The Language of God by Francis S. Collins

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Language of God by Francis S. Collins - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Language of God by Francis S. Collins God, Truth And Believers Dr. Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, is one of the worlds leading scientists. He works at the cutting edge of the study of DNA, the code of life. Yet he is also a man of unshakable faith in God and scripture. He believes that God cares about us and can intervene in human affairs - on rare occasions, even miraculously. Collins has personally discovered some of the scientific evidence for the common descent of all living creatures, even though he repudiates the materialist, atheistic worldview argued by many prominent Darwinists. In short, Dr. Collins provides a satisfying solution for the dilemma that haunts everyone who believes in God and respects science. Faith in God and faith in science can be harmonious - combined into one worldview. The God that he believes in is a God who can listen to prayers and cares
    2. about our souls. The biological science he has advanced is compatible with such a God. For Collins, science does not conflict with the Bible, science enhances it. For many years Dr. Collins kept his views largely to himself, as he helped oversee the Human Genome Projects stunning sequencing of the code of life. Now, in what may be the most important melding of reason and revelation since C. S. Lewiss Mere Christianity, Dr. Collins explains himself in detail. The Language of God makes the case for God and for science. Dr. Collins considers and rejects several positions along the spectrum from atheism to young-earth creationism - including agnosticism and Intelligent Design. Instead, he proposes a new synthesis, a new way to think about an active, caring God who created humankind through evolutionary processes. He has heard every argument against faith from scientists, and he can refute them. He has also heard the needless rejection of scientific truths by some people of faith, and he can counter that, too. He explains his own journey from atheism to faith, and then takes readers on a stunning tour of modern science to show that physics, chemistry, and biology can all fit together with belief in God and the Bible. The Language of God is essential reading for anyone who wonders about the deepest questions of all: Why are we here? How did we get here? And what does life mean? Personal Review: The Language of God by Francis S. Collins Many reviewers note that Collins' book doesn't really provide evidence for belief and complain that the subtitle is misleading. It is-- no doubt thanks to the publisher. Many also note that Collins says as much in the text. "BioLogos [theistic evolution] is not intended as a scientific theory. Its truth can be tested only by the spiritual logic of the heart, the mind, and the soul" (p. 204). Faith and science are compatible, but if you are looking for an authoritative scientific demonstration of faith, you won't find it here or anywhere else. So why did he write the book if it contains no dazzling new scientific breakthrough? Because today the vanguard atheists are evolutionists like Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett, who proclaim that an acceptance of evolution in biology requires an acceptance of atheism in theology (p. 161). Collins is not attempting to convict atheists of "ignoring the evidence." He is pointing out that Dawkins and Dennett have no business claiming that all theists (not just Creationists and Intelligent Design theorists) are ignoring the evidence. Indeed, Collins suggests that it may very well have been the subordination of science to progressive politics by those two luminaries that led to the creation of Intelligent Design in the first place! "ID could be thought of ironically as the rebellious love child of Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett" (p. 184). If believers who do not understand evolution very well are told by evolutionary authorities that biology makes faith untenable, is it any wonder that they will see Darwin as the anti-Christ?
    3. So do not criticize Collins because he is not offering breakthroughs. He is only trying to return to the status quo ante, where individuals had to decide for themselves what to make of life. Dawkins and Dennett want to change the situation in which we respect people's religious choices. Since they think religion is so harmful, they want to stamp it out, even if they have to claim more authority for science than it has. Despite the subtitle of Collin's book, it is Dawkins and Dennett who are arrogant (calling their side "bright"), while Collins- as most reviewers of all stripes recognize-- is modest and unassuming. One other point: a number of reviewers seemed to think that Collins' God is a "God of the gaps" despite his explicit denial of that view (which invokes God to explain what science can't yet explain). Science will never explain a God that transcends nature. Neither will religion, of course. But religion wants to relate to God, not explain Him. If, like Collins, one comes to God though heart, mind, and soul, one has no need for gaps in the fossil record! Albert Schweitzer was a physican, theologian, and musician. Collins gets my vote for an Albert Schweitzer award. For More 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price: The Language of God by Francis S. Collins 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price!
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Vette05Vette05 Nominate

    custom

    83 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Many reviewers note that Collins' book doesn't real more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 83
      • 83 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories