7. USER STORY: EDRIC
21. Male. Stanford Junior. BS in CS, Coterm in Education.
Athletic. Does not self id with disordered eating.
MOOD4FOOD
8. USER STORY: EDRIC
“If I get stressed out and see food, I’ll eat the entire
bag of whatever it is. Then I feel really bad.”
“It’s not really a health issue because I go to the gym
and run a lot. I don’t really think about eating until
after I finish.”
“I wish I had more self-control.”
MOOD4FOOD
9. TRIAL DESIGN
MOOD4FOOD
PARTICIPANTS:
2 Groups: Control & Test
12 People/Group; 24 Total
GROUP SORTING:
Separate genders
Randomly sort females/males into 2 groups such that there is
an equal number of genders in each group
CONTROL GROUP:
Receives meal start message and post-meal survey
TEST GROUP:
Receives meal start message, mindful eating prompts at 10
min intervals during meal, and post-meal survey
10. TRIAL DESIGN
MOOD4FOOD
4 day period.
Ran test 1 meal each day.
DAY 1: CONTROL | TEST
DAY 2: CONTROL | TEST
11. TRIAL DESIGN
MOOD4FOOD
4 day period.
Ran test during 1 meal each day.
DAY 3: CONTROL | TEST
DAY 4: CONTROL | TEST
12. TRIAL DESIGN
MOOD4FOOD
Post-meal survey:
1. How satisfied are you with your meal?
2. How satisfied do you feel about yourself
right now?
3. Three words that come to mind are:
14. QUANTITATIVE RESULTS
Q2:
MOOD4FOOD
Sta%s%c
Value
Mean
5.19
Variance
2.54
Standard
Devia5on
1.60
Sta%s%c
Value
Mean
4.50
Variance
2.00
Standard
Devia5on
1.41
TEST
CONTROL
16. CONCLUSIVE NOI
Shift in post-meal thoughts between control
and test groups:
Control group tended to generate words describing the food
experience;
Test group tended to generate words describing the literal/
physicality of the food
MOOD4FOOD
40% of users exhibited increased interaction
over the 4 days without additional prompting.
Texts became a journal.
17. MOOD4FOOD
NEXT STEPS…
Transforming into a mobile application.
Fine-tuning during meal interaction
& post-meal data collection
Longer trial period. Habit testing.
Integration with Vaden’s existing offline
mindful eating program