A great book by a great scientist.
Richard Feynman was a genius, a great scientist and a great teacher. This book is a testament to all three of these contentions. As the title states, this book is about physical laws: what they are, what they are not and why they require mathematics for their complete understanding. While the need to understand physical laws in terms of mathematics is stressed, this book uses almost no math, and none beyond basic high school math is required.
The book is based on 7 lectures, each of which is covered by an approximately 25-page chapter. These chapters cover: the law of gravitation, the relation of mathematics to physics, the great conservation principals, symmetry in physical law, distinction of past and future, probability and uncertainty, and seeking new laws. These chapters touch on classical physics, relativistic physics and quantum mechanics, all in a fluid and continuous manner. This book is not, however, a physics text because it does not discuss how to solve specific problems. It is, however, a great adjunct to those texts as it goes deeper into what physical laws really mean.
The stated audience for this book is people who are interested in science, but may have little or no background in this field. This is not to say that people who are well versed in the physical sciences would get nothing from this book. Quite the contrary, the more your scientific background the more you will get from the time spent with this book. Theoretical physicists may already understand all of what Professor Feynman is teaching, so this may be old hat to them. They may, however, still enjoy the presentation, so even they may get something from this book. As someone with an advanced degree in the physical sciences, but not in theoretical physics, I found this book to be mind expanding. Feynman gets to the heart of physical laws in ways that I had never considered. For instance, he provides one of the best descriptions of the first and second laws of thermodynamics that I have ever read, but never mentions them as laws per se, as he shows that they are manifestations of more fundamental laws. (Actually, he shows that there is no single set of fundamental laws, as many different ones could be used as the starting point to get to the same conclusions.) College physics students should love this book. It should be of immeasurable help in their more fully understanding what their texts may only hint at. Those with only a high school physics background should also get a lot from this book, but it may be a bit of a hard slog for them.
less
0 comments
Post a comment