David Halberstam provides tons of descriptive details, transcripts, sources and viewpoints about this harsh conflict and nations and individuals involved. Knowing little about this historical conflict, I'm unable to identify information or details that are disputed, considered omitted,nor recognize these differing or conflicting accounts. As usual, there are conflicting historical viewpoints presented in historical books, such as "The Coldest Winter."
There are already so many reviews focus on solely Korea, that below in this review is more mention of China, the American Mainstream Media, Post-WWII US foreign policy in East Asia, and General MacArthur. All of are relevant to the Korean conflict and Halberstam spends a lot of appropriate time and detail describing these topics.
I agree with the common opinion that this was and still is, the Forgotten War. "The Coldest Winter" highlights the fact that this brutal conflict is seldom referred to, today.
Several aspects about American involvement in the Korean war are elucidated throughout this book, from beginning to end: not to focus exclusively on the negative aspects but there was a lot of American arrogance, ignorance, and numerous miscalculations by many influential military and political leaders who were involved in Korea and China. Certain aspects in "Coldest Winter" will remind some readers of US involvement in South East Asia in the 60s, Latin America in the 1950s to 1980s, and in the Middle East since the 1930s up to now.
Halberstam takes the reader to Korea with vivid descriptions of the brutal,
terrain, lethal freezing temperatures, and rugged battle conditions. A great contribution by "Coldest Winter" are the lengthy and detailed portions that discuss the Chinese civil war, US involvement in it, and general US foreign policy in East Asia during this time.
RELEVANT TO THE KOREAN CAMPAIGN:
TRUMAN VS. DEWEY CAMPAIGN OF 1948: Truman's 1948 campaign and the State Department's approaches and actions in this conflict.
This book spent a well-deserved amount of time on the 1948 Presidential campaign. During the 1948 Campaign the political "experts" and the media gurus did what they still do today: misinterpret campaigns, make incorrect predictions, and think they know more than they actually know.
AMERICAN ADVENTURISM IN CHINA - THE FIRST FOREIGN POLICY DEBACLE AFTER WWII:
Halberstam aptly included lots of information and background on the Chinese civil war and US support for Chaing Kai-Shek, and the influence of the (American) China Lobby inside the USA. Described, is the Lobby's arrogance and ignorance about Chinese history, culture, and thinking, while it simultaneously and incorrectly denounced Truman for "Losing China." This divisiveness reminds one of the partisan media spin so often promoted from Washington, the mainstream media, and political talk-TV and talk-radio today.
And like today, the military works in coordination with the mainstream media to promote Military-Industrial Complex and State Department propaganda. General MacArthur interviewed with "Life" magazine in 1948. The headline on the cover of "Life" magazine was, "MacArthur says fall of China Imperils US" (p. 215). Hungry, impoverished, largely illiterate peasant china, imperiling the US? In 1948? Imperiling a world super-power that has the atomic bomb, natural resources, and more technology? Laughable. Yet very influential on manipulating the US public. Like then, as now.
To reinforce this point, "The Coldest Winter" delved into another issue rarely discussed regarding the Korean conflict and China: the US government's misinformation provided to the American public in the US to garner public support of Chaing Kai-Check. In reading the details of Chaing, his tactics, army, and character, I found it similar to involvement in Vietnam (1965-1973), Iran (1953) Guatemala (1954) Chile (1973) and Iraq (Chalabi), and al-Hakim, (2003-2009).
US support of Chaing was a debacle. Billions of dollars of taxpayer money disappeared. The US funded supply lines that were stolen by the Communists, and Chaing and his officers stole from the US constantly. Often in the annals of post-WWII American foreign policy and interference, the US has bet on the wrong horse.
While Korea is the forgotten war, I call this era, the forgotten debacle of
post-World War II American foreign policy.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA: CREATING MYTHS THAT INFLUENCED AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION:
It's universally agreed upon today by objective historians that MacArthur was a disturbed individual, an ineffectual desk General, and an overrated egotistical self-promoter. One of the many myths disseminated to the American public in the 1940s and 50s via the mainstream media (MSM) was that MacArthur was a brilliant, competent man, that was highly respected by those with whom he worked, and knew. Nothing could be farther from the truth. He had then and still has, an atrocious record and reputation.
In accordance with other historians, Halberstam repeatedly notes MacArthur on the surface being an icon with enormous aura and influence. Yet he was out of touch with his peers, subordinates, and people of the United States. Living and working in Tokyo with his inner circle of sycophants, focusing on rebuilding and molding Japan in his own image. He knew and cared little about Korea.
General MacArthur made many military and intelligence miscalculations.
MacArthur openly claimed to "understand the Oriental" mind, even after many
mistakes made with the Japanese previously.
Referring to n the Korean conflict, one American soldier there stated, "in
WWII everything was done right, and in Korea everything seemed to be done
wrong." Soldiers sent to Korea lacked proper Winter clothing, lacked
ammunition, and had old, outdated guns and weapons. Supplies often came late, and sometimes never at all. In Korea and throughout history, the soldiers pay the price for the blunders from the top. The rugged mountainous Korean terrain, and harsh Winters were major factors that gave the initial advantage to the North Koreans. Cornered in Busan, the Inchon landing is quite a historical feat, and perhaps the one and only move by MacArthur that paid dividends.
"The Coldest Winter is lengthy and has lot of info and helpful strategic maps. This is a good book, and unfortunately, was David Halberstam's last.
less
0 comments
Post a comment