I really can't understand how anyone can call such a deeply researched novel only "average". Maybe because it doesn't agree with (or offends) a political bias or personal feeling? Or maybe it's just too much information for people who don't have patience or capacity or desire to deal with the full story about anything. In my mind, anyone who honestly wants to understand more about current affairs should put Exile at the top of his or her reading list.
Early in this book I formed the opinion (and Patterson confirmed in his ending notes) that Exile is as much about the political and human issues of Israel and the West Bank as the story itself. As an older man with military experience that ranges from the Vietnam Era to Desert Storm and a lot more in between, I found that this book represents one of the most complete on-the-ground investigations and resulting political theses that I've ever read. I think Patterson deserves a huge amount of credit for the extensive research and hard work that he obviously invested in backgrounding and writing this book.
Patterson finished writing this book in early 2006. Obviously there is "future history", as there always is with novels like this. Any rational reader should easily be able to adapt to that expectation, appreciate the book within its own context, and then hopefully refrain from criticizing the fact that neither Mr. Patterson nor anyone else can predict the future.
As for the love interest, who has ever been able to define or rationalize why two people fall in love? Actually and honestly, the history between David and Hana was very easy for me to relate to. If one can accept that on its face, then it adds flavor and some necessary tension (suspense) to the story. As for the ending, I was satisfied. I've read too many great novels that either fall completely flat or explode into totally unreasonable incredulity at the end, so I was braced for disappointment. But in this case, I think there was a logical and rational conclusion - much more preferable than something outlandishly shocking or unbelievable. I think Patterson accomplished his purpose very well, even with a certain grace.
Too often I think critics expect a template or "formula" for this or that, and if a story doesn't fit their individually defined and customized expectations, then it's essentially worthless. Exile is plainly NOT an action thiller like The Hunt For Red October or The Bourne Ultimatum, and no one should expect that. This book requires to much thought; it takes time to read, absorb, feel, and assimilate into the fiber of one's consciousness. And I thought the length (about 650 pages including Notes) was just about perfect.
I personally feel that Patterson's Exile is one of the best novels I've ever read. This book was recommended to me by a close friend who defected from Communist Poland in 1981 (and a bit familiar with certain facts concerning the Holocaust) and I've recommended it without reservation to a Jewish friend. Even more, I'm recommending it to an Egyptian Muslim friend if she hasn't read it already. In my mind, Exile is just that good.
less
0 comments
Post a comment