIS managers and IGN !

The modified partnership policy Partner updates Validation Integration GIS application Validation Integration What we want to do! Aim: smooth and more continuous integration of partners’ information and data, based on feedback management.

Feedback Management System CMS + Geoportal API !? Storage Data base management Users controller Query / statistics Workflow validation Syndication Application service model Consultation Back Office Front Office Expert Feedback Application service DBMS Customization module Security access customers

Feedback Management System Plugin Geoportail (virtual map API) file upload feedback service … CMS functions : front/back office – publishing – forum – author – statistics – configuration… CMS

Remaining questions Why would people contribute? What will we expect in terms of accuracy, reliability or completeness? It is easy to participate Civic contribution (national databases) Professional interest Because they are nice partners… Partners already return information Expert professional or authority What are they expecting? To use the service for they own data To secure the data to their group To take advantage of other partner’s feedbacks To plug they own process on the service (input/output format) To add they own layer (WMS, WFS…) Group Concept (community) Social network Professional investment Social reward Involved in the validation workflow How to manage the workflow?

Why would people contribute?

What will we expect in terms of accuracy, reliability or completeness?

It is easy to participate

Civic contribution (national databases)

Professional interest

Because they are nice partners…

Partners already return information

Expert professional or authority

What are they expecting?

To use the service for they own data

To secure the data to their group

To take advantage of other partner’s feedbacks

To plug they own process on the service (input/output format)

To add they own layer (WMS, WFS…)

How to manage the workflow?

Experiment Feedback management Groups definition Web service connections Consulting partners (tests) http://ripart.ign.fr Drawing tools Query tools … Refine the workflow Define evaluation (rating) Integration to existing processes .

Feedback management

Groups definition

Web service connections

Consulting partners (tests)

Drawing tools

Query tools

…

.

Thank you for your attention