We already knew that "one-man-one-vote" makes for messy domestic politics; now John Bolton shows how messy "one-nation-one-vote" is in international politics. Many of us laughed when President Bush appointed John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United Nations. Our first thought was that he'd be a bull in a china shop. Bolton's book shows us that he was just the right bull, and that the UN was just the right china shop. In retrospect we have Bolton to thank for a remarkably thorough insider's expose of the dysfunctionalism at the UN's core, and its apathetic, self-absorbed leaderlessness under Kofi Anan. He shows how the UN encourages and enables the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by consistently yielding to the timid and indecisive in order to obtain consensus. He shows us the UN's "culture of inaction," and "surrender as a matter of high principle." Bolton is a clear thinker and an engaging writer, and no matter what your views of him as a classic Bush administration neocon, the objective reader of his book comes away proud to have had him representing the United States and wondering what he might have accomplished given more time.
Bolton entertains with substance rather than craft, though his editorial humor is ever-present. He notes, for instance that before we wish for reforms that make the UN more effective, we should recognize that its very ineffectiveness is a safeguard against the damage the UN can do. He is a master at capturing his adversaries' deficiencies in a phrase, as when he speaks of the multilateralists' dereliction of duty as "outsourcing our foreign policy." Ambassador Bolton describes in detail his battles in the "twilight zone at Turtle Bay:" the Oil for Food Scandal, the nuclear proliferation of North Korea and Iran, the Peace-Building Commission, Zionism as Racism, the Human Rights Commission, the drafting of "Outcome Documents," and the brawling over the budget. If any American still labors under the misimpression that the UN is a force for the good in the world, this book will be very illuminating. That large numbers of our State Department's "permanent bureaucracy" still hold that view is very disturbing.
Ambassador Bolton distills all of his experience with the UN down to one inescapable conclusion. Among all the reform proposals the UN may consider, one reform alone is worth the effort, changing assessed contributions to voluntary contributions. Only with that change, and with that change only, will the UN become accountable for results, and will the United States have the confidence that its money is well spent. Senator Lincoln Chafee, who put his personal interests above those of the country, will forever carry the stigma of setting back the clock on that effort by obstructing Bolton's reconfirmation.
less
0 comments
Post a comment