Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Value For Your Dollar
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Value For Your Dollar

  • 746 views
Published

Funding options for social initiatives - A joint presentation by Social Capital Partners, Enterprising Nonprofits, Potluck Cafe, and Developmental Disabilities Association

Funding options for social initiatives - A joint presentation by Social Capital Partners, Enterprising Nonprofits, Potluck Cafe, and Developmental Disabilities Association

Published in Economy & Finance , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
746
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
35
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Value for Your Dollar: The Social Enterprise Impact Assessment Project
  • 2. Introduction
      • Joanne Norris – Social Capital Partners
      • David LePage – Enterprising Non-Profits
      • Liz Lougheed Green – Potluck Café Society
      • Deanne Ziebart – Developmental Disabilities Assoc
  • 3. Presentation Timing
    • Introduction (5 mins)
    • Canadian Social Enterprise Context (5 mins)
    • Project context and history (5 mins)
    • Key learnings (40 mins)
    • Next steps: phase 2 (5 mins)
    • Facilitated discussion (30 mins)
  • 4. Social Enterprise – Community Investment Markets Spectrum
    • Funding options for social initiatives can be arrayed along a spectrum depending the degree of focus on social vs. financial outcome
    Grant Funding Investment Funding Social Service Social Enterprise Increasing focus on financial outcomes Focus on social mission Success defined more qualitatively Difficult outcome measurement Uses of funding restricted Focus on ROI Success defined more quantitatively Established measurement criteria Relatively Unrestricted funding
  • 5. Canadian Social Enterprise – Community Investment Context
    • Access to risk capital for social entrepreneurs in Canada has been limited to traditional non-profit relative to entrepreneurs in other countries (the US in particular)
    Venture Philanthropy CDVC Traditional Foundations Venture Capital / Private Equity Government Funding Community Loans Social Service Social Enterprise Canada UK United States Area of Strength Area of Strength Area of Strength Because risk capital is essentially non-existent in Canada, entrepreneurship and creativity are stifled
  • 6. Project Context and History
    • Potluck working on issues not addressed by Canadian social policy
    • Wanted to show impact with a view to building:
      • Supportive Policy
      • Partnerships with government and other funders
    • Searched for partnerships with both funders and practitioners to develop a universal SIA Tool
    • Set goal to develop SIA tool proposal
    • Built structure to guide proposal
  • 7. Alignment with Funder
    • Three key points:
        • Contributes to creation of 'blended value' businesses [Vancity]
        • Expands support for social enterprises [Vancity and ENP]
        • Collaboratively generates research and evaluation tools for investors and funded groups [ENP]
  • 8. Need for a Shared SEIA Measurement Framework
    • Desire and need to develop similar understanding among operators and investors
    • Get operators and investors speaking the same language
    • Establish commitment to measuring what both stakeholder groups value
  • 9. Why Are We Here? Building shared vision and goals amongst stakeholders
    • Generating Common goals
      • Why Social Impact Assessment
      • What did the major stakeholder groups want to achieve
    • Developing common language e.g. definitions and terms
      • Social Enterprise Definitions
      • Typology
      • Canadian Social Economy framework development
      • Blended value
    • Build collaborative process with outcomes that satisfy all stakeholders.
      • Undertaking the stakeholder interviews
      • Literature review
      • Proposal development process
  • 10. Key Research Learnings Social Enterprise Operators: Stakeholder Interviews (17)
    • Currently multiple definitions of success
    • Wide range in current organizational success measurement
    • Purpose often to generate revenue for parent organization and to fulfill at least one aspect of the social mission e.g. employment.
    • Reporting focused on financials rather than social outcomes.
    • Frustration at not having methods and tools for reporting and assessing the scope and impact of their social activities.
    • A standardized SIA framework used by both social enterprises and investors is a good idea.
    • Most SE organizations are interested in assessing social impact.
  • 11. Key Research Learnings Social Enterprise Investors: Stakeholder Interviews (10)
    • Success defined in various ways. Often based on reported achievements of investee
    • No consistent process to assess potential or achieved impact
    • Current short-term, grant funding acknowledged as inadequate
    • Want shared and consistently used methods and metrics to:
      • Inform and influence strategies and goals
      • Create awareness of investment impacts
      • Advocate for the work being done
    • Vision for a standardized SIA framework that different types of SE investors can use
    • Acknowledge that SIA will have to come out of the organizational goals of both SE operators and investors and are eager to collaborate
  • 12. Phase 1 – Outputs
    • Literature Review
      • Extensive review of the literature provided proposal and interview foundation
      • SIA Project Literature Review now complete and will soon be available online
    • Stakeholder Interviews
      • With representatives from 16 Social Enterprise orgs and 9 social investors
      • Phase 2 project proposal built on interview data
      • Stakeholder interview proposal completed and will be available online...
    • Phase 2 Proposal
      • Used literature review, stakeholder interviews and advisory committee input to build comprehensive proposal for implementation of Phase 2 SIA Tool pilot:
        • Target group and project beneficiaries – social enterprise operator and investor organizations.
        • Project location will be primarily British Columbia, with national participants
        • Project Duration is one year
    • Literature Review and Stakeholder Interview Report will both be available at www.enterprisingnonprofits.ca on May 15, 2006
  • 13. Phase 2 – Going Forward
    • Where is Phase 2 is at now
      • Proposal going forward
      • Additional funders engaged
      • Phase 2 underway in 2006
    • Why this phase has engaged additional funders
      • Thoughtful process that funders will more clearly see the full impacts of their investments
    • Anticipated outcomes
      • Long-term learning process that begins with developing the pilot with SE’s and funders/investors
      • Vision to establish an impact measurement tool that is universally recognized and used across Canada
  • 14. Discussion
    • Questions?
    • Costs: Social costs, business costs, performance measurement costs – who should pay for what?
    • How to develop ownership and support among key stakeholder groups in the quest to create a universal impact assessment tool?
    • Hurdles to implementation?